CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04915872PK-LAPUpdated Feb 27, 2023

Are Standard Dosing Regimens of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Suitable in Critically Ill Patients With Open Abdomen and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy? A Population Pharmacokinetic Study.

An observational study in Laparotomy, Critical Illness and Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-27.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
46
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For several years, open abdomen with temporary abdominal closure using Negative Pressure Therapy (OA/NPT) has become one of the leading strategies to treat or prevent intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill surgical patients after a wide range of complex abdominal injuries and conditions.

According to current practice, piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is widely used as part of empirical combined antibiotic therapy to treat severe abdominal infections in the critically ill patients. On the other hand, little is known about the impact of OA/NPT on antibiotics pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and the optimal dosing regimens in this population remain unclear.

As PTZ is a small hydrophilic molecule with a very low level of protein binding, invesitigators hypothesized that OA/NPT should lead to significant changes in volume of distribution (Vd) and/or drug clearance (CL

The main objective of this study was to assess the incidence of underdosing and the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in critically ill patients with OA/NPT.

The secondary objective was to assess the appropriateness of recommended regimens for empirical minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) coverage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparotomy
  • Critical Illness
  • Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Open Abdomen
  • Negative Pressure Therapy
  • Antibiotics
  • Piperacillin - Tazobactam
  • Pharmacokinetics
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 130 across 867 observational studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Critically Ill Patients with Open Abdomen and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18
  • Admitted in surgical ICU for a suspected length of stay > 3 days
  • Receiving an antimicrobial therapy by PTZ
  • For an intra-abdominal infection
  • Under OA/NPT during antimicrobial therapy
  • With urinary and arterial catheters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe renal failure (CLCR \< 30 ml/min) without indication for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
  • Known allergy to PTZ
  • Patient's refusal for participation to the research
  • Patient unable to consent (dementia or severe psychiatric disorders, people under legal protection, people deprived of their liberty...)
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Participant

    Critically Ill Patients with Open Abdomen and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

    Procedure: Blood sampling (T0, inclusion) · Procedure: other samplings (T1)

Interventions

  • ProcedureBlood sampling (T0, inclusion)

    Blood sample (5 ml) at 30 minutes after the loading dose of 4g/0.5g over 30 minutes for therapeutic drug monitoring at peak concentration (Cmax)

  • Procedureother samplings (T1)

    - T1 : Day of the first surgical revision, under PTZ administered by continuous infusion : Blood sample (5 ml) for therapeutic drug monitoring at steady state concentration (Css). Urinary sample and collection of urinary volume between T0 and T1 (Urinary Clearance) NPT fluid sample and collection of NPT volume between T0 and T1 (Peritoneal Clearance) Peritoneal sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring at the site of infection (CPt)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of piperacillin

    The main outcome investigated in this study was the rate of piperacillin (PIP) underdosing, arbitrarily defined by at least one of three samples under 16 mg/L. This threshold represents the highest MIC for Pseudomonas as per the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

    Time frame: T1 (Day of the first surgical revision, up to 72 hours after inclusion)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04915872
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 18, 2022
Completion
Jan 27, 2023
Last update
Feb 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion