CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05065320TIMCIUpdated Oct 31, 2023

Tools for the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: Cross-country Quasi-experimental Pre-post Study in Kenya and Senegal

An observational study in Childhood Severe Illness, Pneumonia and Primary Health Care, sponsored by Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 5 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-31.

Sponsored by Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
51,590
Ages
1 Day to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

By introducing pulse oximetry, with or without clinical decision support algorithms, to primary care facilities in India, Kenya, Senegal and Tanzania, the Tools for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (TIMCI) project aims to contribute to reducing morbidity and mortality for sick children under-five while supporting the rational and efficient use of diagnostics and medicines by healthcare providers.

The multi-country, multi-method evaluation aims to generate evidence on the health and quality of care impact, operational priorities, cost and cost-effectiveness of introducing these tools to facilitate national and international decision-making on scale-up.

Read the detailed description

This registry entry describes the quasi-experimental pre-post studies conducted in Kenya and Senegal. In India and Tanzania, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are conducted (NCT04910750). These studies evaluating health, clinical and quality of care impact are complemented by embedded multi-method studies in all countries, including modified Service Provision Assessments, facility-based process mapping and time-flow studies, in-depth interviews (IDIs) with caregivers and healthcare providers, online key stakeholder surveys and key informant interviews, routine data review, and an economic evaluation.

We enrol sick children 0 to 59 months of age attending government primary care facilities in before and after implementation of pulse oximetry and CDSA. Interventions are implemented with a package of training on the use of devices and refresher IMCI, supportive supervision, operational support and community engagement.

As part of the intervention, facilities are provided with handheld, UNICEF-approved, pulse oximeters along with guidance and training for healthcare providers. In Senegal, healthcare providers are advised to measure oxygen saturation (SpO2) on all children under 2 months of age, all children 2 to 59 months of age with cough or difficulty breathing or with signs of moderate or severe disease based on Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI); in Kenya, healthcare providers are advised to measure oxygen saturation for all sick children. Providers are advised to urgently refer children with SpO2 \<90% in Kenya and \<92% in Senegal. The tablet-based CDSA provides step-by-step support to healthcare providers through consultations, providing national guideline-based recommendations on assessment, diagnosis and treatment based tailored to the individual child based on information entered by the provider. Following training, providers are advised to use CDSA for all consultations with sick children under 5 years of age.

Sociodemographic and clinical data are collected from caregivers and records of enrolled sick children at study facilities, with phone follow-up on Day 7. Two primary outcomes are assessed for the quasi-experimental pre-post study: referrals to a higher level of care at Day 0 consultation; and antibiotic prescriptions on Day 0. These reflect the aim that the intervention increases detection of severe disease, and therefore increasing referral, whilst promoting antimicrobial stewardship, and therefore reducing antibiotic prescription. Secondary outcomes, relating to hypoxaemia, hospitalisation, referral, antimicrobial prescription, follow-up, health status are further detailed in the attached full protocol and statistical analysis plan available.

The pre-post study sample size was originally estimated for a planned 15 month study, with 3 months pre- (Q1) and 12 months post-intervention (Q2-5), with comparison of Q1 and Q5 for the primary outcome. Calculations were based on detecting a ≥50% increase in Day 0 referrals (from 3%, based on DHIS2, SPA and facility estimates), with 80% power, 0.05 alpha and ICC of 0.00547. A relatively large detectable difference was chosen given that a relatively high proportion of referrals may not be completed.5 46 Day 0 referrals, rather than antibiotic prescriptions (with baseline estimated at 60% with ICC 0.05), drove the sample size calculation. We estimated needing 17 facilities, recruiting an average of 690 children per facility per 3-month period in Kenya, and 18 facilities recruiting 510 children per facility per period in Senegal.

Following lower than anticipated recruitment in the baseline of the pre-post study, sample size was re-evaluated resulting in a decision to add two facilities per country, extend the baseline (to 6-7 months), and reduce the post-intervention period (to 9-10 months). A minimum of 7429 and 6760 children were estimated to be needed in each period in Kenya and Senegal respectively, with recruitment continuing after meeting the minimum sample size in order to allow for description of changes over time and with overlapping seasonal periods, in line with the intention of the original design.

Study approval has been granted by all relevant institutional review boards, national and WHO ethical review committees. Findings will be shared with communities, healthcare providers, Ministries of Health and other local, national and international stakeholders to facilitate evidence-based decision-making on scale-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Childhood Severe Illness
  • Pneumonia
  • Primary Health Care
  • Hypoxia
  • Referreal and Consultation
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical
  • Oxymetry

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Children 0 - 59 months, for whom caregivers provide consent, will be eligible if attending any study facility with an illness, excluding those admitted as inpatients within the facility, or attending for a consultation related to trauma only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children 0-59 months of age for whom caregivers provide consent
  • Consulting for an illness, or reported to be unwell when attending for a routine visit (e.g. vaccination, growth or chronic disease monitoring)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children in the immediate post-natal period or first day of life
  • Attending for a consultation related to trauma only (including new and follow-up presentations for burns, injuries, wounds)
  • Admitted within an inpatient part of the facility (including neonates delivered at the facility admitted with their mother)
  • Enrolled in the study within the preceding 28 days at any study facility
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
51,590 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
15 Months
Patient registry
Yes
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of children referred by a primary care healthcare provider to a higher level of care (either to a hospital or to an inpatient part of a larger primary healthcare facility) at Day 0 consultation

    The denominator will be all children recruited. Only urgent referrals will be considered.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  2. Proportion of children prescribed an antibiotic at Day 0

    Only antibacterials for systemic use will be taken into account for the definition of antibiotics. All children recruited will be counted in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of children with a severe complication (death or secondary hospitalisation) by Day 7

    Secondary hospitalisation refers to any delayed hospitalisation (occurring at any point greater than 24 hours after Day 0 consultation) and any hospitalisation occurring without referral. The denominator is all enrolled children..

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 7 days after

  2. Proportion of children admitted to hospital within 24 hours of the Day 0 primary care consultation and as a result of a referral

    This is used as a proxy for 'appropriate referral' of children, as those with severe disease should generally be admitted to hospital. The denominator for this outcome is also all children enrolled in the study, rather than only referred children. This is because the proportion of referred children that are admitted may be high in routine care, in the context of an inappropriately low referral rate. The aim of the intervention is therefore to increase the overall referral rate of children with severe disease. Hospital admission is chosen as the proxy of severe disease rather than using primary care classification of severe disease, as there are inadequacies in the classification of severe disease in routine practice. A child will be considered admitted to hospital 24hrs of Day0 consultation if the date of hospitalization is the same as Day0 date or is one day after Day0 date.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 1 day after

  3. Proportion of children who completed referral, as reported at day 7 follow-up

    Only urgent referrals will be considered. A referral will be considered completed if a child attended a hospital, whether was admitted or not. A window of +3 days from Day 7 is considered.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 10 days after

  4. Proportion of children cured (defined as caregiver reported recovery from illness) by Day 7

    The denominator will be all children recruited. A window of +3 days from Day 7 is considered.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 10 days after

  5. Proportion of children with non-severe disease referred to a higher level of care on Day 0

    Only urgent referrals will be considered. Only urgent referrals will be considered.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  6. Average length of stay (in days) of children admitted to hospital

    If a child is hospitalised twice, the first hospitalization will be used and second hospitalizations will be reported separately. The denominator will be all hospitalised children. This is not a time-to-event outcome measure, as it will be analysed as a continuous variable.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge

  7. Proportion of children prescribed a diagnosis-appropriate antibiotic

    Appropriateness of antibiotic prescription in relation to diagnosis will be evaluated as: * diagnosis for which a systemic antibiotic was indicated and a systemic antibiotic was prescribed * diagnosis for which a systemic antibiotic was not indicated and systemic antibiotic was prescribed * first-line (or second-line) antibiotics were prescribed according to recommendations for IMCI diagnoses for which specific antibiotic(s)are indicated Diagnoses will be classified according to whether systemic antibiotics are indicated, based on IMCI and other relevant national guidelines as used for the CDSA.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  8. Proportion of febrile children tested for malaria at Day 0

    A child will be considered to be febrile if history of fever was reported by the caregiver before the consultation or temperature was recorded to be above or equal 37.5 C°. Only febrile children will be counted in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  9. Proportion of malaria positive children prescribed an antimalarial

    Only children with a positive malaria test result will be counted in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  10. Proportion of malaria negative children prescribed an antimalarial

    Only children with a negative malaria test result will be counted in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  11. Proportion of untested children prescribed an antimalarial

    Only children untested for malaria will be counted in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  12. Proportion of children with severe, moderate and mild hypoxaemia, adjusted for sites at high altitude

    The following SpO2 values ranges will be used: SpO2 \< 90%, 90% ≤ SpO2 \< 92% and 92% ≤ SpO2 \< 94%. All children recruited will be in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  13. Proportion of children with hypoxaemia (according to differing cut-offs) with severe complication

    The following SpO2 values ranges will be used: SpO2 \< 90%, 90% ≤ SpO2 \< 92% and 92% ≤ SpO2 \< 94%, spurious values and missing values. Each SpO2 group will be the denominator of each proportion.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  14. Proportion of children with severe hypoxaemia not meeting any other clinical criteria for severe disease

    Country's specific cut-off for severe hypoxaemia will be used. All children recruited will be in the denominator.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment

  15. Proportion of children referred with hypoxaemia who receive oxygen at hospital

    All children recruited will be in the denominator. Referral and hypoxaemia are assessed at Day0 consultation. Oxygen use at hospital is only available for hospitalised children from hospital records. At the time of enrolment hypoxaemia is measured and referral advise might be issued. Whether the child received oxygen or not at hospital is evaluated based on hospital registry and it refers to oxygen given at arrival to hospital. The specified time frame takes into account that the outcome is evaluated considering information recorded at different time points.

    Time frame: At time of enrolment and at time of hospitalization

  16. Proportion of children attending scheduled follow-up at the same facility by Day 7

    All children recruited will be in the denominator.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 7 days after

  17. Proportion of children presenting for unscheduled follow-up to any health facility by Day 7

    All children recruited will be in the denominator.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 7 days after

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Nairobi
    Nairobi, Kenya
  • UCAD
    Dakar, Senegal
07

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 5, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 5, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Apr 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data will be shared that underlie the quasi-experimental pre-post study outcomes as described in the study protocol, after anonymisation.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05065320
Lead sponsor
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Collaborators
PATH, University of Nairobi, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal, Burnet Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2021
Start date
Aug 16, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Oct 31, 2023

Study contacts

Kaspar Wyss, Prof, PhD
principal investigator · Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Valérie D'Acremont, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion