An interventional study of combined effect in Neck Pain, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-07.
Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of investigator's study is to combine and compare the two scientifically approved therapies for the CNSNP to investigate the short term and mid-term changes of the combination of these two manual techniques concerning pain, function, range of motion ROM and postural stability.
Neck pain NP is a recognized medical and socioeconomic problem, which is responsible for high treatment costs, sick leave, and individual suffering, in addition to being one of the main reasons for people to seek health care services .NP is widely spread in healthcare centers with a prevalence estimation of 288.7 million, in North Africa and the Middle East ranged between 3917.7 to 5022.4 per 100 000 populations in 2017. NP with symptoms duration exceeding 12 weeks is considered chronic.
Individuals who have chronic non-specific neck pain CNSNP have less quality of life, and more pain interference in their life. More over studies showed that patients with CNSNP subjects have poorer postural control than healthy subjects.
Alteration of the proprioception of the neck muscles and joints that play a master role in the cervical joint position and motor control of the head could be the primary cause of CNSNP . Studies have evaluated the effect of different manual techniques in cases of CNSNP checking mainly usefulness and effectiveness of these interventions on this clinical condition. However, there is less evidence in literature investigating the short and mid-term changes of these techniques.
Manual therapy, is a physical treatment primarily used by physical therapists, occupational therapists, manipulative therapy to treat musculoskeletal pain and disability; it is most commonly includes kneading , manipulation of the muscles and mobilization of joints .Many Studies investigating the effectiveness of manual therapies on CNSNP ,proving reduction of spinal excitability and pain sensitivity, enhancement of function and range of motion.
Brian Mulligan techniques are widely used for joint dysfunction by growing number of therapists and are an important addition to the field of Manual Therapy. Literature reveals many and diverse treatment approaches for chronic neck pain. Sustained natural apophyseal glides SNAGs are pain free spinal manual therapy treatment techniques involving concurrent accessory joint gliding and active physiological movement, with overpressure at end range, which are utilized for painful movement restrictions of the spine.
Mulligan's SNAGs is one of the most statistically proved in many studies that manual therapy technique affects proprioception, function, range of motion, pain.
On the other hand, Myofascial release which is a form of soft tissue therapy that is intended to reduce pain and increase mobility in patients that are suffering from chronic pain conditions. Myofascial release has shown effectiveness in reducing mechanical neck pain and in improving functional abilities by freeing restrictions of movement that originate in the soft tissues of the body.
Furthermore, as the focus of most previous studies has been to examine compare mulligan's SNAGs and Myofascial release separately, studies on their combination effects have been largely ignored. Both two techniques have shown efficacy, but since SNAGS and Myofascial release are different mechanisms of action, the time of their effects and their progression could be different.
The aim of investigators' study is to combine and compare the two scientifically approved therapies for the CNSNP to investigate the short term and mid-term changes of the combination of these two manual techniques concerning pain, function, range of motion ROM and postural stability.
1,259 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 256 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 59 is above the median of 52 across 1,026 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.
Browse Neck Pain studies →Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,907 studies on the registry; 1,445 are open to participants now.
Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Investigate the short- and mid-term effects of Mulligan's SNAGs on pain intensity, pain pressure sensitivity, cervical function, range of motion (ROM) and postural stability in CNSNP patients
Other: combined effect
Investigate the short- and mid-term effects of Myofascial release on pain intensity, pain pressure sensitivity, cervical function, range of motion (ROM) and postural stability in CNSNP patients
Other: combined effect
Investigate the short- and mid-term effects of Mulligan's SNAGs combined with Myofascial release on pain intensity, pain pressure sensitivity, cervical function, range of motion (ROM) and postural stability in CNSNP patients
Other: combined effect
Compare the short- and mid-term effects of Mulligan's SNAGs, Myofascial release, and their combination on pain intensity, pain pressure sensitivity, cervical function, range of motion (ROM) and postural stability in CNSNP patients
pain intensity VAS
visual analogue scale ,The pain VAS is a continuous scale formed of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, 100 mm in length, ended with 2 verbal pain descriptor on either end one for each symptom extreme; "no pain" at the most left side of the line (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 /100-mm scale) on the rightest end
Time frame: 15 mins
Pressure pain threshold PPT
pressure algometer ,The PPT represents a hybrid test, falling somewhere between self-reported paper-and-pencil type tools and objective diagnostic techniques
Time frame: 30 mins
function
Neck Disability Index (NDI) This index consists of ten sections, including seven sections related to activities of daily living, two sections related to pain, and one section related to concentration. The score for each section is from 0 to 5, with 0 representing the highest level of function and 5 representing the lowest level of function. Total NDI-TH scores are shown as a percentage. A high score corresponds to a higher degree of disability. The internal consistency of the NDI-TH is high.
Time frame: 15 mins
Range of motion
Cervical range of motion device (CROM) The CROM device is a reliable outcome tool for measuring upper cervical rotation. The clinical implications of these findings suggest that therapists can utilize the CROM device to more completely examine all planes of upper and full cervical mobility. It may also assist in identifying upper cervical ROM limitations associated with underlying cervical pathology or motion dysfunction
Time frame: 30 mins
postural stability
Biodex Balance System (BBS) The Biodex balance system (BBS) uses a circular platform that is free to move in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes simultaneously, which permits three measures to be obtained: an overall stability index (OSI), an anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), and a medial-lateral stability index (MLSI) will measure OSI ,APSI ,and MLSI
Time frame: 30 mins
Ran from Dec 2021 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 3 months.
Of 690 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's 3 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 698 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.