CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04948450Updated Apr 6, 2025Results posted

A Multidomain Intervention Program for Older People With Dementia

An interventional study of Physical activity intervention and Cognitive stimulation intervention in Dementia, Alzheimer Disease and Dementia, Mixed, sponsored by National Geriatric Hospital. Completed at 4 sites in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-06.

Sponsored by National Geriatric Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility of a multidomain intervention for older people with dementia in nursing homes. Participants will be randomized into two equal groups, to receive either an intensive multidomain intervention (intervention group) or regular health advice (control group). The intervention will include physical, cognitive, and social interventions and management of metabolic and vascular risk factors. We hypothesize that the multidomain intervention will be feasible in Vietnam, and participants who receive the intervention will show improvement in cognitive function, quality of life, behaviors, functional ability, sleep, and in reduction of falls, and death rate compared to those in the control group during the 6 months intervention period

Read the detailed description

This is a two-armed, multicenter, randomized controlled pilot study, based in 3 nursing homes in Hanoi, Vietnam.

The study PI and/or researchers in the research team will contact adults aged 60 years and older in the nursing homes to introduce the study. If they are interested in participating, the study PI and/or researchers in the research team will screen them for their eligibility. If they meet the inclusion criteria and are interested in participating, written informed consent will be obtained.

Participants who agreed to participate in the study will be randomized into two equal groups, to receive either an intensive multidomain intervention (intervention group) or regular health advice (control group).

Participants in both the intervention and the control groups will be treated for dementia according to the recommendations of the Vietnam Alzheimer's Disease and Neurocognitive Disorders Association.

All participants will meet the study physician to have an examination at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. At each examination, participants will undergo a physical examination, anthropometry (weight, hip and waist circumference), blood pressure determination, pulse rate and rhythm, risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases (smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, diabetes) and assess blood test results (lipid profile, HbA1C, and fasting glucose if patients have diabetes). Results will be provided to participants and their doctors.

In addition to what is given to both groups, participants in the intervention group will receive four intervention components: (1) physical activity intervention; (2) cognitive intervention; (3) social intervention; and (4) management of metabolic and vascular risk factors. Physical activity and cognitive stimulation interventions will be performed at separate sessions.

All outcome measures will be administered at baseline, 6 months

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia
  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Dementia, Mixed

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Multidomain intervention
  • Older people
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,678 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 872 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

National Geriatric Hospital is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

We aim to enroll participants aged over 60 years old, living in nursing home, who have a diagnosis of dementia (according to DSM 5 criteria), stage mild to moderate (according to Clinical Dementia Rating scale - CDR). Participants receiving pharmacological treatment for dementia must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to the study. Eligible participants must be able to mobilize independently with or without a mobility aid and without physical assistance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria are:

  1. Acute and malignant diseases (e.g., advanced cancers, end-stage chronic diseases, acute myocardial infarction, stroke)
  2. Symptomatic cardiovascular disease, coronary revascularization within 1 year
  3. Clinical evidence of schizophrenia, severe depression, psychiatric or bipolar disorder (according to DSM-V TR criteria)
  4. Alcoholism or substance dependence (according to DSM-5 criteria), currently, or within the past 2 years
  5. Severe loss of vision, hearing, or communicative ability (according to the interRAI Community Health Assessment)

g. Participant or family unwilling to participate in the study

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Physical activity intervention: Progressive resistance training (PRT) for the physical intervention will be provided at the nursing home. Cognitive stimulation intervention: The study subjects will receive cognitive intervention based on Cognitive Stimulation Therapy with rehabilitation experts. Social intervention: The social intervention will be combined with physical and cognitive interventions by doing in a group. Metabolic and vascular risk factors: Metabolic and vascular risk factors of the intervention group will be evaluated by cardiologists and endocrinologists in the study.

    Behavioral: Physical activity intervention · Behavioral: Cognitive stimulation intervention · Behavioral: Social intervention · Other: Management of metabolic and vascular risk factors

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The control group will receive general health advice every 3 months based on their physical examination and blood results. They will be provided information on the vascular risk factors for dementia and will receive instruction and handouts on diet and exercise.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhysical activity intervention

    Progressive resistance training (PRT) for the physical intervention will be provided at the nursing home for 45 minutes twice a week. The sessions will be organized in groups (6-10 patients/ group) and supervised by 2 physiotherapists. Within each small group (maximum 10), participants will follow the program tailored to their individual functioning level, with constant oversight by trainers. People with dementia and care staff will be instructed to follow the prescribed PRT exercises for the rest of the week. Subjects will be encouraged to exercise daily.

  • BehavioralCognitive stimulation intervention

    The study subjects will receive cognitive intervention based on Cognitive Stimulation Therapy with rehabilitation experts. The intervention involves 14 sessions of themed activities, which typically run twice weekly. The sessions will be organized in groups (6-10 patients/ group). People with dementia and their care staff will be instructed on how to practice the various activities at their nursing home for the rest of the week.

  • BehavioralSocial intervention

    Social intervention will be combined with physical and cognitive interventions through doing these in a group, playing games during exercises (dancing, throwing ball to each other) or doing cognitive stimulation therapy in a group.

  • OtherManagement of metabolic and vascular risk factors

    Study physicians will assess the risk of developing new chronic diseases, change in blood pressure, weight and BMI, and hip and waist circumference, blood test (glucose, lipid parameters, fasting glucose, and HbA1C if the person with dementia has diabetes) at 3 and 6 months. Participants in the intervention group will be provided with information on the importance of reducing risk factors, guidance on lifestyle changes and prescribing treatment if necessary by cardiologists and endocrinologists. The target for blood pressure is less than 120/90 mmHg and the target for HbA1c is less than 8 %.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence

    Percentageof sessions attended out of the total planned

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Retention

    The retention rate was calculated as the number (percentage) of participants in each group who did not discontinue the study.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Cognition

    Global cognition will be measured by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog); score ranging from 0-70, a higher score indicates worse impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  2. Executive Function Via Clock Drawing Test

    Excutive function will be assessed using Clock drawing test. Scores range from 0-10, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  3. Attention Function Via Digit Span Forward

    Attention function will be assessed using digit span forward. Scores range from 0-12. Higher scores indicated better attention

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  4. Atttention Function Will be Assessed Using Digit Span Backward.

    Higher scores indicated better attention. Scores range from 0-12. Higher scores indicated better attention

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  5. Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)

    Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) will be measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) questionnaire. The total NPI score ranging from 0 to 144 points. Higher scores indicate greater severity of BPSD

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  6. Total Dependence of Participants Assessed Using the Barthel Index

    Total dependence will be assessed using the Barthel Index, with a total score of 100, where scores between 0 and 20 indicate total dependence.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  7. Functional Ability Via the Handgrip Strength

    Functional ability will be assessed via the handgrip strength. Higher scores indicated better functional ability

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  8. Functional Ability Via 30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test

    Count the total number of complete stands executed in 30 seconds

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  9. Fall

    Falls will be assessed by the fall incident report at baseline and during the study period

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  10. Quality of Sleep

    Quality of sleep will be assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. A global PSQI score greater than 5 distinguishing good and poor sleepers

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  11. Health-related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale. The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale measures the overall quality of life in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. It consists of 13 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total score is obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items, resulting in a possible range from 13 to 52 points. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  12. Death

    Death will be assessed through reports from care staff, nursing home records.

    Time frame: 6 months

  13. Functional Ability Via the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

    Functional ability will be assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  14. Dependence of Participants Assessed Using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

    Dependence will be assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, which evaluates the ability to perform eight daily tasks, including using the telephone, shopping, meal preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. The total score ranges from 0 to 8, with 8 indicating full independence and scores below 8 suggesting dependence in functional activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention GroupControl Group
Started3030
Completed2927
Not completed13
Withdrew: Return home13

Outcome measures

PrimaryAdherence

Percentageof sessions attended out of the total planned

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of Adherence
Adherence
percentage of AdherenceIntervention GroupControl Group
Adherence85.4—
PrimaryRetention

The retention rate was calculated as the number (percentage) of participants in each group who did not discontinue the study.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Retention
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Retention13
SecondaryGlobal Cognition

Global cognition will be measured by Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog); score ranging from 0-70, a higher score indicates worse impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Global Cognition
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline28 ± 8.824.5 ± 8.5
After intervention (6 months)27.3 ± 9.529.1 ± 9.9
SecondaryExecutive Function Via Clock Drawing Test

Excutive function will be assessed using Clock drawing test. Scores range from 0-10, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Executive Function Via Clock Drawing Test
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline0.5 ± 1.62.3 ± 3
After intervention2.3 ± 3.42.7 ± 3.8
SecondaryAttention Function Via Digit Span Forward

Attention function will be assessed using digit span forward. Scores range from 0-12. Higher scores indicated better attention

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Attention Function Via Digit Span Forward
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline8.9 ± 2.59.5 ± 2.2
After intervention9 ± 2.29.1 ± 2.8
SecondaryAtttention Function Will be Assessed Using Digit Span Backward.

Higher scores indicated better attention. Scores range from 0-12. Higher scores indicated better attention

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Atttention Function Will be Assessed Using Digit Span Backward.
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline2.5 ± 1.52.6 ± 1.3
After intervention2.7 ± 1.53 ± 1.3
SecondaryBehavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) will be measured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) questionnaire. The total NPI score ranging from 0 to 144 points. Higher scores indicate greater severity of BPSD

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline1 ± 1.71 ± 1.9
After intervention0.8 ± 1.70.9 ± 1.7
SecondaryTotal Dependence of Participants Assessed Using the Barthel Index

Total dependence will be assessed using the Barthel Index, with a total score of 100, where scores between 0 and 20 indicate total dependence.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Total Dependence of Participants Assessed Using the Barthel Index
participantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Total dependent (baseline)42
Total dependent (After intervention)47
SecondaryFunctional Ability Via the Handgrip Strength

Functional ability will be assessed via the handgrip strength. Higher scores indicated better functional ability

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · kilograms
Functional Ability Via the Handgrip Strength
kilogramsIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline8 ± 7.512.4 ± 14.7
After intervention12.8 ± 6.411.1 ± 6.1
SecondaryFunctional Ability Via 30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test

Count the total number of complete stands executed in 30 seconds

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · events
Functional Ability Via 30 Seconds Sit To Stand Test
eventsIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline4.5 ± 4.23.4 ± 4.6
After intervention5.4 ± 3.91.9 ± 4
SecondaryFall

Falls will be assessed by the fall incident report at baseline and during the study period

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Fall
ParticipantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline118
After intervention67
SecondaryQuality of Sleep

Quality of sleep will be assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. A global PSQI score greater than 5 distinguishing good and poor sleepers

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Quality of Sleep
participantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Poor sleep (baseline)2617
Poor sleep (after intervention)1917
SecondaryHealth-related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale. The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale measures the overall quality of life in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. It consists of 13 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The total score is obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items, resulting in a possible range from 13 to 52 points. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Health-related Quality of Life
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline27.3 ± 4.433.6 ± 4.6
After intervention28.9 ± 4.334.4 ± 4.1
SecondaryDeath

Death will be assessed through reports from care staff, nursing home records.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Death
participantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Death00
SecondaryFunctional Ability Via the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

Functional ability will be assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Functional Ability Via the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
participantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Dependent (baseline)2629
Dependent (After intervention)2327
SecondaryDependence of Participants Assessed Using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale

Dependence will be assessed using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, which evaluates the ability to perform eight daily tasks, including using the telephone, shopping, meal preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication management, and financial management. The total score ranges from 0 to 8, with 8 indicating full independence and scores below 8 suggesting dependence in functional activities.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Dependence of Participants Assessed Using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
participantsIntervention GroupControl Group
Dependent (baseline)2629
Dependent (After intervention)2327

Adverse events

Collected over For each participant, adverse events were collected for the duration of participation in the study (up to 6 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Group0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Control Group0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years123
>=65 years292857
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Number78 ± 7.478 ± 8.878 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Female212041
Male91019
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino000
Unknown or Not Reported303060
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Vietnam303060
Severity of dementia
Severity of dementia(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Mild111122
Moderate191938
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Dien Hong nursing home
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • National Geriatric Hospital
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Nhan Ai nursing home
    Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Orihome
    Hanoi, Vietnam
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Duong S, Patel T, Chang F. Dementia: What pharmacists need to know. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2017 Feb 7;150(2):118-129. doi: 10.1177/1715163517690745. eCollection 2017 Mar-Apr. No abstract available. PubMed 28405256 ↗
  • Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):63-75.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007. PubMed 23305823 ↗
  • Bich NN, Dung NTT, Vu T, Quy LT, Tuan NA, Binh NTT, Hung NT, Anh LV. Dementia and associated factors among the elderly in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Aug 23;13:57. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0314-7. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31462907 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):88-106. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26. PubMed 30497964 ↗
  • Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, Prina AM, Winblad B, Jonsson L, Liu Z, Prince M. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.150. Epub 2016 Aug 29. PubMed 27583652 ↗
  • Fink HA, Jutkowitz E, McCarten JR, Hemmy LS, Butler M, Davila H, Ratner E, Calvert C, Barclay TR, Brasure M, Nelson VA, Kane RL. Pharmacologic Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Clinical Alzheimer-Type Dementia: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 2;168(1):39-51. doi: 10.7326/M17-1529. Epub 2017 Dec 19. PubMed 29255847 ↗
  • Nguyen TA, Pham T, Dang TH, Hinton WL, Nguyen AT, Pham TL, Crotty M, Kurrle S, Bui QT, Nguyen H, Roughead EE. Towards the development of Vietnam's national dementia plan-the first step of action. Australas J Ageing. 2020 Jun;39(2):137-141. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12755. Epub 2019 Dec 9. PubMed 31814244 ↗
  • Streater A, Spector A, Aguirre E, Hoe J, Hoare Z, Woods R, Russell I, Orrell M. Maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) in practice: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Jun 26;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-91. PubMed 22735077 ↗
  • Mohs RC, Knopman D, Petersen RC, Ferris SH, Ernesto C, Grundman M, Sano M, Bieliauskas L, Geldmacher D, Clark C, Thal LJ. Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale that broaden its scope. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S13-21. PubMed 9236948 ↗
  • Kivipelto M, Solomon A, Ahtiluoto S, Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Antikainen R, Backman L, Hanninen T, Jula A, Laatikainen T, Lindstrom J, Mangialasche F, Nissinen A, Paajanen T, Pajala S, Peltonen M, Rauramaa R, Stigsdotter-Neely A, Strandberg T, Tuomilehto J, Soininen H. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): study design and progress. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Nov;9(6):657-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.012. Epub 2013 Jan 17. PubMed 23332672 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 7, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 7, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Oct 7, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04948450
Lead sponsor
National Geriatric Hospital
Responsible party
Nguyen Xuan Thanh (Deputy Head of Palliative care department, National Geriatric Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2021
Start date
Nov 24, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Results posted
Apr 6, 2025
Last update
Apr 6, 2025

Study contacts

Anh T Nguyen, PhD
study director · National Geriatric Hospital
Thanh X Nguyen, MS
principal investigator · National Geriatric Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion