CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05118568PolarhisUpdated Apr 12, 2023

Assessment of Lumpectomy Margins With the Histolog Scanner in Comparison With Intraoperative Imaging Techniques

An observational study in Breast Cancer, sponsored by SamanTree Medical SA. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-12.

Sponsored by SamanTree Medical SA · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Study to assess the capability of using the Histolog Scanner, a recent large field-of-view confocal laser scanning medical imaging device for the breast cancer detection in fresh lumpectomy margins.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. For early-stage breast cancers, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is applied to excise the tumor while saving surrounding healthy tissue as much as possible to avoid radical excisions and achieve better aesthetic and psychological outcomes for the patient. This surgical approach requires postoperative tumor-free margin assessment of the surgical resection in order to carry on with next steps of the patient care treatment (e.g. radiotherapy). Unfortunately, at least 20% of patient undergo more than one procedure to achieve acceptable margin status due to difficulties to identify subclinical and deep-seated tumor during BCS. During the surgery, the surgeon mainly relies on nonspecific visual changes and manual palpation of subtle irregularities to guide cancer excision. While these determinants enable bulk tumor assessment, they do not offer the information to adequately identify tumor infiltrates on lumpectomy margin.

An efficient intraoperative assessment of the margin may solve these issues and confocal imaging has shown some promises by providing real-time imaging of fresh tissue with the resolution sufficient to visualize microscopic tissue features. The Histolog Scanner is a recent confocal microscope designed for clinical use on large surgical specimens.

The main objective of this study is to confirm that the use of the Histolog Scanner by surgeons allows to detect breast cancer on lumpectomy margins and compare the performance of the detection with local standard-of-care intraoperative imaging techniques (ultrasound and radiography) using the final assessment performed in pathology as reference.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Confocal Microscopy
  • Fresh Tissue Imaging
  • Intraoperative Assessment
  • Breast Conserving Surgery
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

SamanTree Medical SA is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patient are selected by breast surgeons during their standard-of-care preoperative consultations

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult female patient ≥18 years old
  • Patient Scheduled for breast conserving surgery of invasive and/ or in situ ductal carcinoma (DCIS).
  • Patient able to read, understand and give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient previously treated for ipsilateral breast cancer surgery
  • Patient with previous radiotherapy of the breast
  • Patient with multicentric breast cancer
  • Patients with planed mastectomy, tumor-adapted breast reduction
  • Patient with presurgical neo-adjuvant treatment
  • Patient is pregnant/lactating
  • Participation in any other clinical study that would affect data acquisition
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceHistolog Scanner

    imaging of fresh lumpectomy specimens with the Histolog Scanner, confocal microscopy scanning medical imaging device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity for breast cancer detection

    Quantification of the performance achieved by breast surgeons and pathologists for breast cancer detection in Histolog Scanner images of lumpectomy margins

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Theoretical impact on re-operation rates

    Extrapolation of the re-operation rate reduction based on positive-margin detection achieved with the Histolog Scanner, in comparison with the local intraoperative margin assessment techniques.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Frauenklinik St. Louise
    Paderborn, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05118568
Lead sponsor
SamanTree Medical SA
Collaborators
St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 12, 2021
Start date
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2021
Completion
May 31, 2022
Last update
Apr 12, 2023

Study contacts

Michael P Lux, MD, MBA
principal investigator · St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion