CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04956770STIMO-PARKUpdated Jun 1, 2026

Study on Feasibility of Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) to Improve Mobility in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

An interventional study of Implantation surgery in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Jocelyne Bloch. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by Jocelyne Bloch · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the STIMO-PARKINSON study is to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of Targeted Epidural Spinal Stimulation (TESS) system to induce modulation in leg muscle recruitment in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, and its capacity to improve key gait and balance deficits when employed in the context of a rehabilitation process of 3 to 5 months.

Read the detailed description

The study intervention consists of 7 phases preceded by pre-screening:

  • enrolment and eligibility
  • baseline
  • surgery
  • main phase of the study
  • home-use
  • end of main study phase
  • (optional and conditional): 3 years follow-up

At baseline, general information and Parkinson related medical history are collected. Clinical evaluations are also completed without and with current therapy, (i.e. NO(MED+DBS), and MED+DBS conditions). Finally, quality of life questionnaires are collected for the patient as well as expectations questionnaires for the physiotherapists involved in the study.

The main phase of the study consists of:

  • Stimulation configuration sessions during which TESS protocols will be setup and optimized. This procedure aims to configure the spatial and temporal parameters of TESS that will recruit specific muscle groups. Specific TESS protocols will be configured for various motor tasks which will be used during the rehabilitation phase and clinical evaluations.
  • TESS-supported rehabilitation sessions during which patients will undergo an in-clinic rehabilitation training regime supported by TESS.
  • Evaluation sessions during which four clinical evaluation sessions will take place focusing on assessment of locomotion, balance and PD related deficits. The tests will be done when patients are:

    (i) in NO(MED+DBS) condition (without any therapy, i.e. without medication and DBS OFF) (ii) in MED+DBS condition (the patient's standard therapeutical condition, i.e. usual medication dose and DBS ON) (iii) in TESS+MED condition (usual medication dose, TESS ON, DBS OFF) (iv) in TESS+MED+DBS condition (usual medication dose, TESS ON, DBS ON)

Participants are allowed to use the investigational system independently if deemed safe and beneficial as assessed by the Principal Investigator (Home-Use Phase).

One year after patient enrolment, the patient will come for follow up visits where he will again perform an evaluation session for each therapy condition as described above, to evaluate the long-term evolution.

If the therapy has been safe and beneficial, they can extend their study participation by entering the Follow-Up period of 3 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation System
  • DBS
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Jocelyne Bloch is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's disease with III-IV Hoehn-Yahr stage, exhibiting severe gait difficulties and postural instability
  • With Medtronic DBS implant and receiving medication for Parkinson's disease
  • Aged 18 to 80 years
  • Stable medical, physical and psychological condition as considered by the Investigators in accordance with treating physician and treating neurologist.
  • Must agree to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all required study training and visit
  • Must provide and sign the study's Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or chronic medical disorder pre-existing PD diagnosis affecting rehabilitation
  • Active oncological disease requiring heavy treatments and frequent MRI controls
  • Having an implanted device that is active (e.g., pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator) whose interference with the investigational system's neurostimulator (Activa RC) is not confirmed safe by the CE-mark of the device, or having an indication that might lead to implantation of such device
  • Inability to follow study procedures, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia as considered by the Investigators in accordance with treating physician and treating neurologist
  • Hematological disorders with an increased risk of hemorrhagic event during surgical interventions
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Participation in another interventional study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rehabilitation supported by TESS

    Patient will be asked to come to the hospital for three types of patient sessions: * Stimulation configuration sessions: TESS protocols will be setup and optimized during this phase. Duration: minimum 4 sessions over 2 weeks, maximum 20 sessions over a month. In addition, some sessions at a free frequency as needed during rehabilitation will be programed (maximum once a week). * TESS-supported rehabilitation sessions: Patients will undergo an in-clinic rehabilitation training regime supported by TESS. Duration: 24 sessions spread over minimum three months and maximum five months * Pre- and post-rehabilitation evaluation sessions: four clinical evaluation sessions will take place focusing on assessment of locomotion, balance and PD related deficits.

    Procedure: Implantation surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureImplantation surgery

    The intervention involves the implantation of: * a neurostimulator: the Activa® RC from Medtronic * a stimulation electrode paddle array: the Specify™ SureScan® 5-6-5 from Medtronic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurence of all SAEs and AEs deemed or related to study procedure or to the study investigational system

    Evaluate the safety of TESS at supporting locomotor rehabilitation in patients with Parkinson's Disease

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. EMG measurements of muscle recruitment in response to stimulation of increasing amplitudes for different contact configurations

    Assess the preliminary efficacy outcome of TESS to induce modulations in muscle recruitment selectivity by measuring the EMG response to iterative stimulation pulses of increasing amplitude for different contact configurations

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  2. Maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of single joints

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS on motor performance through changes in single joint leg muscle strength and fatigue

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  3. Muscle Fatigue Test

    Measure the time the patient can maintain a certain percentage of his MVC measured in the MED+DBS condition. This is used to assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS on motor performance through changes in single joint leg muscle strength and fatigue

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  4. 10-meter walk test

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS on motor performance through changes in gait speed and endurance

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  5. 6 minute walk test

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS on motor performance through changes in gait speed and endurance

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  6. Timed up and Go test and its cognitive version, as custom-made FOG circuit

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS for alleviating deficits specific to PD related to freezing of gait (FOG)

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  7. Kinematic analysis

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS for alleviating deficits specific to PD related to posture using motion sensors acquisition system

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  8. Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest)

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS for alleviating deficits specific to PD related to balance

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  9. Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)

    Assess the preliminary efficacy of TESS for alleviating deficits specific to PD related to motor and non-motor functions. Higher scores indicate greater impact of Parkinson's disease symptoms

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

Other outcomes

  1. Cortical (EEG) and subcortical signals (LFP from the subthalamic nucleus)

    Assess changes in brain activity patterns induced by TESS-supported physical training to get insight into the effects of TESS on brain dynamics. This will be done in the four therapy conditions for rest, for single-joint leg tasks and, if results are encouraging, for gait

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  2. Quality of life questionnaire PDQ-39

    Evaluate the effect of TESS-supported rehabilitation on quality of life of patients through the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). The score ranges from 0 to 100, lower scores reflect better quality of life

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  3. Quality of life questionnaire ABC-Q

    Evaluate the effect of TESS-supported rehabilitation on quality of life of patients through the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-Q). The score ranges from 0% to 100%, higher score reflects higher level of physical functioning

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  4. Quality of life questionnaire FOG-Q

    Evaluate the effect of TESS-supported rehabilitation on quality of life of patients through the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q). The score ranges from 0 to 24, higher scores correspond to more severe FOG

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  5. Quality of life questionnaire KPPS

    Evaluate the effect of TESS-supported rehabilitation on quality of life of patients through King's Parkinson's disease pain scale. The score ranges from 0 to 168, higher scores correspond to higher pain.

    Time frame: At baseline and during the 5-month TESS-supported rehabilitation phase

  6. Therapist expectations and learnings questionnaire

    Obtain information concerning the perceived efficacy of TESS-supported rehabilitation for Parkinson's patients and whether they would recommend tis new therapy for general clinical practice

    Time frame: At baseline (before the patient is implanted) and at the time of study completion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHUV
    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud 1011, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Strauss I, Kalia SK, Lozano AM. Where are we with surgical therapies for Parkinson's disease? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Jan;20 Suppl 1:S187-91. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70044-0. PubMed 24262178 ↗
  • Courtine G, Bloch J. Defining ecological strategies in neuroprosthetics. Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.039. PubMed 25856483 ↗
  • Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, van den Brand R, Yew A, Musienko P, Zhong H, Song B, Ao Y, Ichiyama RM, Lavrov I, Roy RR, Sofroniew MV, Edgerton VR. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1333-42. doi: 10.1038/nn.2401. Epub 2009 Sep 20. PubMed 19767747 ↗
  • Capogrosso M, Milekovic T, Borton D, Wagner F, Moraud EM, Mignardot JB, Buse N, Gandar J, Barraud Q, Xing D, Rey E, Duis S, Jianzhong Y, Ko WK, Li Q, Detemple P, Denison T, Micera S, Bezard E, Bloch J, Courtine G. A brain-spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates. Nature. 2016 Nov 10;539(7628):284-288. doi: 10.1038/nature20118. PubMed 27830790 ↗
  • Fuentes R, Petersson P, Siesser WB, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA. Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Science. 2009 Mar 20;323(5921):1578-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1164901. PubMed 19299613 ↗
  • Yadav AP, Nicolelis MAL. Electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017 Jun;32(6):820-832. doi: 10.1002/mds.27033. Epub 2017 May 12. PubMed 28497877 ↗
  • Santana MB, Halje P, Simplicio H, Richter U, Freire MAM, Petersson P, Fuentes R, Nicolelis MAL. Spinal cord stimulation alleviates motor deficits in a primate model of Parkinson disease. Neuron. 2014 Nov 19;84(4):716-722. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.061. Epub 2014 Oct 30. PubMed 25447740 ↗
  • Cai Y, Reddy RD, Varshney V, Chakravarthy KV. Spinal cord stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review of the preclinical and clinical data and future prospects. Bioelectron Med. 2020 Mar 16;6:5. doi: 10.1186/s42234-020-00041-9. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32232113 ↗
  • Prasad S, Aguirre-Padilla DH, Poon YY, Kalsi-Ryan S, Lozano AM, Fasano A. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Very Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A 1-Year Prospective Trial. Mov Disord. 2020 Jun;35(6):1082-1083. doi: 10.1002/mds.28065. Epub 2020 Apr 20. No abstract available. PubMed 32311155 ↗
  • Cury RG, Carra RB, Capato TTC, Teixeira MJ, Barbosa ER. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Dynamic Habituation as a Mechanism of Failure? Mov Disord. 2020 Oct;35(10):1882-1883. doi: 10.1002/mds.28271. No abstract available. PubMed 33068473 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04956770
Lead sponsor
Jocelyne Bloch
Collaborators
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Responsible party
Jocelyne Bloch (Professor, Neurosurgeon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2021
Start date
Jun 14, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2026
Completion
Apr 16, 2026
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Jocelyne Bloch, MD
principal investigator · CHUV

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion