A Phase 3 interventional study of ITP FIRTECH in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-09.
Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Primary Objective:
To assess the efficacy of the infrared therapy patch (ITP) FIRTECH for treating participants suffering from mild to moderate acute low back pain.
Secondary Objectives:
Duration of study participation is up to 6 days per participant.
2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 221 is above the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.
Browse Low Back Pain studies →Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.
Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a potential participation in a clinical trial.
The ITP FIRTECH patch was applied on the lower back region of the body on Day 1 and intended to be worn for 5 Days (Day 5).
Device: ITP FIRTECH
No patch application.
Infrared Therapy Patch
Percentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 5
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).
Time frame: Day 5
Number of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is any symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an event that emerges during treatment, having been absent pretreatment, or worsens relative to the pretreatment state.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 6
Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5)
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID equals the NRS change from baseline. A negative difference indicates improvement. Time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each postdose time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0- 5) is to be calculated as the SPID0- 5 divided by the total duration time. The score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -5.0 to 2.1 and for no patch control arm is -5.8 to 3.1.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 5
Percentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score
The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 5
Mobility Evaluation Using Schober's Test
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using Schober's test score.Schober test consists of extending a tape measure on the spinal column, between two posterior superior iliac spines and up to 10 cm above this, with the individual in a neutral position. Then, participant is asked to do anterior flexion of the trunk, then therapist will measure the distance of the marked points, in participants without changes of mobility should increase at least 5 cm. Increases smaller than 5 cm indicate that the test is positive, decreased mobility of the lumbar spine. These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then the change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) model with the treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -2.0 to 6.0 and for no patch control arm is -4.2 to 2.0.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 5
Mobility Evaluation Using Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) Test
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using FTF test score.Procedure for FTF test follow recommendation of American Psychological Association:participant stood erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together.Participant was asked to bend forward as far as possible,while maintaining knees,arms,and fingers fully extended.Vertical distance between tip of middle finger and platform is measured with supple tape measure and is expressed in cm.Vertical distance between platform and tip of middle finger is positive when participant did not reach platform and negative when he could go further.These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by ANCOVA model with treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range:ITP FIRTECH arm=-22.0-17.0;no patch control arm=-30.0-13.0.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 5
Time to Reach Acceptable Pain
Time to reach acceptable pain is defined as the time in hours from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain perception) to the first report of post-baseline acceptable pain.
Time frame: Up to Day 5
Time to Reach no Pain
Time to reach no pain was defined as the time (hours) from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain Perception) to the first report of instantaneous pain NRS=0.
Time frame: Up to Day 5
Time Course of PID
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID was defined as instantaneous pain NRS change from baseline. Instantaneous pain NRS was analyzed from baseline up to Day 5. A negative difference indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5
Time Course of Pain Relief
Pain relief is assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS), where 0 = none and 4 = complete in response to a pain relief question.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5
Normalized Sum of Pain Relief
Total pain relief (TOTPAR) is calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point. The Normalized Sum of Pain Relief (TOTPAR0- 5) is to be calculated as the Total Pain Relief divided by the total duration time. Higher scores indicate more pain relief. The score range is from 0.0 to 3.5 for both the arms.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5
A total of 221 participants took part in the study at 7 investigative sites in Germany and Italy from 04 November 2021 to 22 November 2022.
| Milestone | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 113 | 108 |
| Intent-to-treat population | 113 | 108 |
| Safety population | 114 | 107 |
| Modified intent-to-treat population | 91 | 89 |
| Full analysis set | 97 | 84 |
| Completed | 112 | 104 |
| Not completed | 1 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Reason not specified | 0 | 1 |
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. Responder is defined as participant with ≥30% decrease from baseline in pain NRS and who did not take rescue medication (defined as receiving paracetamol (authorized), any other analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs as well as any non-pharmaceutical therapy (prohibited) for treating pain starting from randomization to Day 5 or starting before the study and still ongoing at randomization).
| percentage of participants | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Responders at Day 5 | 72.5 (62.17 to 81.37) | 49.4 (38.67 to 60.25) |
An adverse event (AE) is any symptom, sign, illness or experience that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an event that emerges during treatment, having been absent pretreatment, or worsens relative to the pretreatment state.
| Participants | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Reported With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 18 | 7 |
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID equals the NRS change from baseline. A negative difference indicates improvement. Time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each postdose time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID0- 5) is to be calculated as the SPID0- 5 divided by the total duration time. The score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -5.0 to 2.1 and for no patch control arm is -5.8 to 3.1.
| units on a scale | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Normalized Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (PID) Over 5 Days (SPID0-5) | -1.52 ± 1.356 | -0.91 ± 1.484 |
The RMDQ is a self-administered, widely used health status measure for lower back pain (LBP). It measures pain and function, using 24 items describing limitations to everyday life that can be caused by LBP. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked - that is from a minimum of 0 (no disability) to a maximum of 24 (maximum disability), where lower scores indicative of better function.
| percentage change in RMDQ score | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Score | -32.2 ± 61.81 | -16.4 ± 41.64 |
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using Schober's test score.Schober test consists of extending a tape measure on the spinal column, between two posterior superior iliac spines and up to 10 cm above this, with the individual in a neutral position. Then, participant is asked to do anterior flexion of the trunk, then therapist will measure the distance of the marked points, in participants without changes of mobility should increase at least 5 cm. Increases smaller than 5 cm indicate that the test is positive, decreased mobility of the lumbar spine. These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then the change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by Analysis of covariance(ANCOVA) model with the treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range for ITP FIRTECH arm is -2.0 to 6.0 and for no patch control arm is -4.2 to 2.0.
| cm | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 7.9 ± 4.52 | 8.1 ± 4.89 |
| Day 5 | 8.7 ± 5.48 | 8.1 ± 5.23 |
| Change from Baseline | 0.9 ± 1.44 | -0.1 ± 1.27 |
Change in mobility from baseline to Day 5 using FTF test score.Procedure for FTF test follow recommendation of American Psychological Association:participant stood erect on a platform 20-cm high with shoes removed and feet together.Participant was asked to bend forward as far as possible,while maintaining knees,arms,and fingers fully extended.Vertical distance between tip of middle finger and platform is measured with supple tape measure and is expressed in cm.Vertical distance between platform and tip of middle finger is positive when participant did not reach platform and negative when he could go further.These data were collected at baseline and at Day 5 and then change from baseline to Day 5 was calculated for each treatment group.This change from baseline is analyzed by ANCOVA model with treatment group as fixed effect and baseline instantaneous pain NRS as continuous covariate.Score range:ITP FIRTECH arm=-22.0-17.0;no patch control arm=-30.0-13.0.
| cm | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 21.0 ± 17.48 | 18.6 ± 18.27 |
| Day 5 | 17.4 ± 14.88 | 17.5 ± 16.41 |
| Change from Baseline | -3.5 ± 6.6 | -1.7 ± 5.31 |
Time to reach acceptable pain is defined as the time in hours from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain perception) to the first report of post-baseline acceptable pain.
| hours | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Reach Acceptable Pain | 9.62 (8.017 to 10.317) | 8.65 (7.250 to 10.533) |
Time to reach no pain was defined as the time (hours) from baseline subject symptom self-assessment date and time (Day 1 Visit 1, Pain Perception) to the first report of instantaneous pain NRS=0.
| hours | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Reach no Pain | NA (NA to NA) | NA (NA to NA) |
NRS is used to assess pain intensity, it is a 11-point scale (0-10) where '0' representing 'no pain' and '10' representing 'worst pain imaginable'. PID was defined as instantaneous pain NRS change from baseline. Instantaneous pain NRS was analyzed from baseline up to Day 5. A negative difference indicates improvement.
| units on a scale | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline at Day 1 Evening | -0.8 ± 1.24 | -0.1 ± 1.26 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 2 Morning | -1.1 ± 1.55 | -0.6 ± 1.60 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 2 Evening | -1.3 ± 1.60 | -0.5 ± 1.76 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 3 Morning | -1.6 ± 1.55 | -0.8 ± 1.85 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 3 Evening | -1.6 ± 1.53 | -0.9 ± 1.74 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 4 Morning | -1.8 ± 1.44 | -0.9 ± 1.91 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 4 Evening | -1.8 ± 1.56 | -1.0 ± 1.99 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 5 Morning | -1.6 ± 1.58 | -1.0 ± 2.20 |
| Change from Baseline at Day 5 | -2.1 ± 1.64 | -1.4 ± 1.85 |
Pain relief is assessed using a verbal rating scale (VRS), where 0 = none and 4 = complete in response to a pain relief question.
| units on a scale | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 Evening | 0.8 ± 0.86 | 0.3 ± 0.61 |
| Day 2 Morning | 1.2 ± 0.97 | 0.7 ± 1.01 |
| Day 2 Evening | 1.2 ± 0.92 | 0.7 ± 0.97 |
| Day 3 Morning | 1.4 ± 1.03 | 0.7 ± 0.91 |
| Day 3 Evening | 1.4 ± 0.98 | 0.7 ± 1.02 |
| Day 4 Morning | 1.6 ± 1.11 | 0.8 ± 1.07 |
| Day 4 Evening | 1.6 ± 1.16 | 0.9 ± 1.17 |
| Day 5 Morning | 1.6 ± 1.22 | 1.1 ± 1.37 |
| Day 5 | 1.9 ± 1.21 | 0.9 ± 1.32 |
Total pain relief (TOTPAR) is calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point. The Normalized Sum of Pain Relief (TOTPAR0- 5) is to be calculated as the Total Pain Relief divided by the total duration time. Higher scores indicate more pain relief. The score range is from 0.0 to 3.5 for both the arms.
| units on a scale | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Normalized Sum of Pain Relief | 1.46 ± 0.834 | 0.78 ± 0.842 |
Collected over Day 1 to Day 6. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITP FIRTECH | 0/114 (0%) | 0/114 (0%) | 18/114 (15.8%) |
| No Patch Control Arm | 0/107 (0%) | 0/107 (0%) | 7/107 (6.5%) |
| Event | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm |
|---|---|---|
| Application Site PruritusGeneral disorders | 7/114 | 0/107 |
| NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations | 3/114 | 2/107 |
| Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/114 | 2/107 |
| Application Site ErythemaGeneral disorders | 2/114 | 0/107 |
| Application Site PainGeneral disorders | 2/114 | 0/107 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 2/114 | 0/107 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/114 | 1/107 |
| ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/114 | 1/107 |
| Sleep DisorderPsychiatric disorders | 0/114 | 1/107 |
| Application Site IrritationGeneral disorders | 1/114 | 0/107 |
Intent-to-Treat population was defined as all participants randomized.
| Age, Continuous(years) | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 45.7 ± 13.10 | 44.7 ± 12.87 | 45.2 ± 12.97 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 59 | 62 | 121 |
| Male | 54 | 46 | 100 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | ITP FIRTECH | No Patch Control Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sanofi