ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05090254CUSTOMUpdated Jun 30, 2022

The Effect of Perioperative Cardiac Output-guided GDT on Oxygen Delivery, Consumption, and Microcirculatory Perfusion

An interventional study of Treatment algorithms targeting cardiac output in Caridac Output-guided Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy, Oxygen Delivery and Oxygen Consumption, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-30.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Perioperative cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy (GDT) triggers fluid, vasopressor, and inotrope administration assuming that optimizing cardiac output (i.e., global blood flow) ensures adequate oxygen delivery and microcirculatory perfusion - that are usually not directly monitored during goal-directed therapy. There is increasing evidence that perioperative cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy may reduce postoperative complications compared to routine hemodynamic management in high-risk patients having major surgery. The effect of cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy algorithms on perioperative oxygen delivery and consumption as well as microcirculatory perfusion, however, is unknown.

The investigators aim to investigate the effect of using different cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy algorithms on perioperative oxygen delivery and consumption as well as sublingual microcirculatory perfusion compared to routine perioperative hemodynamic management in patients having major abdominal surgery with general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Perioperative cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy (GDT) triggers fluid, vasopressor, and inotrope administration assuming that optimizing cardiac output (i.e., global blood flow) ensures adequate oxygen delivery and microcirculatory perfusion - that are usually not directly monitored during goal-directed therapy. There is increasing evidence that perioperative cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy may reduce postoperative complications compared to routine hemodynamic management in high-risk patients having major surgery. The effect of cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy algorithms on perioperative oxygen delivery and consumption as well as microcirculatory perfusion, however, is unknown.

With technological advancements a distinct monitoring of oxygen delivery and consumption as well as microcirculatory perfusion in the perioperative period has become possible. Using new technologies, a detailed understanding of the effect of cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy on perioperative oxygen delivery and consumption as well as microcirculatory perfusion is of vital importance to further develop and improve perioperative hemodynamic treatment strategies.

In this pilot randomized-controlled trial, the investigators therefore aim to investigate the effect of using different cardiac output-guided goal-directed therapy algorithms on perioperative oxygen delivery and consumption as well as sublingual microcirculatory perfusion compared to routine perioperative hemodynamic management in patients having major abdominal surgery with general anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caridac Output-guided Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy
  • Oxygen Delivery
  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Microcirculatory Perfusion
  • Major Non-cardiac Surgery
  • Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury
  • Postoperative Acute Myocardial Injury

Keywords

  • non-cardiac surgery
  • oxygen consumption
  • oxygen delivery
  • microcirculatory perfusion
  • goal-directed hemodynamic therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf is the lead sponsor of 415 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) having elective major abdominal surgery with general anesthesia
  • Expected duration of surgery at least 120 minutes
  • Planned postoperative monitoring in intensive care unit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Age \<18 years
  • Body weight \<50 kg
  • Pregnancy
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Planned patient positioning in other position than supine position
  • Surgery within the last 30 days
  • Inaccessibility of the head during surgery
  • Peripheral artery disease stage ≥IIb
  • Chronic vasculitis
  • Supraglottic airway management
  • Enterostomy repair surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cardiac output maximization group

    Patients will be treated according to a goal-directed therapy protocol aiming at a cardiac output maximization. Detailed protocol adapted from Edwards, M.R., et al., Optimisation of Perioperative Cardiovascular Management to Improve Surgical Outcome II (OPTIMISE II) trial: study protocol for a multicentre international trial of cardiac output-guided fluid therapy with low-dose inotrope infusion compared with usual care in patients undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery. BMJ Open, 2019. 9(1): p. e023455.

    Other: Treatment algorithms targeting cardiac output

  • Active comparator
    Cardiac output personalization group

    Patients will be treated according to a goal-directed therapy protocol aiming at a personalized cardiac output goal determined with preoperative cardiac output assessment. Detailed protocol adapted from Nicklas, J.Y., et al., Personalised haemodynamic management targeting baseline cardiac index in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised single-centre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth, 2020. 125(2): p. 122-132.

    Other: Treatment algorithms targeting cardiac output

  • No intervention
    Routine management group

    Patients will be treated according to routine hemodynamic management.

Interventions

  • OtherTreatment algorithms targeting cardiac output

    Treatment algorithms targeting maximization or personalization of cardiac output

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Perioperative changes in oxygen delivery

    assessed via blood gas analysis

    Time frame: after induction of general anesthesia, during the last 30 minutes of surgery, within 6 hours after surgery, day 1, 2, 3 after surgery

  2. Perioperative changes in oxygen consumption

    assessed via indirect calorimetry

    Time frame: baseline awake, after induction of general anesthesia, during the last 30 minutes of surgery, within 6 hours after surgery, day 1, 2, 3 after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perioperative changes of microcirculation

    assessed via Incident Darkfield technology

    Time frame: baseline awake, after induction of general anesthesia, during the last 30 minutes of surgery, within 6 hours after surgery, day 1, 2, 3 after surgery

  2. Perioperative changes in cardiac output

    assessed via pulse wave analysis

    Time frame: baseline awake, after induction of general anesthesia, during the last 30 minutes of surgery, within 6 hours after surgery, day 1, 2, 3 after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of postoperative myocardial injury

    assessed via blood samples

    Time frame: baseline awake, within 6 hours after surgery, and on day 1, 2, and 3 after surgery

  2. Incidence of acute kidney injury

    assessed via blood samples

    Time frame: baseline awake, within 6 hours after surgery, and on day 1, 2, and 3 after surgery

  3. Perioperative changes in urethral perfusion index

    assessed via urethral photoplethysmography

    Time frame: after induction of general anesthesia, during the last 30 minutes of surgery, within 6 hours after surgery, day 1, 2, 3 after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05090254
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2021
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
May 31, 2022
Completion
May 31, 2022
Last update
Jun 30, 2022

Study contacts

Bernd Saugel, Prof., MD
principal investigator · The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion