ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05022511Updated Nov 18, 2023

Three Birds With One Stone

An interventional study of Screening status in Uterine Cervical Cancer, Uterine Cervix Cancer and Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to female participants aged 50 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27,099
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 69 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The overall aim of the study is to increase participation rates in cervical cancer (CCU) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes in Denmark by offering home-based CCU and CRC screening to women who are overdue for one or both screening programmes when attending breast cancer screening

Read the detailed description

A cluster-randomised public health trial will take place in Central Denmark Region (CDR) targeting women attending breast cancer screening. Five breast cancer screening units serve women five days a week, and all five units will be included in the study and randomly allocated to an equal amount of intervention days. On the intervention days, the other four units will serve as the control group, providing a randomisation ratio of 1:4.

On the intervention days, a research assistant will ask the women aged 50-69 years if they are interested in having a check up on their screening status with CCU and CRC screening. If the woman has not participated timely, she will be offered to receive a test-kit corresponding to CRC screening and/or to receive a self-sample device for CCU screening (or reminded to call her general practitioner (GP) to have a conventional cervical cytology sample taken).

If the woman accepts a self-sample kit for CCU and/or CRC screening, she will receive it by mail together with written instructions, picturebased user instructions, information on national recommendation for cancer screening and a pre-paid, pre-addressed envelope for returning the sample to the laboratory.

The result of the test will be sent to the women by digital mail as well as passed on to her GP.

Clinical management in case of a positive test result will follow national guidelines corresponding to CCU and CRC screening programmes.

Women in the control group will receive standard screening offers according to the national screening programmes.

All women entering a breast cancer screening unit in CDR on a intervention day (intervention + control units) will be sent a survey asking their experience with breast cancer screening a few days after breast cancer screening. The women in the intervention group will be asked about the acceptability of the intervention as well.

27500 women must be included, of which 5500 women will be in the intervention group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Cervical Cancer
  • Uterine Cervix Cancer
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Colorectal Carcinoma
  • Mass Screening
  • Early Detection of Cancer
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

1,927 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 576 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27,099 is above the median of 100 across 1,411 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,299 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Women aged 50-69 years attending breast cancer screening in Central Denmark Region on selected days.

  • In CCU screening: women aged 50-64 years will be classified as overdue if they have not had a cervical sample within the last 5 years and 6 months
  • In CRC screening: women aged 50-69 years will be classified as overdue, if they have not had a FIT within the last 2 years and 4.5 months despite an invitation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
27,099 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    All women aged 50-69 years attending breast cancer screening in the intervention unit on an intervention day. They will all be offered to receive information on their screening status in cervical cancer og colorectal cancer screening. Women aged 50-64 years, who have not had a cervical cytology sample taken within 5 years and 6 months will be offered to receive a self-sample device for high risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) screening by mail, or reminded to see her general practitioner (GP) to have a conventional cervical cytology sample taken. Women aged 50-69 years, who have not had a Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) within 2 years and 4.5 months will be offered to receive a new self-sampling kit for FIT.

    Behavioral: Screening status

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Women in the control group will receive standard screening offers according to the national screening programme.

Interventions

  • BehavioralScreening status

    Women are offered check-up on screening status in both CCU and CRC screening. If a woman is not up to date in one or both screening programmes, she will be offered a self-sampling device and/or a FIT kit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coverage

    Difference in overall coverage og CCU/CRC screening six months after the intervention between control and intervention group

    Time frame: 180 days after participating in breast cancer screening

  2. Participation

    Difference between intervention and control group in proportion of women participating in CCU and CRC screening after 180 days for those overdue with CCU/CRC screening at the intervention

    Time frame: 180 days after participating in breast cancer screening

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of hrHPV in self-samples in CCU screening

    Time frame: After study completion, expected to be 1 year

  2. Rate of compliance to follow-up in CCU screening

    A GP collected sample after a hrHPV positive self-sample

    Time frame: Within 180 days after a positive hrHPV self-sample

  3. Register-based screening history of self-samplers in CCU screening

    "Under-screened" defined as screened at least once with in the last 10 years prior to the intervention. "Un-screened" defined as no screening sample with in the last 10 years prior to the intervention.

    Time frame: After test completion. expected to be 1 year

  4. Prevalence of colposcopies after CCU screening

    Time frame: Within 180 days after a positive hrHPV self-sample

  5. Incidence of CIN2+

    Time frame: Within 180 days after a positive hrHPV self-sample

  6. Incidence of hrHPV positive cases in women 60-64 years after 12 months with an initial negative hrHPV sample in CCU screening

    Time frame: After test completion, expected to be 1 year

  7. Prevalence of positive FIT cases after CRC screening for those overdue at the intervention date

    Time frame: After test completion, expected to be 1 year

  8. Histology (number of adenomas, cancer) after a positive FIT in CRC screening

    Time frame: After test completion, expected to be 1 year

  9. Register-based screening history in CRC screening

    "Under-screened" defined as at least one FIT, but none with the last 2 years and 4.5 months. "Un-screened" defined as no previous FIT despite invitation

    Time frame: After test completion, expected to be 1 year

  10. Rate of compliance to follow-up with colonoscopy after a positive FIT

    Time frame: Within 60 days from a positive FIT

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of women accepting a check up on CCU and CRC screening status

    Process outcome within the intervention group

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

  2. Proportion of women overdue with CCU and/or CRC screening

    Process outcome within the intervention group

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

  3. Proportion of women accepting a test-kit

    Process outcome within the intervention group

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

  4. Proportion of women not returning a test kit

    Process outcome within the intervention group

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

  5. Previous screening history, previous cancer diagnoses, socioeconomic data (age, ethnicity, marital status, educational status) and inflammatory bowel disease

    To test if the randomisation succeeded

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

  6. Survey evaluation

    Evaluation regarding the acceptability of the intervention

    Time frame: At end of enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Anne Dorte Lerche Helgestad
    Randers, 8930, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Helgestad ADL, Larsen MB, Njor S, Tranberg M, Petersen LK, Andersen B. Increasing coverage in cervical and colorectal cancer screening by leveraging attendance at breast cancer screening: A cluster-randomised, crossover trial. PLoS Med. 2024 Aug 13;21(8):e1004431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004431. eCollection 2024 Aug. PubMed 39137185 ↗
  • Helgestad ADL, Larsen MB, Njor S, Tranberg M, Petersen LK, Andersen B. Three birds with one stone: a protocol for a randomised intervention study to increase participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening among women attending breast cancer screening. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e062824. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062824. PubMed 36137619 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 15 months.

Of 395 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 71. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 409 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2021
First posted
Aug 26, 2021
StartActual
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Sep 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05022511
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 26, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022
Completion
Sep 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Berit Andersen, Prof., MD, Head of Department
study chair · Department of Public Health Programmes and University Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion