CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05057429Updated Mar 6, 2026Results posted

A Bioelectric Dressing for Post De-Roofing Treatment of HS

An interventional study of Bioelectric Dressing and Standard Gauze Dressing in Hidradenitis Suppurativa, sponsored by University of Miami. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by University of Miami · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to test if the use of a bioelectric dressing can improve healing after a surgical procedure called de-roofing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hidradenitis Suppurativa
03

In context

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

277 studies on the registry are indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa; 88 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 45 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Browse Hidradenitis Suppurativa studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Miami is the lead sponsor of 820 studies on the registry; 161 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 93 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 18 years old and older.
  • Have diagnosis of HS confirmed by a dermatologist
  • Have at least two ancillary tunnels in separate anatomical sites
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are not yet adults
  • Subject is allergic to any of the materials and dressings involved in the procedures
  • Women known to be pregnant
  • Prisoners
  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the PI, cannot comply with hope application of the treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bioelectric Dressing

    Participants acting as their own control. Each participant is counted as 2 sites (2 axilla). Participants undergoing standard of care deroofing surgery will be randomized to dressing assignment per axilla: one axilla will receive the bioelectric dressing, and the contralateral axilla will receive the standard gauze dressing for up to 8 weeks. Side assignment (right vs. left) will be determined by randomization.

    Device: Bioelectric Dressing · Other: Standard Gauze Dressing

  • Experimental
    Standard Gauze Dressing

    Participants acting as their own control. Each participant is counted as 2 sites (2 axilla). Participants undergoing standard of care deroofing surgery will be randomized to dressing assignment per axilla: one axilla will receive the bioelectric dressing, and the contralateral axilla will receive the standard gauze dressing for up to 8 weeks. Side assignment (right vs. left) will be determined by randomization.

    Device: Bioelectric Dressing · Other: Standard Gauze Dressing

Interventions

  • DeviceBioelectric Dressing

    Procellera is single layer, broad-spectrum antimicrobial wound dressing. Embedded in the dressing are microcell batteries made of elemental silver and zinc applied in a dot-matrix pattern. The bioelectric dressing will be applied to surgical site wound with a hydrogel.

  • OtherStandard Gauze Dressing

    Standard of care non-adherent gauze dressing will be applied to surgical site with vaseline.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Healing Rate

    The healing rate of post-surgical wounds will be reported as the area reduction in cm\^2/per day.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Time to Complete Healing

    The average time, measured in the number of days, to complete healing as assessed by treating physician will be reported

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  2. Number of Subjects With Complete Healing

    The number of subjects with complete post-surgical site healing, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  3. Number of Subjects With Nodule and/or Tunnel Recurrence

    The number of subjects with nodule and/or tunnel recurrence, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  4. Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The average pain will be measured using the VAS with scores ranging from 0-100 with the higher score indicating more severe pain. Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  5. Number of Subjects With Tenderness at Surgical Sites

    The number of subjects with tenderness at surgical sites, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  6. Quality of Post-surgical Scars as Measured by Modified Vancouver Scar Scale

    The Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS) is a validated clinical tool used to assess scar quality. It includes four subscales: Vascularity (0-3), Pigmentation (0-2), Pliability (0-5), Height/Thickness (0-3). Each subscale is scored independently, and the scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 13. Higher scores indicate worse scar quality (greater abnormality). Lower scores indicate better scar quality (closer to normal skin).

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  7. Amount of Exudate at Surgical Site

    The amount of exudate at surgical site will be evaluated using a 5 point Likert scale from 0 (Dry) to 4 (Leaking). Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  8. Shoulder Range of Motion

    Shoulder range of motion will be measured using a goniometer. Participant number with preserved range of motion will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  9. Number of Dressings Used Through to Healing Day

    The number of dressings used through to healing day will be reported. Mean change in number of dressings will be compared from baseline to last visit.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  10. Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The average pain will be measured using the VAS with scores ranging from 0-100 with the higher score indicating more severe pain. Mean score on day 2 will be reported.

    Time frame: Day 2 (24 hours post procedure)

  11. Days of Work Lost

    Number of reported days of work lost due to the procedure will be reported

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  12. Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the DLQI

    Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has a total score ranging from 0 to 30 with the lower score indicating higher health related quality of life. Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Up to 8 weeks

  13. Tissue Analysis of Microbiome

    As measured by quantitative 16s recombinant DNA (rDNA) Polymerase Chain Reaction for bacterial enumeration from punch biopsy and biofilm samples. Mean change in bacterial load from baseline and final visit will be compared and reported in log Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/gram.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2026

Participant flow

Participants undergoing standard of care deroofing surgery in a medical clinic office will be randomized to dressing assignment per axilla: one axilla will receive the bioelectric dressing (e.g., left armpit) and the contralateral axilla (right axilla) will receive the standard gauze dressing for up to 8 weeks. Side assignment (right vs. left) will be determined by randomization.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBioelectric Dressing Intervention (Left Armpit) and Standard of Care Dressing (Right Armpit)Bioelectric Dressing Intervention (Right Armpit) and Standard of Care Dressing (Left Armpit)
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryHealing Rate

The healing rate of post-surgical wounds will be reported as the area reduction in cm\^2/per day.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · cm^2/day
Healing Rate
cm^2/dayIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Healing Rate.45 ± .28.39 ± .28
SecondaryAverage Time to Complete Healing

The average time, measured in the number of days, to complete healing as assessed by treating physician will be reported

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · days
Average Time to Complete Healing
daysIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Average Time to Complete Healing56 ± 056 ± 0
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Complete Healing

The number of subjects with complete post-surgical site healing, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Complete Healing
participantsIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Number of Subjects With Complete Healing24
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Nodule and/or Tunnel Recurrence

The number of subjects with nodule and/or tunnel recurrence, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Nodule and/or Tunnel Recurrence
participantsIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Number of Subjects With Nodule and/or Tunnel Recurrence26
SecondaryAverage Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The average pain will be measured using the VAS with scores ranging from 0-100 with the higher score indicating more severe pain. Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-1.5 ± 2.0-1.9 ± 2.4
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Tenderness at Surgical Sites

The number of subjects with tenderness at surgical sites, as evaluated by treating physician, will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Tenderness at Surgical Sites
participantsIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Number of Subjects With Tenderness at Surgical Sites1211
SecondaryQuality of Post-surgical Scars as Measured by Modified Vancouver Scar Scale

The Modified Vancouver Scar Scale (MVSS) is a validated clinical tool used to assess scar quality. It includes four subscales: Vascularity (0-3), Pigmentation (0-2), Pliability (0-5), Height/Thickness (0-3). Each subscale is scored independently, and the scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 13. Higher scores indicate worse scar quality (greater abnormality). Lower scores indicate better scar quality (closer to normal skin).

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Post-surgical Scars as Measured by Modified Vancouver Scar Scale
units on a scaleBioelectric Dressing (Left Axilla) and Standard of Care Dressing (Right Axilla)Bioelectric Dressing (Right Axilla) and Standard of Care Dressing (Left Axilla)
Quality of Post-surgical Scars as Measured by Modified Vancouver Scar Scale2.4 (0 to 8)2.7 (0 to 7)
SecondaryAmount of Exudate at Surgical Site

The amount of exudate at surgical site will be evaluated using a 5 point Likert scale from 0 (Dry) to 4 (Leaking). Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Amount of Exudate at Surgical Site
units on a scaleIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Amount of Exudate at Surgical Site-0.17 ± 1.0.33 ± 1.3
SecondaryShoulder Range of Motion

Shoulder range of motion will be measured using a goniometer. Participant number with preserved range of motion will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Shoulder Range of Motion
participantsIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Shoulder Range of Motion1111
SecondaryNumber of Dressings Used Through to Healing Day

The number of dressings used through to healing day will be reported. Mean change in number of dressings will be compared from baseline to last visit.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · dressing per day
Number of Dressings Used Through to Healing Day
dressing per dayIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Number of Dressings Used Through to Healing Day4.3 ± 5.04.8 ± 4.9
SecondaryAverage Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The average pain will be measured using the VAS with scores ranging from 0-100 with the higher score indicating more severe pain. Mean score on day 2 will be reported.

Time frame:
Day 2 (24 hours post procedure)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
units on a scaleIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Average Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)5.6 ± 3.13.6 ± 2.3
SecondaryDays of Work Lost

Number of reported days of work lost due to the procedure will be reported

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Days of Work Lost
DaysIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Days of Work Lost10.5 ± 11.310.5 ± 11.3
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by the DLQI

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has a total score ranging from 0 to 30 with the lower score indicating higher health related quality of life. Mean change in score will be compared from baseline to last visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the DLQI
units on a scaleIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the DLQI-5.3 ± 4.9-5.3 ± 4.9
SecondaryTissue Analysis of Microbiome

As measured by quantitative 16s recombinant DNA (rDNA) Polymerase Chain Reaction for bacterial enumeration from punch biopsy and biofilm samples. Mean change in bacterial load from baseline and final visit will be compared and reported in log Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/gram.

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · log CFU/gram
Tissue Analysis of Microbiome
log CFU/gramIntervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)Control Group (Standard of Care)
Tissue Analysis of Microbiome-.085 ± .45.070 ± .34

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Group (Bioelectric Dressing)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Control Group (Standard of Care)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Study Participants
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years12
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female9
Male3
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Study Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White9
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yaghi M, Gonzalez T, Vecin N, Pastar I, Lev-Tov H. A bioelectric dressing improves postderoofing outcomes in hidradenitis suppurativa by microbiome modulation: A split-body, randomized clinical trial. JID Innov. 2026 Feb 16;6(4):100461. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100461. eCollection 2026 Jul. PubMed 42164272 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 16, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05057429
Lead sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
Vomaris Innovations
Responsible party
Hadar Lev-Tov (Assistant Professor of Clinical, University of Miami) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2021
Start date
Oct 11, 2021
Primary completion
May 15, 2024
Completion
May 15, 2024
Results posted
Mar 6, 2026
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

Hadar Lev-Tov, MD
principal investigator · University of Miami

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion