ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05005637Updated Feb 5, 2025

The Effectivity of Anti Tuberculosis Therapy in Idiopathic Uveitis with Positive IGRA

A Phase 2 interventional study of Anti Tuberculosis Drug and Methylprednisolone in Tuberculous Uveitis, sponsored by Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-05.

Sponsored by Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The reported incidence of uveitis is 52 persons per year per 100,000 population, with a greater incidence estimated in developing countries, including Indonesia. Uveitis has challenges in diagnosis and therapy, due to the existence of an immunological privilege mechanism, so it is not easy to obtain diagnostic markers or provide appropriate therapy. In uveitis, a work-up examination looking for signs in the entire body or systemic disease is often conducted.

Up until today, establishing the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB)-associated uveitis is still a challenge. From histopathological studies, TB germs are difficult to find. Wreblowski et al. found that paucibacillary conditions also made TB bacteria difficult to find by PCR and tuberculin test results were also not completely reliable. The development of IGRA (Interferon-Gamma Release Assay) assays, such as QuantiFERON-Gold TB (QFT) has been investigated. Our previous study found that IGRA-positive uveitis patients with type 1 IFN gene expression score >5.61 were more likely to have active TB uveitis. In addition, serum C1q examination also showed an inverse correlation with this score.

Regarding therapy, until now corticosteroids and cycloplegics are the mainstay treatment for uveitis. However, appropriate administration of anti-infective drugs is necessary in cases of infection. Inflammation in TB-associated uveitis is thought to be the result of the immune response that occurs as a result of paucibacillary TB infection. Examinations can be redundant and problematic. Determination of therapy is also a dilemma because it is difficult to determine the right patient candidate for administration of anti-tuberculosis therapy (ATT). The protocol of ATT administration itself has not been standardized so it often follows the extra pulmonary TB protocol and there has been no reliable clinical trial research on ATT administration in patients with suspected TB uveitis yet no TB microorganisms are found directly in the eyes or other organs.

On this basis, the investigators planned a prospective randomized clinical trial study that involve idiopathic uveitis patients with positive IGRA test, to assess the effectivity of ATT compared to oral steroids. In addition, this study can also be used as a basis for validation of type 1 IFN scores and serum C1q as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers in cases of TB-associated uveitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculous Uveitis

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Uveitis
  • Tuberculous Uveitis
  • Idiopathic Uveitis
  • Interferon Gamma Release Assay
  • Anti Tuberculosis Therapy
  • IGRA
  • ATT
  • Quantiferon-TB GoldPlus
03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,170 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 78 is below the median of 150 across 820 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient that is newly diagnosed with uveitis of unknown origin/idiopathic (as evidenced by a series of uveitis work-up tests) and tested positive for IGRA (>0.35 U/ml).
  2. Age >18 years old
  3. Lives in Jakarta/Bogor/Depok/Tangerang/Bekasi area or willing to participate in research until the end of monitoring program
  4. Willing to participate in the research and sign the after receiving explanation regarding the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with positive aqueous tap examination results on one of the examination panels for the bacteria causing infectious uveitis according to the standard examination
  2. Anterior uveitis patient with a positive HLA-B27 test result
  3. The patient is proven to have active TB or lives in the same house with an active TB patient
  4. Patients are included in the TB reactivation risk index group according to the 2018 WHO LTBI (Latent Tuberculosis Incident) Guideline
  5. positive patient
  6. Patients with uveitis sanata at the first visit
  7. Patients with visual acuity less than 1/300 or showing signs of preptisis based on ophthalmological examination and ultrasound of the eye
  8. The patient has a history of previous ATT consumption
  9. Patients with impaired liver function or other systemic conditions which according to the Internal Medicine Department are not eligible to receive ATT
  10. The patient has a history of taking antibiotics in the last 1-2 weeks
  11. The patient is not willing to sign the
  12. The patient was pregnant at the first visit or was planning to become pregnant during the study period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anti Tuberculosis Therapy

    Dosage form: ATT fixed-dose combination (FDC). FDC intensive phase containing 150 mg of rifampicin, 75 mg of isoniazid not 300mg, 400 mg of pyrazinamide, and 275 mg of ethambutol, while FDC continuation phase containing rifampicin-isoniazid. Dosage: according to body weight, 30-37 kg: 2 tablets, 38-54 kg: 3 tablets, 55-70 kg: 4 tablets, more than 70 kg: 5 tablets. Frequency: Intensive phase: once daily. Continuation phase: 3 times/week. Duration: 9 months (2 months of FDC intensive phase + 7 months of FDC continuation phase)

    Drug: Anti Tuberculosis Drug

  • Active comparator
    Steroid Local and Oral

    Local steroids were prescribed according to the standard care by the attending uveitis specialists and tailored to the severity of the intraocular inflammation. Additionally, all participants in this group received oral methylprednisolone at a dosage of 0.8 mg/kg of body weight per day (maximum of 56 mg/day), which was tapered gradually based on the intraocular inflammation observed. Tapering of oral methylprednisolone involved reducing the dose by 8 mg for doses above 20 mg and by 4 mg for doses below 20 mg.

    Drug: Methylprednisolone

Interventions

  • DrugAnti Tuberculosis Drug

    ATT will be given in the form of fixed drug combination (FDC). Each patient will get a regimen of 2RHZE (2 months of FDC intensive phase, which contains of Rifampicin, Isoniazide, Pirazinamide, Ethambutol) + 7RH (7 months of FDC continuation phase, which contains of Rifampicin and Isoniazid). The dosage will be according to body weight, 30-37 kg: 2 tablets, 38-54 kg: 3 tablets, 55-70 kg: 4 tablets, more than 70 kg: 5 tablets. FDC drugs have to be consumed daily during intensive phase and three times a week during continuation phase.

  • Selected participants may be prescribed local or systemic immunosuppressants, including oral methylprednisolone, starting at a dosage of 0.8 mg/kg of body weight per day and tapered gradually (e.g., every three days or weekly) based on the severity of intraocular inflammation observed during presentation and follow-up visits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Treatment Failure

    Treatment will be categorized as a failure if subject did not meet the following criteria at the 6-month follow-up post initial therapy, (1) less than or equal to 0.5+ anterior chamber cells by SUN criteria, less than or equal to 0.5+ vitreous haze clinical grading using the NEI scale, and no active retinal or choroidal lesions; and (2) no more than 7.5 mg of oral prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% (or equivalent) per day; or in other words, the subject has persistent inflammation that keeps getting worse.

    Time frame: 6 months after the initial therapy

  2. Response to Treatment

    Criteria for complete uveitis resolution applied to both eyes, in cases with bilateral uveitis, included: (1) fewer than or equal to 0.5+ anterior chamber cells according to the Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) grading system, fewer than or equal to 0.5+ vitreous haze based on clinical grading using the NEI (National Eye Institute) scale, and no active retinal or choroidal lesions; and (2) no more than 7.5 mg of oral prednisone daily (i.e., methylprednisolone at 6 mg or less daily) and fewer than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% (or equivalent) per day. Treatment will be categorized as a failure if subject did not meet the following criteria at the 6-month follow-up.

    Time frame: 6 months after initial treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Uveitis Resolution

    Calculated from the time of randomization. These criteria had to be maintained for at least 90 days following the visit when the first complete uveitis resolution was recorded. If there was insufficient follow-up after resolution, maintained uveitis resolution was still considered. Participants who met criterion 1 but not criterion 2 were classified as having partial uveitis resolution (non-complete uveitis resolution). This was measured every visit using objectives of ophthalmologist's clinical judgement from slit-lamp examination and clinical complaints.

    Time frame: 90 days after the visit of first uveitis resolution was recorded

  2. Uveitis Relapse

    Uveitis relapse was defined as any worsening of ocular inflammation (including a two-step increase in anterior chamber or vitreous cells as per the SUN grading system) or the occurrence of clinically new inflammatory activity (such as choroidal or retinal lesions) that necessitated a modification of local or systemic uveitis treatment after a minimum of 90 days of complete uveitis resolution at the patient level. Time to relapse was calculated from the first visit showing inactive uveitis until the first notification of uveitis relapse.

    Time frame: 6 months after the initial therapy

  3. Eye-Level outcome (Visual Acuity)

    The differences in visual acuity between baseline and month 6.Visual acuity was considered to increase if the difference in best-corrected visual acuity between month 6 and baseline visits (measured with Snellen, in decimal equivalent) was equal to or greater than 0.1, stable if within the range of -0.1 to 0.1, and decreased if less than -0.1. If any cataract or vitreoretinal surgery was performed before the six-month follow-up, the last recorded visual acuity prior to the surgery was used.

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline visit

  4. Eye-Level outcome (Secondary glaucoma)

    The incidence of secondary glaucoma (e.g., occurrences of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) above 21 mmHg in at least two consecutive visits that necessitated prescription of IOP-lowering medications).

    Time frame: 6 months after baseline visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital
    Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10320, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Putera I, Ten Berge JCEM, Thiadens AAHJ, Dik WA, Agrawal R, van Hagen PM, La Distia Nora R, Rombach SM. Relapse in ocular tuberculosis: relapse rate, risk factors and clinical management in a non-endemic country. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 22;108(12):1642-1651. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2024-325207. PubMed 38609164 ↗
  • Putera I, Ten Berge JCEM, Thiadens AAHJ, Dik WA, Agrawal R, van Hagen PM, La Distia Nora R, Rombach SM. Clinical Features and Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Ocular Tuberculosis from the Netherlands and Indonesia: The OculaR TB in Low versus High Endemic Countries (ORTEC) Study. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2025 Jan;33(1):86-97. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2359614. Epub 2024 May 31. PubMed 38820475 ↗
  • Putera I, Schrijver B, Ten Berge JCEM, Gupta V, La Distia Nora R, Agrawal R, van Hagen PM, Rombach SM, Dik WA. The immune response in tubercular uveitis and its implications for treatment: From anti-tubercular treatment to host-directed therapies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2023 Jul;95:101189. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2023.101189. Epub 2023 May 25. PubMed 37236420 ↗
  • Ludi Z, Sule AA, Samy RP, Putera I, Schrijver B, Hutchinson PE, Gunaratne J, Verma I, Singhal A, Nora RD, van Hagen PM, Dik WA, Gupta V, Agrawal R. Diagnosis and biomarkers for ocular tuberculosis: From the present into the future. Theranostics. 2023 Apr 1;13(7):2088-2113. doi: 10.7150/thno.81488. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37153734 ↗
  • La Distia Nora R, Sitompul R, Bakker M, Susiyanti M, Edwar L, Sjamsoe S, Singh G, van Hagen MP, Rothova A. Tuberculosis and other causes of uveitis in Indonesia. Eye (Lond). 2018 Mar;32(3):546-554. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.231. Epub 2017 Nov 3. PubMed 29099497 ↗
  • Betzler BK, Putera I, Testi I, La Distia Nora R, Kempen J, Kon OM, Pavesio C, Gupta V, Agrawal R. Anti-tubercular therapy in the treatment of tubercular uveitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar-Apr;68(2):241-256. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PubMed 36272559 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 37 months.

Of 43 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Tuberculosis, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 37. This study's 37 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2021
First posted
Aug 13, 2021
StartActual
Aug 27, 2021
Primary completionActual
Oct 20, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 20, 2024
Last update
Feb 5, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05005637
Lead sponsor
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia
Responsible party
Rina (Staff of Ocular Infection and Immunology Department, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2021
Start date
Aug 27, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2024
Completion
Nov 20, 2024
Last update
Feb 5, 2025

Study contacts

Rina La Distia Nora, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion