CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05091125Updated Oct 25, 2021

Diagnostic Performance of the S100B Protein in the Prognosis of Patients With Mild Head Trauma With Risk of Complications in Patients Over 65 Years Old.

An observational study in Mild Head Trauma With Risk of Complications, sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 62 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
62 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients with mild head trauma, a large number of CT scans are performed. The S100B protein allows, when the dosage is below the threshold, to rule out the diagnosis of brain damage with a negative predictive value of 98%.

In patients over 65 years old it was found that the dosage of S100B came back positive more often compared to a younger population.

This study proposes to determine the positivity threshold value for S100B dosage in patients over 65 years old. In patients over 65 years suffering from mild head trauma, a head CT will systematically be performed (in accordance with the recommendations) and the S100B will be measured (taken from an additional tube on the blood test carried out in these patients). The results of the TDM will then be compared with the results of the S100B to determine the values of sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of different thresholds.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Head Trauma With Risk of Complications
03

In context

Craniocerebral Trauma

253 studies on the registry are indexed under Craniocerebral Trauma; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 180 across 108 observational studies indexed under Craniocerebral Trauma.

Browse Craniocerebral Trauma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France is the lead sponsor of 966 studies on the registry; 342 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
62 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients over 65 years old who have undergone a mild head trauma.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female aged 65 or more
  • Patients going to the emergency for a mild head trauma with risk of complication and treated within 3 hours of the head injury, according to the following criteria:
  • Adult patients with head trauma presenting:
  • Retrograde amnesia lasting more than 30 min, Or
  • A loss of consciousness or amnesia of the facts Or
  • Glasgow score \<15 to 2 hours from traumatism
  • Speaking and reading French
  • Subject having expressed his non-opposition to the research or non-opposition given by a trusted person / member of his family in cases where the patient is not in a position to express his non-opposition.
  • Subject affiliated to a social health insurance protection scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe head trauma
  • Mild head trauma without risk of complication
  • Patient under the protection of justice
  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship
  • Subject in exclusion period (determined by a previous or current study)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients over 65 years old who have undergone a mild head trauma.

    Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic performance of the S100B protein dosage

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDiagnostic performance of the S100B protein dosage

    Dosage of the S100B protein in patients with mild head trauma with complication risks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The threshold of the S100B protein

    Time frame: This outcome measure is assessed on Day 1.

Secondary outcomes

  1. - Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) of the S100B protein in the differential diagnosis of bleeding - Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the S100B protein in the differential diagnosis of hemorrhage

    * Sensitivity (Se) and Specificity (Sp) of the S100B protein in the differential diagnosis of bleeding in patients over 65 years old who have undergone a mild head trauma. * Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the S100B protein in the differential diagnosis of hemorrhage in patients over 65 years old who have undergone a mild head trauma.

    Time frame: This outcome measure is assessed on Day 1.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05091125
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2021
Start date
Nov 2, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 25, 2021

Study contacts

Etienne QUOIRIN, Dr
Contact
etienne.quoirin@chru-strasbourg.fr
03 88 12 86 52 ext. +333

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion