CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04948697Updated Feb 24, 2025Results posted

A Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Ociperlimab and Tislelizumab and BAT1706 Combinations in Patients With Advanced HCC

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ociperlimab and Tislelizumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, sponsored by BeiGene. Completed at 28 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by BeiGene · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was a Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, 2-arm study to investigate the efficacy and safety of ociperlimab in combination with tislelizumab plus BAT1706, and tislelizumab plus BAT1706, as first-line treatment in participants with advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

BeiGene is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Criteria:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed HCC
  2. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C disease, or BCLC Stage B disease that was not amenable to or had progressed after loco-regional therapy, and was not amenable to a curative treatment approach
  3. Tumor tissue required for an evaluable programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression result
  4. No prior systemic therapy for HCC
  5. At least 1 measurable lesion as defined per RECIST v1.1
  6. Adequate organ function during screening and before randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known fibrolamellar HCC, sarcomatoid HCC, or mixed cholangiocarcinoma and HCC histology
  2. Prior therapy with antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathway; prior treatment with bevacizumab or its biosimilars
  3. Prior history of >= Grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy
  4. Leptomeningeal disease or uncontrolled, untreated brain metastasis
  5. Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse
  6. History of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonitis or uncontrolled lung diseases including pulmonary fibrosis, acute lung diseases
  7. Infection (including tuberculosis) requiring systemic antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral therapy within 14 days of randomization
  8. Prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation or organ transplantation
  9. Significant cardiovascular risk factors
  10. Untreated or incompletely treated esophageal or gastric varices with bleeding or high risk of bleeding
  11. History of severe hypersensitivity reactions to other monoclonal antibodies
  12. Administered a live vaccine \<=28 days before randomization

NOTE: Other protocol Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706

    Participants received tislelizumab 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously once every 3 weeks followed by BAT1706 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenously once every 3 weeks followed by ociperlimab 900 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks in 21-day treatment cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for other reasons, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Ociperlimab · Drug: Tislelizumab · Drug: BAT1706

  • Experimental
    Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706

    Participants received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks followed by BAT1706 15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks in 21-day treatment cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for other reasons, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Tislelizumab · Drug: BAT1706

Interventions

  • DrugOciperlimab

    900 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (dosed in 21-day cycles)

    Also known as: BGB-A1217

  • DrugTislelizumab

    200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (dosed in 21-day cycles)

    Also known as: BGB-A317

  • DrugBAT1706

    15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks (dosed in 21-day cycles)

    Also known as: Bevacizumab Injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version(v) 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Per RECIST v1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration Of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a partial response (PR) or better to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or death whichever comes first, assessed based on RECIST v1.1. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

    Time frame: From the first confirmed objective response until the first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever came first (i.e. up to 27 months)

  2. Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the Investigator

    TTR was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first documented partial response (PR) or better by the investigator, assessed based on RECIST v1.1. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From the randomization date to the first documentation of response (up to 27 months)

  3. Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by the Investigator

    DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), assessed based on RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)

  4. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by the Investigator

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or durable stable disease (stable disease defined as \>= 24 weeks). Per RECIST 1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)

  5. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

    PFS was evaluated by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1; and was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

    Time frame: From the randomization date to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)

  6. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the randomization date until the date of death from any cause. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From the randomization date until the date of death from any cause (up to 27 months)

  7. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that had an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline (pretreatment) on or after the first dose of study drug(s) and up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug(s), or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurs first. AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version (v) 5.0, where Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4 - Life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5: Death related to AE. The TEAEs leading to death in this data table exclude death due to disease under study.

    Time frame: From the date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (i.e., up to 27 months)

  8. Serum Concentrations of Ociperlimab

    Serum samples were assayed for ociperlimab concentrations using a validated immunoassay. This outcome measure was not analyzed for Arm B as ociperlimab was not administered in Arm B.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)

  9. Serum Concentrations of Tislelizumab

    Serum samples were assayed for tislelizumab concentrations using a validated immunoassay.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)

  10. Serum Concentrations of BAT1706

    Serum samples were assayed for BAT1706 concentrations using a validated immunoassay.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)

  11. Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ociperlimab, Tislelizumab, and BAT1706

    Serum samples were tested for the presence of ADAs to ociperlimab, tislelizumab and BAT1706 using a validated immunoassay. The analysis included: Treatment-emergent ADA: sum of treatment-boosted ADA patients and treatment-induced ADA participants as a percentage of the ADA-evaluable participants population; Treatment-boosted ADA: Baseline-positive ADA-evaluable patients with significant increases (4-fold or higher) in ADA titer after drug administration during the treatment or follow-up observation period; and Treatment-induced ADA: ADA-evaluable participants that were ADA-negative at baseline and ADA-positive after drug administration during the treatment or follow-up observation period.

    Time frame: Up to 27 months

07

Results

Posted Feb 24, 2025

Participant flow

A total of 94 eligible participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ociperlimab in combination with tislelizumab + BAT1706 or tislelizumab + BAT1706.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Started6232
Treated6231
Completed00
Not completed6232
Withdrew: Progressive disease2718
Withdrew: Adverse event144
Withdrew: Participant moved to long term extension study74
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Closed by sponsor32
Withdrew: Physician decision02
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Other-miscellaneous10
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated01

Outcome measures

PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version(v) 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Per RECIST v1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator
percentage of participantsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator37.1 (25.2 to 50.3)40.6 (23.7 to 59.4)
SecondaryDuration Of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a partial response (PR) or better to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or death whichever comes first, assessed based on RECIST v1.1. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v1.1, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Time frame:
From the first confirmed objective response until the first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever came first (i.e. up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration Of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator
monthsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Duration Of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator12.6 (6.9 to NA)12.4 (5.4 to NA)
SecondaryTime to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the Investigator

TTR was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first documented partial response (PR) or better by the investigator, assessed based on RECIST v1.1. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From the randomization date to the first documentation of response (up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the Investigator
monthsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the Investigator2.76 (1.2 to 6.9)4.17 (1.4 to 8.3)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by the Investigator

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), assessed based on RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by the Investigator
percentage of participantsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by the Investigator77.4 (65.0 to 87.1)71.9 (53.3 to 86.3)
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by the Investigator

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or durable stable disease (stable disease defined as \>= 24 weeks). Per RECIST 1.1., CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by the Investigator
percentage of participantsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Assessed by the Investigator59.7 (46.4 to 71.9)56.3 (37.7 to 73.6)
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

PFS was evaluated by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1; and was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Per RECIST v 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Time frame:
From the randomization date to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever came first (i.e., up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
monthsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator8.3 (5.5 to 10.3)6.9 (4.1 to 17.4)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the randomization date until the date of death from any cause. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From the randomization date until the date of death from any cause (up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Overall Survival (OS)19.7 (18.4 to NA)22.9 (14.4 to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that had an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline (pretreatment) on or after the first dose of study drug(s) and up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug(s), or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurs first. AEs were graded for severity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version (v) 5.0, where Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4 - Life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5: Death related to AE. The TEAEs leading to death in this data table exclude death due to disease under study.

Time frame:
From the date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (i.e., up to 27 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
TEAEs6231
Serious TEAEs3112
TEAEs >= Grade 34817
TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation186
TEAEs Leading to Death Excluding Death Due to Disease Under Study30
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Ociperlimab

Serum samples were assayed for ociperlimab concentrations using a validated immunoassay. This outcome measure was not analyzed for Arm B as ociperlimab was not administered in Arm B.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)
Serum Concentrations of Ociperlimab
micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0.00 ± 0.000
Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose287.15 ± 50.203
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose39.82 ± 16.896
Cycle 5 Day 1: Pre-dose68.23 ± 28.422
Cycle 5 Day 1: Post-dose385.22 ± 79.227
Cycle 9 Day 1: Pre-dose79.83 ± 30.614
Cycle 17 Day 1: Pre-dose78.16 ± 29.558
Safety Follow-up: Post Dose34.54 ± 28.961
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Tislelizumab

Serum samples were assayed for tislelizumab concentrations using a validated immunoassay.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)
Serum Concentrations of Tislelizumab
micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0.00 ± 0.0000.00 ± 0.000
Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose69.63 ± 11.92367.69 ± 12.545
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose19.65 ± 6.34817.70 ± 5.875
Cycle 5 Day 1: Pre-dose38.14 ± 13.90836.62 ± 11.920
Cycle 5 Day 1: Post-dose106.93 ± 22.321103.21 ± 21.305
Cycle 9 Day 1: Pre-dose43.82 ± 16.82342.00 ± 16.495
Cycle 17 Day 1: Pre-dose39.35 ± 14.06044.01 ± 21.788
Safety Follow-up: Post Dose23.90 ± 16.67425.66 ± 26.011
SecondarySerum Concentrations of BAT1706

Serum samples were assayed for BAT1706 concentrations using a validated immunoassay.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 5, 9 and 17; Post dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 and Safety Follow-up Visit (i.e., up to 30 days after last dose [up to 27 months]) (each cycle duration = 21-days)
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)
Serum Concentrations of BAT1706
micrograms per milliliters (mcg/mL)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0.00 ± 0.0000.00 ± 0.000
Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose319.29 ± 58.599321.03 ± 56.151
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose63.28 ± 19.30255.30 ± 20.999
Cycle 5 Day 1: Pre-dose113.97 ± 37.045112.79 ± 34.114
Cycle 5 Day 1: Post-dose432.60 ± 86.670410.71 ± 90.747
Cycle 9 Day 1: Pre-dose113.72 ± 38.039120.55 ± 43.141
Cycle 17 Day 1: Pre-dose111.29 ± 31.055123.36 ± 44.184
Safety Follow-up: Post Dose59.74 ± 40.02081.42 ± 79.696
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ociperlimab, Tislelizumab, and BAT1706

Serum samples were tested for the presence of ADAs to ociperlimab, tislelizumab and BAT1706 using a validated immunoassay. The analysis included: Treatment-emergent ADA: sum of treatment-boosted ADA patients and treatment-induced ADA participants as a percentage of the ADA-evaluable participants population; Treatment-boosted ADA: Baseline-positive ADA-evaluable patients with significant increases (4-fold or higher) in ADA titer after drug administration during the treatment or follow-up observation period; and Treatment-induced ADA: ADA-evaluable participants that were ADA-negative at baseline and ADA-positive after drug administration during the treatment or follow-up observation period.

Time frame:
Up to 27 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to Ociperlimab, Tislelizumab, and BAT1706
ParticipantsArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
Treatment-emergent ADA: Ociperlimab1—
Treatment boosted ADA: Ociperlimab0—
Treatment induced ADA: Ociperlimab1—
Treatment-emergent ADA: Tislelizumab2218
Treatment boosted ADA: Tislelizumab12
Treatment induced ADA: Tislelizumab2116
Treatment-emergent ADA: BAT170613
Treatment boosted ADA: BAT170600
Treatment induced ADA: BAT170613

Adverse events

Collected over All cause-mortality data was collected from randomization through end of the study (i.e. up to 29 months). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs (NSAEs) data were collected from the date of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 27 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT170628/62 (45.2%)31/62 (50%)61/62 (98.4%)
Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT170614/32 (43.8%)12/31 (38.7%)31/31 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent serious events
EventArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/622/31
Arteriosclerosis coronary arteryCardiac disorders0/621/31
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
Intra-abdominal fluid collectionGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
SubileusGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/621/31
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders0/621/31
Hepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disorders1/621/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 184
Most frequent other events
EventArm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706
ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders24/6216/31
HypertensionVascular disorders23/6215/31
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations26/629/31
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations23/628/31
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations23/628/31
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders10/6210/31
HypoalbuminaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders12/6210/31
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders7/629/31
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations10/628/31
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders15/626/31

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set that included all randomized participants and were analyzed according to their randomized treatment arm (i.e., Arm A or Arm B).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
Mean58.4 ± 11.2759.1 ± 10.7758.6 ± 11.05
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
Female527
Male573087
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino623294
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian623294
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Macrovascular invasion (MVI) Status
Macrovascular invasion (MVI) Status(Participants)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
Present131225
Absent492069
Extrahepatic spread (EHS) Status
Extrahepatic spread (EHS) Status(Participants)Arm A: Ociperlimab + Tislelizumab + BAT1706Arm B: Tislelizumab + BAT1706Total
Present311950
Absent311344
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
    Beijing, Beijing 100021, China
  • Beijing Cancer Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100142, China
  • Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital
    Chongqing, Chongqing 404000, China
  • Fujian Cancer Hospital
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350014, China
  • Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat Sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
  • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    Harbin, Heilongjiang 150000, China
  • Hubei Cancer Hospital
    Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China
  • Hunan Cancer Hospital
    Changsha, Hunan 410013, China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • The First Hospital of China Medical University
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China
  • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China
  • Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200032, China
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    Tianjin, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Tianjin Third Central Hospital
    Tianjin, Tianjin 300170, China
  • Karamay Central Hospital of Xinjiang
    Karamay, Xinjiang 834009, China
  • Zhejiang University College of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
  • Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China
  • Huzhou Central Hospital
    Huzhou, Zhejiang 313003, China
  • Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
    Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, China
  • Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Ningbo No Hospital)
    Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, 704, Taiwan
  • Chi Mei Medical Center
    Tainan, 710, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 100225, Taiwan
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 3, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 22, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04948697
Lead sponsor
BeiGene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2021
Start date
Aug 20, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2024
Completion
Feb 1, 2024
Results posted
Feb 24, 2025
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · BeiGene

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion