An observational study in Avulsion Fracture of the Achilles Tendon and Achilles Tendon Rupture, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-12.
Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Observational
To compare the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and conventional Achilles tendon rupture, collected and analysed information of patients preoperatively and postoperatively.
Include 30 patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and 30 patients with Achilles tendon rupture underwent surgical treatment in our institute. Collect and evaluate MRI, VAS, AOFAS, and FFI score preoperatively and postoperatively. Finally explore the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the AT and conventional ATR.
16 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Avulsion; 4 are open to participants now.
Browse Fractures, Avulsion studies →Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
From 2013 to 2017, patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon or Achilles tendon rupture that underwent surgical treatment in our institute.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon
Procedure: fixation
Achilles tendon rupture
Procedure: primary repair
double row fixation with 3-4 wire anchors
end-to-end repair
MOCART
MOCART is a scoring system to evaluate the repair effect of cartilage injury.The minimum and maximum values of MOCART are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: one year after sugery
VAS
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. This gives them the greatest freedom to choose their pain's exact intensity. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The minimum and maximum values of VAS are 10 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery
AOFAS
The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score combines subjective scores of pain and function provided by the patient with objective scores based on the surgeon's physical examination of the patient (to assess sagittal motion, hindfoot motion, ankle-hindfoot stability and alignment of the ankle-hindfoot). The scale includes nine items that can be divided into three subscales (pain, function and alignment). The minimum and maximum values of AOFAS are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery
FFI
A Foot Function Index (FFI) was developed to measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales. Both total and sub-scale scores are produced. The FFI was examined for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity. Each scale is from 0 (no pain or difficulty) to 10 (worst pain imaginable or so difficult it required help) .
Time frame: pre-surgery, one year after sugery
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Jan 2013 to primary completion in Mar 2018, 62 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Peking University Third Hospital →