CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04922255Updated Oct 1, 2024Results posted

Cystic Fibrosis and Urinary Incontinence

An interventional study of Reusable Underwear and Disposable urethral support in Urinary Incontinence and Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by Megan Bradley. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-01.

Sponsored by Megan Bradley · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
We exhausted all ability to recruit from our study sites
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of non-surgical urinary incontinence (UI) management options for women with CF. The investigators will complete a pilot, feasibility study (n=30) to compare tolerability and symptom relief in women with CF and UI. Subjects will be recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Cystic Fibrosis Center after demonstrating bother from UI on initial phone script. Participants will undergo UI questionnaires and undergo a pelvic examination, non-invasive bladder scan ultrasound and a provocative stress test and then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), an absorbent product (Speax Reusable Underwear), or Pelvic floor muscle therapy. The primary outcome will be to determine the feasibility and tolerability of these options.

Hypothesis: All three non-surgical UI management options for women are feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire).

The results from the proposed aims will provide important information about the experiences and symptom burden of women with CF and UI. Importantly, the investigators will also be able to answer the important questions of "Can it work?" and "Does it work?" as the investigators seek to construct the definitive, adequately powered trial of these therapies in women with CF and UI.

Read the detailed description

Study Procedures: Participants will be recruited at routine cystic fibrosis (CF) clinic visits and via telephone screening. The investigators will again utilize the ISI for screening procedures with subjects required to have at incontinence at least as frequent as 'less than once a month' and at least as 'drops' to be eligible for enrollment. Informed consent will be obtained before any study procedures are initiated. Initial demographic questions and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) will be completed at the baseline visit. Subjects will be given materials to complete a 2-day bladder diary. The bladder diary has participants track what they take in (fluids) and also their voided volumes throughout the day and night. Subjects will be given a hat to void in a collect the numbers/volume of voids and also leakage episodes. Pregnancy will be excluded by self-report. Participants will then have a pelvic exam for a visual urethral mobility examination and assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength to be completed by the principal investigator. The principal investigator will additionally first perform a bladder scan ultrasound to assess current bladder volume and then a cough stress test (CST). The exam will be performed in the supine/lithotomy position with ≥300 mL of fluid in the bladder. The investigators will have the subject cough forcefully 1-4 times and the examiner will directly visualize the urethral meatus for the presence of leakage. Leakage of fluid from the urethral meatus coincident with/simultaneous to the cough(s) is considered a positive test consistent with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Randomized feasibility trial (Table 2). At the baseline visit, women will be given a brief description of the three different treatment options and be initially asked to rank initial choice for treatment. Participants will then be randomized to either a disposable urethral support device (Impressa®), Speax™ Reusable Underwear, or pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT). Randomization will be in a 1:1:1 allocation without stratification by incontinence severity. The disposable Impressa® urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI). Speax Reusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection. Both the Impressa and Speax are commercially available and the Impressa is FDA approved. The Speax underwear are not a FDA regulated product. Urethral support device cohort - A week supply of the Impressa device will be provided and participants will be asked to complete a daily bladder diary for a total of 7 days. The instructions for use booklet will be provided. Subjects will be told that they can continuously utilize one Impressa for up to 12 hours. The investigators will ask subjects to wear for at least 12 hours a day but up to 24 if they desire. Reusable absorbent pad cohort - Three pairs of Speax underwear will be provided and subjects will complete a similar daily UI diary for 7 days. Subjects will be instructed to wear one pair of speax daily and may wash as they desire. Subjects will be provided the website for the product and The investigators will allow them to order whatever pair/size the subject desires. https://www.shethinx.com/pages/speax. PFMT cohort - Experienced pelvic health physical therapists (at both University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart. Each PFMT visit will take \~60 minutes. The investigators will develop a standardized pelvic floor exercise intervention based on previous RCT for PFMT in women with MUI. The intervention will comprise: 1) Bladder training and delayed voiding techniques 2) Urgency suppression 3) SUI strategies (e.g., 'knack') and 4) Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training for those agreeable to internal exams. The investigators will utilize Diaphragmatic breathing, Happy Baby Stretch with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) relaxation and lower abdominal myofascial release (MFR) to start. These are all non-internal stretching type exercises similar to yoga and will be performed for \~20-30 minutes. If the subject is willing the investigators will consider internal pelvic floor muscle training which will involve the physical therapist inserting one digit into the vagina in order to aid in muscle coordination. This will also be done for 20-30 minutes.

Subjects will not be blinded to their group assignment given the nature of the differences in management options. At the end of the treatment assignment all subjects will repeat the KHQ and a patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I). The PGI-I is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). All subjects will complete the follow-up questionnaires 7-days after the beginning of their assigned therapy.

Given the opportunity to gather acceptability on these options for a sensitive issue, subjects will be offered an option to further participate in one alternate therapy of their choosing. If subjects select this option, investigators will organize an additional week of therapy. Participants will only have to complete a BSW questionnaire and another PGI-I at the end of therapy. This is an option for all women in the study even if they initially had been randomized to their preferred option as participants may ultimately have not really liked that choice.

Acceptability and Feasibility assessment: Urethral support device cohort and Reusable absorbent pad cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of use and product performance. Logs regarding utilization of assigned product will be completed daily. Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of both therapies utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. PFMT cohort: Feasibility will be evaluated through assessment of adherence and self-reported success with ability to perform exercises. Adherence to intervention sessions will be documented by physical therapist using attendance logs. Adherence to home practice will be documented by participants in home logs that included the dates and times of practice. At the end of each physical therapy visit, participants will be asked to rate their confidence in performing the PFMT exercises featured in their program (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all confident).

At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy). All subjects will complete a Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire. The investigators will consider therapy feasible (as measured by 80% adherence to treatment assignment over 7 days) and tolerable (as measured by patient report via questionnaire). By allowing subjects to choose another one of the arms after their randomization this will give us further, important information about feasibility and patient preference for a larger trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Cystic Fibrosis
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Megan Bradley is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female age 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of CF
  • Self-reported UI (at least answer of "a little" on King's Health Questionnaire - Question #2)
  • Fluent in spoken English
  • Ability to present for in-office exam and study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • No UI
  • Inability to comply with study protocol
  • No diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    disposable urethral support device

    disposable urethral support device

    Device: Disposable urethral support

  • Active comparator
    Reusable Underwear

    Reusable Underwear

    Device: Reusable Underwear

  • Active comparator
    pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT)

    Pelvic floor muscle therapy

    Behavioral: Pelvic floor physical therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceReusable Underwear

    Reusable Underwear are similarly available for purchase online and are absorbent underwear for bladder leak protection

  • DeviceDisposable urethral support

    The disposable urethral support is a tampon-like device that is available over the counter to help women with urinary incontinence (UI)

  • BehavioralPelvic floor physical therapy

    Experienced pelvic health physical therapists (at University of Pittsburgh) will complete two visits one week apart.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). It is a score calculated at Day 7.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Treatment Preference

    Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of initial assigned therapy utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. Patients are allowed to answer each question with either "unacceptable (1)," "acceptable (2) ," or "good (3) " to each question. Therefor minimum on questionnaire is a 0 and maximum is 39 with higher score showing improved patient treatment preference/performance of product.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. King's Health Questionnaire

    The KHQ is a 21-item scale with 9 domains: general health perceptions, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, Sleep/Energy, and severity measures and an 11-item symptom severity score. (Hebbar et al., 2015) Each question has four options "not at all", "a little", "moderately" and "a lot". (numerically 1-4) The general health perception domain has five choices ("very good", "good", "fair", "bad" and "very bad") (numerically 1-5). The scores are then converted to "out of 100" with accepted formulas. For example for Q1 the overall score = ((actual score-1)/4)\*100 In the KHQ, a minimum possible score of zero is assigned to the best health and a maximum possible score of 100 is assigned to the worst health. The 0-100 scale is used for each item and each subscale separately. You can then report a total average score across all domains which is reported here

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Adherence Logs

    Subjects will be asked to document their adherence to therapy on a daily basis and outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants with 100% adherence (responded yes to adherence to therapy all 7 days of therapy on their daily log)

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Benefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue

    At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy) and complete the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire which asks "would you be willing to continue treatment with this product or therapy?" The reported outcome is the number of participants per group that answered "Yes" to this question.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
Started465
Completed444
Not completed021

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) is a validated one question measure rating their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 (Very much better) to 7 (Very much worse). It is a score calculated at Day 7.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence
score on a scaleDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence2.25 ± 0.053.00 ± 0.053.75 ± 0.05
Statistical analysis
  • Disposable Urethral Support Device vs Reusable Underwear vs Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) · ANOVA · p = 0.04
SecondaryPatient Treatment Preference

Patient treatment preference will be assessed after completion of initial assigned therapy utilizing the product performance questionnaire (PPQ). The PPQ is a 13-item product questionnaire that consists of product questions that are specific to incontinence products and includes questions about overall impression of product, ability to hold urine, ability to prevent odor, fit, discreteness, comfort when wet and dry, and ability to keep skin dry. Patients are allowed to answer each question with either "unacceptable (1)," "acceptable (2) ," or "good (3) " to each question. Therefor minimum on questionnaire is a 0 and maximum is 39 with higher score showing improved patient treatment preference/performance of product.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Patient Treatment Preference
units on a scaleDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
Patient Treatment Preference23 (19 to 34)37 (31 to 38)38 (37 to 39)
Statistical analysis
  • Disposable Urethral Support Device vs Reusable Underwear vs Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.50
SecondaryKing's Health Questionnaire

The KHQ is a 21-item scale with 9 domains: general health perceptions, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, Sleep/Energy, and severity measures and an 11-item symptom severity score. (Hebbar et al., 2015) Each question has four options "not at all", "a little", "moderately" and "a lot". (numerically 1-4) The general health perception domain has five choices ("very good", "good", "fair", "bad" and "very bad") (numerically 1-5). The scores are then converted to "out of 100" with accepted formulas. For example for Q1 the overall score = ((actual score-1)/4)\*100 In the KHQ, a minimum possible score of zero is assigned to the best health and a maximum possible score of 100 is assigned to the worst health. The 0-100 scale is used for each item and each subscale separately. You can then report a total average score across all domains which is reported here

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
King's Health Questionnaire
units on a scaleDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
King's Health Questionnaire66.7 ± 23.633.3 ± 23.625 ± 14.4
Statistical analysis
  • Disposable Urethral Support Device vs Reusable Underwear vs Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) · ANOVA · p = 0.30
SecondaryAdherence Logs

Subjects will be asked to document their adherence to therapy on a daily basis and outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants with 100% adherence (responded yes to adherence to therapy all 7 days of therapy on their daily log)

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence Logs
ParticipantsDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
Adherence Logs334
Statistical analysis
  • Disposable Urethral Support Device vs Reusable Underwear vs Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) · Chi-squared · p = 0.70
SecondaryBenefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue

At the end of the study, all participants will be asked to indicate how easy it would be to continue practicing their assignment intervention (extremely, very, moderately, somewhat, and not at all easy) and complete the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire which asks "would you be willing to continue treatment with this product or therapy?" The reported outcome is the number of participants per group that answered "Yes" to this question.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Benefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue
ParticipantsDisposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)
Benefits, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue044
Statistical analysis
  • Disposable Urethral Support Device vs Reusable Underwear vs Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) · Chi-squared · p = 0.01

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Disposable Urethral Support Device0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Reusable Underwear0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Disposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years46515
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Disposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)Total
Mean35.7 ± 10.742.6 ± 17.934.8 ± 16.737.3 ± 15.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Disposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)Total
Female46515
Male0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Disposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0011
White46313
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Disposable Urethral Support DeviceReusable UnderwearPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT)Total
United States46515
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 5, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04922255
Lead sponsor
Megan Bradley
Collaborators
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Responsible party
Megan Bradley (Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2023
Completion
Oct 1, 2023
Results posted
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Oct 1, 2024

Study contacts

Megan Bradley, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsbugh School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion