ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05066451Updated Mar 2, 2022

5% and 15% Dextrose Prolotherapy Efficacy in Lateral Epicondylitis

An interventional study of %5 dextrose prolotherapy and %15 dextrose prolotherapy in Lateral Epicondylitis, sponsored by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-02.

Sponsored by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2021, registered Sep 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, 5% dextrose prolotherapy is aimed to be more reliable than 15% prolotherapy in terms of side effects and to show that it is similar in terms of efficacy in treatment.

Read the detailed description

For this prospective randomized controlled study, volunteer patients who met the inclusion criteria and applied to the Health Sciences University, Istanbul Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic will be included in the study. Participants who volunteered for the study will be divided into study groups and control groups by stratified randomization. A total of 26 volunteers will be recruited.

A solution to be used for prolotherapy is containing 30% dextrose, 2% lidocaine, and physiological saline.

In the beginning, all patients were asked about gender, age, body mass index, education level, occupation, duration of complaint, dominant side and affected extremity, previous treatments, and when the last treatment was applied.

Patients in the study group will receive a total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 5% dextrose at the beginning(0.) 3rd week and 6th week.

Prolotherapy was planned with the multiplanar injection technique (peppering technique) after palpating the most sensitive point on the lateral epicondyle and entering the lateral epicondyle from here and ensuring bone contact.

Patients in the control group will receive a total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 15% dextrose, initially (0.) Week 3 and Week 6. The injection will be made with the same method as the study group.

Measurements; will be evaluated at baseline (week 0), immediately after treatment at Week 3, Week 6, and Week 12.

Patients; In the evaluation of the visual analog scale (VAS), quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), Grip strength, hand dynamometer measurements, and adverse events during the study period will be noted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lateral Epicondylitis

Keywords

  • lateral epicondylitis
  • dextrose prolotherapy
  • pain
  • injection
03

In context

Tennis Elbow

296 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 50 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pain score ≥3 according to VAS for more than 3 months in the lateral elbow joint
  • tenderness on palpation over the lateral epicondyle
  • Positiveness in at least two of the tests specific to lateral epicondylitis(LE) (Mills test, resistant middle finger extension and cozen test),
  • > 20 years old , \< 60 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received physical therapy modalities and/or steroid injections in the last 3 months,
  • Having a history of malignancy,
  • Pregnant cases,
  • Those who have bone and joint diseases in the neck, shoulder and elbow,
  • Patients with infection in the treatment area,
  • Patients with arrhythmia or pacemaker in the heart,
  • Patients receiving coagulation disorder or anticoagulant therapy,
  • Those with local dermatological problems,
  • Patients with a history of surgery in the elbow joint,
  • Having a tendon tear
  • Presence of nerve involvement
  • Lack of cooperation and refusal to participate in the study due to cognitive dysfunction
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    %5 dextrose prolotherapy

    A total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 5% dextrose will be applied at the beginning, 3rd week, and the 6th week.

    Other: %5 dextrose prolotherapy

  • Active comparator
    %15 dextrose prolotherapy

    A total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 15% dextrose will be applied at the beginning, 3rd week, and the 6th week.

    Other: %15 dextrose prolotherapy

Interventions

  • Other%5 dextrose prolotherapy

    Patients in the study group will receive a total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 5% dextrose at the beginning(0.) 3rd week and 6th week. Prolotherapy was planned with the multiplanar injection technique (peppering technique) after palpating the most sensitive point on the lateral epicondyle and entering the lateral epicondyle from here and ensuring bone contact.

  • Other%15 dextrose prolotherapy

    Patients in the study group will receive a total of 3 sessions of prolotherapy solution containing 15% dextrose at the beginning(0.) 3rd week and 6th week. Prolotherapy was planned with the multiplanar injection technique (peppering technique) after palpating the most sensitive point on the lateral epicondyle and entering the lateral epicondyle from here and ensuring bone contact.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The upper extremity disability level

    The upper extremity disability level will be evaluated by using the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) scale. The maximum score is 100 points. A higher score indicates a worse disability level.

    Time frame: Change from baseline upper extremity disability level at 3, 6, and 12 weeks

  2. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity will be evaluated by using a visual analog scale (VAS). The maximum score is 10 points. A higher score indicates a worse pain level.

    Time frame: Change from baseline pain intensity at 3, 6, and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hand grip strength

    The standard evaluation tool (a hand dynamometer) will used for measuring grip and squeeze strength minimum value 0 and there is not maximum value, bigger values mean better outcome

    Time frame: Change from baseline hand grip strength at 3, 6, and 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • İstanbul physical medicine rehabilitation training &research hospital
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fornalski S, Gupta R, Lee TQ. Anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003 Dec;7(4):168-78. doi: 10.1097/00130911-200312000-00008. PubMed 16518218 ↗
  • Kahlenberg CA, Knesek M, Terry MA. New Developments in the Use of Biologics and Other Modalities in the Management of Lateral Epicondylitis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:439309. doi: 10.1155/2015/439309. Epub 2015 May 31. PubMed 26114106 ↗
  • Rabago D, Slattengren A, Zgierska A. Prolotherapy in primary care practice. Prim Care. 2010 Mar;37(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.09.013. PubMed 20188998 ↗
  • Jensen KT, Rabago DP, Best TM, Patterson JJ, Vanderby R Jr. Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model. J Orthop Res. 2008 Jun;26(6):816-23. doi: 10.1002/jor.20600. PubMed 18240327 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05066451
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2021
Start date
Feb 1, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Feb 25, 2022
Last update
Mar 2, 2022

Study contacts

Gokhan Taskin, MD
principal investigator · Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospita
Fatma Nur Kesiktas, Prof
study chair · Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospita

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion