ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05092776Updated Dec 6, 2024

Efficacy and Safety of RPH-104 for Resolution and Prevention of Recurring Attacks in Adult Subjects With Familial Mediterranean Fever With Resistance to or Intolerance of Colchicine

A Phase 2 interventional study of RPH-104 and Placebo in Familial Mediterranean Fever and FMF, sponsored by R-Pharm International, LLC. Active, not recruiting at 14 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-06.

Sponsored by R-Pharm International, LLC (part of R-Pharm) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2021, registered Sep 2021).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study purpose is an evaluation of efficacy and safety of RPH-104 in the population of subjects with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) with colchicine resistance or intolerance(i.e. colchicine resistant (crFMF).. Primary objective is to determine proportion of subjects with complete response to treatment with RPH-104 compared to placebo among FMF subjects with colchicine resistance or intolerance.

Read the detailed description

The study is supposed to enroll (randomize) (n= not less than 28, not less than 14 per group), so that not less than 24 to complete study in full (including all the treatment period visits and follow-up period visits - Visit 11 for patients who agreed to participate in the Open-label extension (OLE) study; Visit 11 and Visit 12 for those who do not wish to participate in the OLE study; given potential withdrawal at screening the number of screened subjects (signed Informed Consent Form (ICF) is planned to be up to 84.

The study will consists of three following periods:

  1. Screening period (up to 12 weeks); Throughout the screening the subjects will be monitored to identify "marker" attacks and verify the subject eligibility. The subjects having an attack during screening period and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled into treatment period.
  2. Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled treatment period (16 weeks);

    The subjects enrolled will be randomized to one of the treatment groups in 1:1 ratio:

    • RPH-104 group to receive subcutaneous (SC) injections according to the following regimen: 160 mg on Day 0, 80 mg on Day 7, Day 14 and once every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter;
    • placebo group to receive matching SC injections on Day 0, Day 7, Day 14 and q2w thereafter.

    Efficacy assessment will be performed at Visit 2 and Visit 3, and subsequently every 2 weeks up to Visit 10 inclusive; safety assessment will be performed throughout the study (Visit 1 - Visit 12). In a case of adverse event (AE) development (or other safety reasons), additional unscheduled safety visits could be performed throughout the study. Starting from Visit 2, additional unscheduled visits due to suspected development of FMF attack could be performed. In a case of a recurrent attack, the patient should come to the study site within 2 days from the attack onset for the attack registration.

    The treatment response (i.e. the resolution of FMF "marker" attack/absence of recurrent attacks) will be assessed throughout the treatment period with the investigational products administered both blind and open-label. Responders will continue the study treatment with the assigned investigational products (RPH-104 or placebo as a single SC 2 mL injection q2w, based on the randomization group) in a blinded manner. In non-responders, the following treatment modifications are possible:

    • In a case the "marker" attack has not resolved by Visit 2 - the treatment group will be unblinded:

      • patients from placebo group will be switched to active treatment with RPH-104 in SC injections at a dose of 160 mg (single dose, first injection) followed by administration of 80 mg in 7 days at the Attack + 7 days Visit (with procedures corresponding to Visit 2), and 80 mg at the next scheduled Visit performed 1 week later than initially scheduled (with procedures corresponding to this Visit) after the Attack + 7 days Visit.
      • patients from RPH-104 group will receive planned RPH-104 80 mg administration.
    • In a case of recurrent FMF attack confirmation at a scheduled visit - the treatment group will be unblinded (if still blinded):

      • patients from placebo group will be switched to active treatment with RPH-104 in SC injections at a dose of 160 mg (single dose, first injection) followed by administration of 80 mg in 7 days at the Attack + 7 days Visit (with procedures corresponding to Visit 2), and then at the next scheduled Visit (with procedures corresponding to the further study schedule) and all the next scheduled visits every 2 weeks thereafter;
      • patients from RPH-104 group or patients who were switched from placebo group and receiving RPH-104 80 mg will receive RPH-104 160 mg administration at the visit and thereafter 160 mg q2w;
      • patients already receiving RPH-104 160 mg q2w in unblinded manner can continue treatment or can discontinue treatment at the discretion of Investigator, based on the risk/benefit assessment of the further RPH-104 treatment.
    • In a case of recurrent FMF attack confirmation at an unscheduled visit - the treatment group will be unblinded (if still blinded):

      • if a recurrent FMF attack is recorded and the subject visits the study site within 3 days before the next scheduled visit (starting from Visit 3), the subject will undergo all the next scheduled visit procedures including the unblinded RPH-104 administration and blood sampling provided for at this scheduled visit. The treatment rules for a scheduled visit described above are applicable in this case;
      • in a case of a recurrent attack and subject's arrival to the site more than 3 days before the next scheduled visit but not less than 7 days after the previous scheduled visit (starting from Visit 2), the unscheduled visit will be performed on the day of arrival to the study site (and the administration will be shifted from the planned next scheduled visit). The treatment rules for a scheduled visit described above are applicable in this case. Further the subject will not attend the next scheduled visit and all the visit procedures per Protocol should be performed as an unscheduled visit. Afterwards, the initially planned visits schedule for a patient will be kept;
      • in a case of unscheduled visit within 7 days after administration of the scheduled blinded RPH-104 80 mg dose or placebo all procedures planned for unscheduled visit to be performed. If at such unscheduled visit development of a recurrent attack is confirmed the subject will be unblinded:

        • patients from placebo group will be switched to active treatment with RPH-104 in SC injections at the unscheduled visit at a dose of 160 mg (single dose, first injection) followed by administration of 80 mg in 7 days at the Attack + 7 days Visit (with procedures corresponding to Visit 2), and 80 mg at the next scheduled Visit performed 1 week later (with procedures corresponding to this Visit) after the Attack + 7 days Visit;
        • patients from RPH-104 group or patients who were switched from placebo group and receiving RPH-104 80 mg q2w will receive RPH-104 80 mg administration at the visit and thereafter 160 mg q2w starting from the next scheduled visit;
        • patients already receiving RPH-104 160 mg q2w will not receive RPH-104 at this unscheduled visit and can continue treatment or can discontinue treatment at the discretion of Investigator, based on the risk/benefit assessment of the further RPH-104 treatment.

    For patients receiving RPH-104 at a dose of 160 mg q2w no further dose escalation is carried out. In a case of consequent recurrent attacks this patient may continue treatment with RPH-104 at a maximum dose of 160 mg q2w according to the Investigator's reasonable decision until the end of the study treatment period. No dose reduction of the investigational products could be made throughout the study.

    Maximum treatment duration is 16 weeks.

    Subjects receiving both blinded and unblinded therapy will undergo regular evaluation of efficacy and safety; the visits will be performed every 2 weeks for this purpose.

    At the last visit of the treatment period (Visit 10) after completion of all visit procedures the patients will be invited to proceed in a long-term open-label extension (OLE) study to evaluate the safety and efficacy study of RPH-104 (CL04018071).

  3. Follow-up period (8 weeks) that includes safety monitoring for 8 weeks after the last dosing with the investigational products.

In case of lacking relevant clinical response and if the subjects do not wish to participate in the open-label study, they should complete all safety follow-up visits.

Therefore, the total maximum duration of participation of one patient in the study will be 37 weeks, id est (i.e.) about 9 months (1 additional week could be added to the overall study duration in case of switching from the placebo to the RPH-104 treatment for a subject due to the disease attack).

02

Conditions studied

  • Familial Mediterranean Fever
  • FMF

Keywords

  • RPH-104
  • colchicine inefficacy
  • colchicine intolerance
  • subcutaneous
03

In context

Familial Mediterranean Fever

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Familial Mediterranean Fever; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 40 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Familial Mediterranean Fever.

Browse Familial Mediterranean Fever studies →

Lead sponsor

R-Pharm International, LLC is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of voluntarily signed and dated ICF to participate in this study.
  • Verified diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) based on Tel HaShomer diagnostic criteria (Pras M., 1998) or the criteria developed by the Eurofever /Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) expert group (2019);
  • Presence of at least one mutation in Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV) exon 10 (results of the study performed earlier at any time may be provided or a respective test should be performed during the screening);
  • Presence (at screening onset) of data on history of at least one (on average) disease attack per month throughout the last 3 months (Ozen et al., 2020);
  • Presence of at least one of the below-mentioned (at screening onset) documented data confirming:

    • resistance to colchicine at the maximum tolerable therapeutic dose (up to 3 mg/day) confirmed by at least one monthly attack (on average) despite the therapy specified within at least 3 last months. Colchicine administration will be continued at stable dose if it is not associated with unacceptable adverse reactions;
    • intolerance of therapeutic or subtherapeutic doses of colchicine (unacceptable adverse reactions); Colchicine dose should be stable for at least 5 days before patient enrollment into the study (prior to screening onset).
  • Ability and willingness of the subject, according to the reasonable Investigator's judgment, to attend the study site at all scheduled visits, undergo the study procedures and follow the Protocol requirements including subcutaneous (SC) injections by qualified site personnel;
  • Consent of female subjects of defined as all females with physiological potential to conceive (except for those with absolute termination of menses to be determined retrospectively after 12 months of natural amenorrhea, i.e. amenorrhea with relevant clinical status, e.g. appropriate age) to use highly effective throughout the study starting from the screening (signed ICF) and for at least 8 weeks after the study treatment completion (discontinuation); and negative pregnancy test (serum test for human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)).

or Consent of the sexually active men subjects to use highly effective contraception throughout the study starting from the screening (signed ICF) and for at least 8 weeks after the study treatment completion (discontinuation).

A highly effective method of contraception is defined as follows:

  • complete abstinence: if it corresponds to the preferred and conventional lifestyle of the female subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation method) and interrupted coitus are not considered acceptable contraceptive methods;
  • female sterilization: surgical bilateral ovariectomy (with/without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks prior to the study treatment initiation. In case of ovariectomy only the female reproductive status should be verified by further hormonal test;
  • male sterilization (with documented absence of sperm in ejaculate post vasectomy) at least 6 months for screening. Vasectomized male partner should be the only partner of the participating female subject;
  • combination of two of the following methods (a+b or a+c or b+c):

    а) oral, injection or implanted hormonal contraceptives; in case of oral contraceptives the female subjects should administer the same product for at least 3 months prior to the study treatment;

    b) intrauterine device or contraceptive system;

    с) barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical cap / vaginal fornix cap) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/vaginal suppository.

    • Presence of active FMF attack at Visit 1 (Day 0) lasting for not more than 2 days before Visit 1 defined as simultaneous development of clinical and serological signs of the attack including:
  • Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score ≥ 2 supposing mild, moderate or severe activity of the disease (i.e. clinical signs), and
  • CRP level > 10 mg/L (i.e. serological signs).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • to the study product (RPH-104) and/or its components/.
  • Administration of live (attenuated) vaccines less than 3 months prior to Day 0 (treatment initiation) and/or necessity to use such vaccine within 3 months after the study product RPH-104 treatment completion (discontinuation). include viral vaccines against: measles, rubella, parotitis, varicella, rotavirus, influenza (as nasal spray), yellow fever, poliomyelitis (oral polio-vaccine); tuberculosis vaccine (BCG), typhoid (oral typhoid fever vaccine) and camp fever (epidemic typhoid vaccine). Immunocompetent family members should refuse to use oral polio-vaccine throughout the subject's participation in the study.
  • Conditions or signs which, according to the investigator, evidence impaired (reduced) immune response and/or significantly increase the risk of immunomodulating therapy including (but not limited to):

    • active bacterial, fungal, viral or protozoal infection at screening onset;
    • opportunistic infections and/or Kaposi's sarcoma at the screening period onset;
    • chronic bacterial, fungal or viral infection requiring systemic therapy with parenteral products at the main screening period onset;
    • human immunodeficiency (), (HBV) or C () viral infections;
  • Active tuberculosis (TB) in the history or risk factors or signs evidencing active or latent infection with M. Tuberculosis including (not limited to) the following:

    • living in specific conditions increasing the risk of contact with tuberculosis such as detention facilities, in crowded areas of person of no fixed abode, etc. within the last year before the main treatment period;
    • working in a medical institution with unprotected contact with subjects under high risk of tuberculosis or subjects with tuberculosis within the last year until the main therapy period;
    • close contact, i.e. confinement to a place (home or another confined area) for a long period of time (several days or weeks, not minutes or hours) with a subject with active pulmonary tuberculosis within the last year until the main therapy period;
    • results of examinations indicating active or latent infection with M. Tuberculosis: positive QuantiFERON-TB / T-Spot TB test at screening; chest X-ray/chest CT findings confirming pulmonary tuberculosis during screening.
  • Any other relevant concomitant diseases (cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, urinary, gastrointestinal, hepatic disorders, coagulation disorders, other diseases, etc.) or conditions which, according to the investigator's judgment, may affect the subject's participation or well-being in the study and/or distort assessment of the study results.
  • History of organ transplantation or necessity in transplantation at the screening onset.
  • Any during the screening period or for 5 years before screening except for non- basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer after total resection or in situ carcinoma of any type after total resection.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • History of alcohol or psychoactive substance abuse according to the investigator's evaluation.
  • Severe renal failure: (ClCr) calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula \< 30 mL/min.
  • Prior therapy with:

    • rilonacept - less than 6 weeks prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • canakinumab - less than 12 weeks prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • anakinra - less than 72 hours prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • rituximab - less than 24 weeks prior to Day 0;
    • tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors and other biologics - less than 6 weeks or 5 half-life periods (whichever is longer) prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • drugs (azathioprine, leflunomide, dapsone, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mercaptopurine methotrexate, etc.) - less than 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to Day 0 of the study. In the case of administration of leflunomide, the completion of a course of elimination with cholestyramine should be documented;
    • intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin (Ig) - less than 8 weeks prior to Day 0;
    • use of any other biologic less than 5 half-life periods prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • IV administration of less than 1 week (since the end of treatment) prior to Day 0 of the study;
    • intramuscular, intra-articular or peri-articular administration of glucocorticoids less than 4 weeks prior to Day 0;
    • systemic therapy with oral glucocorticoids at doses > 0,2 mg/kg/day equivalent to the prednisolone dose on Day 0;
    • changes in the glucocorticoids dose/dosage regimen within at least 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Any of the deviations in the laboratory tests below:

    • \< 1.5 x 10\^9/L (1500 /mm\^3),
    • White blood cell (WBC) count \< 3 x 10\^9/L (\<3000/mm\^3),
    • count \< 100 \^9/L (\<100000/mm\^3 or \<100000×10\^6/L),
    • (ALT) and/or aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥ 2 x (ULN) if at the screening ALT, AST ≥ 2 x ULN but \< 3 ULN, retest is allowed,
    • > 1.5 x ULN (except for documented cases of Gilberts syndrome).
  • Parallel participation in other clinical studies at the screening onset or administration of any unauthorized () products less than 4 weeks or 5 half-life periods (whichever is longer) before Visit 1 (treatment initiation).
  • Previous participation in this clinical study, in case of passing the randomization procedure.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RPH-104

    Test product group receiving RPH-104 subcutaneous (s.c.) injections:160 mg on Day 0, 80 mg on Day 7, Day 14 and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter. In case "marker" attack does not resolve at Visit 2 - the treatment group will be unblinded: patients will receive planned RPH-104 80 mg administration. In case of a new attack on further days of treatment period until Visit 10 inclusive - the treatment group will be unblinded: the dose of RPH-104 could be escalated to 160 mg q2w; The patients already receiving RPH-104 160 mg q2w will continue to receive RPH-104 at this dose. Further dose escalation is forbidden.

    Biological: RPH-104

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo group receiving the equivalent placebo dose also as s.c. injections on Day 0, Day 7, Day 14 and q2w thereafter. In case the "marker" attack does not resolve at Visit 2 - the treatment group will be unblinded: patients will be switched to active treatment with RPH-104 in SC injections at a dose of 160 mg followed by administration of 80 mg in 7 days at the Attack + 7 days Visit, and 80 mg at the next Visits. In a case of a new attack the patients switching from placebo and receiving RPH-104 at 80 mg dose could be escalated to RPH-104 160 mg q2w; Further dose escalation is forbidden.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • BiologicalRPH-104

    solution for subcutaneous administration 40 mg/mL, 2 mL in the 4-mL glass vial

  • DrugPlacebo

    Normal Saline (0.9% Sodium Chloride solution for subcutaneous Injection), 2 mL in the 4 mL-glass vial. The placebo will contain no active pharmaceutical ingredients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects with complete response during 16 week therapy with RPH-104 vs. placebo in FMF subjects with colchicine inefficacy or intolerance.

    Complete response defined as resolution of "marker" attack by Visit 2 (Day 7) and lack of recurrent attacks during the treatment period up to Visit 10 (Day 112). Criteria of resolution of a "marker" FMF attack include simultaneous clinical and laboratory signs of the attack resolution: * Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score \< 2 (i.e. minimum or complete lack of clinical signs and symptoms) AND * C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≤ 10 mg/L OR CRP reduction by ≥ 70% compared to baseline defined at enrollment to treatment period (Visit 1). Criteria of a recurrent FMF attack development after resolution of "marker" attack include simultaneous development of clinical and laboratory signs of the attack: * PGA score ≥ 2 assuming mild, moderate or severe disease activity (i.e. clinical signs), AND * CRP level ≥ 30 mg/L (serological signs). PGA is a 5-point scale: from 0 = no disease-related clinical signs and symptoms to 4 = severe clinical signs and symptoms of the disease.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to the development of a recurrent FMF attack in patients with resolved "marker" attacks

    Criteria of a recurrent FMF attack development after resolution of "marker" attack include simultaneous development of clinical and laboratory signs of the attack: * PGA score ≥ 2 assuming mild, moderate or severe disease activity (i.e. clinical signs), AND * CRP level ≥ 30 mg/L (serological signs). PGA is a 5-point scale: from 0 = no disease-related clinical signs and symptoms to 4 = severe clinical signs and symptoms of the disease.

    Time frame: from Day 7 to the development of a recurrent FMF attack, up to 16 weeks

  2. Proportion of subjects with Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score < 2 during the study

    PGA score \< 2 during the treatment period with RPH-104 compared to placebo in FMF subjects with colchicine inefficacy or intolerance. PGA is a 5-point scale from 0 = no disease-related clinical signs and symptoms to 4 = severe clinical signs and symptoms of the disease.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  3. Proportion of subjects with partial response to treatment

    Partial response defined as Resolution of "marker" attack by Visit 2 (Day 7) but with development of recurrent attacks up to Visit 10 (Day 112). Criteria of resolution of a "marker" FMF attack include simultaneous clinical and laboratory signs of the attack resolution: * Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score \< 2 (i.e. minimum or complete lack of clinical signs and symptoms) AND * CRP level ≤ 10 mg/L OR CRP reduction by ≥ 70% compared to baseline defined at enrollment to treatment period (Visit 1). Criteria of a recurrent FMF attack development after resolution of "marker" attack include simultaneous development of clinical and laboratory signs of the attack: * PGA score ≥ 2 assuming mild, moderate or severe disease activity (i.e. clinical signs), AND * CRP level ≥ 30 mg/L (serological signs). PGA is a 5-point scale: from 0 = no disease-related clinical signs and symptoms to 4 = severe clinical signs and symptoms of the disease.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  4. Proportion of subjects with serological remission

    Proportion of subjects with serological remission (CRP ≤ 10 mg/L) throughout the study.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  5. Proportion of subjects with normalized Serum Amyloid A (SAA) level

    Proportion of subjects with normalized serum amyloid A level (SAA \< 10 mg/L) throughout the study

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  6. Proportion of subjects escalated to RPH-104 160 mg q2w dose

    In patients whose treatment group has been unblinded because of a confirmed attack or no "marker" attack resolution: the patients from RPH-104 group and those switching from placebo and receiving RPH-104 at 80 mg dose will be escalated to RPH-104 160 mg q2w.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  7. Proportion of subjects receiving additional symptomatic therapy with Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol or glucocorticoids due to FMF

    Proportion of subjects receiving additional symptomatic therapy with NSAIDs, paracetamol or glucocorticoids due to FMF

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  8. Change in inflammation parameters vs. baseline (CRP)

    Change in CRP levels vs. baseline (Day 0)

    Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) up to 18 weeks

  9. Change in inflammation parameters vs. baseline (SAA)

    Change in SAA levels vs. baseline (Day 0)

    Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) up to 18 weeks

  10. PGA score change compared to baseline

    PGA score change compared to baseline (Day 0) during the study. PGA is a 5-point scale from 0 = no disease-related clinical signs and symptoms to 4 = severe clinical signs and symptoms of the disease.

    Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) up to 18 weeks

  11. Changes in patients' quality of life during the treatment period with RPH-104

    Change in quality of life vs. baseline (Day 0) based on Medical Outcome Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-)12® questionnaire throughout the study.

    Time frame: From baseline (Day 0) up to 18 weeks

07

Study locations

14 sites
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2025, 45 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2021
First posted
Oct 26, 2021
StartActual
Apr 29, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2025
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05092776
Collaborators
Data Management 365, Atlant Clinical LLC, R-Pharm JSC, Unimed Laboratories, Exacte Labs LLC, Key Stat LLC, TRPharm İlaç Sanayi Ticaret Anonim Şirketi and ASCOT SCIENCE Education and Consulting Ltd., Ascot Eğitim ve Danışmanlık LTD. ŞTİ.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2021
Start date
Apr 29, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 6, 2024

Study contacts

Mikhail Samsonov
study director · R-Pharm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Goflikicept

Start the discussion