ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05064761Updated Sep 26, 2024Results posted

Safety and Effectiveness of Poly-l-lactic Acid (PLLA) for the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite

An interventional study of Sculptra new dilution in Cellulite, sponsored by Galderma R&D. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-26.

Sponsored by Galderma R&D (part of Galderma Group AG) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This pilot study has been designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PLLA as a single regimen for the improvement in appearance of cellulite after changes in reconstitution procedure.

Read the detailed description

Cellulite is a topographic and localized skin condition that is commonly found on the posterolateral thighs, buttocks, and abdomen. It is often identified by a dimpled or orange-peel appearance of the skin's surface. The presence of visible cellulite is associated with histologic changes in the dermis, adipose tissue, and septae.

Based on the theory that a stronger skin structure, with a decrease in skin laxity and increase in dermal thickness, could reduce the appearance of cellulite, the Sponsor intends to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PLLA for the improvement in appearance of cellulite in the posterior thighs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulite

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cellulite

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulite; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 34 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Cellulite.

Browse Cellulite studies →

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 55 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite in the posterior thighs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known/previous allergy or to any of the Sculptra constituents.
  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine and other local anesthetics, e.g. amide-type anesthetics, or topical anesthetics or nerve blocking agents.
  • Previous or present multiple allergies or severe allergies, such as manifested by anaphylaxis or angioedema, or family history of these conditions.
  • Previous treatment/procedure in or near the treatment area:

    1. Previous permanent implant, filler, lifting threads, or autologous fat in the treatment area, regardless of time.
    2. Previous semi-permanent implants exemplified by Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA), poly l-lactic acid (PLLA) in treatment area, regardless of time.
    3. Previous Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler or collagen filler in the treatment area within 12 months.
    4. Previous energy based aesthetic procedures (e.g. laser, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency and endermology) in the treatment area within 6 months.
    5. Previous mechanical (e.g. dermabrasion, needling) or chemical aesthetic procedures (e.g. chemical peel) in the treatment area within 6 months.
    6. Previous treatment with cryotherapy, lipolytic treatments or liporeduction massage in the treatment area within 6 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment group

    PLLA new dilution for treatment to improve appearance of cellulite.

    Device: Sculptra new dilution

Interventions

  • DeviceSculptra new dilution

    Treatment to improve appearance of cellulite.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9

    Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to current visit. On a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 9 were reported.

    Time frame: At Month 9

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12

    Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

    Time frame: At month 1, 2, 6 and 12

  2. Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12

    Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by themselves (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on participant photography assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

    Time frame: At Months 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12

07

Results

Posted Sep 26, 2024

Participant flow

This study was conducted at Canada from 19 November 2021 to 27 February 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment Group (Sculptra)
Started29
Completed29
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to current visit. On a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 9 were reported.

Time frame:
At Month 9
Reported as:
Count of units · Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
ThighsTreatment Group (Sculptra)
Left thigh — Very much improved23
Left thigh — Much improved4
Left thigh — Improved1
Left thigh — No change1
Right thigh — Very much improved24
Right thigh — Much improved3
Right thigh — Improved1
Right thigh — No change1
SecondaryNumber of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

Time frame:
At month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Reported as:
Count of units · Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
ThighsTreatment Group (Sculptra)
Month 1, Left thigh — Very much improved0
Month 1, Left thigh — Much improved8
Month 1, Left thigh — Improved16
Month 1, Left thigh — No change5
Month 1, Right thigh — Very much improved1
Month 1, Right thigh — Much improved6
Month 1, Right thigh — Improved17
Month 1, Right thigh — No change5
Month 2, Left thigh — Very much improved2
Month 2, Left thigh — Much improved8
Month 2, Left thigh — Improved19
Month 2, Left thigh — No change0
Month 2, Right thigh — Very much improved2
Month 2, Right thigh — Much improved8
Month 2, Right thigh — Improved19
Month 2, Right thigh — No change0
Month 6, Left thigh — Very much improved16
Month 6, Left thigh — Much improved7
Month 6, Left thigh — Improved6
Month 6, Left thigh — No change0
Month 6, Right thigh — Very much improved16
Month 6, Right thigh — Much improved6
Month 6, Right thigh — Improved7
Month 6, Right thigh — No change0
Month 12, Left thigh — Very much improved18
Month 12, Left thigh — Much improved10
Month 12, Left thigh — Improved1
Month 12, Left thigh — No change0
Month 12, Right thigh — Very much improved19
Month 12, Right thigh — Much improved8
Month 12, Right thigh — Improved2
Month 12, Right thigh — No change0
SecondaryNumber of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by themselves (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on participant photography assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

Time frame:
At Months 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Reported as:
Count of units · Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
ThighsTreatment Group (Sculptra)
Month 1, Left thigh — Very much improved2
Month 1, Left thigh — Much improved3
Month 1, Left thigh — Improved19
Month 1, Left thigh — No change5
Month 1, Right thigh — Very much improved2
Month 1, Right thigh — Much improved2
Month 1, Right thigh — Improved20
Month 1, Right thigh — No change5
Month 2, Left thigh — Very much improved5
Month 2, Left thigh — Much improved8
Month 2, Left thigh — Improved14
Month 2, Left thigh — No change2
Month 2, Right thigh — Very much improved4
Month 2, Right thigh — Much improved9
Month 2, Right thigh — Improved14
Month 2, Right thigh — No change2
Month 6, Left thigh — Very much improved6
Month 6, Left thigh — Much improved9
Month 6, Left thigh — Improved11
Month 6, Left thigh — No change2
Month 6, Right thigh — Very much improved6
Month 6, Right thigh — Much improved8
Month 6, Right thigh — Improved13
Month 6, Right thigh — No change1
Month 9, Left thigh — Very much improved11
Month 9, Left thigh — Much improved5
Month 9, Left thigh — Improved11
Month 9, Left thigh — No change2
Month 9, Right thigh — Very much improved11
Month 9, Right thigh — Much improved5
Month 9, Right thigh — Improved12
Month 9, Right thigh — No change1
Month 12, Left thigh — Very much improved12
Month 12, Left thigh — Much improved5
Month 12, Left thigh — Improved10
Month 12, Left thigh — No change2
Month 12, Right thigh — Very much improved11
Month 12, Right thigh — Much improved6
Month 12, Right thigh — Improved10
Month 12, Right thigh — No change2

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Group (Sculptra)0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)10/29 (34.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Group (Sculptra)
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/29
COVID-19Infections and infestations2/29
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/29
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/29
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/29
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/29
Urethral prolapseRenal and urinary disorders1/29

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment Group (Sculptra)
Mean41.2 ± 9.01
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment Group (Sculptra)
Female29
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment Group (Sculptra)
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino27
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment Group (Sculptra)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian5
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White23
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Galderma Research Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z4E1, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05064761
Lead sponsor
Galderma R&D
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2021
Start date
Nov 19, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2022
Completion
Feb 27, 2023
Results posted
Sep 26, 2024
Last update
Sep 26, 2024

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Galderma R&D

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion