CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05051956Updated Sep 21, 2021

Evaluation of Geriatric Questionnaires to Predict Toxicities of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Older Breast Cancer Patients?

An observational study in Can the Geriatric Questionnaires Predict Adverse Effects in Geriatric Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors, sponsored by Namik Kemal University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-21.

Sponsored by Namik Kemal University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

CDK 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib) have taken their place in our practice recently with their clinical benefits in the treatment of hormone-positive and HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Abemaciclib, another CDK 4/6 inhibitor, is not frequently preferred because of reimbursement problems in Turkey. The most obvious advantages of CDK 4/6 inhibitors are that they are used orally and have relatively fewer side effects against chemotherapy. Neutropenia, diarrhea, elevation in liver function tests are the main dose-limiting side effects. In the geriatric age group, it can be thought that the expected benefit from the treatment will not be achieved in cases where these side effects cannot be predicted or managed well. The geriatric age group (65 years and older) deserves special attention in oncology practice, considering both the treatments and the disease itself. Although a number of very useful clinical scales have been developed regarding this subject, it is important that the scale used should be comprehensive as well as being easily applicable for integrating it into daily practice. Geriatric 8 (G8) was found to be a highly sensitive test based on a comprehensive geriatric examination, while the Groningen frailty scale with high specificity. The common feature of these two tests is that they are suitable for daily practice as they are easy to fill. In the light of this information, we aimed to examine whether the G8 and Groningen frailty scale could shed light on clinicians in predicting side effects during the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and ribociclib) in geriatric breast cancer patients. We also aimed to reveal the adverse events of these CDK 4/6 inhibitors as real-life experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Can the Geriatric Questionnaires Predict Adverse Effects in Geriatric Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is below the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Namik Kemal University is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Geriatric (65 years and older) breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (Palbociclib or Ribociclib)

Inclusion criteria

  • Breast cancer 65 years and older Treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors (Palbociclib or Ribociclib)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below 65 years old
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • CDK4/6 inhibitors

    The patient who is started on one of the CDK 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib 125 mg 3 weeks on 1 week off) or ribociclib 600 mg 3 weeks on 1 week off) will be followed up for adverse events.

    Drug: Palbociclib 125mg and Ribociclib 600 mg

Interventions

  • DrugPalbociclib 125mg and Ribociclib 600 mg

    Administration of Palbociclib or Ribociclib

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Event

    First and second adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05051956
Lead sponsor
Namik Kemal University
Responsible party
Asoc. Prof. Erdoğan Selçuk Şeber (Assoc. Prof., Namik Kemal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2021
Start date
Oct 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2021

Study contacts

Okan AVCI, MD
Contact
drokanavci@gmail.com
05302073000
Yakup İriağaç, MD
Contact
yakupiriagac@hotmail.com
+905321579248
Birol Ocak, MD
principal investigator · Uludag University
Özlem Aydın İsak, MD
principal investigator · Ankara Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıd Training and Research Hospital
Elif Şenocak Taşçı, MD
principal investigator · Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Acıbadem University
Seher Yıldız Tacar, MD
principal investigator · Dr. Sadi Konuk Bakırköy Training and Research Hospital
Müslih Ürün, MD
principal investigator · Eskişehir City Hospital
Sema Türker, MD
principal investigator · Zonguldak Atatürk Public Hospital
Turgut Kaçan, Assoc. Prof
principal investigator · Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital
Özlem Özdemir, MD
principal investigator · İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital
Eda Tanrıkulu Şimşek, MD
principal investigator · Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital
Hasan Çağrı Yıldırım, MD
principal investigator · Hacettepe University
Teoman Şakalar, MD
principal investigator · Kahramanmaraş Necip Fazıl City Hospital
Gülhan İpek Deniz, MD
principal investigator · Private Tansan Clinic
Mustafa Ersoy, MD
principal investigator · Eskişehir Osmangazi University
Yusuf Karakaş, MD
principal investigator · Acıbadem Bodrum Hospital
Ezgi Değerli, MD
principal investigator · İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medicine Faculty
Hacer Demir, MD
principal investigator · Afyon University of Health Sciences
Sinem Akbaş, MD
principal investigator · Koç University Hospital
Ahmet Gülmez, MD
principal investigator · İnönü University
Özkan Alan, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Tekirdağ Fehmi Cumalıoğlu City Hospital
Rukiye Arıkan, MD
principal investigator · Marmara University
Özden Özer, MD
principal investigator · Dokuz Eylul University
Sercan Ön, MD
principal investigator · Ege University
Zahid Koçak, MD
principal investigator · Necmettin Erbakan University
Nil Molinas Mandel, Prof.
principal investigator · Koç University
Onur Eşbah, Prof.
principal investigator · Duzce University
Ali İnal, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Mersin City Hospital
Murat Araz, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Necmettin Erbakan University
Halil Taşkaynatan, MD
principal investigator · İzmir Private Ege City Hospital
Abdullah Sakin, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Yuzuncu Yıl University
Eyyüp Çavdar, MD
principal investigator · Namik Kemal University
Kubilay Karaboyun, MD
principal investigator · Namik Kemal University
Erdoğan Selçuk Şeber, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Namik Kemal University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion