An interventional study of Lugol's iodine test in Cervical Dysplasia, sponsored by Ruhr University of Bochum. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.
Sponsored by Ruhr University of Bochum · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. Pre-cancerous lesions (dysplasias) are detected by the gynecologist's preventive smear test and can thus contribute to a 100% chance of cure if they are clarified by a colposcopic examination as part of the dysplasia consultation and, if necessary, surgically removed. Conization (= surgical removal of a cone of tissue from the cervix) is the method of choice for removing the diseased tissue. LLETZ conization (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone) is the worldwide standard surgical procedure for conization. There is risk of local persistence of the precancerous lesion if the cervical dysplasia is not completely removed. To minimize this, the iodine test can be used. Here, a 5% iodine solution (so-called Lugol's solution) is dabbed onto the cervix uteri, resulting in an intense and characteristic brown staining of the healthy cervical epithelium. Sites without staining are termed iodine negative and may contain dysplastic cells. The strength of iodine testing lies in its high specificity, i.e., the reliable ability to exclude false-positive results. The purpose of intraoperative iodine staining is to select the resection line with a high degree of certainty in healthy (i.e., iodine-positive) tissue in order to reduce the rate of cervical dysplasia that is not completely removed (so-called non-in-sano resection, or R1 resection). Systematic survey data from the dysplasia units certified in Germany on the question of the use of intraoperative iodine testing in Germany are lacking, as is the literature as a whole. For example, the current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia (as of March 2020) names intraoperative iodine testing only as a possible option for performing LLETZ.
In this prospective, randomized study, the investigators aim to answer the question whether LLETZ performed with the help of an iodine test with selection of the resection line in the iodine-positive area leads to a lower rate of R1 resections compared to the standard LLETZ without iodine test.
Background 1.1. HPV and dysplasias of the cervix uteri Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the most common sexually transmitted pathogens worldwide. The prevalence in both male and female populations is high. Epidemiological estimates suggest that 85-91% of sexually active adults acquire at least one genital HPV infection by the age of 50, with approximately 95% of HPV infections being spontaneously eliminated within 2 years in terms of HPV immunological clearance. HPV preferentially infects the epithelial cells of the anogenital area and, through incorporation of HPV DNA into the host genome of the basal cells of the squamous epithelium of the cervix and subsequent expression of viral components, causes dysplastic changes in the cervical epithelium that, if left untreated, can develop into invasive carcinoma of the cervix (cervical carcinoma). Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common cancer as well as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide, responsible for 6.6% (570,000) of all new cancer cases and 7.5% (311,000) of cancer-related deaths in women in 2018. The precursor of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (approximately 80% of all cervical cancers) is cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which has three grades of expression (CIN1, CIN 2, and CIN 3). Compared with invasive cervical carcinoma, the incidence of precancerous lesions of the cervix uteri is much higher. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 women in Germany develop high-grade dysplasia (CIN2/CIN3) annually.
1.2. Surgical treatment If precancerous lesions with the potential to develop into an invasive cervical tumor are detected, conization (= surgical removal of a cone of tissue from the cervix) is the method of choice for removing the diseased tissue. Worldwide standard as surgical procedure for conization is LLETZ-conization (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone). In addition to the risk of local persistence of the precancerous lesion if the cervical dysplasia is incompletely removed, LLETZ also increases the risk of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy. This risk increases with increasing volume of removed tissue. To reduce or avoid the aforementioned complications, conization should be performed under colposcopic vision and as little healthy cervical tissue as possible should be removed. One method of LLETZ that is as tissue-conserving as possible is the intraoperative use of the so-called 'iodine test'.
1.3. The iodine test For the identification of healthy squamous epithelium of the cervix uteri, the so-called Schiller's iodine test can be used, which has been part of the clinical routine in the context of colposcopy of cervical dysplasias for decades. In the iodine test, a 5% iodine solution (so-called Lugol's solution) is dabbed onto the cervix uteri, resulting in an intense and characteristic brown staining of the healthy cervical epithelium. Sites without staining are termed iodine negative and may contain dysplastic cells. The strength of iodine testing lies in its high specificity, i.e., the reliable ability to exclude false-positive results. Not all iodine-negative areas contain CIN, but iodine-positive areas are almost certainly healthy. In some centers, because of these characteristics of the iodine sample, it is used during LLETZ to define the resection line of LLETZ. The aim of this approach is to select the resection line with a high degree of certainty in healthy (i.e., iodine-positive) tissue in order to reduce the rate of cervical dysplasia that is not completely removed (so-called 'non-in-sano resection' or 'R1 resection'). Systematic survey data from the dysplasia units certified in Germany on the question of the use of intraoperative iodine testing in Germany are lacking. The current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on the diagnosis and therapy of cervical dysplasia (as of March 2020) also refers to intraoperative iodine testing as a possible option for performing LLETZ. However, exact figures from controlled studies on the usefulness of iodine test-guided LLETZ are lacking in the literature (PubMed search on 10/15/2021; search terms: cervical dysplasia, colposcopy, Lugol's test, iodine test, Lugol's staining; LLETZ; LEEP; conization). At our certified dysplasia center, it is the decision of the respective surgeon whether an additional intraoperative iodine test is performed or not.
Exclusion Criteria:
LLETZ (without intraoperative Lugol's iodine)
LLETZ after the intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine
Diagnostic Test: Lugol's iodine test
Intraoperative application of Lugol's iodine (i.e. staining of the cervix with Lugol's iodine solution)
Rate of R1 resections
The primary outcome parameter is the rate of R1 resections, defined as the presence of a CIN I, CIN II, or CIN III at the ectocervical and/or endocervical resection margin, as indicated in the histopathologic report.
Time frame: Specimen from surgery (result expected 1-2 days after surgery)
Cone mass
The weight of the cone specimen (measured in grams in the unfixed state)
Time frame: During surgery, immediately after the excision
Procedure duration
Duration of the procedure (from start until complete hemostasis is achieved)
Time frame: At surgery
Rate of complications
The occurring intra- and postoperative complications in a period within 14 days after surgery
Time frame: During surgery up to 14 days post surgery
Surgeon's rating of handling
The assessment of the surgeon's handling of the surgical technique (LLETZ with/without intraoperative iodine assay) (11-item numerical rating scale \[NRS\]; 0 = very cumbersome, 10 = very easy)
Time frame: Immediately after surgery
Surgeon's satisfaction
The surgeon's satisfaction with the course of the operation in general (11-item NRS; 0 = no satisfied at all, 10 = very satisfied)
Time frame: Immediately after surgery
Time to complete hemostasis
The time from start of electro-coagulation until complete hemostasis (seconds)
Time frame: During surgery
Blood loss
The intraoperative blood loss (measured as the difference between preoperative and 3-5 hours postoperative Hb levels).
Time frame: At surgery
Plan to share: Yes — Data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author. This includes individual participant data underlying the results presented here, after deidentification, as well as data dictionaries and the the study protocol. Data is available after publication, without a specific end date. Requesting investigators must show that their proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf, Csr
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ruhr University of Bochum