An interventional study of ACURATE neo2 and minimalist approach in Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH. Active, not recruiting at 10 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-11.
Sponsored by Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Open-label, 2 x 2 factorial, prospective, randomized, national, multicenter study to compare latest-generation self-expanding valves and a minimalist approach versus standard of care in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
The purpose of the DOUBEL-CHOICE study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of a latest-generation self-expanding valve (SEV) (ACURATE neo2, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) in comparison to another latest-generation SEV (Evolut Pro, Pro+ and FX, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and of a minimalist approach vs. standard of care with respect to safety and efficacy in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI.
985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 836 is above the median of 120 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 valve using a minimalist approach
Device: ACURATE neo2 · Procedure: minimalist approach
Patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 valve under standard of care
Device: ACURATE neo2 · Procedure: Standard of care
Patients treated with the Evolut Pro, Pro+ or FX valve using a minimalist approach
Procedure: minimalist approach · Device: CoreValve Evolut Pro, Pro+ and FX
Patients treated with the Evolut Pro, Pro+ or FX valve under standard of care
Device: CoreValve Evolut Pro, Pro+ and FX · Procedure: Standard of care
The ACURATE neo2 valve will be implanted using a two-step mechanism during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Balloon predilatation will be recommended in the ACURATE neo 2 valve group.
Isolated local anesthesia. Central venous lines, additional arterial lines for blood pressure monitoring, and urinary catheters will be avoided. Insertion of temporary pacemakers is optional and should be avoided whenever possible, and peri-procedural pacing can then be performed on the left ventricular wire. Patients will be directly transferred to the cardiology ward after the procedure, which can be postponed in case of complications.
The Evolut Pro, Pro+ or FX valve is positioned in a controlled manner either without pacing or under 'slow-rapid' pacing with allowance for limited repositioning and is anchored to the annulus and ascending aorta.
Sedation should be titrated to a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) of 0 to -2 according to local standard of care.The use of EEG monitoring (i.e. BIS, Sedline) can be applied. Continuous CO2-monitoring via face mask should be established during sedation. All patients will receive supplemental oxygen by face mask to maintain an oxygen saturation of approximately 95%. The use of central venous catheters, additional arterial lines for blood pressure monitoring, and urinary catheters can be implemented according to local institutional standards.
Devices: Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30-day follow-up
Time frame: Day 30
Strategy: composite of all-cause mortality vascular complications (major + minor according to VARC-3), bleeding complications (type 1-4 according to VARC-3), infections requiring antibiotic treatment, and neurologic events (NeuroARC type 1-3)
Time frame: Day 30
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH