CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04902326BESTUpdated Nov 29, 2024Results posted

Behavioral Economics and Self-Determination Theory to Change Diabetes Risk (BEST Change)

An interventional study of Automated educational text messages and Autonomy-supportive automated educational text messages in Pre Diabetes, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-29.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
380
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with prediabetes can significantly reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by participating in a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) or using metformin, but very few patients with prediabetes engage in these strategies. This randomized controlled trial will compare, among adults with prediabetes, the effectiveness of financial incentives, tailored messages based on self-determination theory (SDT) principles, and the combination of financial incentives plus tailored messages based on SDT principles in decreasing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight and in increasing participation in a DPP or use of metformin. Our main hypotheses are that the mean decrease in HbA1c will be greater in the arm that receives a combination of financial incentives plus tailored messages than in the arm that receives generic health education messages, and that the mean decrease in HbA1c will be greater in the arm that receives a combination of financial incentives plus tailored messages than in the arm that receives financial incentives alone and the arm that receives tailored messages alone. The study will also identify moderators and mediators of the effectiveness of the interventions and evaluate facilitators of and barriers to scalability, acceptability, and sustainability of the different interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pre Diabetes

Keywords

  • Prevention
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,926 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 380 is above the median of 80 across 8,368 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,476 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary Care Provider part of Michigan Medicine
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 25 or higher (23 or higher if of Asian descent)
  • Primary health insurance is U-M Premier Care
  • Recent Hgb (hemoglobin) A1c 5.7 - 6.4% (inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participated in pretesting of intervention materials
  • Diagnosis of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Serious mental health conditions (described by protocol)
  • End stage renal disease (described by protocol)
  • Alcohol dependence and opioid dependence (described by protocol)
  • Unable to send and receive several text messages weekly
  • No regular access to a smart phone or tablet with data capabilities or Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) connection at home
  • Currently taking metformin
  • Unable to take metformin due to contraindications or side effects
  • Participated in a Diabetes Prevention Program covered by University of Michigan Premier Care insurance
  • Currently enrolled in an interventional research study that is examining how a diet, program, or drug might: promote physical exercise, healthy eating habits, or weight loss; lower blood pressure; or lower blood sugar
  • Not planning to live in local area over the next year
  • Pregnant or planning a pregnancy in the next year
  • Received treatment for an eating disorder (e.g. anorexia or bulimia), not including binge-eating disorder, in last 12 months
  • Intensive cancer treatment such as bone marrow transplant, chemotherapy, radiation, or cancer related surgery (not including hormonal chemotherapy like Tamoxifen) in last six months or near future
  • Organ transplant in last six months
  • Bariatric/ gastric bypass surgery, gastric sleeve surgery, or gastric balloon procedure in last six months
  • Stroke, heart attack, heart surgery, or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in the past three months
  • Other serious health issues or personal concerns that could prevent participant from completing study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
380 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)

    Receives one intervention: automated educational text messages

    Behavioral: Automated educational text messages

  • Experimental
    Financial Incentives

    Receives two interventions: automated educational text messages and financial incentives.

    Behavioral: Automated educational text messages · Behavioral: Financial incentives

  • Experimental
    Tailored Messages

    Receives two interventions: autonomy-supportive automated educational text messages and tailored text messages.

    Behavioral: Autonomy-supportive automated educational text messages · Behavioral: Tailored text messages

  • Experimental
    Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm

    Receives three interventions: autonomy-supportive automated educational text messages, tailored text messages, and financial incentives.

    Behavioral: Autonomy-supportive automated educational text messages · Behavioral: Financial incentives · Behavioral: Tailored text messages

Interventions

  • BehavioralAutomated educational text messages

    During the first two weeks, participants receive a series of educational messages delivered via text message. These messages welcome participants to the study, set expectations for the next 12 months, and establish a general level of knowledge among all participants on prediabetes, the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), and metformin. For the next 11.5 months, participants receive three automated text messages per week that provide evidence-based educational content about prediabetes and tips on prevention. Additionally, participants receive monthly messages reminding them about their health insurance plan's coverage of the DPP at no cost and coverage of metformin as a low co-pay medication, and monthly messages providing feedback on their participation in the DPP and use of metformin in the previous calendar month. Participants' PCPs receive quarterly chart updates about participation in the DPP and use of metformin, and A1c results at enrollment and 6 and 12 months.

  • BehavioralAutonomy-supportive automated educational text messages

    Participants receive the same text messages as in the automated educational text message intervention, but the thrice weekly messages have been modified, where applicable, to support the participant's autonomy, in accordance with principles of Self-Determination Theory. Participants' PCPs receive quarterly chart updates about participation in the DPP and use of metformin, and A1c results at enrollment and 6 and 12 months.

  • BehavioralFinancial incentives

    Participants in this arm have the opportunity to earn a financial incentive ranging from $50 to $250 per month for taking an evidence-based action to prevent T2DM (i.e., engagement in a DPP or fill of a metformin prescription) in the previous month.

  • BehavioralTailored text messages

    Participants receive twice-weekly tailored text messages that link evidence-based actions to prevent T2DM to the participant's self-identified top values, roles, and strengths. Text messages are also tailored, when possible, to participants' self-reported importance of taking action to try to prevent T2DM (i.e., participating in the DPP or taking metformin), confidence in being able to take such preventive action, and past preventive actions taken.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 6 Months

    Hemoglobin A1C will be tested at a clinical lab using blood samples from venipuncture. An A1C test measures the percentage of red blood cells with glucose-coated hemoglobin. This percentage indicates average blood sugar levels over the last 2-3 months. Higher percentages indicate higher blood sugar levels, and an A1c between 5.7% and 6.4% is considered in the prediabetes range. The negative numbers for change over time indicate an improvement because they show a drop in percentages from the baseline percentages. Changes in HbA1c will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 6-month value, with a negative value indicating an HbA1c reduction.

    Time frame: baseline to 6 months

  2. Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 12 Months

    Hemoglobin A1C will be tested at a clinical lab using blood samples from venipuncture. An A1C test measures the percentage of red blood cells with glucose-coated hemoglobin. This percentage indicates average blood sugar levels over the last 2-3 months. Higher percentages indicate higher blood sugar levels, and an A1c between 5.7% and 6.4% is considered in the prediabetes range. The negative numbers for change over time indicate an improvement because they show a drop in percentages from the baseline percentages. Changes in HbA1c will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, with a negative value indicating an HbA1c reduction.

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months

    Participants will measure their body weight (in pounds) using a scale shipped to them by the study. Participants will submit a photo of the weight displayed on the scale. Change in weight will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 6-month value, with a negative value indicating a weight reduction.

    Time frame: baseline to 6 months

  2. Change in Weight From Baseline to 12 Months

    Participants will measure their body weight (in pounds) using a scale shipped to them by the study. Participants will submit a photo of the weight displayed on the scale. Change in weight will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, with a negative value indicating a weight reduction.

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  3. Engagement in Diabetes Prevention Program or Use of Metformin

    Monthly activity of participants enrolled in an online Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) will be obtained from the program provider. Prescription fills of metformin will be collected from pharmacy benefits data, and proportion days covered (PDC) will be calculated for each month. For months 2-12 a participant is in the study, they will be considered engaged if the calculated metformin PDC for that month was 80% or higher or if they reached the monthly threshold for DPP engagement (4 lessons completed plus at least two of following for at least 4 days: tracked food intake, weighed themselves, and tracked physical activity). Total number of months engaged will be calculated for each participant. Engagement is not assessed in the first month of the study to allow for time to commence engagement.

    Time frame: Months 2-12 of participation in the study

07

Results

Posted Nov 29, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Started95959595
6-month assessment85889088
Completed80788188
Not completed1517147
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1301
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1414146

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 6 Months

Hemoglobin A1C will be tested at a clinical lab using blood samples from venipuncture. An A1C test measures the percentage of red blood cells with glucose-coated hemoglobin. This percentage indicates average blood sugar levels over the last 2-3 months. Higher percentages indicate higher blood sugar levels, and an A1c between 5.7% and 6.4% is considered in the prediabetes range. The negative numbers for change over time indicate an improvement because they show a drop in percentages from the baseline percentages. Changes in HbA1c will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 6-month value, with a negative value indicating an HbA1c reduction.

Time frame:
baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of hemoglobin A1c
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 6 Months
percentage of hemoglobin A1cEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 6 Months-0.05 (-0.14 to 0.03)-0.05 (-0.14 to 0.03)-0.04 (-0.12 to 0.04)-0.04 (-0.13 to 0.04)
Statistical analysis
  • Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) vs Financial Incentives vs Tailored Messages vs Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.78
PrimaryChange in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 12 Months

Hemoglobin A1C will be tested at a clinical lab using blood samples from venipuncture. An A1C test measures the percentage of red blood cells with glucose-coated hemoglobin. This percentage indicates average blood sugar levels over the last 2-3 months. Higher percentages indicate higher blood sugar levels, and an A1c between 5.7% and 6.4% is considered in the prediabetes range. The negative numbers for change over time indicate an improvement because they show a drop in percentages from the baseline percentages. Changes in HbA1c will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, with a negative value indicating an HbA1c reduction.

Time frame:
baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of hemoglobin A1c
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 12 Months
percentage of hemoglobin A1cEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to 12 Months-0.14 (-0.25 to -0.03)-0.10 (-0.21 to 0.01)-0.12 (-0.22 to 0.00)-0.12 (-0.23 to 0.00)
Statistical analysis
  • Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) vs Financial Incentives vs Tailored Messages vs Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.64
SecondaryChange in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months

Participants will measure their body weight (in pounds) using a scale shipped to them by the study. Participants will submit a photo of the weight displayed on the scale. Change in weight will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 6-month value, with a negative value indicating a weight reduction.

Time frame:
baseline to 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · pounds
Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months
poundsEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months-9.63 (-15.19 to -4.06)-9.61 (-15.15 to -4.07)-11.11 (-16.50 to -5.72)-10.63 (-16.13 to -5.12)
Statistical analysis
  • Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) vs Financial Incentives vs Tailored Messages vs Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.87
SecondaryChange in Weight From Baseline to 12 Months

Participants will measure their body weight (in pounds) using a scale shipped to them by the study. Participants will submit a photo of the weight displayed on the scale. Change in weight will be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, with a negative value indicating a weight reduction.

Time frame:
baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · pounds
Change in Weight From Baseline to 12 Months
poundsEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Change in Weight From Baseline to 12 Months-10.20 (-17.37 to -3.01)-8.77 (-15.90 to -1.64)-10.63 (-17.53 to -3.73)-11.02 (-18.02 to -4.02)
Statistical analysis
  • Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) vs Financial Incentives vs Tailored Messages vs Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm · Regression, Linear · p = 0.87
SecondaryEngagement in Diabetes Prevention Program or Use of Metformin

Monthly activity of participants enrolled in an online Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) will be obtained from the program provider. Prescription fills of metformin will be collected from pharmacy benefits data, and proportion days covered (PDC) will be calculated for each month. For months 2-12 a participant is in the study, they will be considered engaged if the calculated metformin PDC for that month was 80% or higher or if they reached the monthly threshold for DPP engagement (4 lessons completed plus at least two of following for at least 4 days: tracked food intake, weighed themselves, and tracked physical activity). Total number of months engaged will be calculated for each participant. Engagement is not assessed in the first month of the study to allow for time to commence engagement.

Time frame:
Months 2-12 of participation in the study
Reported as:
Mean · months
Engagement in Diabetes Prevention Program or Use of Metformin
monthsEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)Financial IncentivesTailored MessagesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm
Engagement in Diabetes Prevention Program or Use of Metformin3.6 ± 4.26.6 ± 4.54.0 ± 4.17.2 ± 4.1
Statistical analysis
  • Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) vs Financial Incentives vs Tailored Messages vs Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm · Regression, Linear · p = <0.0001

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months for each participant, from randomization to end of study participation. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)0/95 (0%)——
Financial Incentives1/95 (1.1%)——
Tailored Messages0/95 (0%)——
Combo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages Arm0/95 (0%)——

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Mean52.8 ± 9.754.2 ± 9.353.0 ± 10.754.8 ± 8.753.7 ± 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Female59446361227
Male36513234153
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Race and Ethnicity — Non-Hispanic White64616569259
Race and Ethnicity — Non-Hispanic Black151391350
Race and Ethnicity — HIspanic356216
Race and Ethnicity — Other/ mized Non-Hispanic1316151155
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
United States95959595380
Education
Education(Participants)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
4 years or less of college58474354202
More than 4 years of college36485241177
Missing10001
Income
Income(Participants)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Less than $45,000868628
Greater than and equal to $45,00081838283329
missing665623
Baseline HbA1c
Baseline HbA1c(millimoles per mole (mmol/mol))Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Mean5.9 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.2
Baseline weight
Baseline weight(pounds)Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Tailored MessagesFinancial IncentivesCombo Arm-Financial Incentives Plus Tailored Messages ArmTotal
Mean217.7 ± 53.2213.3 ± 53.2213.9 ± 49.8199.2 ± 42.3211.0 ± 50.1

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 7, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Oct 20, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The de-identified data will be made available after conclusion of the study upon written request to the study team and approval of the Principal Investigator.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04902326
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Jeffrey T. Kullgren (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine and Assistant Professor of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2021
Start date
Sep 16, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2023
Completion
Sep 18, 2023
Results posted
Nov 29, 2024
Last update
Nov 29, 2024

Study contacts

Jeffrey Kullgren, MD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion