ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04949854Updated Sep 18, 2023

Evaluating the Role of the Guidewire in Peripheral Intravenous Access

An interventional study of B.Braun 6.35 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter and B.D Accucath 5.71 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter in Peripheral Intravenous Vein Catheter Phlebitis and Intravenous Infection, sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-18.

Sponsored by William Beaumont Hospitals · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was withdrawn
Protocol was substantially revised
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to demonstrate that the control ultralong intravenous catheter without the guide wire is equivalent to the experimental catheter with the guide wire. The hypothesis of this study is that the 6.35 cm 20G ultralong Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous (USPIV) will have no difference in survival compared to the 5.71 cm ultralong with wire USPIV.

Read the detailed description

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is a standard hospital procedure that enables providers to rapidly administer fluids, medications, or blood products directly into a patients vein. This allows patients who have difficulty with tolerating oral intake or patients who are being prepared for surgery to still receive the proper treatments. Furthermore, because many medications are not designed to be administered orally, a PIVC is often used.

Despite being a common procedure, PIVC insertion routinely fails with failure rates of traditional blind intravenous (IV) catheter placement ranging from 19%-29.9%. Common causes of failure include infiltration, occlusion, dislodgement, phlebitis, and infection. In addition to increasing costs, multiple placements of an IV catheter during a hospital stay places a considerable time burden on hospital staff. One effort to alleviate this burden has been the introduction of ultrasound, which is shown to help mitigate failure rates of PIVC placement in patients with difficult vascular access. .

The catheter length in vein is the single most relevant variable in determining catheter survival in USPIV insertions. IV Catheter survival depends on the length of the catheter inside the veins. Vein depth and angle of insertion play a significant role in choosing the right catheter length to achieve the ideal quantity of catheter in vein. When a shallow angle is used, the catheter distance to the vein also increases and longer catheters are needed to achieve the optimal 2.75 cm in vein. Unfortunately, the longest most commonly stocked peripheral IV catheter at most institutions is 4.78 cm. This length is inadequate for insertions with a vein depth of greater than approximately 0.75 cm. As this is a commonly encountered vein depth, longer peripheral IV catheters are needed to ensure improved catheter survival.Few peripheral intravenous catheter options exist with the Ultra Long profile. The 6.35 cm B. Braun deep access device and the BD 5.71 cm Accucath device are two commercially available options for this category of ultra long peripheral IVs. Both catheters are available and being used in Beaumont Hospital.The 6.35 cm option is similar to other peripheral IV catheters and is inserted using the same technique applied for all ultrasound guided IV insertions. The 5.71 cm option is similar to other peripheral IVs with the additional feature of a built-in wire within the device to help guide the catheter in the vein once the needle has penetrated the vein. The cost of the 5.71 cm option is approximately ten times the cost of the 6.35 cm device.

Adult patients with a Vascular Access Score of 4 or 5 (where Score 1= Visible with distention and easily palpable; Score 2=Visible and easily palpable; Score 3= Not visible and easily palpable; Score 4=Visible and poorly palpable and Score 5=Not visible and poorly or non-palpable) will be approached for inclusion in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Intravenous Vein Catheter Phlebitis
  • Intravenous Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PIV
  • BBraun Ultra Long Catheter
  • BD Accucath
  • Phlebitis
  • IV Infection
03

In context

Phlebitis

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Phlebitis; 9 are open to participants now.

Browse Phlebitis studies →

Lead sponsor

William Beaumont Hospitals is the lead sponsor of 111 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligible patients must be:

  1. ≥ than 18 years old
  2. Vascular Access Score 4 or 5.

Clinicians Eligibility Criteria:

  1. Clinician working in the emergency room (physician, advanced practice provider, nurse, technician) OR clinician working on the inpatient vascular access team (advanced practice provider, nurse)
  2. Greater than 6 months experience in ultrasound guided IV insertions

Patients are excluded:

  1. \<18 years old
  2. Restricted mobility of elbow joint
  3. Cognitively impaired
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm B.Braun 6.35 cm 20 Gauge catheter

    Device 6.35 cm 20 Gauge B. Braun catheter without guidewire

    Device: B.Braun 6.35 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter

  • Experimental
    Experimental Arm B.D. Accucath 5.71 cm 20 Gauge catheter

    Device BD 5.71 cm Accucath IV catheter with guidewire

    Device: B.D Accucath 5.71 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceB.Braun 6.35 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter

    control Arm 1 (6.35 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter without guidewire

  • DeviceB.D Accucath 5.71 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter

    Experimental Arm B.D Accucath 5.71 cm 20 Gauge ultralong intravenous catheter with guide wire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Catheter survival

    Survival in hours or days of the catheter will be evaluated by functionality of catheter for intravenous therapy prior to patient discharge. The event of interest is failure of functionality identified during follow-up assessment during hospitalization.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 60 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. First-stick success.

    Number of patients with only one puncture of skin to achieve venous access

    Time frame: First day of hospitalization

  2. Time to insertion

    Time to insertion (measured in minutes) is defined as needlestick to dressing application.

    Time frame: First day of hospitalization

  3. Provider proficiency

    Change in mean number of attempts per patient for successful insertion, from baseline mean for first three patients attempted to last three patients attempted.

    Time frame: Study period, a maximum of 1 year

  4. Total cost for all vascular access needs during hospitalization.

    Cost per patient for vascular access during hospitalization, comprising (i) direct costs of IV insertion based on estimated labor and material cost per insertion attempt and estimated similar costs for rescue devices if needed and (ii) cost of treatment based on estimated cost per hour.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 60 days

  5. Catheter-associated thrombosis

    The number of patients with all symptomatic catheter related upper extremity venous thrombosis inclusive of superficial thrombophlebitis (SVT), deep venous thrombosis(DVT), and pulmonary embolism will be confirmed by upper extremity doppler evaluation, computed tomography, and/or ventilation perfusion testing.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 60 days

  6. Catheter-associated bloodstream infection

    The number of patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infection. Cases of infection will be diagnosed per laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection criteria published by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and identified by the Department of Epidemiology at Beaumont Hospital.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 60 days

Other outcomes

  1. Inflammatory complications by clinical assessment

    Number of patients with inflammatory complications measured by a score of 2 or greater on a standardized visual phlebitis scale, with a range of 0 to 5 where 0 is no inflammation and 5 is advanced stage thrombophlebitis.

    Time frame: During hospitalization, up to 60 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beaumont Hospitals
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04949854
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2021
Start date
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2023

Study contacts

Amit Bahl, MD.
principal investigator · William Beaumont Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion