CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05011344ICONEUpdated Aug 19, 2021

Evolution of Protective Immunization Against COVID-19 Among Hospital Workers in Health Care Facilities

An interventional study of Blood sample in Covid19, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-19.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2020, registered Aug 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To measure the immunization rate (seroneutralization) in a population of exposed hospital workers (nursing staff assigned to dedicated COVID-19 care units, laboratory staff handling COVID-19 samples).

Read the detailed description

Current studies on seroconversion and the time course of immunity following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 do not document: i) Seroconversion in populations in repeated and frequent contact with patients; ii) The temporal dynamics of seroconversion at medium term. These two elements are however fundamental in the comprehension and management of this epidemic or of its potential resurgence in the following months and years.

Objective: To measure the immunization rate (seroneutralization) in a population of exposed hospital workers (nursing staff assigned to dedicated COVID-19 care units, laboratory staff handling COVID-19 samples).

Secondary objectives:

  1. Determine the kinetics of the protective response over 12 months (4 times).
  2. Compare immunization profiles according to: gender, age, lockdown, blood type, occupational class, exposure, asymptomatic/symptomatic.
  3. Compare immunization kinetics between exposed and low-exposure hospital workers.
  4. To determine the characteristics of the ELISA test in comparison with the reference test (seroneutralization).

Perspectives

  • To provide a reliable, affordable and faster serological test.
  • Understanding of the natural evolution of seroprotection in a population over time.
  • Sensitization to plasma donation for seropositive patients.
02

Conditions studied

  • Covid19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • serology
  • healthcare workers
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Cohort of exposed hospital workers

  • Hospital caregiver or non-clinician agreeing to participate in the study defined as: Healthcare personnel (physician, nurse, orderly, physical therapist, midwives) who have worked for a minimum of 2 weeks since March 1, 2020 in a care unit dedicated to the management of patients confirmed or suspected of COVID-19 infection, in the participating centers: intensive care units, emergency rooms, COVID-19 units;
  • Staff (physician, technician) who have worked for a minimum of 2 weeks since March 1, 2020 in the AP-HM laboratories handling samples from patients confirmed or suspected of having COVID-19 infection
  • Person affiliated to a social security system

Cohort of 'unexposed' hospital workers

  • Hospital care worker (physician, nurse, orderly) willing to participate in the study who has not worked since March 1, 2020 in an intensive care unit or emergency department or other department dedicated to the management of patients confirmed or suspected of having COVID-19 infection.
  • Person affiliated with a social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospital worker declining to participate If the hospital worker changes assignment after the first collection, he/she remains in the exposed cohort.
  • Protected adult
  • Person under legal guardianship or curatorship
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exposed hospital staff

    Hospital health care or non-health care staff willing to participate in the study: * Healthcare personnel (physician, nurse, caregiver) who have worked for a minimum of 2 weeks since March 1, 2020 in a care unit dedicated to the management of patients confirmed or suspected of COVID-19 infection, in the participating centers: intensive care units, emergency rooms, radiology, COVID-19 units; * Staff (physician, technician) who have worked for a minimum of 2 weeks since March 1, 2020 in the AP-HM laboratories handling samples from patients confirmed or suspected of having COVID-19 infection.

    Other: Blood sample

  • Other
    'Non-exposed' hospital workers

    Hospital health care worker (physician, nurse, caregiver) willing to participate in the study who has not worked since March 1, 2020 in an intensive care unit or emergency department or other department dedicated to the management of patients confirmed or suspected of having COVID-19 infection.

    Other: Blood sample

Interventions

  • OtherBlood sample

    Seroneutralization and Elisa tests

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To establish the level of immunization (seroprevalence) to COVID-19 as determined by the seroneutralization test in a population of exposed hospital workers

    Positive seroneutralization test result: the threshold of positivity is set at 40, i.e. any serum with a seroneutralizing value greater than or equal to 40 will be considered positive.

    Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months follow-up visits after the initial visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kinetics of the protective antibody immune response (protective immunization against SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19) in a population of exposed hospital workers over a 12-month period.

    The kinetics of "seroprevalence" will be defined by the results of the seroneutralization test at 4 time-points (4, 8 and 12 month follow-up visits after the initial visit).

    Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months follow-up visits after the initial visit

  2. Compare immunization profiles

    Combine multiple measurement in order to compare immunization profiles (symptomatic status,individual characteristics, i.e, gender, age range, condition of lockdown, blood type; professional characteristics and possible clinical signs.

    Time frame: 12 months after the initial visit

  3. Compare the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and the kinetics of immunization between two groups (exposed hospital workers and a less exposed hospital workers).

    Compare between groups the results of the seroneutralization test over time.

    Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months follow-up visits after the initial visit

  4. Identify the technical (sensitivity and specificity) and predictive (positive and negative predictive values) characteristics of the ELISA test evaluated in comparison with the reference test (serum neutralization) in the population of interest.

    ELISA's test positivity will be defined with reference to the manufacturer's recommendations. For a ratio OD of the tested sample / kit control: * \<0.9: negative test * Between 0.9 and 1.1: unspecified test * \>1.1: positive test The result will be processed under two modalities: negative/indeterminate/positive and quantitative

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Record COVID-19 seroprevalences established by ELISA at different time points: inclusion, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months after inclusion.

    The technical and predictive characteristics of the ELISA test (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) are documented by reference to the serum neutralisation test.

    Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 months follow-up visits after the initial visit

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille
    Marseille, 13354, France
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05011344
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2021
Start date
Jul 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2021

Study contacts

Laetitia Ninove, MCU-PH
Contact
Laetitia.Ninove@ap-hm.fr
+33 4 91 83 20 66
Emilie GARRIDO-PRADALIE, MD
study director · APHM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion