CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04981158Updated Aug 18, 2023

Enhanced Recovery After Lumber Laminectomy Using Epidural and General Anesthesia

An interventional study of (Epidural /GA using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET) group, group II and standard general anesthetic technique, control group, group I in Postoperative Recovery, Epidural Blockade and Endotracheal Tube, sponsored by Zagazig University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-18.

Sponsored by Zagazig University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2017, registered Jun 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Now, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is considered an essential goal to improve patient satisfaction, increase surgical workflow rate and facilitate performing different surgical procedures, including lumber laminectomy, on an ambulatory base. Different ERAS protocols have been applied and succeeded to improve recovery profile after colonic, rectal, gastric, urologic, biliary, pancreatic, and gynecologic procedures. Up to our knowledge, it is the 1st trial that will investigate the effect of combining single shot epidural blockade and general anesthesia (GA) using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET), as components for ERAS protocol for patients undergoing lumber laminectomy, on postoperative recovery profile. so the current study will be done to assess if Single shot epidural blockade and GA using TET, for patients undergoing lumber laminectomy, can enhance their postoperative recovery.

Read the detailed description

The study will be carried out at anesthesia and surgical intensive care department -Zagazig University Hospitals. Patients of both sexes, assigned to a single or double level lumbar laminectomy or discectomy, will be included in the study. all patients will be preoperatively evaluated according to standard local protocol. patients, who will not be excluded, will be assigned to one of two groups: Group I (control group) patients who will undergo standard general anesthetic technique and Group II (combined general/ epidural anesthesia group (CGEA)) patients will undergo single shot epidural analgesia [by bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration)] followed by induction of standard general anesthesia (GA) using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET)

Both groups will be compared as regard:

  1. Patient recovery in the form of time to extubation, , time to achieving modified aldrete score ≥ 9 , duration of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and incidence of PACU bypass.
  2. Patients' satisfaction, time to Post anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) for determining home readiness ≥ 9 and incidence of hospital re-admission
  3. Intra operative hemodynamic stability, blood loss, operative time and surgeon's satisfaction.
  4. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements.

Sample size was calculated using Epi Info 6, based on expected time to modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 in group I 13.1± 3.7 in group GA and in group II 7.9 ± 3.2 , confidence interval 95% and power of test 80%, to be 32. Eight patients will be added to compensate for dropout, so the total number of patients will be 40 patients.

All data will be collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc 13 for windows (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). According to the type of data qualitative data will be represented as number and percentage, parametric quantitative data will be represented by mean ± standard deviation (SD), non-parametric data will be presented as median and range and the following tests were used to test differences for significance and association of qualitative variable by Chi square test (X2). Differences between quantitative multiple by student t-test or Mann Whitney test as appropriate. P value was set at \<0.05 for significant results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Recovery
  • Epidural Blockade
  • Endotracheal Tube
  • Laminectomy

Keywords

  • enhanced recovery
  • epidural anesthesia
  • tolerable endotracheal tube
  • general anesthesia
  • laminectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II
  • body mass index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m2
  • assignment to a single or double level lumbar laminectomy or discectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal of the procedure
  • local infection at site of catheter insertion
  • recurrent disc surgery, emergency surgery
  • coagulopathies
  • hemoglobin \<8 g/dl
  • history of stroke or psychiatric disease
  • baseline neurological deficit
  • active upper respiratory tract infections
  • history of either laryngeal / tracheal surgery or pathology
  • uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal dysfunction
  • any contraindication for study technique or medications
  • being on regular steroids, opioid analgesics or alpha 2 agonists.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    control group, group I

    standard general anesthetic (GA) technique

    Procedure: standard general anesthetic technique, control group, group I

  • Active comparator
    Epidural /GA using TET group, group II

    patients will undergo a single shot epidural bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration) followed by a standard general anesthetic technique in which the trachea was intubated using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET)

    Procedure: (Epidural /GA using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET) group, group II

Interventions

  • Procedure(Epidural /GA using tolerable endotracheal tube (TET) group, group II

    patients will undergo a single shot epidural bupivacaine (15 ml with 0.25% concentration) followed by a standard general anesthetic technique in which the trachea was intubated using TET, through its side port 2mg/kg , lidocaine 2% will be sprayed immediately after intubation when the patient is in flat supine position then the same dose of lidocaine will be repeated 10 minutes before anesthetic discontinuation.

  • Procedurestandard general anesthetic technique, control group, group I

    patients will undergo standard general anesthesia with classic endotracheal tube

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to achievement of phase I recovery criteria

    time to achievement of modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 after GA or CGEA. modified aldrete score (0- 10) higher score is better score

    Time frame: the period of time (mins) starting from extubation to achievement of modified Aldrete score ≥ 9. estimated period of time 30 minutes

  2. incidence of successful PACU bypass

    number of patients who will achieve a modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 before PACU admission. modified aldrete score (0- 10) higher score is better score

    Time frame: immediately before postoperative patient transfer out from the operating room

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to extubation

    Time to achievement of postoperative extubation criteria (eye opening, obeying commands)

    Time frame: the period of time (minutes) starting from neuromuscular reversal until endotracheal extubation. estimated period of time 15 minutes

  2. Time to achievement of phase II recovery criteria

    Time to achievement of post anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) for determining home readiness ≥ 9. PADSS (0-10). higher score is better score

    Time frame: the period of time (hours) starting from endotracheal extubation to achievement of post anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) for determining home readiness ≥ 9. estimated period of time 48 hours

  3. incidence of persistant coughing or agitation on emergence from GA

    persistant coughing due to tracheal irritation by endotracheal tube (ETT), agitation is defined as RSS=1

    Time frame: occuring after neuromuscular reversal up to 20 mins after extubation

  4. patient's rating of perioperative satisfaction

    measured on a scale from 1 to 10. higher score is better score

    Time frame: immediately before hospital discharge (after the 1st postoperative 24- 48 hrs)

Other outcomes

  1. Time to 1st postoperative rescue analgesia

    time to 1st achievement of moderate to severe pain visual analogue score for pain (VAS)≥ 0.4. VAS for pain (0- 10). lower scores indicate better pain control

    Time frame: period of time (minutes) from extubation time to 1st diclofenac administration. estimated period is the 1st postoperative 6 hours

  2. Total postoperative rescue analgesic doses required to maintain VAS for pain less than 4

    Total postoperative rescue nalbufen (mg)) requirements

    Time frame: Total postoperative rescue nalbufen (mg)) requirements for 1st postoperative 24hrs

  3. incidence of intraoperative complications

    number of patients who will suffer either intraoperative hypotension or bradycardia

    Time frame: during operative period (from anesthetic induction to tracheal extubation. estimated time 2 hours

  4. incidence of postoperative complications

    number of patients who will suffer postoperative hypotension, bradycardia, excessive sedation (RSS RSS≥ 5), new neurological deficit, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) or urine retention

    Time frame: from extubation to home discharge. estimated time 48 hrs

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zagazig University Hospitals
    Zagazig, Outside US 44111, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04981158
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Responsible party
Abeer M Elnakera, MD (principle investigator, Zagazig University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2021
Start date
Jan 15, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 12, 2017
Completion
Apr 20, 2018
Last update
Aug 18, 2023

Study contacts

tarek Y Gaafar, MD
study chair · Zagazig University
abeer M elnakera, MD
principal investigator · Zagazig University
abeer H alsawy
study director · Zagazig University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion