ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04894838DISCOURSEUpdated Apr 27, 2026

DIStal gastriC Bypass OUtcome in Revision SurgEry After Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass

An interventional study of Distal gastric bypass in Obesity, Morbid and Weight Gain, sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital. Recruiting at 8 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-27.

Sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2021; still recruiting 5 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed as a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two surgical techniques of distal gastric bypass (DGB) in revisional surgery following failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to A) DGB with lengthening of the BPL (DGB type I) or B) DGB with extended AL (DGB type II). Randomisation is stratified for participating center. The study will be performed in a clinical and out-patient setting with regular visits at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months post intervention. The study will be set up as a multicenter study with bariatric centers: St. Antonius hospital, Groene Hart hospital, OLVG, Rijnstate hospital, Elisabeth Twee-steden Hospital, Bravis hospital, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Catharina Hospital.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Up to 35% of morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) fail to lose sufficient weight or regain excessive weight after initial weight loss. Currently, there is no standardized approach to revisional surgery after failed RYGB. Distalisation of the RYGB limbs (DGB), with shortening of the common channel and extending either the alimentary limb (AL) or biliopancreatic limb (BPL), can be performed as revisional surgery to induce additional weight loss. To date, there is no general consensus as to optimal surgical technique or limb lengths to be used in distalisation of RYGB in both literature as well as clinical practice.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of two distalisation techniques of a gastric bypass in revisional surgery with standardised limb lengths in total weight loss (TWL) and the need for treatment for protein calorie malnutrition (PCM). In this randomised controlled trial DGB with lengthening of the BPL (DGB type I) will be compared to DGB with extended AL (DGB type II) in order to conclude which surgical technique is the optimal therapeutic strategy as revision surgery following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Study design: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Study population: Morbidly obese patients with insufficient weight loss or weight regain following primary RYGB, who are eligible for distalisation surgery.

Intervention: A total of 150 participants will be randomised over two treatment groups: group A will undergo DGB type I and group B will undergo DGB type II.

Main study endpoints: Primary endpoints: %TWL 1 year after treatment and need for treatment of PCM. Secondary endpoints: weight loss, co-morbidity remission, PCM grading (debilitating defecation patterns, temporary total parenteral nutrition treatment, revision, mortality), morbidity, nutritional deficiencies, quality of life and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity, Morbid
  • Weight Gain

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Weight regain
  • Failed RYGB
  • Distal gastric bypass
03

In context

Obesity, Morbid

941 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 62 across 602 interventional studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Antonius Hospital is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years;
  • ≥40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity related comorbidity;
  • Weight regain or insufficient weight loss (EWL\<50% or TWL\<20%)15,16 following RYGB;
  • Multidisciplinary team screening at one of the bariatric centres;
  • and willing to enter the follow-up program.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to anatomic, surgical reasons (gastric pouch dilatation >50 mL, gastro-gastric fistula, gastro-jejunostomy);
  • Distalisation of RYGB is technical infeasible (judgment by surgeon);
  • Inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome and other causes of chronic diarrhea;
  • Severe concomitant disease (such as carcinomas and neurodegenerative disorders);
  • Pregnant women;
  • Noncompliance in follow-up or unwilling to undergo surgery;
  • Inability of reading/understanding and filling out questionnaires.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Distal gastric bypass type I

    Laparoscopic distalisation of RYGB type I. The RYGB is modified by dividing the Roux limb (AL) at the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis and re-anastomosed distally to 200 cm from the ileocecal valve using linear staplers, creating a long biliopancreatic limb (BPL). In cases of initial AL lengths shorter than 100 cm, the CC lengths should be adjusted to create a TALL of at least 300 cm.

    Procedure: Distal gastric bypass

  • Experimental
    Distal gastric bypass type II

    Laparoscopic distalisation of RYGB type II. The RYGB is modified by dividing the BPL at the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis and re-anastomosed distally to 200 cm from the ileocecal valve using linear staplers, creating a long AL.

    Procedure: Distal gastric bypass

Interventions

  • ProcedureDistal gastric bypass

    Distal gastric bypass, revisonal surgery after failed RYGB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight loss

    Percentage total weight loss (%TWL) 1 year after treatment

    Time frame: 1 year post-operative

  2. Number of Participants with development of protein calorie malnutrition (PCM)

    \>6 times/day defecation patterns with diarrhea, assessed by fecal score questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 year postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weight loss

    Patient weight in kilograms is collected preoperative up to 3 years follow-up to determine weight loss.

    Time frame: Up to 3 year follow up

  2. TWL

    Weight loss in kilograms at a follow-up time point divided by weight in kilograms measured at DGB

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 month follow up

  3. Defecation pattern

    Faecal score questionnaire to measure defecation frequencey and consistency

    Time frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative

  4. PCM grading

    Information is collected about each patient who has undergone DGB to ascertain debilitating defecation patterns (grade I), requirement of f participants requiring temporary total parenteral nutrition (grade II, revision surgery (grade III), and mortality (grade IV) after DGB.

    Time frame: up to 3 year follow up

  5. Complications

    Information is collecting regarding the occurrence of one or more defined adverse events following DGB. Defined adverse events collected are: unplanned readmission to hospital, unplanned admission to the intensive care unit, unplanned return to the operating theatre, prolonged length of stay in hospital, and death. The reason for any of the events is also collected. If death occurs, the cause of death is collected to determine the likelihood of the death being caused by the DGB.

    Time frame: uo to 3 year follow up

  6. Quality of life questionnaire

    BODY-Q questionnaire

    Time frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative

  7. Impact defecation pattern questionnaire

    Fecal incontinence quality of life scale FIQL questionnaires

    Time frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative

  8. Patient satisfaction questionnaire

    Self-designed 5-point scale measuring instrument for patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 and 3 year postoperative

  9. Eating behaviour questionnaire

    Three factor earing questionnaire TFEQ R21

    Time frame: 3, 12 and 36 months postoperative

07

Study locations

6 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2029, 100 months after the start.

Of 274 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Obesity, Morbid, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 100 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 286 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 13, 2021
First posted
May 20, 2021
StartActual
May 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Apr 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04894838
Lead sponsor
St. Antonius Hospital
Collaborators
Medtronic
Responsible party
M.J. Wiezer (Dr. M.J. Wiezer, St. Antonius Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2026

Study contacts

Luna Tolenaars, MD
Contact
l.tolenaars@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
0031636434456
M.J. Wiezer, PhD, MD
Contact
r.wiezer@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
0031 6418 73500
M.J. Wiezer, PhD, MD
principal investigator · St. Antonius Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion