CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05137106Updated Nov 30, 2021

Assessment of Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Treating Shoulder Pain

An interventional study of Active Dry Needling and Sham Dry needling in Chronic Shoulder Pain, sponsored by University of Gran Rosario. Completed at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-30.

Sponsored by University of Gran Rosario · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Nov 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of active dry needling (aDN) in the treatment of myofascial trigger points of the infraspinatus muscle (MTP). For this purpose, this technique was compared to placebo dry needling (pDN) for short-term pain relief and increased glenohumeral internal rotation range. The second objective is to explore whether improvements in perceived pain and functional capacity correlate with changes in electromyographic activity.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comprising a sample of 30 volunteers with unilateral shoulder pain of both sexes, aged 18 to 35 years. They were clinically evaluated to assess inclusion and exclusion criteria. For inclusion in the study, volunteers had unilateral shoulder pain for more than 3 months and were symptomatic at the time of evaluation. The volunteers were randomized into two groups (G1: active dry needling) versus (G2: placebo dry needling). The procedure was performed by one investigator, while outcome measures (pressure pain thresholds, VAS, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, and muscle activity) were assessed by other investigators, ensuring a double-blinded evaluation of the experiment. Volunteers were recruited through social networks and emails. The study was conducted in two experimental sessions on separate days, at least 48-72 hours apart to avoid carry-over effects. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately after and 48-72 hours after dry needling.

Assessment of infraspinatus and middle deltoid muscle activity was performed by electromyography (EMG). For the EMG protocol, the patient remained standing while holding a distal load, the magnitude of which depended on the patient's weight. In patients weighting less than 68 kg, a load of 1.5 kg was used; those weighting more than 68 kg lifted 2.5 kg. After a brief familiarization period, patients were asked to perform 5 repetitions of shoulder elevation in a scapular plane with external rotation and elbow extended, ranging from 30° to 90°. EMG recordings were taken during the ascent and descent, with a duration of 3 seconds at each stage. The movement was synchronized using a metronome so that there was as little variability as possible between participants.

The study is original and there are no previously published data available. Thus, data obtained from the pilot study were used for sample size calculation. The variable with the lowest coefficient of determination (R-squared) was considered as a primary outcome (pain perceived by visual analog scale), and applied as input for the calculation. The analysis was performed with an effect size of 0.76, an alpha of 5% and a power of 95%. The results indicated that a total of 22 volunteers were needed. Assuming a loss of 20%, each group consists of 14 volunteers (with a total sample of 28 volunteers). The sample calculation was performed using the G-Power 3.1.9.7 software.

The study was pre registered in the brazilian database (www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) before starting data collection, although identifier were not provided.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Shoulder Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Shoulder Pain

707 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Pain; 152 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 561 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Pain.

Browse Shoulder Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Gran Rosario is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with unilateral shoulder pain
  • Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit
  • Presence of active myofascial trigger point in the infraspinatus muscle

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery in the upper limb
  • Previous physiotherapy treatments in the shoulder
  • Dry needling contraindications
  • Previous dry needling experience to mantain the blinding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Dry Needling

    Active dry needling (ADN). Intramuscular insertion Intervention/treatment. All participants in this group received an ADN session with an intramuscular insertion of a 25 mm X 0.22 mm JEMCO acupuncture needle into the infraspinatus muscle. The dry needling was performed with the rapid entry and exit technique.

    Other: Active Dry Needling

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Dry needling

    Sham dry needling (SDN). All participants in this group received one session of SDN with a 25 mm X 0.22 mm JEMCO acupuncture needle over the infraspinatus region. To ensure that the blunt needles did not puncture the skin during the experimental session (and for patient comfort), each needle was individually cut and polished and checked for sharpness against the investigator's fingertip. As a precaution against infection, each patient was treated with a separate dummy needle.

    Other: Sham Dry needling

Interventions

  • OtherActive Dry Needling

    All participants in this group received an ADN session with an intramuscular insertion of a 25 mm X 0.22 mm acupuncture needle into the infraspinatus muscle. The dry needling was performed with the rapid entry and exit technique.

  • OtherSham Dry needling

    All participants in this group received one session of SDN with a 25 mm X 0.22 mm acupuncture needle over the infraspinatus region. To ensure that the blunt needles did not puncture the skin during the experimental session (and for patient comfort), each needle was individually cut and polished and checked for sharpness against the investigator's fingertip. As a precaution against infection, each patient was treated with a separate dummy needle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain intensity

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity. This scale consists of a sequence of numbers from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable".

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, 72 hours after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold

    Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) were quantified bilaterally through a pressure algometer at the medial portion of the infraspinatus muscle and at the medial portion of the deltoid muscle. Three measurements were taken at intervals of 30 seconds and the mean value was recorded. To determine PPT, the pressure was increased at a rate of approximately 1 kg/second. Patients were asked to raise their arm when they perceived the pressure changing to pain, stopping the estimation at this point.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, 72 hours after the intervention

  2. Changes in Range of motion

    The examiners assessed both shoulder's internal rotation range of motion with an inclinometer.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, 72 hours after the intervention

  3. Changes in EMG activity

    Electrical activity from infraspinatus and deltoid muscles was recorded using surface electromyography (sEMG). The signal was normalized using the maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC). The sEMG data were collected during a shoulder elevation task. Electrode placement, data collection and processing were performed according to Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles standards.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, 72 hours after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Gran Rosario
    Rosario, Santa Fe 2000, Argentina
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05137106
Lead sponsor
University of Gran Rosario
Responsible party
Leonardo Intelangelo (Head of the University Center for Assistance, Teaching and Research, University of Gran Rosario) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2021
Start date
Oct 1, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2021
Completion
Mar 1, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion