CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05039762ICEAUpdated May 8, 2024

Intracorporeal vs. Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colonic Cancer

An interventional study of Extracorporeal anastomosis and Intracorporeal anastomosis in Colon Cancer, sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-08.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the investigators will compare extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) with intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.

Read the detailed description

At Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, current standard treatment for right colon cancer is laparoscopic hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis (EA).

To reduce the risk of adverse events, such as fascial dehiscence and later development of incisional hernia, right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis has been introduced.

When performing a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy the dissection is carried out intracorporeally and the transection and anastomosis is made extracorporeally (EA technique). For IA technique the cancer bearing segment is resected and the bowel ends joined intracorporeally with laparoscopic technique, and the specimen is then retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision.

Previous series have shown shorter hospital stay as well as shorter time to bowel recovery in patients treated with IA compared to EA, without increasing the risk of severe complications or compromising the oncological outcome.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether IA in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy reduces the overall complication rate compared to EA evaluated by Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) .

51 patients will be enrolled in each group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colon Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
  • Intracorporeal anastomosis
  • Extracorporeal anastomosis
03

In context

Colonic Neoplasms

1,432 studies on the registry are indexed under Colonic Neoplasms; 357 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 90 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Colonic Neoplasms.

Browse Colonic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with right colon cancer
  • Eligible for elective laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • CT staged T1-T3M0 tumour.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Mental incompetence
  • Acute right hemicolectomy before the intended elective surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Extracorporeal anastomosis

    Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with Extracorporeal anastomosis in patients with colon cancer.

    Procedure: Extracorporeal anastomosis

  • Experimental
    Intracorporeal anastomosis

    Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with Intracorporeal anastomosis in patients with colon cancer.

    Procedure: Intracorporeal anastomosis

Interventions

  • ProcedureExtracorporeal anastomosis

    Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy will be carried out. The dissection is performed laparoscopically. When the right hemicolon is sufficiently mobilized and the vessels (ileocolic pedicle, right colic pedicle and the right branch of the middle colic pedicle) are ligated, a horizontal incision in the upper right quadrant is made. Through this incision the right hemicolon is extracted, the small bowel and the transverse colon are divided using staplers. The side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis is then handsewn.

  • ProcedureIntracorporeal anastomosis

    Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy will be carried out. The dissection is performed laparoscopically. The right hemicolon is mobilized and the vessels (ileocolic pedicle, right colic pedicle and the right branch of the middle colic pedicle) are ligated. The small bowel and the transverse colon are then divided using laparoscopic staplers. The side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis is formed by creating a small opening in the small bowel and the transverse colon, through which the laparoscopic stapler is used to join the bowel ends. The remaining opening is sutured laparoscopically. The specimen is retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall complication rate

    According to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) based on the Clavien Dindo classification of postsurgical complications. CCI is a continuous scale from 0-100 (0 equals no complications, 100 equals death)

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical stress response

    Evaluated by C-reactive protein (CRP), leucocytes and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). NEWS is an aggregate scoring system, based on physiological measurements, designed to help detect acute illness. Minimum score of 0 indicates normal measurements. The score increases with further deviation from the norm, with a maximum score of 20.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  2. Time until bowel recovery

    Measured in hours from end of surgery to first flatus and first bowel movement respectively

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Measured in hours from end of surgery until the patient is discharged

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  4. Postoperative pain

    Registered daily using Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. The scale ranging from 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  5. Hernia rate

    Based on CT scans 1 and 3 years post surgery

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Odense University Hospital, Svendborg
    Svendborg, 5700, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2. PubMed 16034888 ↗
  • Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V, Zani E, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Minni F. A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x. Epub 2016 Sep 5. PubMed 27595589 ↗
  • Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z. Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):348-357. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485. Epub 2016 Oct 21. PubMed 27768552 ↗
  • van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10. PubMed 27287905 ↗
  • Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD, Sullivan PA, Hardy KM. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):63-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001914. PubMed 25621913 ↗
  • Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):312-7. PubMed 19793468 ↗
  • Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B. Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1886-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29. PubMed 20112118 ↗
  • Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP, Napolitano C, Angiolini MR, Bracale U, Clemente M, D'ambra M, Luglio G, Musella M, Pace U, Rosati R, Milone F. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2314-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21. PubMed 25414066 ↗
  • Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Bassuni M, Christensen P, Wexner SD. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Nov;23(11):1023-1035. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02079-7. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PubMed 31646396 ↗
  • Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A, Carrillo E, Gich I, Martinez MC, Hernandez P, Targarona E. Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):364-372. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11389. Epub 2019 Dec 17. PubMed 31846067 ↗
  • Mari GM, Crippa J, Costanzi ATM, Pellegrino R, Siracusa C, Berardi V, Maggioni D. Intracorporeal Anastomosis Reduces Surgical Stress Response in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Apr;28(2):77-81. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506. PubMed 29360701 ↗
  • Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732. PubMed 23728278 ↗
  • Slankamenac K, Nederlof N, Pessaux P, de Jonge J, Wijnhoven BP, Breitenstein S, Oberkofler CE, Graf R, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):757-62; discussion 762-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948. PubMed 25379846 ↗
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PubMed 19638912 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Petersen JA. Early warning score challenges and opportunities in the care of deteriorating patients . Dan Med J. 2018 Feb;65(2):B5439. PubMed 29393044 ↗
  • Williams B. The National Early Warning Score and the acutely confused patient. Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Mar;19(2):190-191. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-190. No abstract available. PubMed 30872312 ↗
  • Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. PubMed 28097305 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05039762
Lead sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
Responsible party
Benedicte Schelde-Olesen (Principal investigator, University of Southern Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2021
Start date
Sep 2, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2024

Study contacts

Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, MD
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital, Svendborg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion