ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05139810Updated Mar 6, 2025Results posted

OASIS-HAE: A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Donidalorsen (ISIS 721744 or IONIS-PKK-LRx) in Participants With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Donidalorsen and Placebo in Hereditary Angioedema, sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 51 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-06.

Sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of donidalorsen in participants with HAE and effect of donidalorsen on the quality and pattern of HAE attacks and their impact on quality of life (QoL).

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase 3, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donidalorsen in 91 participants. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to Cohort A (donidalorsen or placebo every 4 weeks) or Cohort B (donidalorsen or placebo every 8 weeks), respectively. Within each Cohort, participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive donidalorsen or matching-placebo. The study included an up to 8-week Screening Period, a 24-week Treatment Period, and an up to 13-week Post-treatment Period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hereditary Angioedema

Keywords

  • HAE
03

In context

Angioedemas, Hereditary

171 studies on the registry are indexed under Angioedemas, Hereditary; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 48 across 116 interventional studies indexed under Angioedemas, Hereditary.

Browse Angioedemas, Hereditary studies →

Lead sponsor

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  1. Participants, or their legally appointed and authorized representatives, must provide written and signed form (ICF)/assent
  2. Participants must be aged ≥ 12 years at the time of informed consent and, as applicable, assent
  3. Participants must have a documented diagnosis of hereditary angioedema type 1 (HAE-1)/hereditary angioedema type 2 (HAE-2)
  4. Participants must:

    1. Experience a minimum of 2 HAE attacks (confirmed by the Investigator) during the Screening Period
    2. Be willing to complete the participant reported outcomes (PRO) assessments throughout the study
  5. Participants must have access to, and the ability to use acute medication(s) to treat angioedema attacks

Key Exclusion Criteria

  1. Concurrent diagnosis of any other type of recurrent angioedema, including acquired, idiopathic angioedema or HAE with normal C1-INH (also known as HAE Type III)
  2. Any clinically-significant abnormalities in screening laboratory values that would render a participant unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  3. Treatment with another drug or biological agent within 1 month or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of Screening
  4. Participated in a prior ISIS 721744 study
  5. Exposure to any of the following medications:

    1. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or any estrogen containing medications with systemic absorption within 4 weeks prior to Screening
    2. Chronic prophylaxis with Takhzyro, Haegarda, Cinryze and Ruconest or Orladeyo within 5 half-lives prior to Screening
    3. Oligonucleotides (including small interfering ribonucleic acid [siRNA]) within 4 months of Screening if single dose received, or within 12 months of Screening if multiple doses received. This exclusion does not apply to vaccines
  6. Recent history (3 years) of, or current drug or alcohol abuse
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Pooled Placebo

    Participants with hereditary angioedema type I/type II (HAE-1/HAE-2) received placebo subcutaneously (SC) either every 4 weeks (Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21) or 8 weeks (Weeks 1, 9, and 17)

    Drug: Donidalorsen

  • Experimental
    Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg

    Participants with HAE-1/HAE-2 received donidalorsen, 80 mg, SC, every 4 weeks at Weeks 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21.

    Drug: Donidalorsen

  • Experimental
    Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg

    Participants with HAE-1/HAE-2 received donidalorsen, 80 mg, SC, every 8 weeks at Weeks 1, 9, and 17.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Donidalorsen was administered by SC injection.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Donidalorsen-matching placebo was administered by SC injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-Normalized Investigator-Confirmed (IC) HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 1 to Week 25

    The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of IC HAE attacks occurring from Week 1 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

    Time frame: Week 1 to Week 25

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time-Normalized IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25

    The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of IC HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25

  2. Percentage of IC HAE Attack-Free Participants From Week 5 to Week 25

    An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25

  3. Time-Normalized Moderate or Severe IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25

    The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of investigator-confirmed moderate or severe HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25

  4. Number of Participants With a Clinical Response From Week 5 to Week 25

    Clinical response was defined as a ≥ 50%, ≥ 70%, or ≥ 90% reduction from Baseline in HAE attack rate from Week 5 to Week 25. The HAE attack rate between Week 5 and Week 25 for each participant is calculated as number of HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to week 25 divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). Baseline= Run-in period which is the period from screening to the last day prior to Study Day 1.

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25

  5. IC HAE Attack Rate Requiring Acute HAE Therapy From Week 5 to Week 25

    Time-adjusted HAE attack rate is calculated as number of IC HAE attacks requiring acute therapy occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by number of days the participant contributed to period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). HAE attacks requiring acute therapy included those attacks with following concomitant medications c1 esterase inhibitors (human and recombinant), plasma kallikrein inhibitor (human), and bradykinin antagonist.

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 25

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Are Well Controlled on the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) at Week 25

    The AECT is a validated participant-reported outcome instrument to assess disease activity in participants with recurrent angioedema. The questionnaire consists of 4 questions asking about the frequency and severity of angioedema experienced in last 4 weeks. Each question has 5 response choices with total score ranging from 0 to 16. The AECT can be used to identify participants with poorly controlled disease by working with a cutoff value of greater than or equal to 10 points. Participants who score less than 10 points (0-9) in the AECT have poorly controlled disease whereas participants with well-controlled disease score 10-16 points. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.

    Time frame: Week 25

  7. Change From Baseline in Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 25

    The AE-QoL questionnaire is a validated tool to assess symptom-specific health-related QOL impairment in participants suffering from recurrent angioedema. It is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 17 questions across 4 domains: functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, and food. The responses are scored from 0 to 4 where, 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = very often. The AE-QoL domain scores and total score were calculated by using the following formula: (Sum score of all completed items) / (maximum sum score of all possible items) × 100. Total scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The calculated domain and total scores were not raw scores but linear transformations to a 0 to 100 scale. Baseline is defined as the score on Study Day 1.

    Time frame: Week 25

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at 39 investigative sites from 3 December 2021 to 09 November 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Started224623
Full analysis set (fas)224523
Completed013
Not completed224520
Withdrew: Voluntary withdrawal210
Withdrew: Pregnancy100
Withdrew: Roll over to cs7194420

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime-Normalized Investigator-Confirmed (IC) HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 1 to Week 25

The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of IC HAE attacks occurring from Week 1 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

Time frame:
Week 1 to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · HAE attacks per month
Time-Normalized Investigator-Confirmed (IC) HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 1 to Week 25
HAE attacks per monthPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Time-Normalized Investigator-Confirmed (IC) HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 1 to Week 252.26 (1.657 to 3.085)0.44 (0.265 to 0.727)1.02 (0.651 to 1.594)
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = <0.001 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.19 · 95% CI 0.107 to 0.351Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = =0.004 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.45 · 95% CI 0.261 to 0.777Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
SecondaryTime-Normalized IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25

The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of IC HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · HAE attacks per month
Time-Normalized IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25
HAE attacks per monthPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Time-Normalized IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 252.25 (1.594 to 3.183)0.30 (0.151 to 0.581)0.90 (0.529 to 1.520)
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = <0.001 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.13 · 95% CI 0.062 to 0.281Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = =0.004 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.4 · 95% CI 0.212 to 0.748Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
SecondaryPercentage of IC HAE Attack-Free Participants From Week 5 to Week 25

An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of IC HAE Attack-Free Participants From Week 5 to Week 25
Percentage of participantsPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Percentage of IC HAE Attack-Free Participants From Week 5 to Week 259.153.334.8
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = =0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 11.79 · 95% CI 2.34 to 59.36p-value was calculated based on logistic regression with baseline and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = =0.240 · Odds ratio (or): 3.23 · 95% CI 0.46 to 22.85p-value was calculated based on logistic regression with baseline and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
SecondaryTime-Normalized Moderate or Severe IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25

The time-adjusted HAE attack rate was calculated as number of investigator-confirmed moderate or severe HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx).

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · HAE attacks per month
Time-Normalized Moderate or Severe IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 25
HAE attacks per monthPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Time-Normalized Moderate or Severe IC HAE Attack Rate (Per Month) From Week 5 to Week 251.15 (0.718 to 1.831)0.12 (0.044 to 0.351)0.68 (0.372 to 1.229)
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = <0.001 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.11 · 95% CI 0.035 to 0.339Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = =0.173 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.59 · 95% CI 0.276 to 1.260Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response From Week 5 to Week 25

Clinical response was defined as a ≥ 50%, ≥ 70%, or ≥ 90% reduction from Baseline in HAE attack rate from Week 5 to Week 25. The HAE attack rate between Week 5 and Week 25 for each participant is calculated as number of HAE attacks occurring from Week 5 to week 25 divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). Baseline= Run-in period which is the period from screening to the last day prior to Study Day 1.

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 25
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Clinical Response From Week 5 to Week 25
ParticipantsPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
≥ 50% Reduction64219
≥ 70% Reduction43715
≥ 90% Reduction22811
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 310.35 · 95% CI 11.63 to 8279.94The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 14.8 · 95% CI 3.15 to 69.41The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 34.74 · 95% CI 7.32 to 164.87The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = =0.004 · Odds ratio (or): 9.17 · 95% CI 2.05 to 41.09The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 · Odds ratio (or): 17.04 · 95% CI 3.36 to 86.42The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = =0.014 · Odds ratio (or): 8.7 · 95% CI 1.56 to 48.52The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were calculated based on a logistic regression with baseline (the time-normalized run-in period attack rate) and the treatment-by-baseline interaction as a covariate.
SecondaryIC HAE Attack Rate Requiring Acute HAE Therapy From Week 5 to Week 25

Time-adjusted HAE attack rate is calculated as number of IC HAE attacks requiring acute therapy occurring from Week 5 to Week 25, divided by number of days the participant contributed to period multiplied by 28 days. An HAE attack was defined as an event with signs or symptoms consistent with an attack in at least 1 of the locations: peripheral angioedema (cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region), abdominal angioedema (abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), laryngeal angioedema (stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx). HAE attacks requiring acute therapy included those attacks with following concomitant medications c1 esterase inhibitors (human and recombinant), plasma kallikrein inhibitor (human), and bradykinin antagonist.

Time frame:
Week 5 to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · HAE attacks per month
IC HAE Attack Rate Requiring Acute HAE Therapy From Week 5 to Week 25
HAE attacks per monthPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
IC HAE Attack Rate Requiring Acute HAE Therapy From Week 5 to Week 251.80 (1.232 to 2.616)0.15 (0.057 to 0.391)0.59 (0.308 to 1.146)
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = <0.001 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.08 · 95% CI 0.030 to 0.234Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Poisson regression model · p = =0.004 · Ic hae attack rate ratio: 0.33 · 95% CI 0.155 to 0.706Model adjusted rate ratio from Poisson regression model.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Are Well Controlled on the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) at Week 25

The AECT is a validated participant-reported outcome instrument to assess disease activity in participants with recurrent angioedema. The questionnaire consists of 4 questions asking about the frequency and severity of angioedema experienced in last 4 weeks. Each question has 5 response choices with total score ranging from 0 to 16. The AECT can be used to identify participants with poorly controlled disease by working with a cutoff value of greater than or equal to 10 points. Participants who score less than 10 points (0-9) in the AECT have poorly controlled disease whereas participants with well-controlled disease score 10-16 points. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal.

Time frame:
Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Are Well Controlled on the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) at Week 25
Percentage of participantsPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Percentage of Participants Who Are Well Controlled on the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) at Week 2547.192.977.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 25

The AE-QoL questionnaire is a validated tool to assess symptom-specific health-related QOL impairment in participants suffering from recurrent angioedema. It is a self-administered questionnaire comprising 17 questions across 4 domains: functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, and food. The responses are scored from 0 to 4 where, 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = very often. The AE-QoL domain scores and total score were calculated by using the following formula: (Sum score of all completed items) / (maximum sum score of all possible items) × 100. Total scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The calculated domain and total scores were not raw scores but linear transformations to a 0 to 100 scale. Baseline is defined as the score on Study Day 1.

Time frame:
Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 25
Score on a scalePooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Change From Baseline in Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 25-6.19 (-13.737 to 1.353)-24.76 (-29.860 to -19.652)-19.85 (-26.960 to -12.734)
Statistical analysis
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg · Mixed model with repeated measures(MMRM) · p = <0.001 · Treatment difference: -18.56 · 95% CI -27.673 to -9.454
  • Pooled Placebo vs Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg · MMRM · p = =0.010 · Treatment difference: -13.65 · 95% CI -24.024 to -3.286

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 38. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pooled Placebo0/22 (0%)1/22 (4.5%)15/22 (68.2%)
Cohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mg0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)22/45 (48.9%)
Cohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)13/23 (56.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
Limb InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/220/450/23
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventPooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mg
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/226/453/23
InfluenzaInfections and infestations2/224/455/23
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/227/452/23
Covid-19Infections and infestations3/221/451/23
Limb InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/220/451/23
Injection Site ErythemaGeneral disorders0/226/451/23
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/224/453/23
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/220/453/23
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders2/221/450/23
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations2/221/451/23

Baseline characteristics

The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (donidalorsen or placebo). As pre-specified in the protocol and statistical analysis plan, for purposes of analysis, data for placebo participants from Cohort A and Cohort B was pooled for comparison to donidalorsen treated participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mgTotal
Mean35.4 ± 11.0339.6 ± 15.2334.1 ± 13.2237.2 ± 13.88
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mgTotal
Female8281248
Male14171142
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino1236
Not Hispanic or Latino21432084
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Pooled PlaceboCohort A: Donidalorsen 80 mgCohort B: Donidalorsen 80 mgTotal
Race — American Indian or Alaskan Native2013
Race — Asian0101
Race — Black or African American1102
Race — White18422282
Race — Multiple1001
Race — Other0101
08

Study locations

51 sites
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    San Diego, California 92122, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Kansas City, Kansas 66205, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Toledo, Ohio 43617, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Brussels, 1020, Belgium
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1680, Bulgaria
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Ottawa, Ontario K1G6C6, Canada
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Edmonton, T6G 2G3, Canada
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    La Tronche, 38700, France
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75012, France
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 12203, Germany
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Munich, 81675, Germany
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Ashkelon, 78278, Israel
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Haifa, 3104802, Israel
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Catania, 95124, Italy
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Milan, 20138, Italy
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Palermo, 90146, Italy
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Kraków, 31-503, Poland
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, 8907, Spain
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Ankara, 6230, Turkey
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Istanbul, 34093, Turkey
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    İzmir, 35100, Turkey
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Birmingham, B9 5SS, United Kingdom
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
  • Ionis Investigative Site
    London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Riedl MA, Tachdjian R, Lumry WR, Craig T, Karakaya G, Gelincik A, Stobiecki M, Jacobs JS, Gokmen NM, Reshef A, Gompels MM, Manning ME, Bordone L, Newman KB, Treadwell S, Wang S, Yarlas A, Cohn DM; OASIS-HAE Team. Efficacy and Safety of Donidalorsen for Hereditary Angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jul 4;391(1):21-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402478. Epub 2024 May 31. PubMed 38819395 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Ionis may share anonymized individual participant data, aggregated clinical data, and other types of data that support the results in this study. Data requests from qualified researchers will be considered once all three of the following criteria are met: (1) 12 months from marketing approval of the study drug in both the United States and European Union; (2) 18 months from conclusion of the study; and (3) 6 months from publication of study article. Access would be via a secure environment and is contingent upon approval of a research proposal and entry into an appropriate data use agreement. Requests to access data can be submitted via the website https://vivli.org/ourmember/ionis/.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05139810
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2021
Start date
Dec 3, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 9, 2023
Completion
Nov 9, 2023
Results posted
Mar 6, 2025
Last update
Mar 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Donidalorsen

Start the discussion