CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05067803Updated Apr 11, 2022

Study for the Assessment of USEG Software.

An observational study in Cardiac Disease, sponsored by UltraSight. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-11.

Sponsored by UltraSight · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
99
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The product is comprised of software that aids in automated guided ultrasound image acquisition for novice users (medical professional without experience in performing echocardiography, e.g. nurses, physicians assistants, medical doctors, medical student etc.).

The software provides real-time feedback during image acquisition to optimize image capture and determine whether image quality is sufficient for medical evaluation. The software is designed to be used with any echocardiographic ultrasound system. The Philips Lumify hand-held ultrasound device will be used for this study.

  • Images can be acquired manually by a novice user.
  • Each novice user will have a training course of 8 hours, before the study commences.
Read the detailed description

Study Design:

This pilot study is a single center, multi-reader multi-case study, primarily designed to obtain the quality of the echocardiography exam, obtained by novice users when using the USEG software.

Eligible subject will undergo the examination twice on a single study visit : once by one of novice users when using the USEG software and once by one of the expert sonographers without the aid of the software.

Each novice user will perform the examination on approximately 30 subjects (depending on the number of novice user, with the aim that the number of examinations by each novice will be the same).

The assignment of the novice user and expert sonographer to subjects and their order within a subject will be based upon their availability once the subject's is enrolled. In case of more than 1 available novice, the exam will be assigned to the novice with the least exams performed so far.

At least 10 subjects will be enrolled from each of the following three BMI groups= \< 25; =25 to \<30; => 30.

Study Procedures:

After an informed consent is obtained, screening was completed and eligibility has been confirmed, each subject will undergo the examination twice on the day of visit (Day 1): once by a novice user and once by an expert sonographer.

In case of any administrative delay, the investigator may address the issue with the sponsor, and upon approval, the second examination may be postponed in up to 96 hours.

The novice user will obtain at least 10 clips using the UltraSight guidance software for 10 pre-defined views from each patient, and an expert sonographer will obtain 10 clips for the same at least 10 views without the aid of the UltraSight software.

The order in which the novice user and expert sonographer performs the examination per patient will be based on their availability once the subject's is enrolled. In case of more than 1 available novice, the exam will be assigned to the novice with the least exams performed so far.

Adverse events will be monitored throughout the visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Diseases

3,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Diseases; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is below the median of 294 across 1,241 observational studies indexed under Heart Diseases.

Browse Heart Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

UltraSight is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Up to 100 male and female adults confirmed as eligible according to eligibility criteria.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 and older
  2. Subjects willing and able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency (non-elective) admission within 24 h prior to participating in the study
  2. Female subjects who are pregnant (WOCBP* will perform a urine pregnancy test)
  3. Unable to lie as required in all the classic positions for standard TTE exam: supine on back / left decubitus.
  4. Subjects who currently participate a clinical trial, involving interventional cardiac devices
  5. Subjects who have prior Echo exam with description of Low/Poor quality exam in the echo report
  6. Subjects with BMI above 40
  7. Subjects experiencing a known or suspected acute cardiac event
  8. Subjects with severe chest wall deformity as per previous medical records and physical examination
  9. Subjects who have undergone pneumonectomy
  10. Subjects whose anatomy does not lend itself to yield diagnosable echocardiography clips (i.e. situs inversus with dextrocardia, single ventricle anatomy due to congenital heart defect, etc.)

    • A woman is of childbearing potential if she is postmenarchal, has not reached a postmenopausal state (≥12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and is not permanently infertile due to surgery (i.e., removal of ovaries, fallopian tubes, and/or uterus) or another cause as determined by the investigator (e.g., Müllerian agenesis.)
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the quality of clips obtained by novice users when using the USEG software.

    The expert cardiologists will evaluate whether the echo examination has sufficient to evaluate each of the primary endpoints: 1. Sufficient quality to assess Left Ventricular (LV) size: (YES/NO) 2. Sufficient quality to assess LV function: (Yes/No) 3. Sufficient quality to assess Right Ventricular size: (Yes/No) 4. Sufficient quality to assess presence of non-trivial pericardial effusion: (Yes/No)

    Time frame: 1 year.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sufficient quality assessment for six (6) anatomic elements.

    The expert cardiologists will evaluate whether the echo examination has sufficient quality to evaluate the following six (6) anatomic elements: 1. Qualitative visual assessment of RV function: (Yes/No) 2. Qualitative visual assessment of left atrium size: (Yes/No) 3. Qualitative visual assessment of Aortic valve structure: (Yes/No) 4. Qualitative visual assessment of Mitral valve structure: (Yes/No) 5. Qualitative visual assessment of Tricuspid valve structure: (Yes/No) 6. Qualitative visual assessment of IVC size: (Yes/No)

    Time frame: 1 year.

  2. Diagnostic quality assessment.

    The expert cardiologists will evaluate if each of the following 10 views can be considered of diagnostic quality: * Apical 4 chamber * Apical 2 chamber * Apical 3 chamber * Apical 5 chamber * Para Sternal Long Axis * Para Sternal short axis - Aortic Valve (AV) * Para Sternal short axis - Mitral Valve (MV) * Para Sternal short axis - Papillary Muscle (PM) * Sub Costal - 4 chamber * Sub Costal - Inferior Vena Cava (IVC)f

    Time frame: 1 year.

Other outcomes

  1. Safety outcome.

    Adverse Events.

    Time frame: 1 year.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sheba MC
    Ramat Gan, Israel
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05067803
Lead sponsor
UltraSight
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2021
Start date
Dec 24, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 23, 2022
Completion
Jan 23, 2022
Last update
Apr 11, 2022

Study contacts

Robert Klempfner, MD
principal investigator · Sheba MC
Danny Spiegelstein, MD
study director · UltraSight

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion