An interventional study of Lower limb myofascial trigger points f-ESWT in Plantar Fasciitis, Myofascial Trigger Point Pain and Foot Injury, sponsored by University of Padova. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-22.
Sponsored by University of Padova · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common cause of heel pain. Among the several conservative treatment options, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) is considered the standard treatment.
Recent studies suggest that PF may be sustained by a myofascial impairment proximal to the pain area with a biomechanical disequilibrium of the entire lower limb and pelvis. Therefore, by combining the concepts of Fascial Manipulation and ESWT, the purpose of this open label randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ESWT on myofascial trigger points of lower limb in a sample of subjects with PF.
Patients with PF were randomly assigned to an Experimental treatment Group (EG), treated with focused ESWT on myofascial points, and a Control Group (CG), treated with the focused ESWT traditional approach on the medial calcaneal tubercle.
Outcome measures included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Italian Foot Functional Index (17-iFFI).
The assessment was made before the first session(baseline-T1), immediately before the second session (T2), immediately before the third session (T3), at 1month (T4) and 4 months' follow-up (T5).
Thirty patients who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled.
235 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis; 37 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 54 across 192 interventional studies indexed under Fasciitis.
Browse Fasciitis studies →University of Padova is the lead sponsor of 210 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
3 total sessions, one per week, of focused extracorporeal shockwave treatment with a frequency of 5 Hz, an energy flux density of 0.05-0.167 mJ (millijoule)/mm2 administered on 3 or 4 myofascial points (identified based on Fascial Manipulation principles), 1500 shocks per point.
Device: Lower limb myofascial trigger points f-ESWT
3 total sessions, one per week, of focused extracorporeal shockwave treatment, with a frequency of 5 Hz, an energy flux density of 0.32 mJ(millijoule)/mm2, for a total of 2000 shocks administered on the area of the painful heel on the medial calcaneal tubercle.
Device: Lower limb myofascial trigger points f-ESWT
3 weekly sessions of focused Extracorporeal Shockwave treatment with a frequency of 5 Hz, an energy flux density of 0.05-0.167 mJ(millijoule)/mm2, administered on 3-4 myofascial lower limb trigger points (identified according to the approach of Fascial Manipulation), 1500 shocks per point.
Change in 17-Italian Foot Function Index (17-iFFI)
Self-administered questionnaire. It consists in 17 items divided into 3 subscales: pain (5 items), disability (9 items), and limitation of activity (3 items). The items are rated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), from 0 to 10. A score is calculated for every subgroup of items, and then the final score is calculated by adding the subscale's scores and dividing the result by 170. The final percentage score is between 0% (best outcome) and 100% (worst outcome).
Time frame: T1 (baseline - immediately before the first session); T2 (1 week - immediately before the second session); T3 (2 weeks - immediately before the third session); T4 (1 month follow-up); T5 (4 months follow-up)
Change in Foot and Ankle Outcome Scale (FAOS)
Self-administered questionnaire. It consists of 42 items divided in 5 subscales: pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in activities of daily living (17 items), function in sports and recreation (5 items), and foot-and-ankle related quality of life (4 items). The questions are made to be answered with qualitative terms (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Extreme) or temporal terms (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) corresponding to a numeric value, from 0 to 4. The score for each subdomain as well as the total FAOS is then calculated and normalized to a 0-100 scale, where 0% is the worst outcome and 100% the best outcome. Then, a final, global percentage score, from 0% (worst outcome) to 100% (best outcome), is given.
Time frame: T1 (baseline - immediately before the first session); T2 (1 week - immediately before the second session); T3 (2 weeks - immediately before the third session); T4 (1 month follow-up); T5 (4 months follow-up)
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Padova