CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05038293Updated Mar 31, 2023Results posted

Efficacy of Plaque Removal of a Novel Brushing Device

An interventional study of Automated mouthpiece-based toothbrush and Manual toothbrush in Dental Plaque, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-31.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare how a novel, automated mouthpiece-based toothbrushing device removes dental plaque compared to a manual toothbrush.

Read the detailed description

Plaque is one of the main etiological factors in dental decay and the principal etiological factor for periodontal diseases. Although toothbrushes have greatly evolved, dexterity is still the key component to an efficient cleaning routine. The primary goal is to examine 60 participants to determine the efficacy of a new powered teeth cleaning device designed to bypass the variability of individual dexterity compared with manual toothbrushing.

This is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Sixty pediatric patients will be recruited for the study and randomized into treatment and control groups, subdivided into primary (20), mixed (20), and permanent dentition (20). Participants will be asked to abstain from brushing, flossing, gum or mouthwash use for 24 hours prior to the study visit. Plaque will be assessed using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index before and after a one-time brushing with the assigned study device. A soft tissue assessment will be conducted and intraoral photos taken pre- and post-brushing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Plaque

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gingivitis
  • toothbrushing
  • oral hygiene
  • biofilm
03

In context

Dental Plaque

314 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Plaque; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 59 across 279 interventional studies indexed under Dental Plaque.

Browse Dental Plaque studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 5-17
  • In good general health
  • Fluent in English
  • Parent or guardian willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Have 16 scorable teeth (non-crown/bridge/or full amalgams)
  • Have had a dental cleaning and exam in the past 24 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced periodontal disease or severe gum disease
  • Mouth or teeth pain that prevents brushing in any areas
  • Intraoral piercings (tongue or lip) that cannot be removed
  • Non-controlled diabetes
  • Any autoimmune or infectious disease or any medical condition that would delay wound healing
  • Untreated visible cavities or untreated dental work
  • Oral or gum surgery in the previous 2 months
  • Take antibiotic premedication for dental procedures
  • Undergoing or require extensive dental or orthodontic treatment
  • Current smoker
  • Generalized recession over 1mm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Automated mouthpiece-based toothbrush

    Under observation of study staff, participants assigned to the automated mouthpiece-based toothbrush will insert a properly fitted mouthpiece and use the automated device directly over the sink.

    Device: Automated mouthpiece-based toothbrush

  • Active comparator
    Manual toothbrush

    Under observation of study staff, participants assigned to the manual toothbrush will be timed brushing their teeth directly over the sink using a pre-dispensed quantity of toothpaste on bristles dampened with water.

    Device: Manual toothbrush

Interventions

  • DeviceAutomated mouthpiece-based toothbrush

    One-time use during study visit.

    Also known as: Novel toothbrushing device

  • DeviceManual toothbrush

    One-time use during study visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Dental Plaque Removal Efficacy Using Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index

    Average Change from baseline plaque index after brushing with the automated mouthpiece-based brushing device versus a manual toothbrush. The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index evaluates 6 areas per tooth and gives a score from 0-5 with 0 being no plaque and 5 being the highest amount of plaque and the average score for all sites was used for analysis.

    Time frame: baseline,1 minute after brushing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Presence of Soft Tissue Abrasion After Use of Automated Mouthpiece-based Brushing Versus Manual Toothbrush

    Number of participants with soft tissue abrasion after brushing with the automated mouthpiece-based.brushing device versus a manual toothbrush. An intraoral soft tissue examination will be done before and after brushing and a binary scale will be used to note any areas of abrasion (yes or no). Outcome is the presence of any soft tissue abrasion that was not present prior to brushing.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 minute after brushing

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2023

Participant flow

subjects were recruited via flyers posted at the Center for Pediatric Dentistry at the University of Washington. If parents were interested they contacted the study coordinator for a phone screening.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAutomated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual Toothbrush
Started2418
Completed2218
Not completed20
Withdrew: Device was not operating properly for one subject.10
Withdrew: One subject was dropped due to a behavioral issue10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Dental Plaque Removal Efficacy Using Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index

Average Change from baseline plaque index after brushing with the automated mouthpiece-based brushing device versus a manual toothbrush. The Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index evaluates 6 areas per tooth and gives a score from 0-5 with 0 being no plaque and 5 being the highest amount of plaque and the average score for all sites was used for analysis.

Time frame:
baseline,1 minute after brushing
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Dental Plaque Removal Efficacy Using Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index
units on a scaleAutomated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual Toothbrush
Change From Baseline in Dental Plaque Removal Efficacy Using Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index0.29 (.287 to .293)0.6 (.578 to .628)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Presence of Soft Tissue Abrasion After Use of Automated Mouthpiece-based Brushing Versus Manual Toothbrush

Number of participants with soft tissue abrasion after brushing with the automated mouthpiece-based.brushing device versus a manual toothbrush. An intraoral soft tissue examination will be done before and after brushing and a binary scale will be used to note any areas of abrasion (yes or no). Outcome is the presence of any soft tissue abrasion that was not present prior to brushing.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 minute after brushing
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change From Baseline in Presence of Soft Tissue Abrasion After Use of Automated Mouthpiece-based Brushing Versus Manual Toothbrush
ParticipantsAutomated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual Toothbrush
Change From Baseline in Presence of Soft Tissue Abrasion After Use of Automated Mouthpiece-based Brushing Versus Manual Toothbrush21

Adverse events

Collected over baseline visit up to 1.5 hours. (study was one visit only). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Automated Mouthpiece-based Toothbrush0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)
Manual Toothbrush0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAutomated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual Toothbrush
minor abrasionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/221/18

Baseline characteristics

24 were enrolled but 2 dropped

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Automated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual ToothbrushTotal
<=18 years221840
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Automated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual ToothbrushTotal
Mean10.1 (5 to 17)10.8 (6 to 17)10.45 (5 to 17)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Automated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual ToothbrushTotal
Female111122
Male11718
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Automated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual ToothbrushTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino181735
Unknown or Not Reported314
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Automated Mouthpiece-based ToothbrushManual ToothbrushTotal
United States221840
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Washington, School of Dentistry, Regional Clinical Dental Research Center (RCDRC)
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 7, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 14, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05038293
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Responsible party
Diane M Daubert RDH, MS, PhD (Clinical Associate Professor: School of Dentistry, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2021
Start date
Sep 17, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Feb 1, 2022
Results posted
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 31, 2023

Study contacts

Diane M Daubert, RDH, MS, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion