A Phase 4 interventional study of Subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation and Dental Supplies in Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Type 2, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.
Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention
Purpose: The Baseline Oral Health Health Study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of regular, professional non-surgical Intensive Periodontal Therapy (scaling and root planing and optimal oral hygiene with associated professional oral health behavior advice ), on oral health as well as whether such effects are associated with corresponding changes to biomarkers characterizing systemic health.
Participants: The Baseline Oral Health Study will enroll approximately 200 participants in the study with approximately 100 participants each within the Control Group and the Treatment Group. The study population will be recruited from the Project Baseline Health Study participants in the North Carolina region and may be expanded to include subjects recruited from University of North Carolina (UNC) if the initial screening from Project Baseline Health Study pool of participants in the North Carolina region does not fulfill study enrollment powering.
Procedures (methods): The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants. The Project Baseline Health Study is a longitudinal cohort study which characterizes participants across clinical, molecular, imaging, sensor, self-reported, behavioral, psychological, environmental, or other health-related measurements from onsite and/or remote visits, continuous monitoring through sensor technology, and regular engagement via an online portal, and mobile app. The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (including prediabetes) and eligible for periodontal intervention. The study will use dental centers and an experienced dental team to manage the oral care provided in this study.
The Baseline Oral Health Health Study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of regular, professional non-surgical Intensive Periodontal Therapy (scaling and root planing and optimal oral hygiene with associated professional oral health behavior advice ), on oral health as well as whether such effects are associated with corresponding changes to biomarkers characterizing systemic health. The study will be conducted in partnership with Verily and the Project Baseline Team, Colgate, and the University of North Carolina. The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants. The Project Baseline Health Study is a longitudinal cohort study which characterizes participants across clinical, molecular, imaging, sensor, self-reported, behavioral, psychological, environmental, or other health-related measurements from onsite and/or remote visits, continuous monitoring through sensor technology, and regular engagement via an online portal, and mobile app.
The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (including prediabetes) and eligible for periodontal intervention. The study will use dental centers and an experienced dental team to manage the oral care provided in this study.
4,902 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 920 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 786 is above the median of 100 across 2,738 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.
Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.
Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Has either moderate (stage II) or severe (stage III) periodontitis:
Has at least one of the following indicators of cardiometabolic disease in the following range:
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD):
Exclusion Criteria:
The Treatment Group will receive the same periodontal treatment in addition to having subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation. All subjects will also complete a set of questionnaires (PANAS \& PMT) using an online form. A subset of 50 subjects from each group will be randomly selected to have oral images captured using an intra-oral scanner at Baseline and a subset of follow-up visits. Additionally, subjects in the Treatment Group will also receive brief behavioral advice from dental professionals focusing mainly on motivation and acknowledgement.
Drug: Subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation · Other: Dental Supplies · Other: Periodonal Treatment
The Control Group will receive an initial periodontal treatment consisting of a pre-procedural rinse and scaling \& root planning (SRP). Subjects in the Control Group will receive no products during the course of the study. They will receive a commercial connected toothbrush, toothpaste, mouthwash, proxabrush, and floss at the end of the study. Subjects will be scheduled to receive flow mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) measurements prior to Baseline and approximately 4 weeks after their Baseline visit.
Other: Periodonal Treatment
The dose information for the Chlorhexidine gluconate will be 0.12% with 1 mL in each dental pocket at a frequency of every 3 months for the duration of the study (18 months).
Subjects in the Treatment Group will receive a commercial electric toothbrush (Colgate hum), toothpaste (Colgate Renewal), mouthwash (Colgate Zero), proxabrush (Colgate), and floss (Colgate Palmolive brand) to be used at home along with instructions on their use. Brush heads for the electric toothbrush will be replaced every 3 months and products (toothpaste, mouthwash, proxabrush, and floss) will be replenished at every site visit.
Initial periodontal treatment consisting of a pre-procedural rinse and scaling \& root planing (SRP).
Impact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures
The impact of treatment on oral health measures, will be performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods. Longitudinal outcomes in the Treated vs. Control groups will be compared and will include all subjects who were randomized and their data from visits T1 - T4 based on intent-to-treat (ITT) group assignment. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health.
Time frame: Comparing T1 (day 90) and T4 (day 360)
Association Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c)
The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and % change in HbA1c will be determined in subjects with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes at screening.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Association Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation)
The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and change in flow-mediated dilation will be calculated.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Emotional Wellbeing
Emotional wellbeing will be evaluated through the use of PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales). PANAS consists of 10 positive and 10 negative valence word items. Items are rated by the participant to indicate their assessment of how they are feeling about this item "right now" on a scale of 1(slightly) or not at all through 5 (extremely). 10 of of the items form a positive affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates increased positive affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. 10 of the items form a negative affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates more negative affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. This outcome measure is change in the 10 item positive affect subscale.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease
Beliefs about periodontal disease will be evaluated through the use of a Protective Motivation Theory (PMT) survey. PMT surveys assess an individual's motivation to adopt protective health behaviors by focusing on specific cognitive processes. This survey includes 7 statements related to opinions on periodontal disease and treatment (e.g., "Periodontal disease worries me," "Adhering to my periodontal treatment instructions over the next weeks will improve my oral health"). Each survey item is scored from 1 to 10 with 1 being "not at all" to 10 being "extremely so." Higher values indicate stronger agreement with the survey statements. Reported outcome measures represent total survey scores (range from 7 to 70).
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Bleeding on Probing
Whole-mouth mean of tooth-specific dichotomic response (bleeding = 1, no bleeding = 0) after probing the gingival sulcus.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Gingival Index
The gingival index will be scored on three facial surfaces (distofacial, facial, mesiofacial) and three lingual surfaces (distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual). Areas are examined by placing the periodontal probe under the gingival margin at approximately 1mm deep and sweeping the probe from the distal surface to the mesial surface in quadrants I and IV and mesial to the distal surface in quadrants II and III. After each quadrant is swept, calls are made based on gingival inflammation and the presence or absence of bleeding according to criteria which range from 0 to 3. Loe and Silness Gingival Index (GI); scale: 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = moderate inflammation, 3 = severe inflammation. For this Outcome Measure, less inflammation (lower number) correlates with better outcome. Reported outcome measure is whole-mouth mean value (six surfaces of each tooth), with a range of 0 to 3.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Percent change of whole-mouth mean clinical attachment level (CAL, defined as measured pocket depth - gingival margin, for each site). Percent change calculated as (CAL@T4 - CAL@T0)/CAL@T0.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Dental Plaque Index
Change of digitally measured interdental plaque area. Full mouth plaque assessment shall be assessed using the UNC Modified Plaque Index (Greene and Vermillion). Plaque scores shall be visually assessed at 6 sites per tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal and distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual surfaces) on a scale of 0-3. Scores are the following: 0 =No debris or stain present on the clinical crown; 1 =Soft debris covering not more than 1/3 of the clinical crown (cervical 3rd), or presence of extrinsic stains without other debris regardless of surface area covered; 2 =Soft debris covering more than 1/3, but not more than 2/3 (middle 3rd) of the clinical crown; 3 =Soft debris covering more than 2/3 of the clinical crown. Reported outcome measure is calculated as whole-mouth mean (mean of each site at each tooth) with a range of 0 to 3.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Change in Flow-mediated Dilation
Change of flow mediated dilation. Ultrasound images of the right brachial artery and Doppler measures of arterial flow will be acquired before and after reactive hyperemia is induced by inflating a pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the lower arm. FMD will be calculated as the percent change in arterial diameter from baseline.
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts)
Percent change of HbA1c (% glycated) from day 0 to day 360 \[(HbA1c@T4 - HbA1c@T0) / HbA1c@T0\] in the prediabetic and diabetic cohorts (HbA1c \>= 5.7 at screening)
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT)
Percent change of IMT. Longitudinal ultrasound images of the distal 1 cm segments of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries will be acquired. IMT will be measured as the distance between luminal-intimal interface and medial-adventitial interface. Mean IMT will be calculated as the average of all measurements; mean maximum IMT will be calculated as the average of maximum wall thicknesses for each of the regions. Percent change of IMT (mm) from day 0 to day 360 is calculated as (IMT@T4 - IMT@T0) / IMT@T0\]
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
Percent change of hs-CRP (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(CRP@T4 - CRP@T0) / CRP@T0\]
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol
Percent change of total cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(tchol@T4 - tchol@T0) / tchol@T0\]
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Percent change of low density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(LDL@T4 - LDL@T0) / LDL@T0\]
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Percent Change in Triglycerides
Percent change of triglycerides (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(trig@T4 - trig@T0) / trig@T0\]
Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
| Milestone | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 73 | 82 |
| Completed t0 (day 0) | 73 | 80 |
| Completed t1 (day 90) | 65 | 70 |
| Completed t2 (day 180) | 61 | 65 |
| Completed t3 (day 270) | 56 | 57 |
| Completed t4 (day 360) | 54 | 56 |
| Completed | 53 | 54 |
| Not completed | 20 | 28 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 6 | 12 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 11 | 13 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 0 |
The impact of treatment on oral health measures, will be performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods. Longitudinal outcomes in the Treated vs. Control groups will be compared and will include all subjects who were randomized and their data from visits T1 - T4 based on intent-to-treat (ITT) group assignment. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health.
| millimeters (probing depth difference) | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures | 0.186 (0.0863 to 0.285) | 0.190 (0.0737 to 0.306) |
The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and % change in HbA1c will be determined in subjects with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes at screening.
| Pearson correlation coefficient | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Association Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c) | -0.093 ± 0.379 | -0.282 ± 0.5123 |
The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and change in flow-mediated dilation will be calculated.
| Pearson correlation coefficient | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Association Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation) | -0.0528 ± 0.3635 | 0.006 ± 0.5227 |
Emotional wellbeing will be evaluated through the use of PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales). PANAS consists of 10 positive and 10 negative valence word items. Items are rated by the participant to indicate their assessment of how they are feeling about this item "right now" on a scale of 1(slightly) or not at all through 5 (extremely). 10 of of the items form a positive affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates increased positive affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. 10 of the items form a negative affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates more negative affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. This outcome measure is change in the 10 item positive affect subscale.
| scores on a scale | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Emotional Wellbeing | 1.25 ± 6.93 | -0.6 ± 7.09 |
Beliefs about periodontal disease will be evaluated through the use of a Protective Motivation Theory (PMT) survey. PMT surveys assess an individual's motivation to adopt protective health behaviors by focusing on specific cognitive processes. This survey includes 7 statements related to opinions on periodontal disease and treatment (e.g., "Periodontal disease worries me," "Adhering to my periodontal treatment instructions over the next weeks will improve my oral health"). Each survey item is scored from 1 to 10 with 1 being "not at all" to 10 being "extremely so." Higher values indicate stronger agreement with the survey statements. Reported outcome measures represent total survey scores (range from 7 to 70).
| scores on a scale | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease | 2.56 ± 8.75 | -0.60 ± 4.47 |
Whole-mouth mean of tooth-specific dichotomic response (bleeding = 1, no bleeding = 0) after probing the gingival sulcus.
| scores on a scale | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Bleeding on Probing | -0.109 ± 0.188 | -0.212 ± 0.236 |
The gingival index will be scored on three facial surfaces (distofacial, facial, mesiofacial) and three lingual surfaces (distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual). Areas are examined by placing the periodontal probe under the gingival margin at approximately 1mm deep and sweeping the probe from the distal surface to the mesial surface in quadrants I and IV and mesial to the distal surface in quadrants II and III. After each quadrant is swept, calls are made based on gingival inflammation and the presence or absence of bleeding according to criteria which range from 0 to 3. Loe and Silness Gingival Index (GI); scale: 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = moderate inflammation, 3 = severe inflammation. For this Outcome Measure, less inflammation (lower number) correlates with better outcome. Reported outcome measure is whole-mouth mean value (six surfaces of each tooth), with a range of 0 to 3.
| scores on a scale | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Gingival Index | -0.154 ± 0.47 | -0.379 ± 0.559 |
Percent change of whole-mouth mean clinical attachment level (CAL, defined as measured pocket depth - gingival margin, for each site). Percent change calculated as (CAL@T4 - CAL@T0)/CAL@T0.
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) | -0.31 ± 22.2 | 0.90 ± 25.2 |
Change of digitally measured interdental plaque area. Full mouth plaque assessment shall be assessed using the UNC Modified Plaque Index (Greene and Vermillion). Plaque scores shall be visually assessed at 6 sites per tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal and distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual surfaces) on a scale of 0-3. Scores are the following: 0 =No debris or stain present on the clinical crown; 1 =Soft debris covering not more than 1/3 of the clinical crown (cervical 3rd), or presence of extrinsic stains without other debris regardless of surface area covered; 2 =Soft debris covering more than 1/3, but not more than 2/3 (middle 3rd) of the clinical crown; 3 =Soft debris covering more than 2/3 of the clinical crown. Reported outcome measure is calculated as whole-mouth mean (mean of each site at each tooth) with a range of 0 to 3.
| scores on a scale | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Dental Plaque Index | -0.090 ± 0.579 | -0.181 ± 0.537 |
Change of flow mediated dilation. Ultrasound images of the right brachial artery and Doppler measures of arterial flow will be acquired before and after reactive hyperemia is induced by inflating a pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the lower arm. FMD will be calculated as the percent change in arterial diameter from baseline.
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Flow-mediated Dilation | -0.488 ± 4.97 | 0.45 ± 4.23 |
Percent change of HbA1c (% glycated) from day 0 to day 360 \[(HbA1c@T4 - HbA1c@T0) / HbA1c@T0\] in the prediabetic and diabetic cohorts (HbA1c \>= 5.7 at screening)
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts) | -0.99 ± 2.21 | -0.65 ± 1.92 |
Percent change of IMT. Longitudinal ultrasound images of the distal 1 cm segments of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries will be acquired. IMT will be measured as the distance between luminal-intimal interface and medial-adventitial interface. Mean IMT will be calculated as the average of all measurements; mean maximum IMT will be calculated as the average of maximum wall thicknesses for each of the regions. Percent change of IMT (mm) from day 0 to day 360 is calculated as (IMT@T4 - IMT@T0) / IMT@T0\]
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) | 2.76 ± 14.9 | 3.48 ± 18.1 |
Percent change of hs-CRP (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(CRP@T4 - CRP@T0) / CRP@T0\]
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) | -8.56 ± 70.4 | 21.8 ± 171 |
Percent change of total cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(tchol@T4 - tchol@T0) / tchol@T0\]
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Total Cholesterol | -0.0554 ± 18.0 | -0.710 ± 16.2 |
Percent change of low density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(LDL@T4 - LDL@T0) / LDL@T0\]
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol | 2.63 ± 35.1 | -0.033 ± 26.0 |
Percent change of triglycerides (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(trig@T4 - trig@T0) / trig@T0\]
| % change | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Triglycerides | -2.86 ± 19.3 | -1.52 ± 21.9 |
Collected over From T0 (day 0) through the end of study, up to 15 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | 1/73 (1.4%) | 1/73 (1.4%) | 0/73 (0%) |
| Treatment Group | 0/80 (0%) | 0/80 (0%) | 0/80 (0%) |
| Event | Control Group | Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|
| PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders | 1/73 | 0/80 |
two participants withdrew between randomization and first intervention
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Control Group | Treatment Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 66 | 72 | 138 |
| >=65 years | 7 | 8 | 15 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Control Group | Treatment Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 42 | 47 | 89 |
| Male | 31 | 33 | 64 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Control Group | Treatment Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 36 | 41 | 77 |
| White | 30 | 33 | 63 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Diabetes/pre-diabetes(Participants) | Control Group | Treatment Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prediabetes/diabetes ( HbA1c >=5.7 at screening) | 57 | 64 | 121 |
| Non-prediabetes/non-diabetes ( HbA1c < 5.7 at screening) | 16 | 14 | 30 |
| Uncategorized (HbA1c not recorded at screening or T0) | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Supporting information: Study protocol
This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill