ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04975854Updated May 16, 2024

Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia

An interventional study of Exposure Therapy (Virtual Reality) and Information Session in Specific Phobia, Acrophobia and Fear of Heights, sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic. Completed at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.

Sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) as a treatment for specific phobia (acrophobia). The study will randomly assign 42 participants with acrophobia to one of two conditions: a) the experimental condition (consisting of 3 sessions of virtual reality exposure) or b) a control condition. Both groups will receive short information session about general principles of exposure therapy before the start of the study. After the end of the study, the waitlist group will be invited to attend the short version (one or two-sessions) of the VRET. Both groups will receive a final follow-up questionnaires 2 months after the last session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Specific Phobia
  • Acrophobia
  • Fear of Heights
  • Anxiety Disorders

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • virtual reality exposure therapy
  • specific phobia
  • acrophobia
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

5,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 80 across 4,380 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • individual meeting ICD-10 criteria for diagnosis of specific phobia
  • fluent in Czech

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving psychological treatment for acrophobia
  • psychotropic medication (unless on stable dosage for the previous 1 month and stabilized for the duration of the study)
  • another severe mental disorder, such as bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
  • contradictions to using a virtual reality (e.g., epilepsy, balance problems)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality Exposure

    Participants complete three 30-40-minute sessions of exposure administered via a virtual reality headset. The exposure involve exposure to various heights and height cues in the virtual city environment. Experimental group also attends 20-minute online information session (prerecorded video).

    Behavioral: Exposure Therapy (Virtual Reality) · Other: Information Session

  • Other
    Control

    Control group attends a single 20-minute information session (prerecorded video) about general principles of exposure therapy and anxiety before the start of the study, but receives no exposure-based intervention.

    Other: Information Session

Interventions

  • BehavioralExposure Therapy (Virtual Reality)

    Virtual reality scenarios consists of increasingly intense exposures to phobic stimuli (e.g., looking over railings from various floor levels) with the support of the therapist. The goal of VRET is sufficient reduction in anxiety to allow the patients to expose themselves to heights in everyday situations.

  • OtherInformation Session

    This includes 20-minute information session about general principles of exposure therapy before the start of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Height Intolerance Severity Scale (vHISS)

    The vHISS is a 8-item scale assessing the severity of visual height intolerance with additional questions for diagnosing acrophobia. Raw score range from 0 to 13, where 0 = least severely affected and 13 = most severely affected.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment (Controlling for Baseline Score)

  2. Visual Height Intolerance Severity Scale (vHISS)

    The vHISS is a 8-item scale assessing the severity of visual height intolerance with additional questions for acrophobia.Raw score range from 0 to 13, where 0 = least severely affected and 13 = most severely affected.

    Time frame: 2-months Post-Treatment (Controlling for Immediate Post-Treatment Score)

  3. Severity Measure for Specific Phobia-Adult (SMSP-A)

    SMSP-A is a 10-item scale that assesses the severity of specific phobias in individuals aged 18 and older over the past 7 days. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with item scores of 1-4 respectively indicating mild, moderate, severe and extreme severity of specific phobia related distress.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment (Controlling for Baseline Score)

  4. Severity Measure for Specific Phobia-Adult (SMSP-A)

    SMSP-A is a 10-item scale that assesses the severity of specific phobias in individuals aged 18 and older over the past 7 days. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with item scores of 1-4 respectively indicating mild, moderate, severe and extreme severity of specific phobia related distress.

    Time frame: 2-months Post-Treatment (Controlling for Immediate Post-Treatment Score)

  5. The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance

    The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance is a single item from the outcome measures administered by the UK National Health Service's IAPT programme (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies). The patient is asked to rate his/her avoidance of heights in daily situations on a scale from 0 (would not avoid it) to 8 (always avoid it).

    Time frame: 2-Weeks In-Treatment (Controlling for Baseline Score)

  6. The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance

    The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance is a single item from the outcome measures administered by the UK National Health Service's IAPT programme (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies). The patient is asked to rate his/her avoidance of heights in daily situations on a scale from 0 (would not avoid it) to 8 (always avoid it).

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment (Controlling for Baseline Score)

  7. The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance

    The IAPT phobia scale-avoidance is a single item from the outcome measures administered by the UK National Health Service's IAPT programme (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies). The patient is asked to rate his/her avoidance of heights in daily situations on a scale from 0 (would not avoid it) to 8 (always avoid it).

    Time frame: 2-months Post-Treatment (Controlling for Immediate Post-Treatment Score)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Six-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6)

    The 6-item short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is used to measure self-reported symptoms of state anxiety with higher score indicating higher anxiety levels (prorated score range 20-80).

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Sessions

  2. Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS)

    The SUDS is a visual analog scale in which the participant rates his/her anxiety/discomfort based on a range between 0 (no anxiety/discomfort) and 10 (very severe anxiety/discomfort). A SUDS rating will be collected at the end of each segment, reflecting maximum distress experienced during the interaction.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 months. During In-Sessions: week 1-3 (reported repeatedly during each session in response to presented exposure situations).

  3. Anxiety Hierarchy

    The patient is asked to develope a hierarchy of feared situations ranging from most-feared at the top to least-feared at the bottom. Then, he/she rates anticipated fear, anxiety or distress for each item (score 0-100 %, with higher score indicating higher anxiety) - according to how distressing they feel it would be to encounter that situation. The hierarchy is used to guide a process of VRET sessions.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-Treatment (Controlling for Baseline Score)

Other outcomes

  1. The Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)

    The scale includes 3 subscales SP (spatial presence), INV (involvement) and REAL (experienced realism) with score range 0-7. Higher scores indication higher sense of presence. This measure might be positivelly associated with positive outcome.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-First Session

  2. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)

    The scale evaluates cybersickness symptoms in three subscales: nausea (N), oculomotor disturbance (O), disorientation (D). Total simulator sickness raw score 0-48 (adjusted total score 0-180). Higher scores on each scale indicatestronger perceptions of the underlying sickness symptoms and aretherefore undesired. This measure might be negatively associated with positive outcome and sense of presence.

    Time frame: Immediately Post-First Session

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institute of Mental Health
    Klecany, Czechia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Francova A, Jablonska MK, Lhotska L, Husak J, Fajnerova I. Efficacy of exposure scenario in virtual reality for the treatment of acrophobia: A randomized controlled trial. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;88:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2025.102035. Epub 2025 Mar 30. PubMed 40186999 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD (primary outcome measures) that underlie results in a publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: IPD will be shared starting 6 month after the publication.

Access criteria: Data access requests will be reviewed using an online form. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2022, 11 months.

Of 2,759 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30. This study's 11 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,829 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2021
First posted
Jul 26, 2021
StartActual
Jul 13, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 17, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 17, 2022
Last update
May 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04975854
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic
Responsible party
Iveta Fajnerová (senior researcher, National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 26, 2021
Start date
Jul 13, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 17, 2022
Completion
Jun 17, 2022
Last update
May 16, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion