CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05027438SEDATIVEUpdated Apr 11, 2025Results posted

Reducing Use of Sleep Medications Assisted by a Digital Insomnia Intervention

An interventional study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and Deprescribing in Insomnia, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-11.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among Veterans and significantly impacts their health, function, and quality of life. Sedative-hypnotic medications are the most common treatment despite mixed effectiveness and are associated with numerous risks that can further impact Veteran function. An intervention combining evidence-based interventions for deprescribing sedative-hypnotics and behavioral interventions for insomnia (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia [CBT-I]) can help to optimize sleep and functional outcomes for Veterans with a desire to reduce or stop using these medications. Furthermore, by delivering these interventions through an easy to use and highly accessible digital platform can provide additional benefits to Veterans, especially those with limited time and access to engage in traditional in-person interventions. The Clinician Operated Assistive Sleep Technology (COAST) is an efficient, scalable, and adaptable platform that can help providers to reach more Veterans and provide evidence-based care that translates to improved health and function.

Aim 1: To assess the feasibility of recruiting Veterans with chronic sedative-hypnotic use to participate in a 12-week combined deprescribing and CBT-I intervention, delivered through the COAST digital platform.

Aim 2: To assess Veteran acceptability and usability of the COAST platform.

Aim 3: To assess change in Veteran sleep, sedative-hypnotic use, and function pre- to post-intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insomnia

Keywords

  • Insomnia
  • Veterans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Deprescribing
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia
  • Telemedicine
  • Mobile Applications
03

In context

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

1,856 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; 593 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 73 across 1,631 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders.

Browse Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A Veteran receiving care at VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
  • Active sedative-hypnotic medication use >14 days/month for >=3 months
  • A desire to reduce or stop using sedative-hypnotic medications
  • Access to a mobile device with internet

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A disorder that would impair participation (e.g., cancer, uncontrolled pain, severe depression)
  • A disorder that can be exacerbated by changes in sleep (e.g., seizure disorder, bipolar I disorder)
  • High risk of suicide
  • An active substance use disorder in past 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    COAST + Deprescribing

    CBT-I with simultaneous sedative-hypnotic deprescribing delivered through a digital platform

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia · Behavioral: Deprescribing

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

    A multimodal psychotherapy that may include stimulus control, sleep restriction, cognitive therapy, psychoeducation, and relaxation strategies

    Also known as: CBT-I

  • BehavioralDeprescribing

    The reduction or withdrawal of a medication, through gradual dose reduction, managed by a healthcare professional that aims to reduce harm and improve outcomes

    Also known as: Gradual Dose Reduction, Tapering

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Change

    Total score (0-28): no insomnia (0-7); sub-threshold (8-14); moderate (15-21); and severe insomnia (22-28). A reduction pre- to post-treatment/follow-up of 8 points (or more) indicate a treatment response and a post-treatment/follow-up score or 7 (or less) indicate remission.

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  2. Sedative-Hypnotic Medication Use Change

    Change in dose % from baseline (T0; week 0) to post-treatment (T1; week 12) Change in dose % from baseline (T0; week 0) to 3-month follow-up (T2; week 24)

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sedative-Hypnotic Medication Cessation

    Percentage of participants that stopped using sleep medications at post-treatment (T1; week 12) and 3-month follow-up (T2; week 24)

    Time frame: post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  2. Sleep Diary - Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) Change

    The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) is the subjective estimate of time it takes to fall asleep after going to bed and turning the lights out (or attempting to go to sleep). SOL is measured in minutes (lower values are better).

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  3. Sleep Diary - Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Change

    The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) is the subjective estimate of time awake in the middle of the night, after falling asleep and before final rise time/out of bed. WASO is measured in minutes (lower values are better).

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  4. Sleep Diary - Sleep Efficiency Change

    The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Sleep Efficiency (SE) = (total sleep time \[TST\] / time in bed \[TIB\]) x 100. SE is measured as a percentage (range 0-100%; higher values are better).

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  5. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) Change

    Includes constructs of Physical Function, Participation in Social Roles, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference and Intensity, and Cognitive Function. Constructs are scored individually (4 items, 4-20) except Cognitive Function (2 items, 2-10). T-score: population mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like Anxiety, Depression, Sleep, Pain, and Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, an Anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average. However, for positively-worded concepts like Physical Function, Cognitive Function, and Social Roles, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average while a T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average. When all constructs are scored together, a preference score is calculated, representing health-related quality of life ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health).

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

  6. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) - PROMIS Preference (PROPr)

    The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 (PROPr) is used to calculate a preference score (PROMIS Preference, PROPr). Preference-based scores provide an overall summary of health-related quality of life on a common metric. Preference-based scores summarize multiple domains on a metric ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health). Scores can be used in comparisons across groups and for cost-utility analyses. The profile includes all items in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 plus two Cognitive Function Abilities items. T-scores from the measure can be used to calculate a preference-based score.

    Time frame: baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)

07

Results

Posted Apr 11, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Drop out during intervention and failure to complete post-treatment and follow-up assessments resulted in smaller number of subjects analyzed.

Participant flow

Intervention
Participant flow — Intervention
MilestoneCOAST + Deprescribing
Started36
Completed25
Not completed11
Post-Treatment
Participant flow — Post-Treatment
MilestoneCOAST + Deprescribing
Started25
Completed24
Not completed1
3-month Follow-Up
Participant flow — 3-month Follow-Up
MilestoneCOAST + Deprescribing
Started24
Completed19
Not completed5

Outcome measures

PrimaryInsomnia Severity Index (ISI) Change

Total score (0-28): no insomnia (0-7); sub-threshold (8-14); moderate (15-21); and severe insomnia (22-28). A reduction pre- to post-treatment/follow-up of 8 points (or more) indicate a treatment response and a post-treatment/follow-up score or 7 (or less) indicate remission.

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Change
score on a scaleCOAST + Deprescribing
Baseline14.63 ± 4.04
Post-Treatment6.13 ± 4.10
3-month Follow-Up7.17 ± 3.59
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -7.58post-treatment - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -7.063-month follow-up - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
PrimarySedative-Hypnotic Medication Use Change

Change in dose % from baseline (T0; week 0) to post-treatment (T1; week 12) Change in dose % from baseline (T0; week 0) to 3-month follow-up (T2; week 24)

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · % medication dose relative to baseline
Sedative-Hypnotic Medication Use Change
% medication dose relative to baselineCOAST + Deprescribing
baseline100 ± 0
post-treatment41.45 ± 43.98
3-month follow-up37.74 ± 54.93
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Friedman test · p = 0.004 (Bonferroni correction) · Mean difference (net): 58.55
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Friedman test · p = 0.005 (Bonferroni correction) · Mean difference (net): 62.26
SecondarySedative-Hypnotic Medication Cessation

Percentage of participants that stopped using sleep medications at post-treatment (T1; week 12) and 3-month follow-up (T2; week 24)

Time frame:
post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Sedative-Hypnotic Medication Cessation
ParticipantsCOAST + Deprescribing
post-treatment7
3-month follow-up12
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Cochran's Q test · p = 0.052 · Proportion (%): 31.8Bonferroni correction
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Cochran's Q test · p = <0.001 · Proportion (%): 60Bonferroni correction
SecondarySleep Diary - Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) Change

The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) is the subjective estimate of time it takes to fall asleep after going to bed and turning the lights out (or attempting to go to sleep). SOL is measured in minutes (lower values are better).

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Sleep Diary - Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) Change
minutesCOAST + Deprescribing
baseline34.19 ± 27.73
post-treatment20.02 ± 14.50
3-month follow-up20.11 ± 16.46
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -16.67post-treatment - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -17.113-month follow-up - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
SecondarySleep Diary - Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Change

The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) is the subjective estimate of time awake in the middle of the night, after falling asleep and before final rise time/out of bed. WASO is measured in minutes (lower values are better).

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Sleep Diary - Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Change
minutesCOAST + Deprescribing
baseline26.04 ± 31.90
post-treatment14.68 ± 14.96
3-month follow-up11.04 ± 14.58
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.101 · Mean difference (net): -6.24post-treatment - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -10.343-month follow-up - baseline (negative value indicates reduction of symptoms)
SecondarySleep Diary - Sleep Efficiency Change

The Sleep Diary measures common sleep variables important for tracking and changing sleep behaviors: Sleep Efficiency (SE) = (total sleep time \[TST\] / time in bed \[TIB\]) x 100. SE is measured as a percentage (range 0-100%; higher values are better).

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · sleep efficiency (%)
Sleep Diary - Sleep Efficiency Change
sleep efficiency (%)COAST + Deprescribing
baseline87 ± 9
post-treatment93 ± 5
3-month follow-up94 ± 5
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 5post-treatment - baseline (positive value indicates improvement)
  • COAST + Deprescribing · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 63-month follow-up - baseline (positive value indicates improvement)
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) Change

Includes constructs of Physical Function, Participation in Social Roles, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference and Intensity, and Cognitive Function. Constructs are scored individually (4 items, 4-20) except Cognitive Function (2 items, 2-10). T-score: population mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like Anxiety, Depression, Sleep, Pain, and Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, an Anxiety T-score of 40 is one SD better than average. However, for positively-worded concepts like Physical Function, Cognitive Function, and Social Roles, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average while a T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average. When all constructs are scored together, a preference score is calculated, representing health-related quality of life ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health).

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) Change
T-scoreCOAST + Deprescribing - BaselineCOAST + Deprescribing - Post-TreatmentCOAST + Deprescribing - 3-Month Follow-Up
Anxiety51.58 ± 8.1848.48 ± 8.5148.39 ± 7.96
Cognitive Function45.46 ± 5.9448.46 ± 7.6049.98 ± 4.62
Depression50.74 ± 8.7749.08 ± 8.3246.75 ± 6.01
Fatigue56.31 ± 7.9950.90 ± 9.1746.93 ± 8.50
Pain Interference/Intensity57.74 ± 6.9356.53 ± 7.4153.23 ± 6.38
Physical Function42.90 ± 7.3045.40 ± 6.0747.67 ± 6.64
Sleep Disturbance58.48 ± 6.1150.10 ± 6.2949.99 ± 5.22
Ability to Participate in Social Roles49.07 ± 8.5054.36 ± 8.6057.53 ± 6.63
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing - Baseline vs COAST + Deprescribing - Post-Treatment · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -7.48post-treatment - baseline (negative value indicates improvement)
  • COAST + Deprescribing - Baseline vs COAST + Deprescribing - 3-Month Follow-Up · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -7.823-month follow-up - baseline (negative value indicates improvement)
SecondaryPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) - PROMIS Preference (PROPr)

The PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 (PROPr) is used to calculate a preference score (PROMIS Preference, PROPr). Preference-based scores provide an overall summary of health-related quality of life on a common metric. Preference-based scores summarize multiple domains on a metric ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health). Scores can be used in comparisons across groups and for cost-utility analyses. The profile includes all items in the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 plus two Cognitive Function Abilities items. T-scores from the measure can be used to calculate a preference-based score.

Time frame:
baseline (T0; week 0), post-treatment (T1; week 12), 3 month follow-up (T2; week 24)
Reported as:
Mean · score 0-1
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) - PROMIS Preference (PROPr)
score 0-1COAST + Deprescribing - BaselineCOAST + Deprescribing - Post-TreatmentCOAST + Deprescribing - 3-Month Follow-Up
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Adult Profile (PROMIS 29+2) - PROMIS Preference (PROPr)0.29 ± 0.160.41 ± 0.190.50 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • COAST + Deprescribing - Baseline vs COAST + Deprescribing - Post-Treatment · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.22 · Mean difference (net): 0.11post-treatment - baseline (positive value indicates improvement)
  • COAST + Deprescribing - Baseline vs COAST + Deprescribing - 3-Month Follow-Up · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 0.203-month follow-up - baseline (positive value indicates improvement)

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through 3-month follow-up assessment (1 year).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
COAST + Deprescribing0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)COAST + Deprescribing
Mean59.22 ± 13.97
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)COAST + Deprescribing
Female3
Male33
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)COAST + Deprescribing
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American5
White31
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)COAST + Deprescribing
Married23
Divorced8
Never Married3
Widowed1
Unknown1
Military Branch
Military Branch(Participants)COAST + Deprescribing
Army15
Marine Corps8
Navy6
Air Force5
Coast Guard1
Unknown1
Combat Exposure
Combat Exposure(Participants)COAST + Deprescribing
Yes21
No15
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bramoweth AD, Hough CE, McQuillan AD, Spitznogle BL, Thorpe CT, Lickel JJ, Boudreaux-Kelly M, Hamm ME, Germain A. Reduction of Sleep Medications via a Combined Digital Insomnia and Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing Intervention: Protocol for a Feasibility Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 20;12:e47636. doi: 10.2196/47636. PubMed 37471122 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 24, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Aug 15, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05027438
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2021
Start date
Sep 22, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Results posted
Apr 11, 2025
Last update
Apr 11, 2025

Study contacts

Adam D. Bramoweth, PhD
principal investigator · VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion