CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05021263Updated Apr 9, 2024

Does IV Magnesium Improve Quality of Recovery With ERAS Protocols in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery?

A Phase 3 interventional study of IV Medications and placebo in Colo-rectal Cancer and Anesthesia, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-09.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Dec 2023, 2 years 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized, double blind controlled trial examining the impact of incorporating a single intraoperative intravenous magnesium bolus and infusion into a preexisting Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal surgery in place of preoperative oral pregabalin. These protocols are pathways designed with the goal of achieving early surgical recovery by utilizing a constellation of perioperative care techniques that include the use of opioid-sparing pain medications, minimally invasive approaches, and prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting, among others. Intravenous magnesium has shown to be an effective non-opioid analgesic in abdominal surgeries that decreases total opioid consumption, pain, and improves recovery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether or not the addition of intravenous magnesium to our institutional ERAS protocol will improve specific outcome measures, and provide additional benefits when compared to oral preoperative pregabalin. The primary outcome is the patient's quality of recovery based on the "Quality of Recovery - 40 Questionnaire" (QOR 40), and secondary outcomes will be opioid consumption, pain, shivering, sedation scores, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal function, respiratory function, and hospital length of stay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colo-rectal Cancer
  • Anesthesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,762 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 518 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 65 across 1,297 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
  • Age 18-75
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Classification 1-3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of Buprenorphine/Suboxone or Methadone maintenance treatment
  • Known history of substance abuse
  • Use of intra- and/or postoperative Ketamine or Lidocaine infusion
  • Pre- or postoperative placement of Epidural catheter
  • Inability to speak English or communicate verbally
  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 3
  • Hepatic Cirrhosis
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Heart block on EKG
  • Uncontrolled diabetes with Hba1c > 8%
  • Known allergies to study drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Magnesium Group

    The magnesium group (Mg) will receive a bolus of 50 mg/kg of IV magnesium prior to incision and an infusion of 15 mg/kg/hr, with no preoperative oral pregabalin. All groups will receive preoperative oral acetaminophen, preoperative NSAIDs, subcutaneous heparin, intraoperative TAP block, intraoperative dexamethasone, ondansetron, transdermal scopolamine patch, and postoperative care as per the current ERAS protocol.

    Drug: IV Medications

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group

    The control group (Ct) will receive saline solution and no IV magnesium or oral pregabalin. All groups will receive preoperative oral acetaminophen, preoperative NSAIDs, subcutaneous heparin, intraoperative TAP block, intraoperative dexamethasone, ondansetron, transdermal scopolamine patch, and postoperative care as per the current ERAS protocol.

    Other: placebo

Interventions

  • DrugIV Medications

    IV magnesium sulfate, used to replete magnesium stores

  • Otherplacebo

    placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery 40 Questionnaire

    Validated Assessment of Postoperative Recovery

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 0-2

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05021263
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Responsible party
Kevin Min (Assistant Professor, Thomas Jefferson University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 25, 2021
Start date
May 27, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2023
Completion
Dec 29, 2023
Last update
Apr 9, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion