CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06369025PreVioUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Preventing Physical and Emotional Violence by Parents and Teachers in Public Schools in Tanzania (ICC-T/ICC-P_Tanz)

An interventional study of Interaction Competencies with Children in Violence, sponsored by Bielefeld University. Completed at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Bielefeld University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,848
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

More than 1.7 billion children worldwide experience violence in their upbringing. Prevalence rates are particularly high in Africa. Toxic stress associated with violence impacts the developing brain. This affects behavioral, social, and emotional functioning of children. The present project will test an intervention that simultaneously aims at reducing violence against children at home and at school. Within the project, (1) the feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of the Intervention and (2) the initial effectiveness of reducing parental and teacher violence will be tested. To this end, a mixed-methods two-arm school-based pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT) in Tanzania will be conducted.

One unique and novel aspect of this project is to test a school-based intervention approach that targets both teachers and parents. A school-based approach including both teachers and parents has the following key advantages: (1) parents of different social, economic, and educational backgrounds can be motivated to participate and (2) using the existing infrastructure of schools reduces costs and will later improve the scalability of the program. The project is bringing together the global health, development economy, and psychological perspectives to promote our collaboration within the German global health community and with research and policy partners in Tanzania.

Read the detailed description

The study is a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial with 16 primary schools (clusters) in the Urban District of Morogoro in Eastern Tanzania as level of randomization. The eligible schools are located in 20 wards (smallest administrative unit). To avoid cross-over effects between the study conditions, only one school per ward will be selected. To select the final sample of schools, 16 out of the 20 wards schools will be randomly selected and then one school from each ward. Then pairs of schools will be randomly formed. These has primarily logistical reasons: Due to the short project period (12 months), the implementation of the intervention will start after completion of the baseline assessment in the first pair of schools and after randomly allocation of the first school to the intervention condition. The selection and allocation of the schools will be performed by an independent researcher neither belonging to the core research team nor involved in data collection process.

At each school, 45 students in the in 5th school grade, 90 parents (45 mothers \& 45 fathers = 90 parents) and 25 teacher will be recruited. Thus the final sample will comprise 720 students, 720 parent pairs (720 mothers \& 720 fathers) and 400 teachers at baseline across 16 schools.

The study will have two data assessment points: baseline assessment prior to the intervention, the one follow-up assessment three months after the intervention. In addition, feasibility data will be assessed in the intervention group at the beginning and the end of the intervention. The cluster-randomized control trails will additionally be accompanied by a process evaluation.Qualitative information will be collected after intervention training of parents and teachers to complement the quantitative data.

Primary outcome measures are student-, parents- and teacher-reported physical and emotional violence by the parents or teachers in the past week. Secondary outcome measures include adult-child relationship, children's emotional and behavioral problems, quality of life, parents' and teachers' stress level and school climate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Violence

Keywords

  • school violence
  • teacher violence
  • parental violence
  • family violence
  • children
  • public schools
  • primary schools
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bielefeld University is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

General:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Schools:

  • Public primary schools
  • at least 45 students in selected class/ stream
  • least 25 but no more than 50 employed teacher in selected school.

All participants:

- Written informed consent (if underaged by parents (written) \& minors themselves (orally)

Students:

  • Enrollment in selected public primary school, age between 9 and 13 years
  • living with their caregiver or parents near to the schools

Teachers:

  • employed at the selected schools
  • aged between 18 and 60 years of age (statutory retirement age)

Parents:

  • their child is participating in the study and is enrolled in a study's eligible school,
  • social parent (the parent currently taking care of the child independent of the biological relationship to the children; social parents can be biological parents, step-parents, foster parents, relatives, etc.)
  • aged between 16 and 80 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria (all participants):

  • Acute drug or alcohol intoxication,
  • acute psychotic disorder
  • severe mental disabilities
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,848 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICC-T & ICC-P

    ICC-T: 5 days with 8 hours of training for teachers. Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting. ICC-P: 4 days with 8 hours of training for parents. Core training components include parents-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened children and implementation of the training materials into the daily home setting

    Behavioral: Interaction Competencies with Children

  • No intervention
    Monitoring condition

    No intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralInteraction Competencies with Children

    Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting. Interaction Competencies with Children - for Parents (ICC-P) Core training components include parents-child interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the home

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction of children's exposure to emotional and physical violence by parents and teachers

    The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess children's self-reported experiences of emotional and physical violence by parents at home and teachers at school in the past week. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by parents or teachers. A stronger reduction of exposure to violence in the children of parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  2. Reduction of parents' or teachers' use of emotional and physical violence

    The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess parents' and teachers' use of emotional and physical violent discipline measures against children in the past week. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by parents or teachers. A stronger reduction of violence use by parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of parents' and teachers' attitudes towards emotional and physical violence

    Teachers' and parents' attitudes towards emotional and physical violence will be assessed with an adapted version of the Conflict Tactic Scale (CTS). Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive attitudes towards violence. A stronger reduction of favourable attitudes towards violence of parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The adapted version of CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  2. Improvement of children's mental health

    The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - Youth Report (PSC-Y) will assess children's emotional and behavioral problems reported by children and parents. Higher scores indicate higher levels of children's mental health problems. A stronger improvement of mental health problems in the children of parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The PSC-Y will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (first follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  3. Increase of children's quality of life

    The KIDSCREEN-10 will assess children's quality of life reported by children and parents. Higher scores indicate higher levels of children's quality of life. A stronger increase of quality of life in the children of parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The KIDSCREEN-10 will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  4. Improvement of school climate

    The Teacher Relationship with Colleagues will assess school climate reported by teachers. Higher scores indicate higher quality of school climate. A stronger increase of school climate quality in the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The Teacher Relationship with Colleagues will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

Other outcomes

  1. Reduction of children's perceived stress

    The Stress Scale for Kids will assess the perceived stress of children reported by children. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. A stronger decrease of children's perceived stress in the children of parents and teachers of the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The Stress Scale for Kids will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  2. Reduction of parents' and teachers' perceived stress

    The Parental Stress Scale will assess the perceived stress of parents reported by parents. The Teachers Stress Inventory will assess the perceived stress of teachers reported by teachers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. A stronger decrease of parents' and teachers' perceived stress in the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: The Parental Stress Scale and the Teachers Stress Inventory will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  3. Improvement of teachers' decision making

    The Teacher Participation in Decision Making will assess the teachers' decision making strategies reported by teachers. Higher scores indicate better decision making strategies. A stronger increase indecision making strategies in the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: Teacher Participation in Decision Making will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

  4. Improvement of teachers' self-efficacy

    The Teachers Sense of Efficacy Scale will assess the teachers' self-efficacy reported by teachers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy. A stronger increase of self-efficacy in the intervention group compared to the control group is hypothesized.

    Time frame: Teachers Sense of Efficacy Scale will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Daressalaam University College of Education
    Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mattonet K, Kabelege E, Mkinga G, Kolwey L, Nkuba M, Masath FB, Hermenau K, Schupp C, Steinert JI, Hecker T. School-based prevention of teacher and parental violence against children: Study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 31;24(1):2367. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19888-7. PubMed 39217292 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The ICC-T intervention is being tested in various other countries including Haiti, Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda. ICC-P is being pilot tested in Tanzania. We will share anonymized data with project partners from the different countries for combined and/or comparative analyses. In addition, we will share anonymized data with other researchers working on prevention of violence against children in school settings for the purpose of conducting synthesizing analyses such as meta-analyses. Finally, the anonymized data collected in the study will be made publicly available in a data repository.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06369025
Lead sponsor
Bielefeld University
Collaborators
Technical University of Munich, Dar es Salaam University College of Edcuation, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
Responsible party
Tobias Hecker, PhD (Prof. Dr., Bielefeld University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2024
Start date
Apr 15, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2025
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Tobias Hecker, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Bielefeld University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion