CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04931095Updated Aug 3, 2026Results posted

The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment

A Phase 1 interventional study of Cannabis and Alcohol in Cannabis Intoxication and Alcohol Intoxication, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the individual and interactive effects of oral cannabis and alcohol on subjective and behavioral measures of impairment.

Read the detailed description

This clinical laboratory study will be double-blind, placebo-controlled and will utilize a within-subjects experimental design. Participants will complete 7 outpatient drug administration sessions that will consist of self-administration of oral cannabis (0, 10 or 25mg THC) and alcohol (either placebo or active; BAC of 0.05 percent); participants will always receive both an alcohol drink (active or placebo) and dose of cannabis (active or placebo). Participants will also complete a condition in which they administer alcohol (BAC: 0.08 percent) with placebo cannabis, as a positive control. Primary outcomes include performance on field sobriety tests, cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective drug effects, and simulated driving performance. Blood concentrations of THC and THC metabolites will also be determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cannabis Intoxication
  • Alcohol Intoxication

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Have provided written informed consent
  2. Be between the ages of 21 and 55
  3. Be in good general health based on a physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and screening urine and blood tests
  4. Not be pregnant or nursing (if female). All females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit and a negative urine pregnancy test at each study visit.
  5. Have a body mass index (BMI) in the range of 19 to 36 kg/m2
  6. Blood pressure at Screening Visit does not exceed a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mmHg
  7. Have not donated blood in the prior 30 days.
  8. Report at least 2 days of binge drinking in the past 90 days (greater than 4 or 5 drinks on a single occasion for women and men, respectively)
  9. Report ≥ 1 use of cannabis in the past year
  10. Provide negative urine test for illicit drug use (excluding THC) and negative breath alcohol test (0% BAC) at screening and before study sessions
  11. Report at least 1 instance of simultaneous alcohol and use in the past year.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Psychoactive drug use (aside from cannabis, nicotine, alcohol, or caffeine) in past month
  2. Current use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements/vitamins, or prescription medications that, in the opinion of the investigator or medical staff, will impact the participant's safety
  3. History of or current evidence of significant medical condition
  4. Evidence of current psychiatric condition [(MINI for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-V)]
  5. Meet criteria for severe alcohol use disorder (MINI for DSM-V)
  6. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar) score > 9
  7. Been in treatment previously for alcohol or cannabis use disorder
  8. Use of cannabis, on average, more than 2 times/week over past 3 months
  9. Liver function tests more than 2x normal range
  10. Enrollment in another clinical trial or receiving of any drug as part of research within past 30 days
  11. Shipley vocabulary score \<18 (corresponds to 5th grade reading level).
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo cannabis + placebo alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 0mg THC in combination with a placebo alcohol drink.

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    low dose cannabis with placebo alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 10mg THC in combination with a placebo alcohol drink.

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    high dose cannabis with placebo alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 25mg THC in combination with a placebo alcohol drink.

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    low dose cannabis with low dose alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 10mg THC in combination with an alcohol drink (0.05 percent BAC).

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    high dose cannabis with low dose alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 25mg THC in combination with an alcohol drink (0.05 percent BAC).

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    Placebo cannabis + low dose alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 0mg THC in combination with an alcohol drink (0.05 percent BAC).

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

  • Experimental
    Placebo cannabis + high dose alcohol

    Participants administer oral cannabis containing 0mg THC in combination with an alcohol drink (0.08 percent BAC).

    Drug: Cannabis · Drug: Alcohol

Interventions

  • DrugCannabis

    Cannabis will be orally ingested via a brownie

  • DrugAlcohol

    Alcohol will be orally ingested via a flavored drink

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Peak Change From Baseline DRUID Application Global Impairment Score

    Acute cognitive and behavioral impairment will be assessed with global impairment score (range 0-100) on the DRUID app (higher scores indicate greater impairment). Results are mean change from baseline.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestion.

  2. Cumulative Score on Field Sobriety Tests

    Impairment will be assessed using a battery of standard field sobriety tests including: the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN), the Walk and Turn, the One Leg Stand, and the Modified Romberg Balance. We will report the cumulative amount of clues observed across these tasks (out of a possible 0-22 clues). Higher scores indicate greater/worse impairment. These assessments were completed once after 7.5 hours.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  3. Mean Peak Change From Baseline Scores on the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) - Feel Drug Effect

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel drug effects". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Results are mean change from baseline and a higher score indicates a more extreme/worse drug effect.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 0.5, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestion

  4. Drug Effect Questionnaire - Feel High

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel high". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score greater "feel high" rating.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  5. Drug Effect Questionnaire - Confidence to Drive (Change From Baseline)

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "confidence to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher scores indicate higher confidence to drive. Results expressed as change from baseline

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  6. Drug Effect Questionnaire - Willingness to Drive

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "willingness to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicates higher willingness to drive.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  7. Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Sedative Score

    The BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 sedative-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall sedative score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater sedative effects of alcohol. Scores presented show the change from baseline to 7.5 hours.

    Time frame: Baseline, 7.5 hours

  8. Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Stimulant Score

    The BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 stimulant-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall stimulant score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater stimulant effects of alcohol.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  9. Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS)

    For the SHAS, participants are presented with 13 questionnaire items, displayed on a visual analog scale anchored from 0 (normal) to 10 (extremely), which assess subjective effects of alcohol. These items are integrated to produce an overall SHAS score (0-130). Higher score indicates greater effects of alcohol.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  10. Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDLP (measured in cm) was calculated across all drives to get a composite index of lateral control and reported as peak change from baseline. SDLP is the gold standard of quantifying the magnitude of driving impairment from drugs and alcohol and has excellent predictive validity to actual driving. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  11. Driving Performance as Assessed by Composite Drive Score

    Driving impairment will be assessed via a composite drive score. The composite drive score is derived by integrating various driving outcomes (see primary and secondary driving outcomes). Higher z-score indicates worse performance. The score is on a z-score scale, meaning a score of 1 equates to 1 standard deviation outside of the participants' mean baseline performance and a Z-score of 0 represents the mean baseline performance. This was calculated across all drives and reported as peak change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Speed (SDSP)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDSP will be calculated across all drives to get a composite index of the variability in speed (measured in MPH) and is reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  2. Total Run Length

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Total run length will be calculated across all drives and measured as peak change from baseline score (in seconds). Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  3. Driving Performance (Number of Speed Exceedances)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of times participants exceed the allowable speed limit and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of speed exceedances.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  4. Driving Performance (Number of Accidents)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of accidents (including car collisions, pedestrians hit, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of accidents.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  5. Driving Performance (Total Rule Violations)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of total rule violations (including number of missed stop signs, illegal turns, speed exceedances, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of rule violations. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a lower number of rule violations than at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  6. Driving Performance (Distance to Lead Vehicles)

    The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get the mean distance (in meters) maintained to lead vehicles during car-following segments and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent greater distance maintained to lead vehicles. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a shorter distance maintained than at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  7. Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test

    Impairment will be assessed using performance on the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN). Total score will be recorded (out of possible 0-6 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

    Time frame: Baseline, 7.5 hours

  8. Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Walk and Turn Test

    Impairment will be assessed using performance on the the Walk and Turn. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-8 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

    Time frame: Baseline, 7.5 hours

  9. Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on One Leg Stand

    Impairment will be assessed using performance on the One Leg Stand test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

    Time frame: Baseline, 7.5 hours

  10. Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Modified Romberg Balance

    Impairment will be assessed using performance on the Modified Romberg Balance test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

    Time frame: Baseline, 7.5 hours

  11. Drug Effect Questionnaire - Like Drug Effect

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "like drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "liked drug effect" rating.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  12. Drug Effect Questionnaire - Dislike Drug Effect

    The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "dislike drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "dislike drug effect" rating.

    Time frame: 7.5 hours

  13. Pharmacokinetics - CMax for THC and THC Metabolites

    Whole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  14. Pharmacokinetics - AUC for THC and THC Metabolites

    Whole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  15. Pharmacokinetics - CMax for Alcohol

    BAC will be measured using the Alco-Sensor IV. Measuring BAC is needed to confirm that participants reached the targeted BAC for a given session and to confirm adherence to pre-session alcohol abstinence requirements (g/210L). The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

  16. Pharmacokinetics - AUC for Alcohol

    Whole blood concentrations of Alcohol will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours

06

Results

Posted Aug 3, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneThe Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
Started25
Placebo cannabis and placebo alcohol25
Low dose cannabis with placebo alcohol25
High dose cannabis with placebo alcohol25
Low dose cannabis with low dose alcohol25
High dose cannabis with low dose alcohol25
Placebo cannabis + low dose alcohol25
Placebo cannabis + high dose alcohol25
Completed25
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Peak Change From Baseline DRUID Application Global Impairment Score

Acute cognitive and behavioral impairment will be assessed with global impairment score (range 0-100) on the DRUID app (higher scores indicate greater impairment). Results are mean change from baseline.

Time frame:
7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestion.
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Mean Peak Change From Baseline DRUID Application Global Impairment Score
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Mean Peak Change From Baseline DRUID Application Global Impairment Score-2.1 ± 6.84.6 ± 7.85.5 ± 7.83.3 ± 7.52.6 ± 20.52.9 ± 8.15.1 ± 10.1
PrimaryCumulative Score on Field Sobriety Tests

Impairment will be assessed using a battery of standard field sobriety tests including: the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN), the Walk and Turn, the One Leg Stand, and the Modified Romberg Balance. We will report the cumulative amount of clues observed across these tasks (out of a possible 0-22 clues). Higher scores indicate greater/worse impairment. These assessments were completed once after 7.5 hours.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cumulative Score on Field Sobriety Tests
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Cumulative Score on Field Sobriety Tests0.2 ± 1.30.4 ± 1.31.4 ± 1.50.8 ± 2.22.1 ± 3.00 ± 1.62.2 ± 2.2
PrimaryMean Peak Change From Baseline Scores on the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) - Feel Drug Effect

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel drug effects". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Results are mean change from baseline and a higher score indicates a more extreme/worse drug effect.

Time frame:
7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 0.5, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Mean Peak Change From Baseline Scores on the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) - Feel Drug Effect
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Mean Peak Change From Baseline Scores on the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) - Feel Drug Effect11.9 ± 12.723.5 ± 21.050.8 ± 28.953.0 ± 22.067.2 ± 18.433.7 ± 25.253.0 ± 22.6
PrimaryDrug Effect Questionnaire - Feel High

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel high". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score greater "feel high" rating.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Feel High
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Feel High8.7 ± 10.921.8 ± 19.349.8 ± 27.535.4 ± 23.056.1 ± 29.313.2 ± 16.928.7 ± 25.9
PrimaryDrug Effect Questionnaire - Confidence to Drive (Change From Baseline)

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "confidence to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher scores indicate higher confidence to drive. Results expressed as change from baseline

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Confidence to Drive (Change From Baseline)
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Confidence to Drive (Change From Baseline)-14.2 ± 19.1-25.2 ± 25.7-60.0 ± 30.8-56.1 ± 25.1-63.0 ± 24.3-44.8 ± 31.5-61.8 ± 26.5
PrimaryDrug Effect Questionnaire - Willingness to Drive

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "willingness to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicates higher willingness to drive.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Willingness to Drive
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Willingness to Drive21 ± 8413 ± 527 ± 285 ± 202 ± 89 ± 364 ± 16
PrimaryBiphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Sedative Score

The BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 sedative-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall sedative score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater sedative effects of alcohol. Scores presented show the change from baseline to 7.5 hours.

Time frame:
Baseline, 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Sedative Score
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Sedative Score0.9 ± 1.41.2 ± 1.62.6 ± 2.42.3 ± 1.72.9 ± 2.11.6 ± 1.32.0 ± 1.9
PrimaryBiphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Stimulant Score

The BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 stimulant-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall stimulant score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater stimulant effects of alcohol.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Stimulant Score
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Stimulant Score0 ± 1.90.4 ± 1.30 ± 1.81.7 ± 2.42.4 ± 2.30.6 ± 2.82.3 ± 2.7
PrimarySubjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS)

For the SHAS, participants are presented with 13 questionnaire items, displayed on a visual analog scale anchored from 0 (normal) to 10 (extremely), which assess subjective effects of alcohol. These items are integrated to produce an overall SHAS score (0-130). Higher score indicates greater effects of alcohol.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS)
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS)1.6 ± 8.89.7 ± 12.223.6 ± 20.123.9 ± 14.533.7 ± 21.715.7 ± 10.623.9 ± 14.0
PrimaryDriving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDLP (measured in cm) was calculated across all drives to get a composite index of lateral control and reported as peak change from baseline. SDLP is the gold standard of quantifying the magnitude of driving impairment from drugs and alcohol and has excellent predictive validity to actual driving. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)
centimetersPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)2.2 ± 6.02.4 ± 8.38.9 ± 7.66.3 ± 8.39.3 ± 11.83.7 ± 9.96.5 ± 7.0
PrimaryDriving Performance as Assessed by Composite Drive Score

Driving impairment will be assessed via a composite drive score. The composite drive score is derived by integrating various driving outcomes (see primary and secondary driving outcomes). Higher z-score indicates worse performance. The score is on a z-score scale, meaning a score of 1 equates to 1 standard deviation outside of the participants' mean baseline performance and a Z-score of 0 represents the mean baseline performance. This was calculated across all drives and reported as peak change from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · z score
Driving Performance as Assessed by Composite Drive Score
z scorePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance as Assessed by Composite Drive Score0.2 ± 1.10.7 ± 1.11.5 ± 1.31.6 ± 1.42.5 ± 1.71.3 ± 1.51.6 ± 1.6
SecondaryDriving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Speed (SDSP)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDSP will be calculated across all drives to get a composite index of the variability in speed (measured in MPH) and is reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mph
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Speed (SDSP)
mphPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Speed (SDSP)0.2 ± 2.00.0 ± 2.30.7 ± 2.20.3 ± 2.40.7 ± 2.40.8 ± 3.30.8 ± 2.7
SecondaryTotal Run Length

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Total run length will be calculated across all drives and measured as peak change from baseline score (in seconds). Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Total Run Length
secondsPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Total Run Length1.46 ± 115.55-27.64 ± 83.64-86.25 ± 310.65-41.64 ± 84.05-40.52 ± 399.99-37.79 ± 128.41-8.39 ± 160.12
SecondaryDriving Performance (Number of Speed Exceedances)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of times participants exceed the allowable speed limit and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of speed exceedances.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · speed exceedances
Driving Performance (Number of Speed Exceedances)
speed exceedancesPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance (Number of Speed Exceedances)1.8 ± 6.51.92 ± 6.464.04 ± 6.963.64 ± 6.764.56 ± 5.394.84 ± 5.794.44 ± 5.78
SecondaryDriving Performance (Number of Accidents)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of accidents (including car collisions, pedestrians hit, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of accidents.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · collisions
Driving Performance (Number of Accidents)
collisionsPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance (Number of Accidents)1.16 ± 3.651.4 ± 2.973.72 ± 7.62.8 ± 6.173.36 ± 4.581.56 ± 2.833.2 ± 4.64
SecondaryDriving Performance (Total Rule Violations)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of total rule violations (including number of missed stop signs, illegal turns, speed exceedances, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of rule violations. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a lower number of rule violations than at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · rule violations
Driving Performance (Total Rule Violations)
rule violationsPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance (Total Rule Violations)0.16 ± 0.08-0.08 ± 0.08-0.04 ± 0.090.32 ± 0.080.16 ± 0.140.2 ± 0.120.16 ± 0.6
SecondaryDriving Performance (Distance to Lead Vehicles)

The STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get the mean distance (in meters) maintained to lead vehicles during car-following segments and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent greater distance maintained to lead vehicles. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a shorter distance maintained than at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Driving Performance (Distance to Lead Vehicles)
metersPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Driving Performance (Distance to Lead Vehicles)0.0 ± 0.1-0.1 ± 0.2-0.2 ± 0.2-0.1 ± 0.2-0.2 ± 0.3-0.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
SecondaryChange in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test

Impairment will be assessed using performance on the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN). Total score will be recorded (out of possible 0-6 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

Time frame:
Baseline, 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test0.2 ± 0.5-0.1 ± 0.40.4 ± 0.90.6 ± 1.11.2 ± 1.70.2 ± 0.51.2 ± 1.9
SecondaryChange in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Walk and Turn Test

Impairment will be assessed using performance on the the Walk and Turn. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-8 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

Time frame:
Baseline, 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Walk and Turn Test
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Walk and Turn Test0.0 ± 0.80.4 ± 0.90.7 ± 1.00.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 1.1-0.1 ± 1.10.4 ± 1.0
SecondaryChange in Field Sobriety Test - Score on One Leg Stand

Impairment will be assessed using performance on the One Leg Stand test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

Time frame:
Baseline, 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on One Leg Stand
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on One Leg Stand0.1 ± 0.80.2 ± 0.80.5 ± 0.80.3 ± 1.00.2 ± 1.40.0 ± 1.00.7 ± 0.8
SecondaryChange in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Modified Romberg Balance

Impairment will be assessed using performance on the Modified Romberg Balance test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported

Time frame:
Baseline, 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Modified Romberg Balance
score on scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Modified Romberg Balance0.3600 ± 0.75720.4000 ± 0.57740.2400 ± 0.96950.0800 ± 0.75940.1200 ± 0.97130.2400 ± 0.92560.6400 ± 0.7000
SecondaryDrug Effect Questionnaire - Like Drug Effect

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "like drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "liked drug effect" rating.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Like Drug Effect
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Like Drug Effect24.0 ± 26.631.4 ± 27.249.2 ± 24.059.5 ± 21.768.8 ± 18.740.2 ± 33.857.5 ± 24.0
SecondaryDrug Effect Questionnaire - Dislike Drug Effect

The DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "dislike drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "dislike drug effect" rating.

Time frame:
7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Dislike Drug Effect
score on a scalePlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Dislike Drug Effect1.3 ± 2.75.0 ± 9.713.6 ± 18.19.8 ± 12.416.4 ± 21.27.2 ± 14.18.9 ± 13.7
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - CMax for THC and THC Metabolites

Whole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetics - CMax for THC and THC Metabolites
ng/mLLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose Alcohol
THC0.67 (0.00 to 1.82)3.21 (1.34 to 6.70)0.67 (-1.51 to 2.10)2.98 (0.74 to 8.28)
11-OH-THC0.86 (-1.57 to 2.69)2.90 (-2.88 to 5.39)1.03 (-1.81 to 3.17)3.24 (1.13 to 9.64)
THCCOOH5.30 (-23.91 to 19.10)17.52 (-55.61 to 37.07)2.31 (-33.58 to 14.32)11.11 (-25.55 to 25.23)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - AUC for THC and THC Metabolites

Whole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mcg*hr/mL
Pharmacokinetics - AUC for THC and THC Metabolites
mcg*hr/mLLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose Alcohol
THC3.66 (0.00 to 39.85)12.57 (3.27 to 82.63)3.81 (0.00 to 35.84)9.96 (0.96 to 47.90)
11-OH-THC4.62 (0.00 to 37.75)14.06 (3.38 to 64.32)5.53 (0.00 to 40.47)13.22 (3.10 to 52.42)
THCCOOH53.24 (9.90 to 375.38)117.80 (24.63 to 593.64)54.24 (11.49 to 406.32)88.90 (21.10 to 358.89)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - CMax for Alcohol

BAC will be measured using the Alco-Sensor IV. Measuring BAC is needed to confirm that participants reached the targeted BAC for a given session and to confirm adherence to pre-session alcohol abstinence requirements (g/210L). The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · g/210L
Pharmacokinetics - CMax for Alcohol
g/210LPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Pharmacokinetics - CMax for Alcohol0.056 (0.042 to 0.085)0.053 (0.036 to 0.076)0.055 (0.038 to 0.075)0.082 (0.058 to 0.122)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - AUC for Alcohol

Whole blood concentrations of Alcohol will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mcg*hr/mL
Pharmacokinetics - AUC for Alcohol
mcg*hr/mLPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Pharmacokinetics - AUC for Alcohol0.31 (0.17 to 0.43)0.30 (0.20 to 0.45)0.31 (0.20 to 0.41)0.53 (0.39 to 0.78)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 7.5 hours post-dose. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Cannabis + Placebo Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)2/25 (8%)
Low Dose Cannabis With Placebo Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
High Dose Cannabis With Placebo Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)3/25 (12%)
Low Dose Cannabis With Low Dose Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
High Dose Cannabis With Low Dose Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)4/25 (16%)
Placebo Cannabis + Low Dose Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Placebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Cannabis + Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Placebo AlcoholLow Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholHigh Dose Cannabis With Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + Low Dose AlcoholPlacebo Cannabis + High Dose Alcohol
Lightheaded/DizzyNervous system disorders2/250/253/250/254/250/250/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years25
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
Mean25.6 ± 4.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
Female10
Male15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino21
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White20
More than one race2
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment
United States25
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zamarripa CA, Lin S, Klausner M, Rastogi K, Roche DJO, Novak M, Antoine D, Wolinsky D, Marcotte TD, Weerts EM, Vandrey R, Spindle TR. Impact of Cannabis Edibles Combined With Alcohol on Driving, Field Sobriety Performance, and Subjective Effects: A Within-Participant Crossover Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 May 1;9(5):e269842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.9842. PubMed 42065887 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 9, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04931095
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2021
Start date
Feb 17, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2025
Completion
Aug 15, 2025
Results posted
Aug 3, 2026
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Tory Spindle, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion