CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05092789Updated Mar 23, 2022

Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Neck Pain

An interventional study of Kinesio taping group and Cervical thrust manipulation group in Neck Pain, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-23.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the effects of kinesio taping, cervical thrust manipulation and conventional therapy on neck pain, functional status and range of motion

Read the detailed description

Neck pain is most prevalent condition affecting globally, which also create threats to the individuals. Mechanical neck pain affects mainly two third of population at some time in life possibly in middle age, some people may be acute mechanical neck pain while some leading to chronic stage. Mechanical neck disorders usually associated with pain, decreased cervical mobility, spasm. Often neck pain is mechanical in nature, according to literature mechanical neck pain is defined as, that pain originating from cervical spine which may be aggravated with cervical motion, prolonged posture, muscular stiffness. Due to widespread occurrence of mechanical neck pain mainly in modern society, proper interventional strategies of this problem is needed to facilitate that problem. Incidence of neck pain may range from 10.4-23.3%in one year, while according to previous literature prevalence of neck pain was 0.4 to 86.8%, with high proportion in office workers, computer users, and females especially 35 to 55 years. Pain, stiffness, tenderness and restricted mobility is most common symptoms associated with neck pain, manual therapy techniques, exercises, mobilization, manipulations, kinesio taping are treatment strategies used for this problem may improve neck pain.

The main purpose of my study is to improve neck pain, discomfort and functional status in patients with mechanical neck pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mechanical neck pain
  • Kinesio taping
  • Cervical manipulation
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects having mechanical neck pain.
  • participants having neck pain more than 1 month.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of serious pathology (Malignancy, inflammatory disorders).
  • Cervical spinal surgery.
  • History of trauma or fracture.
  • Vascular syndromes.
  • Neurological and cardiac pathologies.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Kinesio taping group

    Participants in this group will receive treatment through standardized therapeutic Kinesio taping along with conventional therapy. Tape will be water proof, porous, adhesive,with width of 5cm and thickness of 0.5 mm.

    Other: Kinesio taping group

  • Experimental
    Cervical thrust manipulation group

    Participants in this group will receive treatment via cervical thrust manipulation along with conventional therapy. Manipulation will be directed on mid cervical spine.

    Other: Cervical thrust manipulation group

  • Active comparator
    Conventional therapy group

    .Participants of this group will receive only conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching Exercises

    Other: Conventional therapy group

Interventions

  • OtherKinesio taping group

    Participants in this group will receive treatment through standardised therapeutic kinesio taping along with conventional therapy. Tape will place over the posterior cervical extensor muscle, from insertion to the origin, with the patient's neck in cervical contralateral side-bending and rotation. Duration of kinesio tape will be of 48 hours with 50-100% tension. Participants of this group will also receive conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching exercises of the neck muscles. This protocol is for 6 weeks. The sessions will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions.

  • OtherCervical thrust manipulation group

    Participants of this group will receive treatment via cervical thrust manipulation along with conventional therapy. For mid cervical spine thrust manipulation, the patient will be in supine lying position,with cervical spine in neutral position. The therapist will cradle the patients head with the other hand. Gentle ipsilateral cervical side flexion and contralateral rotation will introduce until tension will perceive in target tissues at contact point. A high velocity, low amplitude thrust manipulation, will direct upward and medially in direction of subject's contralateral eye. Participants of this group will also receive conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching exercises of the neck muscles. This intervention protocol is for 6 weeks. The sessions will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions with 1 month follow up.

  • OtherConventional therapy group

    Participants of this group will receive only conventional therapy which will include: Hot pack for 10 minutes Stretching Exercises of neck muscles. For sternocleidomastoid stretching, the subject will ask to sit or stand facing forward, exhale and slowly turn your head to right, by keeping shoulder relaxed and down,inhale and return to the center, then turn to look at your left shoulder, ask to hold this position for 30 seconds and do 3 repetitions. For Trapezius stretching, patient is seated upright, therapist then passively move right ear to right shoulder. This study includes interventional protocol of 6 weeks. The session will be given twice a week making it a total of 12 sessions with 1 month follow up.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical range of motion

    This tool will be used to detect cervical range of motion like cervical flexion, cervical extension, cervical side bending and cervical rotation at the baseline and at the end of 6th week. Cervical spines range of motion is 80-90 degrees of flexion, 70 degrees of extension, 20-45 degrees of lateral bending and up to 90 degrees of rotations.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical pain rating scale

    This tool will be used in order to measure the intensity of pain at the baseline and at the end of 6th week. Maximum score on the scale is 10. Lower score means no pain and vice versa. Interpretation of the scores are as following: 0 indicates no pain. 1-3 indicates mild pain. 4-7 indicates moderate pain. 8-10 indicates worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Neck functional stability

    This tool will be used to measure functional stability of neck at the baseline. Maximum score on the scale is 50. Lower score means less disability of the neck and vice versa. Interpretation of the scores are as following: 0-4 indicates no disability. 5-14 indicates mild disability. 15-24 indicates moderate disability. 25-34 indicates severe disability. Above 34 indicates complete disability

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Natural Medicine and Rehabilitation Center
    Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05092789
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2021
Start date
Oct 26, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 16, 2022
Completion
Feb 16, 2022
Last update
Mar 23, 2022

Study contacts

Saad Rauf, Master
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion