CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04954313Updated Feb 12, 2026Results posted

Baseline Oral Health Study: UnCoVer the Connections to General Health

A Phase 4 interventional study of Subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation and Dental Supplies in Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes Type 2, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
786
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: The Baseline Oral Health Health Study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of regular, professional non-surgical Intensive Periodontal Therapy (scaling and root planing and optimal oral hygiene with associated professional oral health behavior advice ), on oral health as well as whether such effects are associated with corresponding changes to biomarkers characterizing systemic health.

Participants: The Baseline Oral Health Study will enroll approximately 200 participants in the study with approximately 100 participants each within the Control Group and the Treatment Group. The study population will be recruited from the Project Baseline Health Study participants in the North Carolina region and may be expanded to include subjects recruited from University of North Carolina (UNC) if the initial screening from Project Baseline Health Study pool of participants in the North Carolina region does not fulfill study enrollment powering.

Procedures (methods): The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants. The Project Baseline Health Study is a longitudinal cohort study which characterizes participants across clinical, molecular, imaging, sensor, self-reported, behavioral, psychological, environmental, or other health-related measurements from onsite and/or remote visits, continuous monitoring through sensor technology, and regular engagement via an online portal, and mobile app. The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (including prediabetes) and eligible for periodontal intervention. The study will use dental centers and an experienced dental team to manage the oral care provided in this study.

Read the detailed description

The Baseline Oral Health Health Study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of regular, professional non-surgical Intensive Periodontal Therapy (scaling and root planing and optimal oral hygiene with associated professional oral health behavior advice ), on oral health as well as whether such effects are associated with corresponding changes to biomarkers characterizing systemic health. The study will be conducted in partnership with Verily and the Project Baseline Team, Colgate, and the University of North Carolina. The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants. The Project Baseline Health Study is a longitudinal cohort study which characterizes participants across clinical, molecular, imaging, sensor, self-reported, behavioral, psychological, environmental, or other health-related measurements from onsite and/or remote visits, continuous monitoring through sensor technology, and regular engagement via an online portal, and mobile app.

The study population will be recruited from Project Baseline Health Study participants diagnosed with cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (including prediabetes) and eligible for periodontal intervention. The study will use dental centers and an experienced dental team to manage the oral care provided in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Diabetes Type 2

Keywords

  • Oral health
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

4,902 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 786 is above the median of 100 across 2,738 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At least eighteen (18) years of age but not older than seventy (70) years of age at the time of screening
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Has at least 16 teeth present.
  • Able to consent, follow an outpatient protocol, and is available by telephone
  • Has either moderate (stage II) or severe (stage III) periodontitis:

    • Stage II - Interdental clinical attachment level (CAL) at the site of greatest loss = 3 to 4mm with maximum probing depth ≤ 5mm
    • Stage III - Interdental CAL at the site of greatest loss ≥ 5mm, probing depth (PD)≥ 6mm, and radiographic bone loss (vertical bone loss ≥ 3mm)
  • Has at least one of the following indicators of cardiometabolic disease in the following range:

    • Type 2 diabetes: 9% ≥ HbA1c ≥ 6.5% OR Prediabetes: 6.4%≥ HbA1c ≥ 5.7% OR
    • Cardiovascular Disease (CVD):

      • Medical history of Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease or stroke
  • Access to Apple (iOS) devices or Android devices with appropriate versions to be compatible with the applications to complete study procedures.
  • Females of childbearing capacity must be willing to have pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who exhibit gross oral pathology
  • Presenting oral manifestations of systemic diseases (e.g. pemphigus, pemphigoid, lupus)
  • Presence of any acute or chronic systemic infection as determined by the clinician
  • Periodontal treatment performed within 6 months prior to study start
  • Refusal to extract hopeless teeth identified as determined by the clinician at the screening visit.
  • Participating in any other interventional cardiometabolic or Oral Health study
  • Individuals currently undergoing any type of orthodontic treatment (e.g. aligners)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
786 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group

    The Treatment Group will receive the same periodontal treatment in addition to having subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation. All subjects will also complete a set of questionnaires (PANAS \& PMT) using an online form. A subset of 50 subjects from each group will be randomly selected to have oral images captured using an intra-oral scanner at Baseline and a subset of follow-up visits. Additionally, subjects in the Treatment Group will also receive brief behavioral advice from dental professionals focusing mainly on motivation and acknowledgement.

    Drug: Subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation · Other: Dental Supplies · Other: Periodonal Treatment

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    The Control Group will receive an initial periodontal treatment consisting of a pre-procedural rinse and scaling \& root planning (SRP). Subjects in the Control Group will receive no products during the course of the study. They will receive a commercial connected toothbrush, toothpaste, mouthwash, proxabrush, and floss at the end of the study. Subjects will be scheduled to receive flow mediated dilation (FMD) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) measurements prior to Baseline and approximately 4 weeks after their Baseline visit.

    Other: Periodonal Treatment

Interventions

  • DrugSubgingival chlorhexidine irrigation

    The dose information for the Chlorhexidine gluconate will be 0.12% with 1 mL in each dental pocket at a frequency of every 3 months for the duration of the study (18 months).

  • OtherDental Supplies

    Subjects in the Treatment Group will receive a commercial electric toothbrush (Colgate hum), toothpaste (Colgate Renewal), mouthwash (Colgate Zero), proxabrush (Colgate), and floss (Colgate Palmolive brand) to be used at home along with instructions on their use. Brush heads for the electric toothbrush will be replaced every 3 months and products (toothpaste, mouthwash, proxabrush, and floss) will be replenished at every site visit.

  • OtherPeriodonal Treatment

    Initial periodontal treatment consisting of a pre-procedural rinse and scaling \& root planing (SRP).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures

    The impact of treatment on oral health measures, will be performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods. Longitudinal outcomes in the Treated vs. Control groups will be compared and will include all subjects who were randomized and their data from visits T1 - T4 based on intent-to-treat (ITT) group assignment. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health.

    Time frame: Comparing T1 (day 90) and T4 (day 360)

  2. Association Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c)

    The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and % change in HbA1c will be determined in subjects with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes at screening.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  3. Association Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation)

    The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and change in flow-mediated dilation will be calculated.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Emotional Wellbeing

    Emotional wellbeing will be evaluated through the use of PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales). PANAS consists of 10 positive and 10 negative valence word items. Items are rated by the participant to indicate their assessment of how they are feeling about this item "right now" on a scale of 1(slightly) or not at all through 5 (extremely). 10 of of the items form a positive affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates increased positive affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. 10 of the items form a negative affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates more negative affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. This outcome measure is change in the 10 item positive affect subscale.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  2. Change in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease

    Beliefs about periodontal disease will be evaluated through the use of a Protective Motivation Theory (PMT) survey. PMT surveys assess an individual's motivation to adopt protective health behaviors by focusing on specific cognitive processes. This survey includes 7 statements related to opinions on periodontal disease and treatment (e.g., "Periodontal disease worries me," "Adhering to my periodontal treatment instructions over the next weeks will improve my oral health"). Each survey item is scored from 1 to 10 with 1 being "not at all" to 10 being "extremely so." Higher values indicate stronger agreement with the survey statements. Reported outcome measures represent total survey scores (range from 7 to 70).

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  3. Change in Bleeding on Probing

    Whole-mouth mean of tooth-specific dichotomic response (bleeding = 1, no bleeding = 0) after probing the gingival sulcus.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  4. Change in Gingival Index

    The gingival index will be scored on three facial surfaces (distofacial, facial, mesiofacial) and three lingual surfaces (distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual). Areas are examined by placing the periodontal probe under the gingival margin at approximately 1mm deep and sweeping the probe from the distal surface to the mesial surface in quadrants I and IV and mesial to the distal surface in quadrants II and III. After each quadrant is swept, calls are made based on gingival inflammation and the presence or absence of bleeding according to criteria which range from 0 to 3. Loe and Silness Gingival Index (GI); scale: 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = moderate inflammation, 3 = severe inflammation. For this Outcome Measure, less inflammation (lower number) correlates with better outcome. Reported outcome measure is whole-mouth mean value (six surfaces of each tooth), with a range of 0 to 3.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  5. Percent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

    Percent change of whole-mouth mean clinical attachment level (CAL, defined as measured pocket depth - gingival margin, for each site). Percent change calculated as (CAL@T4 - CAL@T0)/CAL@T0.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  6. Change in Dental Plaque Index

    Change of digitally measured interdental plaque area. Full mouth plaque assessment shall be assessed using the UNC Modified Plaque Index (Greene and Vermillion). Plaque scores shall be visually assessed at 6 sites per tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal and distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual surfaces) on a scale of 0-3. Scores are the following: 0 =No debris or stain present on the clinical crown; 1 =Soft debris covering not more than 1/3 of the clinical crown (cervical 3rd), or presence of extrinsic stains without other debris regardless of surface area covered; 2 =Soft debris covering more than 1/3, but not more than 2/3 (middle 3rd) of the clinical crown; 3 =Soft debris covering more than 2/3 of the clinical crown. Reported outcome measure is calculated as whole-mouth mean (mean of each site at each tooth) with a range of 0 to 3.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  7. Change in Flow-mediated Dilation

    Change of flow mediated dilation. Ultrasound images of the right brachial artery and Doppler measures of arterial flow will be acquired before and after reactive hyperemia is induced by inflating a pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the lower arm. FMD will be calculated as the percent change in arterial diameter from baseline.

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  8. Percent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts)

    Percent change of HbA1c (% glycated) from day 0 to day 360 \[(HbA1c@T4 - HbA1c@T0) / HbA1c@T0\] in the prediabetic and diabetic cohorts (HbA1c \>= 5.7 at screening)

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  9. Percent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT)

    Percent change of IMT. Longitudinal ultrasound images of the distal 1 cm segments of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries will be acquired. IMT will be measured as the distance between luminal-intimal interface and medial-adventitial interface. Mean IMT will be calculated as the average of all measurements; mean maximum IMT will be calculated as the average of maximum wall thicknesses for each of the regions. Percent change of IMT (mm) from day 0 to day 360 is calculated as (IMT@T4 - IMT@T0) / IMT@T0\]

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  10. Percent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

    Percent change of hs-CRP (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(CRP@T4 - CRP@T0) / CRP@T0\]

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  11. Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

    Percent change of total cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(tchol@T4 - tchol@T0) / tchol@T0\]

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  12. Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

    Percent change of low density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(LDL@T4 - LDL@T0) / LDL@T0\]

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

  13. Percent Change in Triglycerides

    Percent change of triglycerides (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(trig@T4 - trig@T0) / trig@T0\]

    Time frame: Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)

07

Results

Posted Feb 12, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl GroupTreatment Group
Started7382
Completed t0 (day 0)7380
Completed t1 (day 90)6570
Completed t2 (day 180)6165
Completed t3 (day 270)5657
Completed t4 (day 360)5456
Completed5354
Not completed2028
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up612
Withdrew: Protocol violation12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1113
Withdrew: Physician decision01
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Adverse event10

Outcome measures

PrimaryImpact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures

The impact of treatment on oral health measures, will be performed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods. Longitudinal outcomes in the Treated vs. Control groups will be compared and will include all subjects who were randomized and their data from visits T1 - T4 based on intent-to-treat (ITT) group assignment. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health.

Time frame:
Comparing T1 (day 90) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimeters (probing depth difference)
Impact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures
millimeters (probing depth difference)Control GroupTreatment Group
Impact of Treatment on Change in Oral Health Measures0.186 (0.0863 to 0.285)0.190 (0.0737 to 0.306)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · Generalized Estimating Equations · p = 0.957 (p values are presented without adjustment for multiple hypotheses.) · Difference in difference of lsm: -0.00419 · 95% CI -0.157 to 0.149Change from T1 to T4 in the control group compared to the treatment group
PrimaryAssociation Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c)

The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and % change in HbA1c will be determined in subjects with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes at screening.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Number · Pearson correlation coefficient
Association Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c)
Pearson correlation coefficientControl GroupTreatment Group
Association Between Changes in Oral Health (Probing Depth) and Changes in Systemic Health (HbA1c)-0.093 ± 0.379-0.282 ± 0.5123
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.0378
PrimaryAssociation Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation)

The association between changes in oral health and changes in systemic health, will be evaluated using correlation analysis. Periodontal probing depths (mm) will be measured per sextant. Whole-mouth mean probing depths will be used as a measure of oral health. The correlation between % change in whole-mouth mean probing depth and change in flow-mediated dilation will be calculated.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Number · Pearson correlation coefficient
Association Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation)
Pearson correlation coefficientControl GroupTreatment Group
Association Between Changes in Oral Health and Changes in Systemic Health (Flow-mediated Dilation)-0.0528 ± 0.36350.006 ± 0.5227
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.4735
SecondaryChange in Emotional Wellbeing

Emotional wellbeing will be evaluated through the use of PANAS (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales). PANAS consists of 10 positive and 10 negative valence word items. Items are rated by the participant to indicate their assessment of how they are feeling about this item "right now" on a scale of 1(slightly) or not at all through 5 (extremely). 10 of of the items form a positive affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates increased positive affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. 10 of the items form a negative affect subscale, in which a higher score indicates more negative affect, with a subscale range of 10 to 50. This outcome measure is change in the 10 item positive affect subscale.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Emotional Wellbeing
scores on a scaleControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Emotional Wellbeing1.25 ± 6.93-0.6 ± 7.09
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.469
SecondaryChange in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease

Beliefs about periodontal disease will be evaluated through the use of a Protective Motivation Theory (PMT) survey. PMT surveys assess an individual's motivation to adopt protective health behaviors by focusing on specific cognitive processes. This survey includes 7 statements related to opinions on periodontal disease and treatment (e.g., "Periodontal disease worries me," "Adhering to my periodontal treatment instructions over the next weeks will improve my oral health"). Each survey item is scored from 1 to 10 with 1 being "not at all" to 10 being "extremely so." Higher values indicate stronger agreement with the survey statements. Reported outcome measures represent total survey scores (range from 7 to 70).

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease
scores on a scaleControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Beliefs About Periodontal Disease2.56 ± 8.75-0.60 ± 4.47
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.220
SecondaryChange in Bleeding on Probing

Whole-mouth mean of tooth-specific dichotomic response (bleeding = 1, no bleeding = 0) after probing the gingival sulcus.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Bleeding on Probing
scores on a scaleControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Bleeding on Probing-0.109 ± 0.188-0.212 ± 0.236
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.014
SecondaryChange in Gingival Index

The gingival index will be scored on three facial surfaces (distofacial, facial, mesiofacial) and three lingual surfaces (distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual). Areas are examined by placing the periodontal probe under the gingival margin at approximately 1mm deep and sweeping the probe from the distal surface to the mesial surface in quadrants I and IV and mesial to the distal surface in quadrants II and III. After each quadrant is swept, calls are made based on gingival inflammation and the presence or absence of bleeding according to criteria which range from 0 to 3. Loe and Silness Gingival Index (GI); scale: 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation, 2 = moderate inflammation, 3 = severe inflammation. For this Outcome Measure, less inflammation (lower number) correlates with better outcome. Reported outcome measure is whole-mouth mean value (six surfaces of each tooth), with a range of 0 to 3.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Gingival Index
scores on a scaleControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Gingival Index-0.154 ± 0.47-0.379 ± 0.559
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.025
SecondaryPercent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

Percent change of whole-mouth mean clinical attachment level (CAL, defined as measured pocket depth - gingival margin, for each site). Percent change calculated as (CAL@T4 - CAL@T0)/CAL@T0.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)-0.31 ± 22.20.90 ± 25.2
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.79
SecondaryChange in Dental Plaque Index

Change of digitally measured interdental plaque area. Full mouth plaque assessment shall be assessed using the UNC Modified Plaque Index (Greene and Vermillion). Plaque scores shall be visually assessed at 6 sites per tooth (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal and distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual surfaces) on a scale of 0-3. Scores are the following: 0 =No debris or stain present on the clinical crown; 1 =Soft debris covering not more than 1/3 of the clinical crown (cervical 3rd), or presence of extrinsic stains without other debris regardless of surface area covered; 2 =Soft debris covering more than 1/3, but not more than 2/3 (middle 3rd) of the clinical crown; 3 =Soft debris covering more than 2/3 of the clinical crown. Reported outcome measure is calculated as whole-mouth mean (mean of each site at each tooth) with a range of 0 to 3.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Dental Plaque Index
scores on a scaleControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Dental Plaque Index-0.090 ± 0.579-0.181 ± 0.537
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.394
SecondaryChange in Flow-mediated Dilation

Change of flow mediated dilation. Ultrasound images of the right brachial artery and Doppler measures of arterial flow will be acquired before and after reactive hyperemia is induced by inflating a pneumatic occlusion cuff placed around the lower arm. FMD will be calculated as the percent change in arterial diameter from baseline.

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Change in Flow-mediated Dilation
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Change in Flow-mediated Dilation-0.488 ± 4.970.45 ± 4.23
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.323
SecondaryPercent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts)

Percent change of HbA1c (% glycated) from day 0 to day 360 \[(HbA1c@T4 - HbA1c@T0) / HbA1c@T0\] in the prediabetic and diabetic cohorts (HbA1c \>= 5.7 at screening)

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts)
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Prediabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Cohorts)-0.99 ± 2.21-0.65 ± 1.92
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.464
SecondaryPercent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT)

Percent change of IMT. Longitudinal ultrasound images of the distal 1 cm segments of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries will be acquired. IMT will be measured as the distance between luminal-intimal interface and medial-adventitial interface. Mean IMT will be calculated as the average of all measurements; mean maximum IMT will be calculated as the average of maximum wall thicknesses for each of the regions. Percent change of IMT (mm) from day 0 to day 360 is calculated as (IMT@T4 - IMT@T0) / IMT@T0\]

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT)
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT)2.76 ± 14.93.48 ± 18.1
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.838
SecondaryPercent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

Percent change of hs-CRP (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(CRP@T4 - CRP@T0) / CRP@T0\]

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-8.56 ± 70.421.8 ± 171
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.242
SecondaryPercent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change of total cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(tchol@T4 - tchol@T0) / tchol@T0\]

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol-0.0554 ± 18.0-0.710 ± 16.2
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.847
SecondaryPercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

Percent change of low density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(LDL@T4 - LDL@T0) / LDL@T0\]

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol2.63 ± 35.1-0.033 ± 26.0
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.666
SecondaryPercent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change of triglycerides (mg/dL) from day 0 to day 360 \[(trig@T4 - trig@T0) / trig@T0\]

Time frame:
Comparing T0 (day 0) and T4 (day 360)
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Percent Change in Triglycerides
% changeControl GroupTreatment Group
Percent Change in Triglycerides-2.86 ± 19.3-1.52 ± 21.9
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Treatment Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.758

Adverse events

Collected over From T0 (day 0) through the end of study, up to 15 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group1/73 (1.4%)1/73 (1.4%)0/73 (0%)
Treatment Group0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)0/80 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControl GroupTreatment Group
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/730/80

Baseline characteristics

two participants withdrew between randomization and first intervention

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control GroupTreatment GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6672138
>=65 years7815
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupTreatment GroupTotal
Female424789
Male313364
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control GroupTreatment GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native303
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American364177
White303363
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported358
Diabetes/pre-diabetes
Diabetes/pre-diabetes(Participants)Control GroupTreatment GroupTotal
Prediabetes/diabetes ( HbA1c >=5.7 at screening)5764121
Non-prediabetes/non-diabetes ( HbA1c < 5.7 at screening)161430
Uncategorized (HbA1c not recorded at screening or T0)022
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • UNC Nutrition Research Institute
    Kannapolis, North Carolina 28081, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 2, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Supporting information: Study protocol

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04954313
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Colgate Palmolive
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2021
Start date
Sep 28, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2025
Completion
Feb 1, 2025
Results posted
Feb 12, 2026
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Saroja Voruganti, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion