ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05155059Updated Aug 12, 2026Results posted

Non-invasive Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Functional Movement Disorders

An interventional study of MagStim and Sham Comparator in Functional Movement Disorder, sponsored by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC). Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Functional movement disorders (FMD) involve involuntary movements that are not due to a recognized neurological or medical cause. FMD can cause major disability. Researchers want to learn more to create better treatments for FMD.

Objective:

To test whether non-invasive brain stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) improves FMD symptoms.

Eligibility:

People between the ages of 18 and 80 who have been diagnosed with FMD by a neurologist.

Design:

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group is an active brain stimulation group and the other is a sham brain stimulation group.

Participants will have a baseline visit. This will include:

Neurological exam

Questionnaires

Urine test

Brain MRI: Participants will lie in a machine that takes pictures of the body. They will be asked to respond to images on a screen while in the scanner.

Within 2 weeks of the baseline visit, participants will begin 5 daily sessions of TMS. The active group will have stimulation delivered to the brain via a coil. In the sham group, a dummy coil will be used that will not deliver stimulation. A total of three 3-minute cycles will be done in one visit. There will be 20-minute breaks between the cycles.

Participants will have visits 1 month, 2 months, and 6 months after their last day of TMS. Their FMD symptoms will be evaluated. They will complete health questionnaires. These visits can be in person or virtual.

Read the detailed description

Study Description:

The purpose of this protocol is to investigate efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active iTBS or sham stimulation of the left DLPFC for 5 consecutive daily sessions.

Objectives:

Primary Objective: To investigate efficacy of iTBS of the left DLPFC on motor symptoms in patients with FMD

Secondary Objectives: To investigate efficacy of iTBS of the left DLPFC on mood symptoms and its effect on fronto-amygdala circuit on functional neuroimaging

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoint: Relative change in Functional Movement Disorder Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) from the baseline to 1 month after iTBS vs sham: 100 *( S-FMDRS at one-month - S-FMDRS at baseline)/ S-FMDRS at baseline

Secondary Endpoints:

  • S-FMDRS immediately after, 2 months and 6 months after the treatment
  • HADS at 1 month, 2 months and 6 months after the treatment
  • DLPFC-amygdala functional connectivity
  • Amygdala BOLD response to emotional stimuli
02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Movement Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional Movement Disorders
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
  • iTBS
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Neuroimaging
  • Conversion Disorder
03

In context

Conversion Disorder

89 studies on the registry are indexed under Conversion Disorder; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 38 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Conversion Disorder.

Browse Conversion Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Male or female, aged 18-80
  • Diagnosis of functional movement disorder made by a neurologist
  • Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration
  • Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written document.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Current psychosis or active suicidal ideation
  • History of epilepsy with the exception of febrile seizure
  • Patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizure without comcomitant functional movement disorder
  • Any significant neurological disorders other than FMD including but not limited to multiple sclerosis, stroke, Parkinson s disease, space occupying brain lesion
  • Alcohol or substance use disorder
  • Patients who are on Buproprion (Wellbutrin)
  • Patients with moderate to severe cardiac disease
  • Any psychiatric, medical or social condition due to which, in the judgment of the PI and after any consults if indicated, participation in the study is not in the best interest of the patient.
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil

    Other: Sham Comparator

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Active TMS stimulation using an active TMS coil

    Device: MagStim

Interventions

  • DeviceMagStim

    Bursts of three at 50Hz with an inter burst interval of 200 ms will be given for 190 seconds and this session will be repeated 3 times with 20 minutes between each session in one day. The set of 3 sessions will be repeated 5 times in 5 consecutive days.

  • OtherSham Comparator

    Sham TMS stimulation using a sham coil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in S-FMDRS at 1 Month After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

    The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.

    Time frame: 1 month after iTBS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in S-FMDRS at 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

    The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.

    Time frame: 2 and 6 months after iTBS

  2. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a continuous numeric scale in depression and anxiety (depression 0-21 and anxiety 0-21, higher score representing worse outcome) and the questions ask about the feeling in the past week. This was repeatedly measured at baseline, then at 1 month, 2 months and 6 months after iTBS vs sham and was compared between iTBS vs sham group.

    Time frame: At baseline and 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS

  3. CGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) can assess patient's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. The CGI scale of 1-7 is a measure of clinical improvement from the intervention, higher score presenting worse outcome. (1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse)

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS

Other outcomes

  1. Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

    The short form (36) health survey is an indicator of health-related quality of life using 36 questions. It has eight domains; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each domain. Scores range from 0 - 100 in each domain (lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability). 1. Physical Functioning (PF) - ability to perform physical activities (e.g., walking, climbing stairs) 2. Role Physical (RP) - limitations in work or daily activities due to physical health 3. Bodily Pain (BP) - intensity of pain and its impact on normal work 4. General Health (GH) - overall perception of personal health 5. Vitality (VT) - energy level and fatigue 6. Social Functioning (SF) - impact of physical or emotional health on social activities 7. Role Emotional (RE) - limitations in work or daily activities due to emotional problems 8. Mental Health (MH) - psychological distress and well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression)

    Time frame: Baseline and at 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS

07

Results

Posted Aug 12, 2026

Participant flow

Study participants were recruited between May 2022 and March 2025 at National Institutes of Health Clinical Center located in Bethesda Maryland.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatmentControl
Started1112
Completed1112
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in S-FMDRS at 1 Month After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.

Time frame:
1 month after iTBS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · % change of scores on a scale
Change in S-FMDRS at 1 Month After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
% change of scores on a scaleTreatmentControl
Change in S-FMDRS at 1 Month After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS-48.08 ± 13.30-39.47 ± 11.40
SecondaryChange in S-FMDRS at 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

The Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) measures abnormal movements in 7 body regions as well as gait and speech. Symptom severity in each body region is rated from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and duration from 0 to 3 (0=none; 1=occasionally, 2=frequent, 3= constant). All severity and duration scores are added to yield a total score. The total score ranges from minimum 0 to maximum 68, high score representing worse outcome.

Time frame:
2 and 6 months after iTBS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · % change of scores on a scale
Change in S-FMDRS at 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
% change of scores on a scaleTreatmentControl
Change in S-FMDRS at 2 months-48.04 ± 13.30-43.43 ± 11.62
Change in S-FMDRS at 6 months-45.33 ± 13.30-40.76 ± 11.62
SecondaryChange in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a continuous numeric scale in depression and anxiety (depression 0-21 and anxiety 0-21, higher score representing worse outcome) and the questions ask about the feeling in the past week. This was repeatedly measured at baseline, then at 1 month, 2 months and 6 months after iTBS vs sham and was compared between iTBS vs sham group.

Time frame:
At baseline and 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 1, 2 and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
scores on a scaleTreatmentControl
Anxiety_baseline8.82 ± 5.47.67 ± 3.37
Anxiety_1 month7.73 ± 5.626.08 ± 2.61
Anxiety_2 months9.18 ± 6.875.45 ± 2.98
Anxiety_6months9.18 ± 6.387.27 ± 4.76
Depression_baseline7.55 ± 4.953.83 ± 2.72
Depression_1 month6.91 ± 4.762.92 ± 1.93
Depression_2 months8.27 ± 5.483.45 ± 3.05
Depression_6 months8.18 ± 5.984.64 ± 2.98
SecondaryCGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) can assess patient's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. The CGI scale of 1-7 is a measure of clinical improvement from the intervention, higher score presenting worse outcome. (1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse)

Time frame:
1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
CGI at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
scores on a scaleTreatmentControl
1 month3.62 ± 0.572.99 ± 0.51
2 months3.80 ± 0.573.16 ± 0.51
6 months3.44 ± 0.573.06 ± 0.52
Other pre-specifiedChange in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS

The short form (36) health survey is an indicator of health-related quality of life using 36 questions. It has eight domains; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each domain. Scores range from 0 - 100 in each domain (lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability). 1. Physical Functioning (PF) - ability to perform physical activities (e.g., walking, climbing stairs) 2. Role Physical (RP) - limitations in work or daily activities due to physical health 3. Bodily Pain (BP) - intensity of pain and its impact on normal work 4. General Health (GH) - overall perception of personal health 5. Vitality (VT) - energy level and fatigue 6. Social Functioning (SF) - impact of physical or emotional health on social activities 7. Role Emotional (RE) - limitations in work or daily activities due to emotional problems 8. Mental Health (MH) - psychological distress and well-being (e.g., anxiety, depression)

Time frame:
Baseline and at 1, 2 and 6 months after iTBS
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in SF-36 at 1, 2, and 6 Months After Real iTBS vs Sham iTBS
scores on a scaleTreatmentControl
PF_Baseline57.5 ± 25.6457.86 ± 27.52
PF_1 month53.89 ± 29.2456.42 ± 30.82
PF_2 months52.78 ± 27.462.86 ± 39.14
PF_6 months55.56 ± 27.7865.71 ± 34.21
RP_Baseline47.92 ± 28.1439.29 ± 30.77
RP_1 month45.14 ± 31.0652.78 ± 32.64
RP_2 months34.72 ± 30.861.61 ± 43.22
RP_6 months42.36 ± 34.260.71 ± 37.97
BP_Baseline36.25 ± 19.3559.64 ± 19.76
BP_1 month41.39 ± 20.0865.83 ± 25.83
BP_2 months37.5 ± 23.5261.07 ± 37.99
BP_6 months35 ± 26.8770.36 ± 26.28
GH_Baseline50.83 ± 18.2852.86 ± 17.53
GH_1 month62.78 ± 20.9359.44 ± 20.07
GH_2 months57.22 ± 20.9367.14 ± 27.21
GH_6 months53.33 ± 27.9562.86 ± 26.12
VT_Baseline42.08 ± 26.2439.29 ± 8.35
VT_1 month36.11 ± 23.2350.32 ± 17.19
VT_2 months31.94 ± 25.4351.61 ± 18.38
VT_6 months33.19 ± 22.5648.57 ± 11.28
SF_Baseline43.75 ± 30.3660.71 ± 32.62
SF_1 month51.39 ± 35.675 ± 18.75
SF_2 months43.06 ± 25.8575 ± 31.46
SF_6 months41.67 ± 29.3280.36 ± 18.9
RE_Baseline69.44 ± 28.2272.62 ± 19.67
RE_1 month61.11 ± 29.1783.33 ± 19.54
RE_2 months54.63 ± 30.9376.19 ± 33.13
RE_6 months56.48 ± 33.2880.95 ± 27.52
MH_Baseline63.33 ± 22.2860.14 ± 19.07
MH_1 month66.56 ± 17.7475.33 ± 7.75
MH_2 months57.22 ± 20.5476.57 ± 13.36
MH_6 months58.56 ± 21.5774.71 ± 13.61

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)8/11 (72.7%)
Control0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)3/12 (25%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatmentControl
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/110/12
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders2/110/12
PainNervous system disorders1/112/12
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/110/12
Involuntary movementsNervous system disorders1/111/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years101222
>=65 years101
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
Female9817
Male246
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American303
White71017
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TreatmentControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino91019
Unknown or Not Reported224
S-FMDRS
S-FMDRS(scores on a scale)TreatmentControlTotal
Mean18.82 ± 9.0313.25 ± 7.9215.91 ± 8.75
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Spagnolo PA, Parker J, Horovitz S, Hallett M. Corticolimbic Modulation via Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation as a Novel Treatment for Functional Movement Disorder: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 15;11(6):791. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060791. PubMed 34203993 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected IPD during the trial can be shared after de-identification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: At the time of publication. For 2 years after the publication

Access criteria: IPD can be shared with researchers who provide methodologically sound proposal for meta-analysis or any other scientific analysis. Requests should be directed to the study PI who will review requests. Only de-identified data will be shared for scientific purposes.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2026, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Conversion Disorder, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's 35 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2021
First posted
Dec 13, 2021
StartActual
May 6, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 25, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Results first posted
Aug 12, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05155059
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2021
Start date
May 6, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2025
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Results posted
Aug 12, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Debra J Ehrlich, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion