An interventional study of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement in Tricuspid Regurgitation, sponsored by Trisol Medical. Recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.
Sponsored by Trisol Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this early feasibility study is to gain early clinical insight into Trisol system safety and performance to treat patients with moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
A prospective, single-arm, open-label, multi-center early feasibility clinical study.
219 studies on the registry are indexed under Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; 106 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 118 interventional studies indexed under Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency.
Browse Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency studies →This is the only study on the registry with Trisol Medical as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement
Replacement of the tricusupid valve using Trisol System in a transcatheter approach
Rate of device-related serious adverse events
Rate of device-related serious adverse events, including death (cardiovascular and non- cardiovascular), MI (MVARC definitions), disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding (MVARC type III-V), renal failure requiring dialysis, emergency surgery, need for additional surgical procedures due to device failure
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Rate of technical success
Technical success: delivery and deployment of the device in the correct position and retrieval of the delivery system.
Time frame: During procedure
Rate of procedural success
Procedural success: freedom from emergency surgery or reintervention related to the device or access procedure, without death, stroke, or device dysfunction
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Change in TR from baseline
Change in TR from baseline: reduction in TR grade immediately following implantation as compared to baseline TR grade, based on TEE imaging.
Time frame: During procedure
Clinical performance endpoints - Change in TR from baseline
Change in TR from baseline: reduction in TR grade as compared to baseline TR grade, based on TTE imaging
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months, 12 months
Clinical performance endpoints - Change in NYHA class
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class: change in NYHA from baseline
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually
Clinical performance endpoints --minute walk test
Six-minute walk test: change in distance (m) from baseline
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months
Quality-of-Life: change from baseline as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Clinical performance endpoints -Quality-of-Life: change from baseline as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 12 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency→