An interventional study of Manual lymphatic drainage and Manual lymphatic drainage in Lymphedema of Upper Limb, sponsored by University of Vigo. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-06.
Sponsored by University of Vigo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Lymphedema related to breast cancer is one of the main complications after breast cancer treatment. Manual lymphatic drainage appears as a technique which could be applied in the treatment of lymphedema along with other techniques. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of a physiotherapy program based on manual lymphatic drainage on the treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer, during the stabilization or maintenance phase of complex decongestant therapy. Therefore, a randomized, blinded, crossover clinical trial is suggested to assess the effect of an intensive physiotherapy intervention on the treatment of lymphedema in its maintenance phase, in comparison with a control group without physiotherapy treatment. The cytometry, displaced water volume, thickness of the lymphedema with ultrasound, dynamometry and sensation of heaviness, pain and tension of the upper limb will be evaluated.
Complex decongestant therapy is a set of techniques which seek the treatment of lymphedema in a conservative way as described in the recent international consensus of the International Lymphology Society, published in 2020. Complex decongestant therapy in a first phase aims to reduce cutaneous edema and in a second phase it aims to preserve and optimize the results obtained.
The first phase consists of skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, muscle pumping exercises, and compression techniques, typically applied with multilayer bandages. The second phase consists of compression with low elasticity, skin care exercises, and repeated manual lymphatic drainage as needed.
The frequency and intensity of components of complex decongestant therapy in phase I and II should depend on the clinical findings of edema and the stage of lymphedema and could be adapted to clinical changes. Note that phase II or stabilization represents long-term therapy over many years and in the case of deterioration of edema, phase I of complex decongestant therapy may need to be repeated.
In recent years, there is debate about the efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage. Sometimes it is not prescribed, being replaced by the recommendation of a self-massage. Furthermore, complex decongestant therapy was suggested to be time consuming, expensive and difficult to tolerate, and does not improve lymphatic function.
In contrast, researchers such as Müller et al., in 2018, state that it is a well-tolerated and safe treatment technique, demonstrating benefits in reducing edema. Other research has also shown that manual lymphatic drainage is effective both on a preventive level and as a postoperative rehabilitation treatment, having optimal results when combined with the other elements of complex decongestant therapy.
A recent systematic review published in 2020 highlights the need of more experimental studies on the effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage on lymphedema. Thus, the
purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of a physiotherapy program based on manual lymphatic drainage in the treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer, during the stabilization or maintenance phase of complex decongestant therapy. Therefore, a double-blind crossover clinical trial is proposed.
560 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphedema; 135 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 50 across 403 interventional studies indexed under Lymphedema.
Browse Lymphedema studies →University of Vigo is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Group 1 receives treatment A for 4 weeks. Afterwards, a period of washing or bleaching should be allowed in order to be sure that the effects of the intervention have disappeared. This period will last 2 months during which the usual treatment for LGA patients will be carried out, which consists of 2 monthly physiotherapy sessions, in this way it is intended that the subjects are in the initial state (as before the start of the first intervention). After this washout period, treatment B was applied to group 1.
Procedure: Manual lymphatic drainage
Group 2 receives treatment B for 4 weeks. Afterwards, a period of washing or bleaching should be allowed in order to be sure that the effects of the intervention have disappeared. This period will last 2 months during which the usual treatment for LGA patients will be carried out, which consists of 2 monthly physiotherapy sessions, in this way it is intended that the subjects are in the initial state (as before the start of the first intervention). After this washout period, treatment A was applied to group 2 .
Procedure: Manual lymphatic drainage
Subjects are randomly assigned to group 1. Group 1 receives treatment A\* for 4 weeks. Afterwards, a period of washing or bleaching should be allowed in order to be sure that the effects of the intervention have disappeared. This period will last 2 months during which the usual treatment for LGA patients will be carried out, which consists of 2 monthly physiotherapy sessions, in this way it is intended that the subjects are in the initial state (as before the start of the first intervention). After this washout period, treatment B\*\* was applied to group 1 for 4 weeks. \*Treatment A consists of manual lymphatic drainage. \*\*Treatment B consists of no treatment
Subjects are randomly assigned to group 2. Group 2 receives treatment B\*\* for 4 weeks. Afterwards, a period of washing or bleaching should be allowed in order to be sure that the effects of the intervention have disappeared. This period will last 2 months during which the usual treatment for LGA patients will be carried out, which consists of 2 monthly physiotherapy sessions, in this way it is intended that the subjects are in the initial state (as before the start of the first intervention). After this washout period, treatment A\* was applied to group 2 for 4 weeks. \*Treatment A consists of manual lymphatic drainage. \*\*Treatment B consists of no treatment
circometry
measurement of upper limb perimeters
Time frame: 1 day
circometry
measurement of upper limb perimeters
Time frame: 1 month
circometry
measurement of upper limb perimeters
Time frame: 3 month
circometry
measurement of upper limb perimeters
Time frame: 4 month
Volumetry by water displacement
weight of water extravasated when introducing the upper limb into a container with water
Time frame: 1 day
Volumetry by water displacement
weight of water extravasated when introducing the upper limb into a container with water
Time frame: 1 month
Volumetry by water displacement
weight of water extravasated when introducing the upper limb into a container with water
Time frame: 3 month
Volumetry by water displacement
weight of water extravasated when introducing the upper limb into a container with water
Time frame: 4 month
Measurement of edema thickness by ultrasound
measurement of subcutaneous tissue thickness
Time frame: 1 day
Measurement of edema thickness by ultrasound
measurement of subcutaneous tissue thickness
Time frame: 1 month
Measurement of edema thickness by ultrasound
measurement of subcutaneous tissue thickness
Time frame: 3 month
Measurement of edema thickness by ultrasound
measurement of subcutaneous tissue thickness
Time frame: 4 month
Assessment of the sensation of heaviness
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 day
Assessment of the sensation of heaviness
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of the sensation of heaviness
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 3 month
Assessment of the sensation of heaviness
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 4 month
Assessment of the sensation of pain
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 day
Assessment of the sensation of pain
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of the sensation of pain
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 3 month
Assessment of the sensation of pain
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 4 month
Assessment of the sensation of tension in the upper limb
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 day
Assessment of the sensation of tension in the upper limb
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 1 month
Assessment of the sensation of tension in the upper limb
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 3 month
Assessment of the sensation of tension in the upper limb
Visual analogic scale
Time frame: 4 month
dynamometry
Assessment of muscle grip strength by dynamometry
Time frame: 1 day
dynamometry
Assessment of muscle grip strength by dynamometry
Time frame: 1 month
dynamometry
Assessment of muscle grip strength by dynamometry
Time frame: 3 month
dynamometry
Assessment of muscle grip strength by dynamometry
Time frame: 4 month
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Vigo