CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04901234ART-OPCUpdated Aug 24, 2026

Adaptive RadioTherapy for OroPharynx Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Standard radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy and Experimental radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy in Oropharynx Cancer, Radiotherapy; Complications and Radiotherapy Side Effect, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase II randomized trial, where patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx that have primary tumor (T3 - T4) in place, treated with curative intent chemoradiation, will be randomized to systematic mid-treatment MRI-based radiotherapy adaptation vs. standard of care. The primary objective is to compare patient-rated dysphagia (as assessed by the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory composite score at 6 months post-treatment in patients undergoing routine mid-treatment MR-guided radiotherapy adaptation vs. in patients receiving the current standard of care.

Read the detailed description

Background: Dysphagia was shown to be the main driver of adverse quality of life after head and neck radiotherapy. Over the 7-week radiotherapy course, patients with head and neck cancers undergo significant anatomical changes, including weight loss and tumor shrinkage (with complete response at mid-treatment in as high as 50% of patients). The current standard of care is to maintain the same radiotherapy plan for the entire treatment duration, unless major dosimetric deviations are detected. The use of MRI for treatment adaptation has the advantage of increased soft tissue contrast and is being integrated into several clinical practises with the recent development of MR-Linac technology. However, there is currently no demonstrated clinical advantage from the use of MRI for treatment adaptation in head and neck cancer.

Primary objective: To compare patient-rated dysphagia (as assessed by the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory composite score at 6 months post-treatment in patients undergoing routine mid-treatment MR-guided radiotherapy adaptation vs. in patients receiving the current standard of care.

Methods: This is a phase II randomized trial, where patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx that have primary tumor (T3 - T4) in place, treated with curative intent chemoradiation, will be randomized to systematic mid-treatment MRI-based radiotherapy adaptation vs. standard of care. Patients with contra-indications to MRI will be excluded. The study will use a 2-sided, independent-sample t-test with an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 80%, with a 1:1 randomization between the 2 arms. In order to detect a 10-point improvement in the MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) and assuming that the quality of life scores would be normally distributed with a standard deviation of 18, a total of 104 patients will be required (52 in each arm), which has been increased to 120 patients overall (60 patients in each arm) to account for a 10% dropout rate in completion of the quality of life scoring at 6 months post-treatment. An independent DSMB will review the pooled standard deviation of the interim data collected for this trial after 40 patients overall have been recruited (20 in each arm) the value of the standard deviation used to calculate the sample size required. The DSMB will inform the study team if there is potential to reduce the sample size if the standard deviation was much lower than 18 (i.e. \<=15 would result in a reduction of 25% in patients required), which will potential reduce the length of the trial. Patients will be stratified by institution and recruited in blocks of 4 to ensure a balance between arms at the interim assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oropharynx Cancer
  • Radiotherapy; Complications
  • Radiotherapy Side Effect
  • Dysphagia
  • MRI

Keywords

  • Oropharynx cancer
  • Radiotherapy
  • Adaptation
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
03

In context

Oropharyngeal Neoplasms

373 studies on the registry are indexed under Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; 97 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 48 across 284 interventional studies indexed under Oropharyngeal Neoplasms.

Browse Oropharyngeal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 370 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Stage T3-T4N0-3 as per AJCC 8th edition
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
  • Biopsy proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
  • Planned for curative radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy
  • For females of child-bearing age, a negative pregnancy test
  • Patients treated with induction chemotherapy can be included if they have residual tumor in place.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous irradiation of the head and neck (HNC) region, excluding superficial radiation therapy for non-melanomatous skin cancer
  • Previous surgery of the HNC region (except for incisional or excisional biopsies)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Any medical condition that could, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent follow-up after radiotherapy.
  • Patients with contra-indications to MRI will be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard radiotherapy

    Radiotherapy as planned at baseline, with replanning allowed only if significant weight loss or change in anatomy due to unforeseen circumstances (eg that would affect dosimetry and treatment delivery of baseline treatment plan). No adaptation to shrinking tumour is allowed.

    Radiation: Standard radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy

  • Experimental
    Adaptive radiotherapy

    Systematic radiation treatment plan adaptation according to the shrinking tumour on mid-treatment MRI.

    Radiation: Experimental radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationStandard radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy

    No radiotherapy adaptation unless major dosimetric deviation

  • RadiationExperimental radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy

    Systemic MRI-based radiotherapy adaptation mid-treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported dysphagia

    Patient-reported dysphagia as measured by the MD Anderson Dysphagia Index. Overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score representing better functioning and quality of life.

    Time frame: at 6 months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute and late toxicities

    Rate of grade ≥ 3 late toxicity as per CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: From treatment start to 5-years after the end of chemoradiation]

Other outcomes

  1. Locoregional control

    Time frame: at 6 months, 2 and 5 years

  2. Disease-free survival

    Time frame: at 6 months, 2 and 5 years

  3. Overall survival

    Time frame: at 6 months, 2 and 5 years

  4. Complete response rate

    Time frame: at 6 months

  5. Patient-reported dysphagia

    Patient-reported dysphagia as measured by the MD Anderson Dysphagia Index. Overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score representing better functioning and quality of life.

    Time frame: [Time Frame: At baseline, and 1-, 3-, 12- months post-treatment, and yearly up to 5 years after the end of chemoradiation]

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Austin Health
    Melbourne, Australia
    • Sweet Ping Ng, MD PhD · Contact
    • Sweet Ping Ng, MD PhD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
    Montreal, Quebec H2x 3E4, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Giguere P, Bahig H, Westra S, Roberge D, Bourque JM, Masucci GL, Nkurunziza ES, Freire V, Belliveau C, Duplan D, Vigneault E, Wong P, Lang P, Menard C. Platform for the Evaluation of innovations in Radiation oncology through registry-based conduct of multi-centric pragmatic randomized trials: PERa implementation. Trials. 2026 Apr 24;27(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09709-0. PubMed 42032732 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04901234
Lead sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Collaborators
Austin Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2021
Start date
Jul 30, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion