An observational study in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Venous Disease, sponsored by Prairie Education and Research Cooperative. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-18.
Sponsored by Prairie Education and Research Cooperative · Observational
To ascertain the potential symptom improvement assessed by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and nonthrombotic iliofemoral venous lesions and/or iliocaval obstruction defined by MR or CT venography AND CEAP Clinical Category ≥3 prior to venous stenting.
Primary Objective:
Evaluate potential improvement in metrics of functional capacity assessed by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing performed before and after venous stenting of an ≥50% iliofemoral venous obstruction by MR or CT venography and confirmed by intra-procedural IVUS in a prospective patient cohort presenting with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with a H2FpEF score of ≥4 AND a CEAP Category ≥3.
Secondary Objectives:
Identify patient demographic, baseline laboratory, imaging, procedural and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing variables and the FDA-approved Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire as a Medical Device Development Tool (MDDT) in patients with and without functional improvement as assessed by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing VO2max after successful venous stenting of iliofemoral/iliocaval venous obstructions.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 200 across 1,679 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Prairie Education and Research Cooperative is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Male and female patients ≥40 years old with diagnosed HFpEF by established standard of care clinical ACC/AHA Congestive Heart Failure Definition and Clinical Guidelines23 and a Mayo Clinic H2FpEF Score ≥ 4 with evidence of peripheral venous disease assessed by the CEAP Classification 3 according to the Reporting Standards of International Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (ISCV)/Society of Vascular Society (SVS).24
Exclusion Criteria:
Evaluate potential change in metrics of functional capacity assessed by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing performed before and after venous stenting
The primary focus of the study is to estimate the change in functional capacity in patients of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) of varying severities and chronic peripheral venous disease associated with pelvic venous obstruction after resolution via IVUS-guided venous stenting. Key estimate will be the change in functional capacity (i.e., VO2max or 6MWD) as assessed by the percentage change in pre- and post-venous stenting. No formal hypothesis tests are pre-specified.
Time frame: 180 days
Identify patient functional change utilizing the FDA-approved Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire as a Medical Device Development Tool (MDDT) post treatment versus pre treatment
The secondary outcome measure of the study is to estimate the change in functional capacity in patients of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) of varying severities and chronic peripheral venous disease associated with pelvic venous obstruction after resolution via IVUS-guided venous stenting. Key estimate will be the change in functional capacity as assessed by the percentage change in pre- and post-venous stenting utilizing the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). No formal hypothesis tests are pre-specified.
Time frame: 180 days
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Prairie Education and Research Cooperative