An interventional study of Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) in Violence by Teachers, sponsored by Bielefeld University. Completed at 1 site in Haiti. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-06.
Sponsored by Bielefeld University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Violence has severe and long-lasting negative consequences for children's and adolescents' well-being and academic functioning, which can hinder communities' and societies' economic growth. According to the Human Development Index, Haiti is one of the least developed countries in the world and the least developed in the Western hemisphere. Although Haiti has officially signed international and national laws aiming to protect children, preliminary reports suggest high rates of violence against children at schools. In addition to a lack of adequate training and supervision of teachers and an underdeveloped education system, attitudes favoring violence against children as an effective and acceptable discipline method and the lack of access to alternative non-violent strategies are likely to contribute to teachers' ongoing use of violence against children.
Notwithstanding, no school-level interventions addressing these factors to reduce violence by teachers have been scientifically evaluated in Haiti so far.
Thus, the present study tests the effectiveness of the preventative intervention Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) in primary schools in Haiti. Previous studies have provided initial evidence on the feasibility and effectiveness of ICC-T to reduce teacher violence in primary and secondary schools in Tanzania and secondary schools in Uganda. This study aims to provide first evidence for the effectiveness of ICC-T to reduce violence and to improve children's functioning (i.e. mental health, well-being, academic performance) in a cultural setting outside of Sub-Saharan Africa.
The study is designed as a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial with schools (clusters) as level of randomization. The study will be conducted in the Northern department of Haiti. Six schools in each of the 6 included communes will be randomly selected, resulting in a total number of 36 schools.
In each commune, three schools will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (that will receive the ICC-T intervention) and three schools to the control group (that will receive no intervention). At each school, 28 students (stratified by gender) in the 4th grade of primary School (between 9 and 11 years of age) and all teachers (at least 13) will be recruited. Thus, the final sample will comprise at least 1008 students and at least 468 teachers.
The study will have two data assessment points: baseline assessment prior to the intervention and follow-up assessment six to 12 months after the intervention. In addition, feasibility data will be assessed in the intervention group at the beginning and the end of the intervention. Primary outcome measures are student- and teacher-reported physical and emotional violence by teachers in the past week. Secondary outcome measures include teachers' attitudes towards violence against students, children's emotional and behavioral problems, quality of life, and cognitive functioning.
Bielefeld University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Students: Enrollment in class 4 of primary school
Teachers: All teachers employed at the school
Schools:
Exclusion Criteria:
Students and teachers:
Schools:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
5 days with 9 hours of training for teachers. Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting
Behavioral: Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T)
No intervention
Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting. A one-day ICC-T refresher workshop aiming to refresh and re-emphasize the key aspects of the intervention is implemented about 6 to 12 months after the initial intervention.
Change of students' exposure to emotional and physical violence by teachers
The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess students' self-reported experiences of emotional and physical violence by teachers at school in the past week. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers. We hypothesize a stronger reduction of exposure to violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of teachers' use of emotional and physical violence
The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess teachers' use of emotional and physical violent discipline measures against students in the past week. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers. We hypothesize a stronger reduction of the use of violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of teachers' positive attitudes towards emotional and physical violence
Teacher's attitudes towards emotional and physical violence will be assessed with an adapted version of the Conflict Tactic Scale (CTS). Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive attitudes towards violence. We hypothesize a stronger decrease of positive attitudes towards violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The adapted version of CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of student's mental health
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - Youth Report (PSC-Y) will assess students' emotional and behavioral problems. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' mental health problems. We hypothesize a stronger reduction of mental health problems in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The PSC-Y will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of students' quality of life
The KIDSCREEN-10 will assess students' quality of life. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' quality of life. We hypothesize a stronger increase of quality of life in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The KIDSCREEN-10 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of students' cognitive functioning
Four tasks from the tablet application Psych Lab 101 will be used to assess children's cognitive abilities including selective attention, working memory, interference control and impulsivity. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' cognitive abilities. We hypothesize higher levels of cognitive functioning in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The app-based tasks will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention)
Change of students' academic performance
Purpose-built tests will be used to assess students' numeracy and literacy skills. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' academic skills. In addition, students' grades in the previous term's exams will be obtained from the school administration. A change in academic performance in the intervention group is hypothesized.
Time frame: he standardized achievement tests will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention).
Change of Students' social competence
The Social Cognitive Map Technique will assess students' social competence through peer nominations. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' social competence. We hypothesize a stronger increase of social competence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The Social Cognitive Map Technique - peer nomination will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention).
Change of peer violence
The Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale will be used assess students' experiences of violence by peers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' experiences of peer violence. We hypothesize a stronger decrease of peer violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
Time frame: The Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 6-12 months after intervention).
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Nov 2021 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 34 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Bielefeld University