CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04979351Updated Mar 14, 2025

The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction

An interventional study of Abdominal Massage in Healthy, sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Jul 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort are the most frequently seen side effects after colonoscopy. These side effects can cause physical and mental results and increased workloads and care costs. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. Currently, there are no studies evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on post colonoscopy these abdominal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a random number generator. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive abdominal massages twice a day after colonoscopy, and participants assigned to the control group will receive only "routine care". The abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and satisfaction levels of the patients will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale.

Conclusions: New approaches are needed to improve the physiological and psychological health levels of patients after colonoscopy and help them return to their daily life activities and social lives faster. The trial will provide valuable evidence to inform clinical application and help evaluate the effects of the use of the relevant intervention.

Read the detailed description

Abdominal pain, bloating, and discomfort are the most frequently problems experienced by patients undergoing colonoscopy. These problems are thought to be caused by several factors such as the duration of the process, the technical difficulty level of the process, distension caused by air insufflation, and the expertise level of the endoscopist. These problems are experienced by approximately a third of patients undergoing colonoscopy, and may last from a few hours to a few days. In a recent study, 44% of patients were found to experience such minor side effects 24 hours after colonoscopy, and 23% were found to experience them after a 30 day follow up. Although these problems are dubbed minor side effects, they may cause serious results for patients with regard to physical comfort and mental stress and may necessitate patients to be monitored post colonoscopy and followed up closely. This may lead to an increase in costs by increasing the length of hospital stay and nursing care requirements. Additionally, the satisfaction of the patients with the colonoscopy process may affect their willingness to undergo repeated colonoscopies in the future which may be required for the surveillance of colon malignity. For these reasons, decreasing post colonoscopy abdominal pain, distension, and discomfort and increasing patient satisfaction may increase the acceptance of future colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancers.

Studies focused on decreasing abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy and increasing patient comfort and satisfaction have yielded varying results. For example, while some studies have reported that rectal tube application after colonoscopy reduces pain and increases patient comfort and satisfaction, in another study, it was determined that rectal tube application post colonoscopy had no effect on abdominal distension, pain, discomfort, and patient satisfaction after the process and 24 hours later. In another study, rectal aspiration applied right after colonoscopy was found to be more effective in decreasing abdominal symptoms compared to the application of rectal tubes after colonoscopy. In another study where total colonic decompression through repeating cecal intubation after colonoscopy was applied, the method was found to decrease the distension complaints of patients in the early post colonoscopy period from 59% to 25%. However, in this study, no significant difference between the groups that did and did not receive decompression with regard to abdominal pain and distension could be found 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. In yet another study, no significant difference with regard to pain intensity could be found between the aspiration of air in the curves of the colon without repeated intubation while the colonoscope was being taken out and rectal aspiration.

Abdominal massaging has been shown to help improve symptoms in patients with severe constipation. In the literature, it has been reported that abdominal massage relaxes the abdominal muscles and stimulates the excretory activity by supporting the intestine, decrease discomfort and pain in individuals with abdominal pain related to cramps or flatulence, and increase the quality of life. Moreover, it is a non-invasive and safe non-pharmacological method. It has no known side effects and does not require any cost.

In this study, it was assumed post-colonoscopy abdominal massage can improve their abdominal symptoms. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the effects of abdominal massage on abdominal symptoms after colonoscopy. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to evaluate the aspect of post-colonoscopy abdominal massage that concerns endoscopy nurses, namely its effect on abdominal pain, bloating, discomfort and patient satisfaction.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of post colonoscopy abdominal massage on abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.

Null hypothesis

There will be no significant difference between patients receiving abdominal massage post colonoscopy and those not receiving such an intervention with regard to abdominal pain, distension, discomfort, and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • abdominal massage
  • abdominal pain
  • abdominal distension
  • abdominal discomfort
  • patient satisfaction
03

In context

Abdominal Pain

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 72 across 250 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Pain.

Browse Abdominal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • being of 18 years of age and above
  • owning a cell phone
  • having a body mass index below 30
  • being conscious and having location
  • people, and time orientation
  • having no communication barriers
  • being able to communicate in Turkish
  • giving written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • were receiving sedation
  • having previously received intestine resection or other intestinal surgery
  • having an uncontrolled psychopathological illness
  • receiving colonoscopy for treatment
  • having active lower gastrointestinal system bleeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Abdominal Massage Group

    Abdominal massage for 15 minutes twice a day application.

    Other: Abdominal Massage

  • No intervention
    Placebo Group

    Abdominal massage was not applied.

Interventions

  • OtherAbdominal Massage

    Abdominal massage will be applied twice a day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abdominal pain

    Abdominal pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value

    Time frame: The end of the second day.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Abdominal distension

    Abdominal distension will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value

    Time frame: The end of the second day.

Other outcomes

  1. Comfort

    Abdominal comfort will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value

    Time frame: The end of the second day.

  2. High Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale Zero = minimum value Ten = maximum value

    Time frame: The end of the second day.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital
    Istanbul, 34384, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Steffenssen MW, Al-Najami I, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Baatrup G. Patient-reported complications related to colonoscopy: a prospective feasibility study of an email-based survey. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S65-S70. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1535188. Epub 2018 Dec 7. PubMed 30523730 ↗
  • Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, Rawlinson J, Salena B, Marshall JK, Stevenson GW, Hunt RH. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70176-4. PubMed 12145595 ↗
  • Erstad DJ, Krowsoski LS, Kaafarani HM. Abdominal Pain After Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):486-487. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.060. Epub 2017 Jan 3. No abstract available. PubMed 28056353 ↗
  • Yi CH, Liu TT, Lei WY, Hung JS, Chen CL. Influence of Rectal Decompression on Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Physiology following Colonoscopy in Healthy Adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:4101248. doi: 10.1155/2016/4101248. Epub 2016 Aug 29. PubMed 27651788 ↗
  • Liu TT, Yi CH, Lei WY, Yu HC, Hung JS, Chen CL. Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jun;4(6):E725-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392223. Epub 2015 Dec 15. PubMed 27336061 ↗
  • Devitt J, Shellman L, Gardner K, Nichols LW. Using positioning after a colonoscopy for patient comfort management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31820f9ac3. PubMed 21455041 ↗
  • Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):190-204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190. PubMed 30670909 ↗
  • Lynch I, Hayes A, Buffum MD, Conners EE. Insufflation using carbon dioxide versus room air during colonoscopy: comparison of patient comfort, recovery time, and nursing resources. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;38(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000109. PubMed 25946475 ↗
  • Steinberg EN, Howden CW. Randomized controlled trial of rectal tube placement for the management of abdominal distension following colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Nov;46(5):444-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70038-5. PubMed 9402119 ↗
  • Hilzenrat N, Fich A, Odes HS, Krugliak P, Eidelman L, Gaspar N, Weisberg G, Rosenthal A, Delgado JL, Ginat R, Sperber AD. Does insertion of a rectal tube after colonoscopy reduce patient discomfort and improve satisfaction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):54-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.47. PubMed 12518131 ↗
  • Lee JG, Vigil H, Leung JW. A randomized controlled trial of total colonic decompression after colonoscopy to improve patient comfort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):95-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03458.x. PubMed 11197295 ↗
  • Lamas K, Lindholm L, Stenlund H, Engstrom B, Jacobsson C. Effects of abdominal massage in management of constipation--a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12. PubMed 19217105 ↗
  • Liu Z, Sakakibara R, Odaka T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Hattori T. Mechanism of abdominal massage for difficult defecation in a patient with myelopathy (HAM/TSP). J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1280-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0825-9. Epub 2005 May 20. No abstract available. PubMed 15895308 ↗
  • Sinclair M. The use of abdominal massage to treat chronic constipation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Oct;15(4):436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 25. PubMed 21943617 ↗
  • Dehghan M, Fatehi Poor A, Mehdipoor R, Ahmadinejad M. Does abdominal massage improve gastrointestinal functions of intensive care patients with an endotracheal tube?: A randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;30:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.018. Epub 2017 Dec 30. PubMed 29389471 ↗
  • McClurg D, Lowe-Strong A. Does abdominal massage relieve constipation? Nurs Times. 2011 Mar 29-Apr 4;107(12):20-2. PubMed 21520798 ↗
  • Arabul M, Kandemir A, Celik M, Alper E, Akpinar Z, Aslan F, Vatansever S, Unsal B. Impact of an information video before colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):523-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0416. PubMed 23161296 ↗
  • Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. PubMed 26827847 ↗
  • Ayan M, Tas U, Sogut E, Arici S, Karaman S, Esen M, Demirturk F. [Comparing efficiencies of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol in patients with primary dysmenorrhea pain by using Visual Analog Scale]. Agri. 2013;25(2):78-82. doi: 10.5505/agri.2013.42103. Turkish. PubMed 23720082 ↗
  • Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863. PubMed 11719741 ↗
  • Kjeldsen HB, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J. Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain. Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):980-984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. Epub 2015 Aug 27. PubMed 26310997 ↗
  • Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VWS. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.004. PubMed 16153776 ↗
  • Uysal N, Eser I, Akpinar H. The effect of abdominal massage on gastric residual volume: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31824c235a. PubMed 22472671 ↗
  • Altun Ugras G, Yuksel S, Isik MT, Tasdelen B, Dogan H, Mutluay O. Effect of abdominal massage on bowel evacuation in neurosurgical intensive care patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):558-566. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12575. Epub 2020 Nov 12. PubMed 33179847 ↗
  • Preece J. Introducing abdominal massage in palliative care for the relief of constipation. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 May;8(2):101-5. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2002.0610. PubMed 12188155 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study results will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04979351
Lead sponsor
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Responsible party
Dilek Ozturk (Principal Investigator, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2021
Start date
Nov 9, 2020
Primary completion
May 31, 2021
Completion
May 31, 2021
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Study contacts

DİLEK ÖZTÜRK, MSc
principal investigator · specify Unaffiliated
Aysel GÜRKAN, PhD
study director · specify Unaffiliated

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion