ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04906642Updated Nov 3, 2023

Clinical Assessment of Next Science Solution on Gustilo and Anderson Type II and IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures

An interventional study of Next Science and Standard of Care in Surgical Wound Infection, sponsored by Next Science TM. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-03.

Sponsored by Next Science TM · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
low patient enrollment, less-than-ideal patient sample for the study, leading to a significant number of missed scheduled study visits, inefficient study data, and reallocation of finances.

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2023, 3 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical feasibility study of subjects that are being treated for Gustilo and Anderson Type II or IIIA or IIIB Tibial Fractures

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, controlled, double-arm, double-blinded, randomized clinical study of 30 subjects that are undergoing single stage surgical repair of Type II or IIIA or IIIB tibial fractures.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is required before the site can begin enrolling patients. Additionally, protocol amendments need to be approved by the IRB prior to starting any changes or procedures stemming from the amended protocol. Potentially eligible patients will be offered study enrollment and all subjects are required to participate in the informed consent process and sign the most recent IRB-approved written informed consent document prior to being enrolled in the study. If all the study inclusion/exclusion criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable subjects' rights and safety regulations. Reconsenting procedures for cases of protocol amendments will be performed in compliance with the IRB.

Patients who present for open tibial fracture repair surgery will have a pre-op medical evaluation prior to being screened against the protocol's inclusion/exclusion criteria. If criteria are met, patients will be presented with the option to participate in the study, and informed consent procedures will be carried out, in compliance with currently applicable participants' rights and safety regulations. At the time of surgery, participants determined to require surgical repair of a Type IIIC tibial fracture will be excluded. Patients who continue to be eligible meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of surgery will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms: SOC with Saline or SOC plus Next Science treatment. The treatment assignment will be predetermined by a randomization plan within Castor Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. Although, paper source documents will be used to obtain subject data, randomization will be primarily through the EDC system. As a back-up, should the EDC system be unavailable at that time, randomization will occur using a sealed envelope system.

The following must have occurred prior to determining treatment assignment:

  • Screening
  • Participant must meet all eligibility requirements
  • Informed Consent must be signed
  • Continued Eligibility screening
  • Randomization must occur*

    • Randomization occurs prior to surgery based on Exclusion #8. If the index fractures are bilateral, right leg will be randomized while the other leg will be assigned to the opposite treatment arm to prevent dosing of identical products on one subject.

Once surgical evaluation occurs if the index fracture is determined to be Type II, IIIA or IIIB (that does not require referral to another surgical service [vascular, plastic surgery] ) then the subject will continue to dosing. If the index fracture(s) must receive additional surgical referrals they will not be dosed, considered a screen failure, and exited from the study.

If the patient fails to meet continued eligibility:

  • Screen Failure and
  • Study Exit forms must be completed.

Accurate recording of the information per section 9.3 is critical for the traceability of treatment and product to a participant.

The duration of each subjects' participation once eligible and approved to start treatment, will start from Day 1 (first index surgery) and end at the Day 90 Visit. On-site visits will be carried out at Screening/Enrollment; Day of Surgery; Day of Discharge; and Days 14, 30, and 90; consisting of safety, bone healing (via X-ray findings), bioburden assessment, and surgical site infection assessment questions.

The key parameters of the study include bioburden and surgical site infection assessment, re-admission assessment, serious adverse events, and healthcare cost impact.

Bacterial identification and quantification will be evaluated via two methods: PCR/NGS (according to this protocol) and microbiology/pathology (according to site SOC). PCR/NGS swabs will be taken after fracture fixation inside the wound and then around the closed surgical incision:

  • After fracture fixation (deep tissue): Swabs will be performed right after fracture fixation, before blinded rinse, and then immediately after blinded irrigation. The swabs will be performed on the entire wound base and around the fixation device. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
  • After closed surgical incision (superficial): After final closure, swabs will be taken within the 1-2cm perimeter surrounding the entire incision. This will be repeated on the day of discharge. The time of collection for each swab must be specific (hour and minute) and recorded on the specimen label and requisition form.
02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Wound Infection

Keywords

  • Open tibial fracture
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Surgical Irrigation
  • Single Stage Closure
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 200 across 581 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Next Science TM is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female 18 to 65 years old
  2. Scheduled to undergo surgery to repair open tibial fracture
  3. Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  4. Provide signed and dated or obtain consent from legally authorized representative
  5. Not be pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or nursing female subjects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide signed and dated or unable to obtain consent from a legally authorized representative
  2. Unable or unwilling to comply with all study-related procedures
  3. Known history of allergic reaction to any of the study products or its components, including any products used for standard of care (such as dressings or any coverings)
  4. Subject has known history of to general anesthesia
  5. Subject with any underlying condition or state that, in the investigator's opinion, will make them too critically ill to complete 30 and/or 90 day follow ups
  6. Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or nursing female subjects.
  7. Any subject positive for Covid-19 virus at time of surgical screening
  8. Tibial plateau, pilon, or Gustilo-Anderson type IIIc fractures and any fracture that will require referral to another surgical service will be excluded from this study
  9. Any patient who will require ongoing use of NPWT after hospital discharge will be excluded from the study.
  10. Subjects have evidence of prolonged segment, per .
  11. Subjects from a vulnerable population, in accordance with 45 CFR 46 Subparts B, C, and D
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Each of the following procedures will be conducted according to general or local site Standard of Care (SoC): * Medication administration at surgery * Surgical irrigation and wound debridement * Surgical fracture preparation/fixation * Surgical closure

    Other: Standard of Care

  • Experimental
    Standard of Care plus Next Science

    In addition to the SoC, the blinded product will be applied in place of saline irrigation as the wound is closed (after bone fracture preparation/fixation), depending on the randomization.

    Device: Next Science

Interventions

  • DeviceNext Science

    Solution is a clear, colorless, aqueous solution that is used to remove debris, including microorganisms, from wounds via hydrodynamic shear across the wound. This aids in the removal of foreign material such as, microorganisms, dirt, and debris.

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Normal Saline will be used in place of Next Science for irrigation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Site Infection

    Proportion of subjects that develop a surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space) from surgery to post-op Day 90 for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Superficial Bioburden

    Mean change in bioburden around the closed incision, as evaluated via PCR/NGS, from baseline to Day of Discharge for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Deep Bioburden

    Mean change in bioburden from the deep tissue immediately after fixation around the fixation site, as evaluated via PCR/NGS, before and after use of the blinded product for the Next Science Group compared to the Control group

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Piedmont Healthcare
    Columbus, Georgia 31901, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04906642
Lead sponsor
Next Science TM
Collaborators
Piedmont Healthcare, Hughston Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 28, 2021
Start date
May 4, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2023
Completion
Sep 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 3, 2023

Study contacts

Robert Harris, MD
principal investigator · Piedmont Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion