An observational study in Bladder Cancer, sponsored by British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-14.
Sponsored by British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training · Observational
Superficial bladder cancer, known as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), is the most common type of bladder cancer. It is expensive to manage and significantly impacts on patients' quality of life. This is because there is a high burden of recurrent disease after initial treatment, and need for long term surveillance for recurrence.
The most important step in the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC is the first surgical procedure called the transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). There is evidence that the quality of the TURBT operation, and the use of a single administration of bladder chemotherapy following the operation, can reduce cancer recurrence rates and progression to more invasive cancer. There is anecdotal evidence that the quality of TURBT surgery and the usage of intravesical chemotherapy varies widely between hospitals and thus may result in worse outcomes for some patients.
The primary objective of the study is to determine if audit and feedback can improve the quality of TURBT surgery and if this reduces recurrence of NMIBC.
RESECT aims to be the largest multicentre international observational study evaluating the first and most important step in the management of non muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).
It is known that achieving a "good quality" TURBT results in reduced NMIBC recurrence rates. This evidence forms the basis for the recommendations made in evidence-based guidelines such as the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association (AUA) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The RESECT study will evaluate the effects of a variety of patient, hospital, surgical and surgeon-related factors which may contribute to altered outcome in patients with NMIBC following a TURBT.
The only known national data collection about quality standards in TURBT surgery is in Scotland. The aim is to conduct a multicentre international observational study of urological practice for the management of NMIBC. Current operative practice will be measured across hospitals, regions and countries and compare these against evidence-based recommendations. It will be determined if any hospital, service, training or technical factors impact the achievement of quality indicators and/or early recurrence rates. These data will be used to present hospital and surgeon performance back to surgeons as an intervention to drive quality improvement. The timing of feedback to different hospitals will be varied randomly so that it can determined if the feedback is having an impact on audit performance.
RESECT aims to answer some key UNKNOWNS:
Does reporting and comparing our TURBT quality make us do it better? What things should be measured to determine TURBT quality? What rate of achievement should be aimed for in our practice? What factors are associated with better achievement of TURBT quality?
Methods:
The is an observational study that will include randomized feedback and education to hospitals about their TURBT performance.
Sites will first submit survey data about usual practice, and then retrospective data about consecutive TURBT surgery previously performed at their site.
Sites will then be randomized to either receiving early feedback or to not receiving early feedback and just taking part in the study. Sites will then collect prospective data about consecutive TURBT surgeries performed at their site.
Performance will then be compared between hospitals that received feedback during the study and those who did not. All sites will receive the feedback intervention at the end of the study.
1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 19,505 is above the median of 180 across 374 observational studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.
Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Site: Primary analysis and randomization is at the site level. Patients are not randomized and audit performance outcomes are analysed at the site level. Estimated 200 sites total sample.
Patient: Patients undergoing TURBT for a first or recurrent transitional cell carcinoma presumed to be non-muscle invasive at the time of surgery.
Site inclusion criteria:
Perform TURBT surgery for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and perform at least 20 first tumour TURBT surgeries per year.
Case Inclusion criteria:
● Patients undergoing transurethral surgical treatment of confirmed transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
Case Exclusion criteria
This group of sites will participate in the audit. No performance feedback will be provided during the period under study. Feedback will be provided at the end of the study period.
This group of sites will participate in the audit, and receive a feedback intervention about their practice based on retrospective data about surgery performed before the start of the study period.
Behavioral: Performance feedback and education
Hospitals and surgeons will have an online interactive performance feedback dashboard provided to them along with educational components.
The rate of detrusor muscle sampling at TURBT
The proportion of first tumour cases with tumours \>5mm in diameter where detrusor muscle is present in the specimen on histological assessment.
Time frame: At point of surgery, assessed from specimen pathology report.
The rate of single instillation intra-vesical chemotherapy (SI-IVC) instillation within 24 hours
The proportion of first tumour cases at sites where SI-IVC is possible that were given SI-IVC within 24 hours of TURBT.
Time frame: 24 hours.
The rate of documentation of resection completeness
The proportion of first tumour cases where a statement of resection completeness is included in the patient operation record.
Time frame: At time of surgery, assessed retrospectively from patient record.
The rate of documentation of all of tumour number, tumour size and tumour location in the operative record.
The proportion of first tumour cases where all of tumour number, tumour size and tumour location are documented in the official operative record.
Time frame: At time of surgery, assessed retrospectively from patient record.
Early recurrence rate
The rate of recurrence at first follow up check after complete TURBT.
Time frame: 12 months
The rate of achievement of all applicable key TURBT quality indicators
The proportion of first tumour cases achieving all applicable co-primary outcomes. This is a composite outcome that aims to determine if a single metric of quality is associated with cancer recurrence.
Time frame: 12 months
The rate of Clavien Dindo 3 or more complications
The rate of Clavien Dindo 3 or more complications
Time frame: 1 month after surgery
The association of the achievement of TURBT quality indicators with early recurrence.
A per protocol and per-protocol analysis will be performed to determine if actual achievement of TURBT quality indicators is association with early recurrence rate.
Time frame: 12 months.
The association of en-bloc resection or use of visual diagnostic aids with achievement of TURBT quality indicators and early recurrence rate
To determine if the use of en-bloc resection or visual diagnostic aids improves achievement of quality indicators and reduces recurrence
Time frame: 12 months
The association of surgeon experience in years and number of TURBTs performed per month with achievement of TURBT quality indicators and early recurrence rate
To determine if surgical experience is important in TURBT quality
Time frame: 12 months
The association of dedicated TURBT lists with achievement of TURBT quality indicators and early recurrence rate
To determine if focusing one type of surgery (TURBT) in a dedicated surgical list improves outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Plan to share: Undecided — Country specific data to be provided to regional lead on request and with conditions.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training