CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05082090RWE SpineUpdated Jul 30, 2025

A Multi-Center Post-Market Data Collection Protocol to Evaluate the Performance of Orthofix Spine Devices

An observational study in Spinal Disorders/Injuries, sponsored by Orthofix Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 20 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-30.

Sponsored by Orthofix Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This protocol is designed to study Orthofix regulatory approved and commercially available spine devices to generate Real World Evidence (RWE) of device safety and performance in the treatment of patients with spine injuries and/or disorders following the local medical standard of care. The clinical data generated from this study will support compliance to global regulatory requirements including but not limited to the European Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) for the applicable devices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Disorders/Injuries

Browse trials for

03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 135 across 1,597 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Orthofix Inc. is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Both retrospective and prospective study subjects have spinal injuries/disorders requiring treatment with an Orthofix Spine device.

The three types of subject enrollment include:

  1. Retrospective data collection only
  2. Prospective data collection only
  3. Retrospective and prospective data collection

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient diagnosed with a spine injury/disorder and undergoing or has undergone spine procedure at the participating investigative centers utilizing Orthofix Spine devices.
  2. Patient is 18 years or older at the time of surgery.
  3. Patient is capable of understanding the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the prospective segment of the study.
  4. Patient is willing and able to participate in the prospective data collection protocol and comply with the required data collection.

Note: For retrospective segment of the study: A waiver of consent for retrospective data collection is in place OR an informed consent is obtained from the participating patient prior to data collection as required by local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

1. Patient may be excluded from study participation if there are other concurrent medical or other conditions (chronic or acute in nature) that in the opinion of the participating investigator may prevent participation or otherwise render patient ineligible for the study.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Implanted with Orthofix Spinal products

    Study will include 2000+ subjects implanted with Orthofix Spine devices including spine fixation systems and motion preservation systems (i.e. M6-C artificial cervical disc and M6-L artificial lumbar disc)

    Procedure: Spinal Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureSpinal Surgery

    Implanted with Orthofix Spinal products

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Assessment: Device or procedure related adverse events

    Evaluation of device related or procedure related adverse events

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  2. Primary Effectiveness Assessments: Fusion status measured radiographs

    Fusion status measured utilizing quantitative and qualitative radiographic assessments as applicable

    Time frame: Intra-operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  3. Primary Effectiveness Assessment

    Improvement in pain measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): NRS is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. Patients rate their current pain intensity at the time of the visit from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain") by selecting a number on a horizontal bar. NRS scores for the evaluation of pain have been categorized as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). VAS scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Time frame: Intra-operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  4. Primary Effectiveness Assessment

    Improvement in function as measured with Neck Disability Index (NDI) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). NDI includes 4 items that relate to subjective symptomatology (pain severity, headache, concentration, sleeping) and 6 items that relate to activities of daily living (lifting, work, driving, recreation, personal care, reading). Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores corresponding to greater disability. A total NDI score is determined by adding the scores of the individual questions and dividing that total by the maximum possible score (i.e., 50 if all questions are answered) to yield a percentage. Therefore, the NDI score ranges from 0 to 100. The ODI was developed as a specific outcomes tool for subjects suffering from back pain. The questionnaire scores 10 aspects of the subject's home and work life and analgesic use. The disability index is then calculated as a percentage with a high percentage indicating a high level of disability.

    Time frame: Intra-operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Safety Assessments: Additional required medical treatments and/or supplemental surgical procedure

    Additional required medical treatments and/or supplemental surgical procedure(s) at the index level (including revision, removal, reoperation, or supplemental fixation). Percentage of patients that required additional/supplemental treatments and/or surgical procedures and time to additional surgery.

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  2. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Quality of Life assessment

    Quality of Life score measured utilizing PROMIS-29 PROMIS®-29 Profile v2. PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. It can be used with the general population and with individuals living with chronic conditions. This instrument is comprised of 8 constructs: Physical Function; Anxiety; Depression; Fatigue; Sleep Disturbance; Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities; Pain Interference; and Pain Intensity that closely evaluate the impact of a patient's health on their quality of life

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  3. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Changes in neurological function

    Maintenance or improvement in neurological function Neurological function will be evaluated, where neurological examination is performed as part of standard of care. The outcome of neurological function assessment (normal versus abnormal) and details related to abnormal sensory function (i.e. absent/impaired/normal/other) will be collected as appropriate.

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  4. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Work and Activity status

    Work/Activity status Return to Work: The ability to and the time it takes for the subjects to return to work from the date of surgery will be documented. Return to Normal/Usual activities: The ability to and the time it takes for the subjects to return to normal daily activities from the date of surgery will be documented.

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  5. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction At ≥ 6-months after the index procedure, subjects will be asked how satisfied they are with the results of their surgery on a 5-point Likert Scale (Very Satisfied; Satisfied; Neutral; Unsatisfied; Very Unsatisfied).

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  6. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Duration of Surgery

    Surgery time

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  7. Secondary Effectiveness Assessments: Duration of Hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

  8. Secondary Safety Assessments: Device and/or procedure-related deficiencies

    Quantitative and qualitative radiographic assessments for evidence of device and/or procedure-related deficiencies. Inadequacy of a medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, usability, safety or performance will be documented. Percentage of patients with device deficiency will be reported

    Time frame: Pre-Operative to up to 10-years Post-Operative

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • Lanman Spinal Neurosurgery
    Beverly Hills, California 90210, United States
  • RasouliSpine
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Neurosurgical Medical Clinic
    San Diego, California 92111, United States
  • Acadiana Neurosurgery
    Lafayette, Louisiana 70508, United States
  • Columbus Orthopaedic
    Columbus, Mississippi 39705, United States
  • M3 Emerging Medical Research
    Durham, North Carolina 27704, United States
  • University Orthopedics
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02914, United States
  • Summit Brain, Spine and Orthopedics
    Lehi, Utah 84043, United States
  • Tuckahoe Orthopedics
    Richmond, Virginia 23226, United States
  • Marien-Krankenhaus Bergisch Gladbach
    Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
  • Stenum Ortho GmbH
    Ganderkesee, 27777, Germany
  • Praxis für Neurochirurgie-Chirotherapie
    Nordhausen, Germany
  • Orthopädikum Potsdam
    Potsdam, 14482, Germany
  • Krankenhaus Maria-Hilf Stadtlohn
    Stadtlohn, Germany
  • The Club Surgical Centre
    Pretoria, South Africa
  • Zuid-Afrikaans Hospital
    Pretoria, South Africa
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
    Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
    Santander, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05082090
Lead sponsor
Orthofix Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2021
Start date
Sep 15, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2025

Study contacts

Cahit Akbas
study director · Global Clinical Program Manager

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion