ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05070728Updated Dec 19, 2024Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of an Injectable Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal (FAI) Insert

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sham Injector and FAI Insert in Uveitis, Uveitis, Posterior and Uveitis, Intermediate, sponsored by EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-19.

Sponsored by EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
No longer pursuing indication
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal (FAI) insert in the management of subjects with chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye.

Read the detailed description

This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, masked, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an injectable FAI insert for the management of subjects with chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye. Subjects were randomized to receive either a sham injection or the FAI insert and were observed for 1 year following treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uveitis
  • Uveitis, Posterior
  • Uveitis, Intermediate

Keywords

  • EYP-2102
  • EyePoint
  • Uveitis
03

In context

Uveitis

299 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 30 across 175 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or non-pregnant female at least 18 years of age at time of consent.
  2. One or both eyes had a history of recurrent non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye (intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis) with or without anterior uveitis >1 year duration.
  3. During the 52 weeks prior to enrollment (Day 1), the subject must have received treatment for uveitis in the study eye with:

    1. Systemic or other systemic therapies for at least 12 consecutive or non-consecutive weeks, AND/OR
    2. at least 2 intra- or peri-ocular administrations of corticosteroid in the study eye, OR
    3. the study eye has experienced recurrence of uveitis at least 2 separate times requiring systemic, intra- or peri-ocular injection of corticosteroid.
  4. At the time of enrollment (Day 1), the study eye has \<10 anterior chamber cells/HPF (high power field) and a vitreous haze ≤ grade 2.
  5. Visual acuity of study eye ≥15 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
  6. Not planning to undergo elective ocular surgery during the study.
  7. Able to understand and sign the Form (ICF).
  8. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

Ocular Exclusion Criteria (for the study eye, unless indicated otherwise):

  1. History of posterior uveitis only that is not accompanied by vitritis or macular edema.
  2. History of iritis only associated with no vitreous cells, anterior chamber cells, or vitreous haze at Day 1.
  3. Uveitis with infectious etiology.
  4. Vitreous hemorrhage.
  5. Intraocular inflammation associated with a condition other than noninfectious uveitis (eg, intraocular lymphoma).
  6. Uveitis limited to the anterior segment, ie, anterior uveitis only.
  7. Ocular in either eye, including choroidal melanoma.
  8. Previous viral retinitis.
  9. Toxoplasmosis scar or scar related to previous viral retinitis in the study eye.
  10. Current viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva including epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, and varicella, mycobacterial infections of the eye, or fungal diseases of ocular structures.
  11. Media opacity precluding evaluation of retina and vitreous.
  12. Peripheral retinal detachment in area of insertion.
  13. Diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension at Screening, unless previously treated with an incisional surgery procedure that has resulted in stable intraocular pressure (IOP) in the normal range [10-21 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)].
  14. IOP >21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at Screening with any IOP lowering pharmacologic agent.
  15. Chronic hypotony (\<6 mmHg).
  16. Ocular surgery within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.
  17. Capsulotomy within 30 days prior to Day 1.
  18. Prior intravitreal treatment with Retisert®, ILUVIEN®, or YUTIQ® (0.18 mg) within 156 weeks prior to Day 1.
  19. Prior intravitreal treatment with OZURDEX® or sub-choroidal injection with XIPERE™ within 24 weeks prior to Day 1.
  20. Prior intravitreal treatment with Triesence® or TRIVARIS™ within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.
  21. Peri-ocular or subtenon steroid treatment within 12 weeks prior to Day 1.

    All other Exclusion Criteria:

  22. Allergy to fluocinolone acetonide or any component of Yutiq 0.05 mg.
  23. Requirement for chronic systemic or inhaled corticosteroid therapy (>15mg prednisone daily) or chronic systemic therapy.
  24. History of certain skin cancers (specifically, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma), any malignancy receiving treatment, or in remission less than 5 years prior to Day 1.
  25. Positive test for (HIV) or syphilis during Screening.
  26. Mycobacterial uveitis or chorioretinal changes of either eye which, in the opinion of the Investigator, result from infectious mycobacterial uveitis.
  27. Systemic infection within 30 days prior to Day 1.
  28. Any severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that could increase the risk associated with study participation or could interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the Investigator, could make the subject inappropriate for study enrollment.
  29. Any other systemic or ocular condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, could make the subject inappropriate for study enrollment.
  30. Treatment with an drug or device within 30 days prior to Day 1.
  31. Pregnant or nursing females; females of who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of as outlined in the protocol from at least 14 days prior to Day 1 until the 52-week Visit.
  32. Unlikely to comply with the study protocol or who are likely to be lost to follow-up within 52 weeks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Comparator

    Intravitreal sham injection

    Drug: Sham Injector

  • Active comparator
    FAI insert (0.05 mg fluocinolone acetonide)

    Fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreal 0.05 mg insert (Yutiq 0.05 mg).

    Drug: FAI Insert

Interventions

  • DrugSham Injector

    Intravitreal sham injection

    Also known as: Sham Comparator

  • DrugFAI Insert

    Yutiq 0.05 mg contains 0.05 mg FA and was designed to deliver FA into the vitreous humor for at least 24 weeks. Yutiq 0.05 mg was administered to the study eye by injection through the pars plana using a pre-loaded applicator with a 25-gauge needle.

    Also known as: Active Drug

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 24

    Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit; or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 52

    Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

    Time frame: Week 52

  2. Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Fellow Eye at Weeks 24 and 52

    Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye at Weeks 24 and 52

    The BCVA was measured according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The ETDRS letter score calculated when 20 or more letters were read correctly at 4.0 meters; the visual acuity letter score was equal to the total number of letters read correctly at 4.0 meters plus 30. The score ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate positive outcome measure.

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  4. Number of Recurrences of Uveitis Within 24 and 52 Weeks

    Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  5. Time to Recurrence of Uveitis Through Weeks 24 and 52

    Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  6. Number of Adjunctive Treatments Required to Treat Recurrences of Uveitis at 24 and 52 Weeks

    Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit). In the event of a uveitis recurrence in either eye, peri-ocular or intraocular corticosteroid injections, or topical medications administered as first line local therapy.

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  7. Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Iridocyclitis in the Study Eye Compared to Baseline at 24 and 52 Weeks

    Iridocyclitis was defined as a \>2-step increase in anterior chamber cells per high-power field (HPF) (1.6\*using a 1-millimeter beam).

    Time frame: Weeks 24 and 52

  8. Percentage of Subjects With Resolution of Macular Edema at Day 28 and Months 2, 3, 6 and 12

    The macular edema was measured by spectral-domain - optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging.

    Time frame: At Day 28 and Months 2, 3, 6 and 12

07

Results

Posted Dec 19, 2024
Limitations and caveats
The Sponsor made the decision to stop study enrollment and terminate the study for reasons other than safety or efficacy in early May 2022 upon receipt of FDA comments on the clinical program in January 2022.

Participant flow

This Phase 3 prospective, controlled study was conducted in subjects with chronic non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye at 8 sites in the United States between 13 October 2021 and 12 April 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Started66
Completed60
Not completed06
Withdrew: Sponsor decided to stop study enrollment and terminate the study06

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 24

Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit; or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 24
percentage of subjectsFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 240 (0 to 45.9)—
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 52

Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 52
percentage of subjectsFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Percentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Study Eye at Week 520 (0 to 45.9)—
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Uveitis in the Fellow Eye at Weeks 24 and 52

Recurrence was defined as: * An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or * A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye at Weeks 24 and 52

The BCVA was measured according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The ETDRS letter score calculated when 20 or more letters were read correctly at 4.0 meters; the visual acuity letter score was equal to the total number of letters read correctly at 4.0 meters plus 30. The score ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate positive outcome measure.

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye at Weeks 24 and 52
score on a scaleFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Week 249.7 ± 4.93—
Weeks 5216.8 ± 12.11—
SecondaryNumber of Recurrences of Uveitis Within 24 and 52 Weeks

Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Number · recurrences of uveitis
Number of Recurrences of Uveitis Within 24 and 52 Weeks
recurrences of uveitisFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Week 240—
Week 520—
SecondaryTime to Recurrence of Uveitis Through Weeks 24 and 52

Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit).

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Adjunctive Treatments Required to Treat Recurrences of Uveitis at 24 and 52 Weeks

Recurrence was defined as: An increase in the vitreous haze of ≥2 steps compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit); or A deterioration in visual acuity of at least 15 letters BCVA compared to baseline or any visit time point prior to the Week 24 visit (or the Week 52 visit). In the event of a uveitis recurrence in either eye, peri-ocular or intraocular corticosteroid injections, or topical medications administered as first line local therapy.

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Recurrence of Iridocyclitis in the Study Eye Compared to Baseline at 24 and 52 Weeks

Iridocyclitis was defined as a \>2-step increase in anterior chamber cells per high-power field (HPF) (1.6\*using a 1-millimeter beam).

Time frame:
Weeks 24 and 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Resolution of Macular Edema at Day 28 and Months 2, 3, 6 and 12

The macular edema was measured by spectral-domain - optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging.

Time frame:
At Day 28 and Months 2, 3, 6 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Resolution of Macular Edema at Day 28 and Months 2, 3, 6 and 12
percentage of subjectsFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham Injection
Day 28 - Yes50.060.0
Day 28 - No50.040.0
Month 2 - Yes50.075.0
Month 2 - No50.025.0
Month 3 - Yes40.033.3
Month 3 - No60.066.7
Month 6 - Yes20.0—
Month 6 - No80.0—
Month 12 - Yes75.0—
Month 12 - No25.0—

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events were collected from the study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 52 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Study Eye0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)4/6 (66.7%)
Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Fellow Eye0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)4/6 (66.7%)
Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Systemic0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)
Sham Injection- Study Eye0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)2/6 (33.3%)
Sham Injection- Fellow Eye0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)
Sham Injection- Systemic0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)0/6 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Study EyeFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Fellow EyeFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - SystemicSham Injection- Study EyeSham Injection- Fellow EyeSham Injection- Systemic
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders0/60/60/61/60/61/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Study EyeFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - Fellow EyeFluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mg - SystemicSham Injection- Study EyeSham Injection- Fellow EyeSham Injection- Systemic
Epiretinal membraneEye disorders1/60/60/60/60/60/6
Optic atrophyEye disorders1/61/60/60/60/60/6
Posterior capsule opacificationEye disorders1/61/60/60/60/60/6
Vision blurredEye disorders1/61/60/61/60/60/6
Vitreal cellsEye disorders0/60/60/61/60/60/6
Vitreous hazeEye disorders0/60/60/61/60/60/6
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations1/61/60/61/61/60/6
Ear infectionInfections and infestations0/60/61/60/60/60/6
Anterior chamber cellEye disorders0/61/60/60/60/60/6
Hypotony of eyeEye disorders0/60/60/60/61/60/6

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set included all subjects who were randomized.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham InjectionTotal
Mean52.3 ± 12.4851.7 ± 19.2352.0 ± 15.46
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham InjectionTotal
Female347
Male325
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham InjectionTotal
Black or African American213
White358
Missing101
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.05 mgSham InjectionTotal
Hispanic or Latino022
Not Hispanic or Latino347
Not Stated101
Unknown202
08

Study locations

1 site
  • EyePoint Study Site
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05070728
Lead sponsor
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2021
Start date
Oct 13, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2023
Completion
Apr 12, 2023
Results posted
Dec 19, 2024
Last update
Dec 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion